Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Member of staff, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Research Center for Plant Sciences

2 Member of staff, Faculty of Agriculture, and Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

3 Member of Science in Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University

4 Member of staff, Shirvan Higher Education Complex

5 Ph.D. in Agronomy, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

6 Ph.D. in Crop Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction
Soil salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses affecting plant growth and production. It is estimated that approximately half of the irrigated lands of Iran are affected by salinity and much of the agricultural lands of Iran especially in the central regions are susceptible to salinity. According to the development of saline soils and water resources, utilization of halophytes as alternatives for cultivation in saline conditions could be a suitable strategy to crop production. In addition to understanding the physiological salinity tolerance pathways, studying such crops could help to plant breeding and transferring these useful traits to crop species and also domestication of these plants.
Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted in 2009-2010 in Salinity Research Station of faculty of agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad as split-plot based on Complete Randomized Block Design with three replications. Salinity as the main plot had two levels of 5.2 and 16.5 dSm-1 and five kochia ecotypes including Birjand, Urmia, Borujerd, Esfahan and Sabzevar were allocated as sub-plot. Seedlings were irrigated with saline water having electrical conductivity (EC) of 5.2 dSm-1 until the full establishment and thereafter salinity stress was imposed with saline water having EC=16.5 dSm-1. Physiological and biochemical traits were measured in the youngest fully expanded leaf at the beginning of the anthesis and shoot biomass at the end of the growth season. Data analysis was performed using Minitab 16 and means were compared by LSD test at a significance level of 0.05.
Results and Discussion
Results indicated that biomass was increased in Birjand, Isfahan and Urmia ecotypes as salinity level increased while it was decreased in Sabzevar and Boroujerd ecotypes. A reduction of 34, 31, 11 and 29 percentage and an increase of 4 percentage in seed yield was seen in Sabzevar, Birjand, Boroujerd, Urmia and Isfahan, respectively. Harvest index was also increased in Isfahan while it was decreased in the other ecotypes with the highest reduction in Birjand ecotype. An increasing trend of shoot Na+ content at anthesis was observed in all ecotypes showing the highest increase in Boroujerd and Isfahan and the lowest in Birjand ecotypes. A lower shoot K+ content at anthesis was observed in all ecotypes except Urmia in higher salinity levels. In contrast to Sabzevar soluble carbohydrates was decreased in Urmia, Isfahan, Boroujerd and Birjand in higher salinity levels. Increasing salinity intensity caused an increase in leaf proline content in Birjand and Isfahan ecotypes while it had no effect on Boroujerd and an additive effect on this parameter in Urmia and Sabzevar ecotypes. A higher osmotic potential was found in Boroujerd, Birjand and Sabzevar in higher EC levels. Phenol content was lower in Urmia, Boroujerd and Birjand in higher salinity levels while it was higher in Sabzevar. No significant difference was observed in Isfahan ecotype according to this parameter. DPPH radical scavenging activity was decreased in Birjand, Urmia and Boroujerd while it was increased in the other two ecotypes.

Conclusion
Regarding higher biomass and lower physiological indices such as soluble carbyhydrates, total phenol, DPPH radical scavenging activities in Birjand and Urmia ecotypes, it may be cocluded that higher amounts of these parameters might not be suitable traits in salinity tolerant genotypes selection.

Keywords

Abdi Sand Ali, A., 1999. Role of ROS modified human DNA in the pathogenesis and etiology of cancer. Cancer Letters. 142, 1–9.
Abe, N., Murata, T., Hirota, A., 1998. Novel 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryhy- drazyl- radical scavengers, bisorbicillin and demethyltrichodimerol, from a fungus. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 62, 61-662.
Balasundram, N., Sundram, K., Samman, S., 2006. Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chemistry. 99, 191–203.
Bates, L.S., Waldran, R.P., Teare, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205–208.
Benlloch-Gonzàlez, M., Fournier, J.M., Ramos, J., Benlloch, M., 2005. Strategies underlying salt tolerance in halophytes are present in Cynara cardunculus. Plant Science. 168, 635–659.
Dionisio-Sese, M.L., Tobita, S., 2000. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic respoes of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. Plant Physiology. 157, 54-58.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith, F., 1956. Calorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry. 28, 350-356.
Gordon, M.H., 2001. Measuring antioxidant activity. In: Antioxidants in food: Practical applicatio. In: Pokorny J, Yanishlieva N, and Gordon MH (Eds.), Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp. 71–84.
Jami Al Ahmadi, M., Kafi, M., 2008. Kochia (Kochia scoparia): To be or not to be? Crop and forage production using saline waters. In: Kafi M and Khan MA (eds.), Daya Publisher, New Delhi, pp. 119-162.
Janagoudar, B.S., 2009. Physiological strategies of plant breeding for drought and salinity tolerance in cotton. Biological Forum – an International Journal. 1, 105-106
Luo, X.M., Basile, M.J., Kennelly, E.J., 2002. Polyphenolic antioxidants from the fruit of Chryso-phyllum cainito L. (Star Apple). Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50, 1379–1382.
Maisuthisakul, P., Suttajit, M., Pongsawatmanit, R., 2007. Assessment of phenolic content and free radical-scavenging capacity of some Thai indigenous plants. Food Chemistry. 100, 1409–1418.
Molassiotis, A., Sotiropoulos, T., Tanou, G., Diamantidis, G., Therios, I., 2006. Boron-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic response in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environtal and Experimental Botany. 56, 54–62.
Munns, R., 2003. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 25, 239–50.
Munns, R., Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 59, 651-681.
Nabati, J., 2011. Effect of salinity on physiological characteristics and qualitative and quantitative traits of forage Kochia (Kochia scoparia). PhD thesis Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Faculty of Agriculture. [In Persian with English Summary]
Parida, A.K., Das, A.B., 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 60, 324-349.
Qureshi, A.S., Qadir, M., Heydari, N., Turral, H., Javadi, A., 2007. A review of management strategies for salt-proneland and water resources in Iran. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. 30p. (IWMI Working Paper 125).
Rout, N.P., Shaw, B.P., 2001. Salt tolerance in aquatic macrophytes: Ionic relation and interaction. Biologia Plantarum. 55, 91–5.
Sairam, R.K., Veerabhadra Rao, K., Srivastava, G.C., 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science. 163, 1037-1046.
Sannada, Y., Ueda, H., Kuribayashi, K., Andoh, T., Hayashi, F., Tamai, N., Wada, K., 1995. Novel light-dark change of proline levels in halophyte (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) and glycophytes (Hordeum vulgare L. and Triticum aestivum L.) leaves and roots under salt stress. Plant and Cell Physiology. 36, 965-970.
Singleton, U.L., Rossi, J., 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-posphotungustic acid reagent. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 16, 144-158.
Smart, R.E., Bingham, G.E., 1974. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology. 53, 258–260.
Tandon, H.L.S., 1995. Methods of analysis of soils, plants, water andfertilizers. FDCO, New Delhi
Zhu, J.K., 2001, Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 6, 66-71.
Zhu, J.K., 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 6, 441-445.