Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Crop Physiology, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

2 Faculty member. College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is undoubtedly one of the most important environmental stresses limiting the productivity of crop plants around the world. It has substantial influence on the growth condition, morphological structure and physiology and biochemistry of plants. Deficit irrigation strategy and planting crops with low water requirements and low expectations, for example, Kochia is very important under drought stress. Kochia is a salt- and drought-tolerant species that can be grown on drought soils, yielding fodder in quantities approaching that produced by alfalfa. Farmers in some arid areas of the world have already begun to cultivate Kochia as a salt-tolerant forage crop on lands where other crops are difficult to grow; accordingly, Kochia has been called ‘‘the poor man’s alfalfa’’.
Drought stress decreases the rate of photosynthesis. Limiting factors in photosynthesis under environmental stresses is the two groups, stomatal limiting factors (Transpiration, stomatal conductance and co2 sub-stomatal) and non- stomatal limiting factors (chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence and etc.). Plants grown under drought condition have a lower stomatal conductance in order to conserve water. Consequently, CO2 fixation is reduced and photosynthetic rate decreases, resulting in less assimilate production for growth and yield of plants. Diffusive resistance of the stomata to CO2 entry probably is the main factor limiting photosynthesis under drought. Furthermore, drought stress lead to oxidative stress in the plant cell. Drought stress caused a large decline in the chlorophyll a content, the chlorophyll b content, and the total chlorophyll content in most plants. The decrease in chlorophyll under drought stress is mainly the result of damage to chloroplasts caused by active oxygen species. One of the most often employed parameters is maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), which gives the information about the proportion of the light absorbed by chlorophyll in PSII that is used in photochemical processes that it decreased under stress conditions. The aim of this greenhouse study was investigating some stomatal and non- stomatal limiting factors in photosynthesis rate and biomass of Kochia under drought stress conditions.

Materials and Methods
To comparison the photosynthetic parameters of kochia under drought stress, a pot experiment was carried out in completely randomized design with three replications in University of Ferdowsi in 2013. There were 9 treatments included control (no drought), light drought stress during the vegetative phase, heavy drought stress during the vegetative phase, light drought stress during the reproductive phase, heavy drought stress during the reproductive phase, light drought stress during the vegetative phase and heavy drought stress during the reproductive phase, heavy drought stress during the vegetative phase and light drought stress during the reproductive phase, light drought stress during total growth period and heavy drought stress during total growth period. Photosynthetic parameters including photosynthesis rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance, Co2 sub stomatal (by IRGA, Model LCA4), PWUE, SPAD (by SPAD, 502, Japan), chlorophyll content (with spectrophotometer model 6305 by Arnon's method), chlorophyll fluorescence components (chlorophyll fluorescence meter model OSL-FL) and biomass were measured. For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and FLSD test were performed using SAS ver. 9.1 software.

Results and Discussion
Results showed that chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content and SPAD under drought stress conditions were lower than the control treatment. Effect of drought stress was significant on chlorophyll fluorescence indices so that maximum quantum yield of photosystem II declined significantly due to increasing of initial fluorescence (Fo) and decreasing of maximum fluorescence (Fm). Transpiration, stomatal conductance and co2 sub-stomatal did not differ significantly from control. Photosynthetic rate also decreased in drought stress at different growth stages. The most and lowest of biomass observed in control and heavy drought stress during growth period, respectively.

Conclusions
Finally, this study showed that stomatal parameters (Transpiration, stomatal conductance and CO2 sub-stomatal) shown the same reaction under stress and non- stress conditions. Even under heavy drought stress, this plant is able to hold open stomata and maintain the continuity of CO2 absorption that it refers to the high resistance of Kochia. Therefore stomatal limiting factors didn’t have role in limit photosynthesis. Unlike stomatal limiting factors, non- stomatal factors had a significant positive correlation with photosynthesis rate and a decrease in each of them reduces photosynthesis rate.

Keywords

Arnon, A.N., 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 23, 112-121.
Bettaieb, I., Hamrouni-Sellami, I., Bourgou, S., Limam, F., Marzouk, B., 2011. Drought effects on polyphenol composition and antioxidant activities in aerial parts of Salvia officinalis L. Acta Physiology Plantarum. 33, 1103–1111.
Chaves, M.M., Flexas, J., Pinheiro, C., 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany. 103, 551-560.
Efeoglu, B., Ekmekci, Y., Cicek, N., 2009. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African Journal of Botany. 75, 34-42.
Fayez, K.A., Bazaid, S.A., 2013. Improving drought and salinity tolerance in barley by application of salicylic acid and potassium nitrate. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 13, 45–55.
Flexas, J., Medrano, H., 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3- plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitation revisited. Annals of Botany. 183, 183-189.
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., Sharkey, T.D., 2004. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biology. 6, 1-11.
Flexas, J., Diaz-Espejo, A., Galmes, J., Kaldenhoff, R., Medrano, H., Ribas-Carbo, M., 2007. Rapid variations of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment. 30, 1284-1298.
Ishikawa, T., Takahara, K., Hirabayashi, T., Matsumura, H., Fujisawa, S., Terauchi, R., Uchimiya, H., Kawai-Yamada, M., 2010. Metabolome analysis of response to oxidative stress in rice suspension cells overexpressing cell death suppressor Bax inhibitor-1. Plant Cell Physiology. 51, 9–20.
Jami Al-Ahmadi, M., Kafi, M., 2008. Kochia (Kochia Scoparia L.): to be or not to be. In: Crop and forageproduction using saline waters (Eds.): M. Kafi & M.A.Khan. Daya Publishers, India, pp. 119-162.
Jill, E.C., Ciro, S., Mateo, V., 2012. Dissecting maize productivity, ideotypes associated with grain yield under drought stress and well-watered conditions. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 54(12), 1007–1020.
Kafi, M. Asadi, H., Ganjeali, A., 2010a. Possible utilization of high-salinity waters and application of low amounts of water for production of the halophyte Kochia scoparia as alternative fodder in saline agroecosystems. Agricultural Water Management. 97 (1), 139–147.
Kafi, M., Borzuei, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masumi, A., Nabati, J., 2010b. Physiology of Environmental Stresses in Plants. Publications of University of Mashhad. 502 p [In Persian].
Kauser, R., Athar, H.R., Ashraf, M., 2006. Chlorophyll fluorescence: A potential indicator for rapid assessment of water stress tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 38, 1501-1509.
Kirkham, M.B. 2005. Principles of soil and plant water relations. Elsevier Academic Press. 500p.
Lawlor, D.W., Cornic, G., 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell and Environment. 25, 275-294.
Lepedus, H., Brkic, I., Cesar, V., Jurkovic, V., Antunovic, J., Jambrovic, A., Brkic, J., Simic, D., 2012. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis of photosynthetic performance in seven maize inbred lines under water-limited conditions. Periodicum Biologorum. 114 (1), 73–76.
Lieth, H., Lohmann, M., 2000. Cash crop halophytes for future halophyte growers. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück.
Mamnuei, A., Sayed Sharifi, R., 2011. Effects of water deficit on chlorophyll fluorescence indices and proline in six barley genotypes and its relation with canopy temperature and yield. Plant Biology. 2(5), 51-62. [In Persian with English Summary].
Masumi, A., 2011. The effect of drought stress on native populations Kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) morpho-physiological parameters in field conditions and greenhouse. PhD thesis of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. [In Persian with English Summary].
Miyashita, K., Tanakamaru, S., Maitaniand, T., Kimura, K., 2005. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 53(2), 205-214.
Nabati, J., Kafi, M., Khaninejad, S., Masumi, A., Zare mehrjerdi, M., Keshmiri, A., 2015a. Evaluate the effect of salinity on some photosynthetic characteristics five kochia populations (Kochia scoparia Schrad (L.)). Journal Crop Production, 8(2), 77-95. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nabati, J., Kafi, M., Nezami, A., Rezvanimoghaddm, P., Masoumi, A., Zaremehrjerdi, M., 2011b. Effect of salinity on biomass production and activities of some key enzymatic antioxidants in Kochia (Kochia scoparia).Pakistan Journal of Botany. 43(1), 539-548.
Netondo, G.W., Onyango, J.C., Beck, E., 2004. Sorghum and salinity: II. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of sorghum under salt stress. Crop Science. 44, 806-811.
Oliviera-Neto, C.F., Silva-Lobato, A.K., Goncalves-Vidigal, M.C., Costa, R. C.L., Santos.Filho, B.G., Alves, G.A.R., Silva-Maia, W.J.M., Cruz, F.J.R., Neres, H.K.B., Santos Lopes, M.J., 2009. Carbon compounds and chlorophyll contents in sorghum submitted to water deficit during three growth stages. Science and Technology. 7, 588-593
 Paknejad, F., Nasri, M.,  Tohidi Moghadam, H.R.,  Zahedi, H., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M.,  2007. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll content and grain yield of wheat cultivars. Journal of Biological Sciences. 7(6), 841-847.
Pessarkli, M., 1999. Hand Book of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekkor Inc.
Sanitata, L., Gabbriella, R., 1999. Response to Cd in higher plants-Review. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 45, 105-130.
Souza, R.P., Machadoa, E.C., Silva, J.A.B., Lagoa, A.M.M.A., Silveira, J.A.G., 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 51, 45-56.
Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., 2006. Plant Physiology. Fourth Edition. Sinauer Associates, Inc. 764 p.
Xiao, X., Xu, X., Yang, F., 2008. Adaptive responses to progressive drought stress in two Populus cothayana populations. Silva Fennica. 42, 705-719.
Zhao, G. Q., Ma, B.L., Ren, C. Z., 2007. Growth, Gas Exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity. Crop Science. 41, 123-131.