Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI); Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Maragheh, Iran.

2 Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI); Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sararood Branch, Iran.

3 Kordestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center; Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sanandaj, Iran.

4 Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center; Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ardabil, Iran.

5 North Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center; Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), North Khorasan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) is grown for human consumption, mainly as pasta products, e.g., spaghetti and macaroni, couscous, bulgur, frike, flat breads, etc. Worldwide, the area annually planted to durum wheat is estimated to be around 17-18 million hectares, i.e., 8 percent of total wheat area, with a production averaging about 30 million tons annually, which is 5.5 percent of total wheat production. Although durum is grown in various regions of the world, the great bulk of durum area and production is concentrated in the Mediterranean basin and North America. Eight countries (Algeria, Canada, Italy, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, and USA) account for nearly two thirds (2/3) of world durum area and production. In Iran, the area under durum cultivation is about 400-500 thousands hectares with an annual production of 400-500 thousand tons, which covers about 60% of country demands. In spite of the importance of durum for Iranian rural economies, the country has not all succeeded in its research and development efforts to substantially improve durum productivity. The combinations of increasing demand for durum and durum products, as a result of demographic pressure, and relatively low durum productivity partly due to abiotic stresses (i.e. cold, terminal heat, moisture and nutrient deficiency stresses) made the country to an importer of durum. These are frequently exacerbated by biotic stresses, e.g., diseases and insects that may severely inhibit crop growth.

Materials and methods
The main purpose of this study was to achieve high yielding durum wheat genotypes with higher yield stability in different environmental condition, tolerance to environmental stresses such as cold damage, drought and end of season heat stress. Hence, 17 durum wheat lines were evaluated for grain yeild and morphlogical traits in Maragheh, Sararood, Qamloo, Ardabil and Shirvan agricultural research stations in 2011-14. In each location, the experiments were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications.
Results and discussion
Based on combined ANOVA, there was significant difference among the environments, genotypes and G×E. GGE-biplot models showed that the 5 environments were belonged to 3 mega-environments, and different genetopes had higher yield in each mega-environments. Sumplimentary irrigation, at sowing time and flowering growth stages, could increase grain yield of lines 30 and 70 percent in Maragheh and Qamloo locations, respectively. The increase of grain yield was 42 percent for line Rascon under suplimentary irrigation. The AMMI and GGE results also confirmed genotype 5 was the most high-yielding durum line with reasonable yield stability in cold areas (Maragheh, Qamloo and Ardabil). Also, genotype 13 was the most high yielding and stable line in Sararood. Hence, these line can be candiatted to release new durum varieties for cold and moderat rainfed areas. Complementary irrigation could increase grain yield up to 30 and 70 percent in Maragheh and Sararood, respectively.
Conclusions
It can be concluded that finding of new stable high-yielding durum lines, with better performances than that the existed varieies, is a great progress in durum breeding programs in cold rainfed areas. Both GGE biplot and AMMI analyses could be used in grain yield stability and adaptability under rainfed conditions and sumplementary irrigations, however, the results of GGE biploet were more applicable and can be use extensively in the study of grain yield adaptability and stability under rainfed and sumplementary irrigations conditions in durum wheat breeding programs.

Keywords

Aggarwal, P., Sinha, S., 1987. Response of droughted wheat to mid-season water application: recovery in leaf area and its effect on grain yield. Functional Plant Biology. 14, 227-237.
Akcura, M., Kaya, Y., Taner, S., 2005. Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat in the Central Anatolian region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 29, 369-375.
Benli, B., Pala, M., Stockle, C., Oweis, T., 2007. Assessment of winter wheat production under early sowing with supplemental irrigation in a cold highland environment using CropSyst simulation model. Agricultural Water Management. 93, 45-53.
Blum, A., 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.
Cakmak, I., Pfeiffer, W.H., McClafferty, B., 2010. Review: biofortification of durum wheat with zinc and iron. Cereal Chemistry. 87, 10-20.
Chen, T., Xu, G., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Zhang, J., 2015. Expression of proteins in superior and inferior spikelets of rice during grain filling under different irrigation regimes. Proteomics. 16, 102-121.
De Lacy, I.H., Basford, K.E., Cooper, M., Bull, J.K., Macclaren, C.G., 1996. Analysis of multi-environmental interaction and adaptation. In: Hayward, D., Bosemark, N.O., Romagosa, I., Eds. Plant Breeding, Principals and Prospects. Chapman and Hall. London UK.
Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A., 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. 6, 36-40.
Fan, X.-M., Kang, M.S., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Tan, J., Xu, C., 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agronomy Journal. 99, 220-228.
Feizi, M., Sadeghzadeh, B., Ansari, Y., Dolatpanah, T., 2013. Genetic variation of soluble sugars and growth habit, and the relationship between these traits with cold tolerance in barley genotypes. Journal of Research in Crop Sciences. 6, 1-10. [In Persian with English Summary].
Finlay, K.W, Wilkinson, G.N., 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Crop and Pasture Science. 14(6(, 742-754.
Fowler, D.B., Gusta, L.V., Tyler, N.J., 1981. Selection for winter hardiness in wheat. III. Screening methods. Crop Science. 21, 896-901.
Francis, T., Kannenberg, L., 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58, 1029-1034.
Garcia del Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D., Royo, C., 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agronomy Journal. 95, 266-274.
Gauch, H.G., 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Trials. AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, New York, USA.
Gauch, H.G., 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science. 46, 1488-1500.
Gauch, H.G., Zobel, R.W., 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang, M.S., Gauch, H.G., (eds.), Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
Giunta, F., Motzo, R., Deidda, M., 1993. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research. 33, 399-409.
Heidari-Sharifabad, H., 2008. Drought mitigation strategies for the agriculture sector. The 10th Iranian Congress of Crop Sciences. Karaj, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ilbeyi, A., Ustun, H., Oweis, T., Pala, M., Benli, B., 2006. Wheat water productivity and yield in a cool highland environment: Effect of early sowing with supplemental irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 82, 399-410.
Iranian Ministry of Agriculture, 2011. Agricultural Statisctic Booklet. Misitry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Department of Planning and Economics. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kang, M.S., 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal. 85, 754-757.
Nachit, M.M., 2002. Breeding for improved resistance to drought in durum wheat. ICARDA Caravan, ICARDA.
Nachit, M.M., Nachit, G., Ketata, H., Gauch, H., Zobel, R., 1992. Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 83, 597-601.
Ortiz-Ferrara, G., Yau, S., Assad Moussa, M., 1991. Identification of agronomic traits associated with yield under stress conditions. In: Acevedo, E., Conesa, A.P., Monneveux, P., Eds. Physiology Breeding of Winter Cereals for Stressed Mediterranean Environments. Paris: INRA.
Oweis, T., Pala, M., Ryan, J., 1998. Stabilizing rainfed wheat yields with supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal. 90, 672-681.
Purchase, J., Hatting, H., Van Deventer, C., 2000. Genotype× environment interaction of winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 17, 101-107.
Rose IV, L.W., Das, M.K., Taliaferro, C.M., 2008. A comparison of dry matter yield stability assessment methods for small numbers of genotypes of bermudagrass. Euphytica. 164, 19-25.
Royo, C., Abaza, M., Blanco, R., del Moral, L.F.G., 2000. Triticale grain growth and morphometry as affected by drought stress, late sowing and simulated drought stress. Functional Plant Biology. 27, 1051-1059.
Sadeghzadeh, B., Abediasl, G., Sadeghzadeh-ahari, D., 2012. Evaluating agronomic traits related to grain yield of durum wheat landraces in drylands condition. Iranian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Science. 1, 40-62 [In Persian with English Summary].
Samonte, S.O.P., Wilson, L.T., McClung, A.M., Medley, J.C., 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Science 45, 2414-2424.
Shukla, G., 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity. 29, 237-245.
Tavakkoli, A.R., Oweis, T.Y., 2004. The role of supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in producing bread wheat in the highlands of Iran. Agricultural Water Management. 65, 225-236. [In Persian with English Summary].
Trethowan, R., Reynolds, M., 2007. Drought resistance: genetic approaches for improving productivity under stress. In: Trethowan, R.M., Reynolds, M. (eds.), Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Springer Pub., The Netherlands.
Wricke, G., 1962. Evaluation method for recording ecological differences in field trials. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 47, 92-96.
Yan, W., 2001. GGEbiplot - A Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal. 93, 1111-1118.
Yan, W., 2002. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data. Agronomy Journal. 94, 990-996.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L., 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science. 47, 643-653.