Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduated Student of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives
The cowpea (vigna unguiculata L.) including grains, grown in tropical and sub-tropical countries, especially in the countries of Asia, Africa and South America, and it is considered an important source of nutrition. Among legums, in terms of cultivars and economic value, the first place belongs to beans. Good climate (warm to moderate summer) and adequate water in the areas under beans, high quality soils and high depth of clay are the main reasons for increasing its cultivation area. Water is a key factor in the production of crops. The yield of crops in many areas is limited by living or non-living environmental stresses, and therefore, there is a significant difference between actual yield and yield potential of crops. Low moisture content in each of the different stages of growth reduces water absorption, nutrients, decreases the transfer of elements within the plant, and ultimately reduces the yield of the grain or the final product. Optimal use of water is of great importance, especially in areas where dry climatic conditions and Semi-dry is dominant. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of humic acid spraying on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of bean-eyed beans under irrigation regimes in Hamidieh region.
Materials and methods
This research was carried out in 2016 in a farm located in Hamidieh with a longitude of 48 degrees and 10 minutes east and 31 degrees and 33 degrees north latitude and 13 meters above sea level. This study was carried out as split split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments included irrigation regimes at three levels (60, 90 and 120) mm evaporation from class A evaporation pan in the main plots and different times of humic acid spraying at three levels (no spraying, spraying at vegetative stage, Spraying at flowering stage) in sub plots.
Results
The results showed that irrigation regimes had a significant effect on grain yield, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and protein yield. The highest grain yield (205.42 g/m2) was obtained from 60 mm evaporation from the evaporation pan and the lowest with an average of 160.2 g/m2, with 120 mm evaporation from evaporation pan. Also, the application of humic acid spraying dates significantly affected seed yield and protein function. Humic acid increases the amount of nutrients (seed storage compositions) by increasing the activity of the rosicose enzymes and increasing the photosynthesis activity of the plant, possibly by improving the production of sugar, protein and vitamin in the plant, and the positive effect on the various aspects of photosynthesis.The highest grain yield (200.77 g/m2) was obtained from spray application during vegetative time and the lowest (152.52 g/m2) was obtained from non-spray application. The interaction of irrigation regimes and spraying periods of humic acid had a significant effect on grain yield. The highest grain yield was assigned to 60 mm evaporation from evaporation pan and humic acid spraying treatment at a vegetative stage of 213.88 g/m2.  
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that the use of humic acid due to different physiological effects, in addition to increasing yield, can play a positive role in decreasing the use of chemical fertilizers as well as environmental pollution. Therefore, as a natural source material, To sustain and increase the production of crops. Drought stress increased protein percentage, but irrigation at flowering and podding stage reduced the protein percentage. Despite the high percentage of protein in 120 mm evaporation from the pan, the protein function in this treatment was less than the other two treatments due to low grain yield. Therefore, in order to achieve maximum grain yield, 60-millimeter water irrigation with evapotranspiration from the pan is recommended by application of humic acid spraying at the vegetative stage.
 

Keywords

Amiri-Dehahmadi, S.R., Parsa, M., Nezami, A., Ganjali, A., 2009. Effects of water stress at different phenological stages on the growth indexes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under greenhouse condition. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 1(2), 69-84. [In Persian with English summary].
Ayman, M., Kamar, M., El-Hai, A., Khalid, M., 2013. Amino and humic acids promote growth, yield and disease resistance of cowpea cultivated in clayey soil. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 731-739.
Azeri Nasrabadi, A., Attardi, B., 2007. Final report on the effects of different irrigation water on the yield of two forage sorghum cultivars. Institute of Soil and Water Research. 15p. [In Persian].
Beheshti, S., Tadayon, A., Fallah, S.A., 2016. The effect of humic acid levels on yield and its components of bean lima (Phaseolus lunatus L.) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Cereals Research. 7(2), 187-175. [In Persian with English summary].
Delfine, S., Tognetti, R., Desiderio, E., Alvino, A., 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agronomy for sustainable development. 25, 183-191.
El-bassiony, A.M., Fawzy, Z.F., Abd El-Baky, M.M.H., Mahmoud, A.R., 2010. Response of snap bean plants to mineral fertilizers and humic acid application. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 6(2), 169-175.
Fallah Ghazaany, M., Habibi, D., Pazoki, A.R., Khavazy, K. 2012. Some strains of Azotobacter and Humic acid on auxin hormone production and yield of wheat at different nitrogen levels. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding. 8(2), 97-109. [In Persian with English summary].
Gad, S.H., Ahmed, A.M., Moustafa, Y., 2012. Effect of foliar application with two antioxidants and humic acid on growth, yield and yield components of peas (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Horticultural Sciences and Ornamental Plants. 4(3), 318-328.
Goldani, M., Rezvani Moghadam, P., 2007. Effect of various moisture regimes and planting date on phonological characteristics of index Mashhad dry. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 14(1), 25-32. [In Persian with English summary].
Habibzadeh, Y., Moosavi, Y., 2014. The effects of water deficit stress on protein yield of mung bean genotypes. Peak Journal of Agricultural Science. 2(3), 30-35.
Habz, R., Egli, D., 2012. Short period of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence and yield of mungbean. Journal of Crop Science. 43, 2083-2088.
Haghparast, M., Maleki Farahani, S., Siniqi, J. M., Zerae, Gh., 2012. Reduction of negative effects of drought stress in chickpea using humic acid and seaweed extract. Crop production under environmental stress. 4(1), 59-71. [In Persian with English summary].
Jahan, M., Sohrabi, R., Doaei, F., Amiri, M.B., 2012. Effect of super absorbent water application in soil and humic acid foliar application on some agroecological characteristics of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Mashhad (Iran). Journal of Agroecology. 3(2), 71-90. [In Persian with English Summary].
Jalilian, J., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., Sabbaghpour, S.H., 2005. The effect of density and supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four chickpea (Cicer aritinum) cultivars under dry land condition. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 12(5), 1-9. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kaya, M., Atak, M., Khawar, Kh., Ciftei, C.Y., Ozcan, S., 2014. Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with zinc and foliar spray of humic acids on yield of cowpea. International journal of agriculture & biology.7(6), 875-878.
Khazraei, N., 2013. The Growth response of blubbery beans to the use of humic acid and iron nanoparticles in  low water conditions, Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Sabzevar Branch. [In Persian with English Summary].
Keeney, D.R., Nelson, D.W., 1982. Nitrogen in organic forms. PP. 643-698. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., (eds.), Method of Soil Analysis. Part II.
Ludwig-Muller, J., 2013. Indole-3-butyric acid in plant growth and development. Plant Growth Regulation. 2(3), 219-230.
Madani, H.M., Malbubi, A., Amiri, M., 2015. Application of phosphor releasing bacteria in bean farming. First National Bean Congress. Mashhad University. 404p. [In Persian].
Majnoun Hosseini, N., 2008. Agriculture and Legume Production, Publishing Tehran University Jahad. 283p. [In Persian].
Mohammadnejad, Y. Sayyedi, F., 2011. Interactive effects of supplemental irrigation and planting arrangement on yield and water use efficiency of chickpea (cv. Arman) in Gonbad. Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 3(4), 89-105. [In Persian with English Summary].
Naderi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A., Vianello, A., 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 34, 1527–1536.
Nasri, M., Khalatbari, M. 2011. Effect of different levels of nitrogen, potassium and zinc fertilizer on some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of green beans (Phaseolouse vulgaris) of Sunray genotype. Ecology of Agricultural Plants. 3(1), 93-82. [In Persian with English Summary].
Raei, Y., Demaghsi, N., Seyed Sharifi, R., 2008. Effect of different levels of irrigation and plant density on grain yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) deci type cv. Kaka. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 9(4), 371-381. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rahi, A. R., Davodifard, M., Azizi, F., Habibi, D., 2012. Investigating the effects of different amounts of humic acid and studying the process of response curves in species (Dactylis glomerata). Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding. 8(3), 15-28. [In Persian with English Summary].
Roshdi, M., Boyaghchi, D., Rezadoost, S., 2011. The effect of micronutrients on growth and yield of chiti bean under water deficit treatments. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 2(5), 131-141. [In Persian with English summary].
Sabzevari, S., Khazaee, H., 2009. Effect of spraying of different humic acid levels on growth characteristics, performance and wheat performance of pishtaz cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agricultural Ecology. 1(2), 53-63. [In Persian with English summary].
Sadeghi Moghadam, S., Moslehi, J., Armin, M., Jami Moeini, M. 2013. The effect of different levels of humic acid levels on yield and chickpea yield components of hashem varieties. National Conference on Environment and Plant Production. [In Persian].
Saki Nejad, T., Hossaini, S. M., and Hyvari, M., 2011. Calculate changes of bean germination process in the presence of various compounds of biological fertilizer humic acid mixed with micro and macro elements. Journal of American Science. 7(6), 10-14.
Shahbazi, Sh., Fateh, A., Aynband, A., 2015. Study of the effect of humic acid and vermicompost on yield and yield components of three wheat cultivars in tropical regions. Plant Products (Scientific Journal of Agriculture). 38(2), 24-33.
Thomas, M., Robertson, J., Ukai, S.F., Peoples, M.B. 2003. The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mung bean. Field Crop Research. 86(1), 67-80.
Zhu, J.K., 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review. Plant Biology. 53, 247-316.