Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assisant Professor, National Salinity Research Center (NSRC), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity stress is known as a worldwide abiotic stress responsible for reduced crop production. It is estimated that annual losses of yield due to salt induced land degradation is US$ 27.3 billion globally (Qadir et al., 2014). Social and economic dimentions of salinity stress can be employment losses as well as environmental degradation (Butcher et al., 2016). In addition, it is well documented that application of chemical fertilizers usually improve plant performance under saline conditons but results in plant fertilizer requirement under salt affected soils are contrary. While there is little evidence of yield benefits due to application of fertilizers in salinized fields at rates beyond optimal in non-saline conditions, there is enough evidence indicating that soil salinity does not affect or decrease plant fertilizer needs (Hanson, 2006).
A hypothesis that potassium (K) application can reduce the negative effects of salinity on plant performance has been proposed, but, contradictory results have been reported. These include a reduction in salinity damage to crops when high concentrations of K are present in growth media as well as no response to K fertilizer under salinity or even a negative effect of K addition on salt tolerance (Bar-Tal et al., 1991). These contradictory results can be attributed to the types of experiments (field, greenhouse or laboratory), composition of the saline substrate, studies conducted over the short term vs. the long term and many other differences in experimental conditions (Grattan and Grieve, 1999).
Thus K fertilizer management may need to be modified under arid and semiarid conditions of Yazd peovince with wide range of irrigation water qualities. Accordingly, the objectives of this field study were to (a) elucidate the interactions between K nutrition and the salinity of irrigation water and their effects on wheat growth and (b) test the possibility of wheat improvement at saline conditions by applying higher levels of K fertilizer.

Materials and methods
A field experiment was conducted on wheat at Sadooq Salinity Research Station, Ashkezar, Yazd, Iran. The soil at the experimental site was calcareous with 30.92% total nutrient value, sandy loam texture, pH 8.06 and 0.22 % organic carbon. Mean annual temperatue is 18°C and precipitation is 70 mm. The treatments, four potassium sulphate application rates (0, 100, 200 and 300 kg ha-1) and three irrigation water qualities (1.88, 7.22 , 14.16 dS/m), arranged in a randomized block, split plot design with three repelications. Consisting 12 rows of wheat, each field plot was 3*5 m. All plots received common agricultural practices including tillage and fertilizer application. Rgarding typical recommendations and guidelines for this region and soil type (Balali et al., 2000: Moshiri et al., 2015), all fertilizers, except urea that applied in 4 splits, were soil-applied before plnating and included 100 kg ha-1 triple superphosphate, 40 kg ha-1 FeSO4, 40 kg ha-1 ZnSO4, 40 kg ha-1 MnSO4 and 20 kg ha-1 CuSO4. To model the relationship between plant properties and irrigation water salinity, the data were subjected to different regression models at the probability level of 0.01 and 0.05 with the help of the Sigmaplot software. The analysis of variance for different parameters was done following ANOVA technique. When F was significant at p ≤ 0.05 level, treatment means were separated using DMRT.

Results and discussion
The results showed that increasing irrigation water salinity to 7.22 dS/m did not significantly affect wheat graine yield. This is due to the non-significant effect of salinity on 1000 seed weight, harvesting index and non bearing spikelets in addition to the significant increase in spike length, bearing spikelets, bearing spikelet numbers, seed number per spikes and total spikelet numbers. At the same time, the results showed 50% decrease in wheat grain and straw yield due to the increase in the salinity of irrigation water from 1.88 to 14.16 dS/m. As application of K fertilizer did not affect wheat performance significantly, it was concluded that K application did not increase wheat tolerance to salinity stress under field conditions of our experiment.

Conclusion
Overall, it was concluded that K fertilizer was not necessary for wheat production (6 Mg ha-1 grain and 9 Mg ha-1 straw) under saline and non-saline calcareous soils of Yazd province with soil available K of 150 mg kg-1.
Key words: Calcareous soils, Irrigation Water and Yazd.

Keywords

Ayers, R.S., Westcot, D.W., 1985. Water quality for agriculture, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev. 1, U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Balali, M., Mohajeremilani, P., Khademi, Z., Doroodi, M.S., Mashayekhi, H.H., Malakooti, M.J., 2000. A comperehensive computer model for fertilizer recommendation towards sustainable agriculture. Ammozeshe Keshavarzi Press, Karaj. [In Persian].
Bar-Tal, A., Feigenbaum, S., Sparks D.L., 1991. Potassium-salinity interactions in irrigated corn. Irrigation Science. 12, 27-35.
Bernstein, L., Francois, L.E. Clark, R.A., 1974. Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables. Agronomy Journal. 66, 412-421.
Bouyoucos, C.J., 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle-size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal. 54, 406-465.
Butcher, K., Wick, A.F., Desutter, T., Chatterjee, A., Harmon, J., 2016. Soil Salinity: A Threat to Global Food Security. Agronomy Journal. 108, 2189–2200.
Castrignanò A., Katerji N., Mastrorilli M. 2002. Modeling crop response to soils salinity: review and proposal of a new approach. In: Katerji, N., Hamdy A., van Hoorn, I.W., Mastrorilli, M., (eds.), Mediterranean Crop Responses to Water and Soil Salinity: Eco-physiological and Agronomic Analyses. Bari: CIHEAM, 2002. p. 251 -280 (Options Méditerran éen n es: Série B. Etu des et Rech erch es; n. 36).
Doroodi, M.S., Siadat, H., 2000. Effect of irrigation water salinity, potassium sulphate and urea on wheat yield and nutrient concentration. In: Malakooti, M.J., (eds.), Balanced Nutrition of Wheat. Amoozeshe Keshavarzi Press, Karaj, Iran, pp. 445-469. [In Persian].
Grattan S.R., Grieve C.M., 1999. Mineral nutrient acquistion and response by plants grown in saline environments. In: Pessarakli, M., (ed.), Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. CRC Press, New York, USA, pp. 275-300.
Hanson B.R., Grattan, S.R., Fulton, A., 2006. Agricultural salinity and drainage, United States of America. Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California.
Heakal, M.S., Modahish, A.S., Mashady, A.S., Metwally, A.I. 1990. Combined effects of leaching fraction salinity and potassium content of waters on growth and water-use efficiency of wheat and barely. Plant and Soil. 125(2), 177-184.
Hocking, P. J., 1994. Dry‐matter production, mineral nutrient concentrations, and nutrient distribution and redistribution in irrigated spring wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 17.8, 1289-1308.
Jackson, M.L., 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jafarzadeh, R., Jami Moeini, M., Hokmabadi, M., 2013. Response of yield and yield components in wheat to soil and foliar application of nano potassium fertilizer. Journal of Crop Production Research. 5, 189-198. [In Persian with English summary].
Karimi M., 2015. A Guideline for Wheat Nitogen Fertilization. Sahrasharq Press, Mashhad. [In Persian].
Keshavarz, P., Moshiri, F., Tehrani, M.M., Balali, M.R., 2015. The Necessity of Integrated Soil Fertility Management for Wheat Production in Iran. Journal of Land Management. 3, 61-72. [In Persian with English summary].
Kholdebarin, B., Eslamzadeh, T., 2001. Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Shiraz University Press. Shiraz. [In Persian].
Maas, E.V., 1990. Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji, K.K., (ed.), Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. (pp. 262-303). ASCE. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No.71.Am.Soc.Civil Engineers, New York.
Maas, E.V., Hoffman, G.J., 1977. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. Journal of  Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. 103, 115-134.
Malakooti, M.J., 2010. Balanced Nutrition of Wheat. Amoozeshe Keshavarzi Press. Karaj. [In Persian].
Marschner P., 2012. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press. San Diego.
Miller, E.C., 1939. A physiological study of the winter wheat plant at different stages of its development. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station. Rep. 47.
Moshiri, F., Shahabi, A.A., Keshavarz, P., Khoogar, Z., Feiziasl, V., Tehrani, M.M., Asadirahmani, H., Samavat, S., Qeibi, M.N., Sadri, M.H., Rashidi, N., Khademi, Z., 2014. Guidelines for Integrated Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Management of Wheat. Sana Press, Tehran. [In Persian].
Motesharezadeh, B., Vatanara; F., Savaghebi, G.R., 2015. Effect of Potassium and Zinc on Some Responses of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salinity Stress. Iranian Journal of Soil Research. 29, 243-381. [In Persian with English summary].
Qadir, M., Quillerou, E., Nangia, V., Murtaza, G., Singh, M., Thomas, R.J., Dreschel, P., Noble, A.D., 2014. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Nat. Resour. Forum. 38, 282–295.
Rad, M.H., Meshkat, M.A., Soltani M., 2009. The Effects of Drought Stress on some Saxual‘s (Haloxylon aphyllum) Morphological Characteristics. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Reseach. 16, 34-43. [In Persian with English summary].
Ramazanpur, M.R., Dastfal, M., Malakouti M.J., 2008. The Effect of Potassium in Reducing Drought Stress in Wheat in Darab. Iranian Journal of Soil Research. 22, 127-135. [In Persian with English summary].
Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Koocheki, A., 2001. Research history on salt affected lands of Iran: Present and future prospects–Halophytic ecosystem. International Symposium on Prospects of Saline Agriculture in the GCC countries, Dubai, UAE.
Rose, T.J., Rengel, Z., Ma, Q., Bowden, J.W., 2007. Differential accumulation patterns of phosphorus and potassium by canola cultivars compared to wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170, 404-411.
Steppuhn H., Van Genuchten, M.Th., Grieve, C.M., 2005. Root zone salinity; II. Indices for tolerance in agricultural crops. Crop Science, 45, 221-232.
Tayler, G.R., 2017. Evaluation of in-season wheat nutrient uptake changes and nitrogen management for grain and dual purpose winter wheat. MSc dissertation, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, USA.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Washington. DC. USDA Handbook No. 60.
Vahhabzadeh, M., Majidiheravan, E., Hajakhoondimeibodi, H., Tabatabaee, M.T., Bozorgipoor, R., Bakhtiar, F., Akbari, A., Pakder, A., Sharifolhoseini, M., Afyouni, D., Rostami, H., Azarmjoo, H., Koohkan, SH., Amirijebalbarez, Q., Saberi, M.H., Binab, H., Qandi, A., Bahraee, S., Torabi, M., Nazari, K., Pirayeshfar, B., 2009. Bam, A new bread wheat cultivar for moderate climate zones with salinity of soil and water. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 25, 223-226. [In Persian with English summary].
Van Genuchten, M.Th., Hoffman, G.J., 1984. Analysis of crop salt tolerance data. In: Shainberg, I., Shalhevet, J. (eds), Soil salinity under irrigation-process and dmanagement ecological studies 51. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 258-271.
Watanabe, F.S., Olsen, S.R., 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorous in water and NaHCO3 extract from soil. Soil Science of American Procedure. 29, 677-678.