Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Former MSc. Student in plant breeding, Department of Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof. Department of Biotechnology and Plant breeding, College of Agriculture, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Maize is the cereal with the largest annual global production at 1000 M tons annually. Maize (Zea mays L.) along with wheat and rice provides at least 30% of the food calories to more than 4.5 billion people in 94 developing countries where one-third of world children are malnourished. By 2050, the demand for maize in the developing will be almost double to the current demand. However, an estimated 15% to 20% of maize grain yield is lost each year due to drought and such losses may further increase as droughts become more frequent and severe because of climate change. Cultivation area for maize grown in Iran was about 350000 ha with 1.25 million tons production in 2014. But drought stress in recent years and poorly water sources could limit maize cultivation in Iran.
Materials and methods
In order to evaluate of drought stress effects on yield and it’s components in some maize hybrids, also determine drought tolerant genotypes, 8 maize hybrids was studied as three experiments under normal, drought stress in vegetative stage and drought stress in reproductive stage. Experiment was conducted using RCBD design with three replications in training field of Kermanshah education center. Some agronomic traits such as plant height, ear per plant, ear length, ear diameter, ear cob diameter, row per ear, seed per ear, 100 seed weight, grain yield based on 14% moisture, ear weight, ear cob weight, seed depth, leaf area, stem diameter and days to physiological were recorded. Because of numerous recorded traits, in result and discussion section just some of most important yield components have been explained.

Results and discussion
Analysis of combined variance showed that drought stress had significant effect on all recorded traits. Some yield components such as 100 seed weight, seed per row and rows per ear reduced mostly due to drought stress. Above traits due to drought stress reduced 25.6, 19.1 and 17.6 percent, respectively. Among evaluated traits, drought stress reduced grain yields more than any other traits. In fact, cumulative reduction in component yield caused significant reduce in grain yield. Then grain yield under drought stress in vegetative and reproductive stages reduced 13.7 and 28.7 percent, respectively. Maize hybrids were different statistically for all recorded traits. Hybrids Ksc260, Ksc704 and Ksc647 had high grain yield under both normal and drought stress conditions. Drought tolerance indices confirmed above issue so that these hybrids had high potential for grain yield also partial drought tolerance. Among above hybrids, Ksc260 had well characteristics to cultivate in regions with drought stress conditions.

Conclusions
Among evaluated traits, drought stress reduced grain yields more than any other traits. In fact, cumulative reduction in component yield caused significant reduce in grain yield. There were well variation among evaluated hybrids and it could be identify some drought tolerant hybrids among them. Among evaluated hybrids, Ksc260 with high grain yield under normal and drought stress conditions also early maturity had well characteristics to cultivate in regions with drought stress conditions. Besides Ksc260, Hybrid Ksc704 had high grain yield under both conditions but this hybrid is ale maturity and it,s water requirement is more than Ksc260 so it suggested that Ksc704 cultivated in areas with no water limited.


Keywords

Banziger, M., Edmeades, G.O., Lafitte, H.R., 2002. Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance. Field Crops Research. 75, 223–233.
Barker, T.C., Campos, H., Cooper, M., Dolan, D., Edmeades, G.O., Habben, J., Schussler, J., Wright, D., Zinselmeier, C., 2005. Improving drought tolerance in maize. Plant Breeding Reviews. 25, 173-253.
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W. T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 24, 933-937.
Chaudhary, H.K., Kaila, V., Rather, S.A., 2014. Maize. In: Pratap, A., Kumar, J., (eds), Alien Gene Transfer in Crop Plants: Achievements and Impacts, Springer, New York, USA.
Choukan, R.,  Heidari, A.,  Mohammadi, A.,  Haddad, M.H., 2008. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in Grain Maize Hybrids Using Drought Tolerance Indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 22(3), 543-562. [In Persian with English Summary].
Choukan, R., Taherkhani, T., Ghannadha, M. R., Khodarahmi, M., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in grain maize inbred lines using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 8(1), 79-89. [In Persian with English Summary].
Claassen, M.M., Shaw, R.H., 1970. Water deficit effects on corn: Grain components. Agronomy Journal. 62, 652-655.
Dehghanpour, Z., Sabzi, M.H.,  Mozayan, A.,  Hasanzadeh Moghaddam, H., Estakhr, A.,   Zamani, M.,   Sadeghi, F.,  Normohamadi, S.,  Mohseni, M., 2009. Fajr, A New Early Maturity Grain Maize Hybrid (KSC 260). Seed and Plant Improvement Journal.  25(2), 361-363. [In Persian with English Summary].
Edmeades, G., 2013. Progress in Achieving and Delivering Drought Tolerance in Maize - An Update. Update, ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Edmeades, G.O., Bolanos, J., Elings, A., Ribaut, J.M., Banziger, M., Westgate, M.E., 2000. The Role and regulation of the anthesis-silking interval in maize. In: Westgate, M.E., Boote, K.J., (eds.), Physiology and modeling kernel set in maize, Vol. 29, CSSA Special Publication, Wisconsin, 43-73.
Edmeades, G.O., Bänziger, M., Campos, H., Schussler, J., 2006. Improving tolerance to abiotic stresses in staple crops: a random or planned process? p. 293-309. In: Lamkey, K.R., Lee, M., (eds.), Plant breeding: the Arnel R. Hallauer International Symposium. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
Emam, Y., Niknejad, M., 2004. An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. Shiraz University Press. 571p. [In Persian].
FAOSTAT., 2010. Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome.
FAOSTAT., 2014. Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome.
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Symposium of AVRDC, 13-16 Aug. Taiwan.
Fisher, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Ghazian Tafrishi, Sh., Ayenehband, A., Tavakoli, H., Khavari Khorasani, S., Joleini, M., 2012. Investigating sweet corn (Zea mays L.) yield determining traits under normal irrigation and water deficit stress, using multivariate statistical methods. Environmental stress in crop sciences. 5 (1), 95-98. [In Persian with English Summary].
Golbashy, M., Ebrahimi, M., Khavari Khorasani, S., Choukan, R., 2010. Comparison of commercial and new corn hybrids (Zea mays L.) under drought stress and normal irrigation conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 3(1), 47-57. [In Persian with English Summary].
Grant, R.F., Jackson, B.S., kiniry, J.R., Arkin, G.F., 1989. Water deficit timing Effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal. 81, 61-65.
O’Neill, P.M., Shanahan, J.F., Schepers, J.S., Caldwell, B., 2004. Agronomic responses of corn hybrids from different eras to deficit and adequate levels of water and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal. 96, 1660–1667.
Magorokosho, C., Pixley, K.V., Tongoona, P., 2003. Selection for Drought Tolerance in two Tropical Maize Populations. African Crop Science Journal. 11, 151-161.
Mostafavi, Kh., Firoozi, M., Mousavi, SMN., 2013. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components of maize hybrids. Scientific Research and Essays. 8(24), 1145-1149.
Rabbani, J., Emam, Y., 2012. Yield response of maize hybrids to drought Stress at Different growth stages. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 1(2), 65-78. [In Persian with English Summary].
Richards, R.A., 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regularity. 157-166.
Rosielli, A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoritical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non- stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 493-501.
Russell, W.A., 1984. Agronomic performance of maize cultivars representing different eras of breeding. Maydica. 29, 375-390.
Sayadi Maazou, AD, Tu, J., Qiu, J., Liu, Z., 2016. Breeding for Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 7, 1858-1870
Seghatoleslami, M.J., Kafi, M., Majidi, E., 2008. Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40(4), 1427- 1432.
Seyedzavar, J., Norouzi, M., Aharizad, S., tahmasebpour, B., 2014. Evaluation of correlation among traits in corn hybrids under drought stress conditions. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences. 3(10), 1088-1091.
Tabatabaei, S.A., Shakeri, E., 2016. Effect of drought stress on maize hybrids yield and determination of the best hybrid using drought tolerance indices. Environmental stress in crop sciences. 8(1), 121-125. [In Persian with English Summary].
Von Braun, J., Byerlee, D., Chartres, C., Lumpkin, T., Olembo, N., Waage, J.J., 2010. A Draft Strategy and Results Framework for the CGIAR. World Bank, CGIAR, Washington DC, USA.