Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc. Student, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

2 PhD. Student, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

3 Faculty member, Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Grass pea is an annual plant which produces adequate yield in unfavorable conditions. South Khorasan is one of the areas where grass pea cultivation has been spread, but due to rainfall rate and high evaporation and transpiration in this region, plants are facing drought stress; On the other hand, Amaranthaceae family weed (pigweed and tumble pigweed) also among the most important weed in farm fields in this region of Iran. Since the studies of multi-species competition provide more detailed information about relationships circumstance between plants, the aim of this study is to evaluate the competitiveness of pigweed, tumble pigweed and grass pea under drought stress using experiments with replacement series.

Materials and methods
The experiment was carried out in a factorial based on RCBD with three replications. Experimental treatments consisted of two levels of water stress (80 and 50% of soil water field capacity), different weed interference ratios with grass pea (tumble pigweed + pigweed- grass pea) including (0-100, 75-25, 50-50, 25-75 and 100-0%), as well as different two weed interference ratios with each other (tumble pigweed - pigweed) containing (0-100, 50-50 and 100-0). Optimum density of eight plants per pot was fixed. Plants were cultivated after soil preparation and addition of chemical fertilizers and at four leave stage, the desired density was reached. At the end of the experiment, all plants were harvested from each species separately and weighed after drying. Finally, for results analyzing of the experiment, relative yield indices, total relative yield (LER) were used and relative competition Intensity index and aggressiveness index were used.

Results and discussion
The results showed that grass pea, pigweed and tumble pigweed dry matter, decreased with reducing soil water content of 80 to 50 % of field capacity by 33, 30 and 12 % respectively. Also, the results showed that predicted yield of tumble pigweed was close to the actual yield. The results of relative yields showed that in sowing ratio of 50-50% grass pea and pigweed, 50-50% of grass pea and tumble pigweed, also 50-50% of grass pea and both two weed together in 80% treatment of soil water field capacity, the relative yield of grass pea were 0.33, 0.36 0.39 respectively, that with drought stress increasing to 50% of soil water field capacity, increased by 36, 50 and 31% reached to 0.45, 0.54 and 0.51 respectively. Changes in relative yield curve of grass pea under 80% treatment of soil water field capacity irrigation, in competition with tumble pigweed, pigweed and both weeds together was convex; which indicates that with enough water in the soil, grass pea competitiveness is less than Amaranthaceae family weed. The results of relative competition Intensity index showed that numerical value of this index for grass pea, tumble pigweed and pigweed, in all sowing ratios is a positive value, which shows higher inter-specific competition than intra-specific competition in different sowing ratios. Also the results showed that in the sowing ratio of 50% grass pea with 25% tumble pigweed and 25% pigweed in 50% treatment of soil water field capacity, Grass pea aggressiveness index against both weed separately and together was positive value, which indicates a relative superiority of grass pea under drought stress in competition with these two weed.

Conclusion
In generally, the results of this study showed that water stress reduced all three plants growth but, decline in tumble pigweed was lower. The results also showed that the competition formed between these three species was Inter-specific and have negative effects on all three plants. Although the aggressiveness index indicates that the grass pea was beaten in most sowing ratios, but with the increase of drought stress and water deficit, due to inter-specific competition between weed, competition between weed and grass pea has been reached to lowest level.

Keywords

Atri, A., Zand, E., 2005. Determination of competitive ability of six canola cultivars (Brassica napus) with wild oat (Avena fatua). Plant Pests and Diseases. 72(2), 95-114. [In Persian with English Summary].
Babaie Zarch, M.J., Jami-Al-Ahmadi, M., Zamani, G. R., Golestanifar, F., 2016. Effect of competition in Lathyrus sativus and Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in Dehydration stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 8(2), 179-189. [In Persian with English Summary].
Beckie, H.J., Johnson, E.N., Blackshaw, R.E. Gan, Y., 2008. Weed suppression by canola and mustard cultivars. Weed Technology. 22, 182-185.
Beheshti, S.A., Soltanian B., 2012. Assessment of the inter-and intra- specific competition of sorghum-bean intercropping using reciprocal yield approach. Seed and Plant Production. 28-2(1), 1-17. [In Persian].
Berger, S.T., Ferrell, J.A., Rowland, D.L., Webster, T.M., 2015. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) competition for water in cotton. Weed Science. 63, 928–935.
Fanaei, H. R., Galavi, M., Kafi, M., Shirani-rad, A.H., 2013. Interaction of water deficit stress and potassium application on potassium, calcium, magnesium concentration and oil of two species of canola (Brassica napus L.) and mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Knowledge. 23(3), 261-275. [In Persian with English Summary].
Grichar, W.J., Minton, B.W., 2006. Supplementary weed control using soil applied herbicides in glyphosat-resistant maize in Texas. Crop Protection. 25(10), 1071-1074.
Henderson, T.L., Jonson, B.L., Schneiter, A.A., 2000. Row spacing, plant population, and cultivar effects on grain amaranth in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal. 92, 329-336.
Horak, M.J., Loughin, T.M., 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Science. 48, 347-355.
Jenks, M.A., Hasegawa, P.M., 2005. Plant Abiotic Stress. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. 270 pp.
Manalila, S., Coastd O., Werthe, J., Chauhana B.S., 2017. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through weed-crop competition: A review. Crop Protection. 95, 53–59
Muhammad, A., Tian, Z., Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T., Liu, Y., Cui, Y., Zahoor, R., Jiang, D., Dai, T., 2016. Improved tolerance to post-anthesis drought stress by pre-drought priming at vegetative stages in drought-tolerant and -sensitive wheat cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 106, 218-227.
Ruttanaprasert, R., Jogloy, S., Vorasoot, N., Kesmala, T., Kanwar, R.S., Holbrook, C.C., Patanothai A., 2016. Effects of water stress on total biomass, tuber yield, harvest index and water use efficiency in Jerusalem artichoke. Agricultural Water Management. 166, 130–138.
Saberali, S.F., Mohammad Modarres-Sanavy, S. A., Bannayan, M., Baghestani, M. A., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Hoogenboom, G., 2012. Dry bean competitiveness with redroot pigweed as affected by growth habit and nitrogen rate. Field Crops Research. 135, 38–45.
Saberali, S.F., Mohammadi, K., 2015. Organic amendments application down weight the negative effects of weed competition on the soybean yield. Ecological Engineering. 82, 451-458.
Samieiani, E., Ansari, H., Azizi, M., Hashemi-Nia, S. M., Salahvarzi, Y., 2013. Effects of drought stress on some biochemical indices of four groundcovers (Lolium perenne, Potentilla spp, Trifolium repens and Frankenia spp) with potential usage in landscape. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture. 4(3), 101-110. [In Persian with English Summary].
Tesfaye, K., Walker, S., Tsubo, M., 2006. Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 60–70.
Vahaedi, A., 2015. Effects of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) competition on the yield and yield components of corn under different levels of nitrogen application. 5(2), 14-25. [In Persian with English Summary].
Weiget, A., Jolliffe, P., 2003. Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology. 91, 707-720.
Zand, E., and Beckie, H. J. 2002. Competitive ability of hybrid and open pollinated canola (Brassica napus L.) with wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 82, 473-480.