Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Agronomy, Malekan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malekan, Iran

Abstract

Increasing crop production to ensure future food security while reducing environmental pressure on agro-ecosystems requires improved water and nutrient use efficiency. the arid and semiarid regions of the world lack of sufficient water supply is the major problem for corn cultivation and is a restriction for its production, so studies on the growth limitation and germination of corn seeds under drought conditions seems very necessary. The effects of drought on plant growth depend on several factors such as plant genetic resistance, stage of growth and duration of plant expose to drought. The AMF are playing a vital role in sustainable agriculture because they enhance plant water relations, which improve the drought resistance of host plants. It is important to increase our understanding of AM fungal and maize genotype interactions and water condition on the symbiosis, and on the physiology and nutritional status of maize plants. Thus Mycorrhizae application and choosing suitable cultivar are of simple managements in decreasing drought effect. This investigation had done in order to investigate effect of irrigation regimes (irrigation after 70, 110 and 150 mm evaporaation from evaporate basin), Mycorrhizae (non application and application of Mycorrhizae) and cultivar (704 and 640) on growth and yield of maize. A split factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted during growing season of 2015 at Islamic Azad University, Malekan Branch, Plots were then furrow irrigated in the mornings every week. Each block was including 12 plots. The size of each plot was 3.5m×4m, and there was in each plot, 5 rows with a distance of 75 cm, and the length of 4 m. The distance between plots was selected 150 cm, and the distance between blocks was selected 3 m. By mid August an area of 2.5 m from 3 line of plot area was separately harvested and traits were evaluated. MSTAT-C and EXCEL were used to analyze data and draw graphs, respectively. Based on results of this investigation, response of cultivars to drought were different. In irrigation after 70 mm evaporaation from evaporate basin in 704 cultivar highest grain yield observed. In cultivar 704 both irrigation after 110 mm evaporaation from evaporate basin and irrigation after 150 mm evaporaation from evaporate basin decreased grain yield by 19 and 50.6 % in grain yield, but in 640 cultivar that had higher grain yield in control than 704, drought did not had significant effect on grain yield. Mycorrhizae also increased grain yield by 25.2 %. All three factor of drought, Mycorrhizae and cultivar caused changes by changing both yield component of grain number and 100 grain weight. It seems drought caused a decrease in grain number by decreasing number of total floret and increasing unfertile floret number, but Mycorrhizae had opposite effect that this decrease in floret number can caused by gap increase between tasseling and silk emergence. Drought did not had effect on chlorophyll a, but it decreased chlorophyll b, but Mycorrhizae caused an increase in chlorophyll b. Drought and Mycorrhizae increased catalase and Peroxidase content. We then suggest potential areas for future research related to (a) the adoption of cropping practices promoting AM colonization and survival; (b) the further understanding of AM effects on maize morpho-physiology; and (c) the creation of AM-colonized, drought-tolerant maize cultivars through conventional breeding as well as molecular and genomic techniques.

Keywords

Abdallah, M.M., Abd El-Monem, A.A., Hassanein, R.A., El-Bassiouny, H.M.S., 2013. Response of sunflower plant to the application of certain vitamins and arbuscular mycorrhiza under different water regimes. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 7(2), 915-932.
Alizadeh Oskuie, P., Baghban Cirus, S., 2015. The effect of Vesicular–arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi on vitamin c content of tomato in the presence of lead and different levels of phosphorus. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 4, 01- 04.
Aminifar, J., Sirousmehr, A., 2014. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi community, nutrient availability and soil glomalin in organic farming. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences. 3, 1-6.
Aslam, M., Zamir, M.S.I., Afzal, M.I., Shoaib, A., 2013. Drought stress, its effect on maize production and development of drought tolerance through potassium application. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova. 2(154), 99-114.
Augé, R.M., Toler, H.D., Saxton, A.M., 2014. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza. 7, 87-98.
Azmat, R., Hamid, N., 2015. A plausible mechanism of biosorption in dual symbioses by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal in plants. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 28, 541-546.
Barnabás, B., Jäger, K., Fehér, A., 2008. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell and Environment. 31, 11–38.
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F. W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Mare, C., Tondelli, A., Michele Stanca, A., 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research. 105, 1–14.
Elhag, A.Z., Sayed Abdelhaleem Musa, T., Osman Gafar, M., 2015. The allelopathic effect of Euphorbia hirta and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM) on growth of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 6, 222-228.
Fahramand, M., Zohoori, M., 2013. Evaluate the effect biological fertilizer on some quantitative traits in maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 6, 789-793.
Farnia, A., Khodabandehloo, S., 2015. Changes in yield and its components of maize (Zea mays L.) to foliar application of zinc nutrient and mycorrhiza under water stress condition. International Journal of Life Sciences. 9 (5), 75 – 80.
Fraser, L.H., Greenall, A., Carlyle, C., Turkington, R., Ross Friedman, C., 2009. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of Pseudoroegneria spicata: response of stomatal density, leaf area and biomass to changes in water supply and increased temperature. Annals of Botany. 103, 769–775.
Gomes, M. M. A., Magalhães Andrade Lagôa, A. M., Lázaro Medina, C., Caruso Machado,E., Antônio Machado, M., 2004. Interactions between leaf water potentialstomatal conductance and abscisic acid content of orange trees submitted to drought stress. Braz. Journal of Plant Physiology. 16(3), 155-161.
Harb, A., Krishnan, A., Ambavaram, M. M.R., Pereira, A., 2010. Molecular and pH ysiological analysis of drought stressin arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiology. 154, 1254–1271.
Karaarslan, E., Uyanöz, R., Doğu,S. 2015. Morphological identification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on bulbous plants (Taurus Mountain in Turkey). Archives of Biological Sciences. 67(2), 411-426.
Khoshvaghti, H., Eskandari-Kordlar, M., Lotfi,R., 2014. Response of maize cultivars to water stress at grain filling phase. Azarian Journal of Agriculture. 1, 39-42.
Lauer, J., 2012. The effects of drought and poor corn pollination on corn. Field Crops. 28, 493 - 95.
Lisanti, S., Hall, A.J., Chimenti, C.A., 2013. Influence of water deficit and canopy senescence pattern onHelianthus annuus (L.) root functionality during the grain-filling phase. Field Crops Research. 154, 1–11.
Maazou, A. S., Tu, J., Qiu, J., Liu. Z., 2016. Breeding for drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 7, 1858-1870.
Man, D., Bao, Y., Han, L., 2011. Drought tolerance associated with proline and hormone metabolism in two tall fescue cultivars. Hortscience. 46(7), 1027–1032.
Moussa, H.R., Abdel-Aziz, S.M., 2008. Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 1(1), 31-36.
Panigrahy, M., Nageswara Rao, D., Sarla,N ., 2009. Molecular mechanisms in response to phosphate starvation in rice. Biotechnology Advances.2 7, 389–397.
Reddappa Reddy, M., 2006. Effect of calcium, sulphur and boron on the yield andcomposition of corn (Zea Mays L.) under water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 54, 205–209.
Robinson, J., Nithya, K., Ramya, R., Karthikbalan, B., Kripa, K., 2014. Effect of Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Glomus fasiculatum on the growth and Physiological response in Sesamum indicum L. International Letters of Natural Sciences. 23, 47-62.
Rodriguez, H., Fraga, R., Gonzalez, T., Bashan, Y., 2006. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential application for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant and Soil. 287, 15–21.
Sani, B. M., Oluwasemire, K.O., Mohammed, H. I., 2008. Effect of irrigation and plant density on the growth, yield and water use efficiency of early maize in the Nigerian savanna. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 3, 33-40.
Santrucek, J., Vrablova, M., Simkova, M., Hronkova, M., Drtinova, M., Kveton, J., Vrabl, D., Kubasek, J., Mackova, J., Wiesnerova, D., Neuwithova, J., Schreiber, L. 2014. Stomatal and pavement cell density linked to leaf internal CO2 concentration. Annals of Botany. 114, 191–202.
Sivagurunathan, P., Sathiyamoorthy, M., Sivasubramani, K., 2014. Effect of mycorrhizal fungi on growth of Zea mays L. Plants. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences. 1(1), 137-148.
Wu, Q. S., 2011. Mycorrhizal efficacy of trifoliate orange seedlings on alleviating temperature stress. Plant, Soil and Environment. 57 (10), 459–464.
Yadav, A., Aggarwal. A., 2015. The associative effect of arbuscular mycorrhizae with Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens in promoting growth, nutrient uptake and yield of Arachis hypogaea L. New York Science Journal. 8(1), 101-108.
Han, Y., Fan, S., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., 2013. Effect of heat stress on the MDA, proline and soluble sugar content in leaf lettuce seedlings. Agricultural Sciences. 4, 112-115.