Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master Student, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, South Khorasan, Iran.

2 Faculty member, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, South khorasan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) is the most important medicinal plant in Iran that main part of its production costs spends on combat weeds. Given the difference among different species in water use patterns and techniques for moisture stress resistance, it may be feasible to manage weeds by irrigation practices (Zand et al., 2010). In an in-depth review of literature on the competition between weeds and crops for water, Patterson (1995) concluded that lower soil moisture sometimes benefits crops by weakening weeds’ competitiveness. It seems that cumin is of those crops that have a competitive advantage in arid climates. The growth of cumin so extensively accompanied with dryness that most farmers know it as a rain-fed crop (Kafi et al., 2002). Research on weeds of cumin farms in Southern Khorasan Province shows that false barley (Hordeum murinum L.) is the most prevailing narrow-leaf weed in the region (Amininasab, 2014). Seemingly, the competition between cumin and weeds has not been studied comprehensively. Therefore, it appeared necessary to carry out a study to assess the effect of drought stress on the competition between false barley and cumin.
 
Materials and Methods
The study was carried out in the experimental greenhouse of Faculty of Agriculture in Birjand in February-March 2015 on the basis of a Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. The studied factors including the density of false barley at four levels (0, 1, 3, and 5 plants per pot equivalent to 0, 26, 79, and 131 plants per m2) and soil moisture relative to field capacity (FC) at three levels of normal conditions (soil moisture = FC), moderate stress (soil moisture = 60% FC) and severe stress (soil moisture = 30% FC). Cumin density was five plants per pot (131 plants per m2) in all treatments. Plastic pots were used in the present study with capacity to hold 6 kg soil, mouth diameter of 22 cm, and depth of 21.5 cm. According to field capacity determined in the laboratory, the water required for 100%, 60% and 30% FC was 750, 450 and 225 cc, respectively. To keep the pre-determined moisture levels, all pots were weighed every day and the required water was added. The recorded growth and yield measures of cumin included the changes in height, leaf number, individual plant yield, total biomass, and seed number. Data were analyzed by DSAASTAT macro ver. 1.022 in MS-Excel Software Package. Also, means were compared by FLSD test at the 5% significance level, and the graphs were drawn by MS-Excel Software Package.
 
Results and discussion
It was found that drought stress significantly affected the loss of some growth and yield measures of cumin including plant height, leaf number, total biomass, root length, and individual plant yield at the 1% level, whilst the effect of weed density and the interaction between weed density and drought stress was significant for total biomass, leaf number, and plant yield at the 1% level and for plant height at the 5% level. They were not significant for root length. According to the results, adequate soil moisture increased inter-species competition of false barley, and weed density had higher negative impact on cumin yield. In these conditions, weeds occupied whole pot space at the density of three plants per pot, whilst cumin yield showed more stability at different weed densities under drought stress of 30% FC. It can be said that when soil moisture was not limited, false barley exploited the favorable conditions better than cumin and reduced its growth by limiting the space and using nutrients and water. In total, it was revealed that the highest cumin yield was obtained from adequate moisture and no-weed conditions. Also, under the lack of soil moisture limitations, false barley at the density of three plants per pot (79 plants per m2) incurred the greatest damage to cumin. So, it seems necessary to irrigate cumin farms adequately and to remove false barleys, especially under adequate soil moisture. In addition, the full removal of false barleys after cumin harvest will be a suitable managerial approach.

Keywords

Amininasab, M., 2014. Distribution map of weeds by using geographical information system (GIS) and determining population indexes at cotton and cumin fields of southern Khorasan. MSc dissertation. Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Birjand. Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bazoobandi, M., Sadrabadi Haghighi, M., BeheshtianMesgaran, M., 2006. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems. (Translation). First Edition. Islamic Azad University of Mashhad. 424p. [In Persian].
Chanbdracar, B.L., Sechar, N., Tuteja, S.S., Tripathi, R.S., 1994. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth and yield of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum). Indian. Journal of Agronomy. 39, 701-702.
Chauhan, B.S., Johnson, D.E., 2010. Growth and reproduction of Junglerice (Echinochloa colona) in response to water stress. Weed Science. 58, 132–135.
Duncan, W.G., 1980. Physiology of maize. In Evans (ed), Crop Physiology. Cambridge.
Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., Clark, R.B., 2006. Physiology of crop production. Food Products Press. Binghamton, NY. 345p.
GolestaniFar, F., 2013. Investigation of competition between wheat (Triticum aesativum L.) and ray (Secale cereal L.) under drought stress conditions. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture. University of Birjand. Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kafi, M., Rashed Mohassel, M. H., Kochaki, A., Mollafilabi, A., 2002. Cumin Production and Processing. First Edition.University of Mashhad Publication.195p. [In Persian].
Kafi, M., Zand, A., Kamkar, B., Mahdavidamghani, A., Abbasi. F., 2010. Plant Physiology (Translation). Second Edition. Publication of Jahad Daneshgahi of Mashhad. 568p. [In Persian].
Kafi, M., Borzoee, A., Kamandi, A., Masoumi, A., Nabati, J., 2014. Physology of Environmental Stresses in Plants. Third Edition. Publication of Jahad Daneshgahi of Mashhad. 502p. [In Persian].
Lecoeur J., and Sinclair T.R. 1996. Field pea transpiration and leaf growth in response to soil water deficits. Crop Science, 36: 331-335.
Leport, L., Turner, N.C., Davies, S.L., Siddique, K.H.M., 2006. Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. European Journal of Agronomy. 24, 236-246.
Li, F., Bao, W., Wu, N., You, Ch., 2008. Growth, biomass partitioning, and water-use efficiency of a leguminous shrub (Bauhinia faberi var. microphylla) in response to various water availabilities. New Forests. 36: 53–65.
Pajoohan, R., Eslami, S.V., Mahmoodi, S., Jamial-ahmadi, M., 2013. Response of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) seedling growth to drought stress. 5th Iranian Weed Science Congress. College of Agriculture University of Tehran. Karaj. Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Patterson, D.T., 1995. Effect of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Science. 43, 483-490.
Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Najafi, H., Akbarzadeh, M.D., 2009. Weed Biology and Control. Second Edition. University of Mashhad Publication.404p. [In Persian].
Rostamza, M., 2004. Productivity and forage quality of pearl millet (Pennesitum americanum) as affected by soil water deficit and nitrogen fertilization at different vegetative growth stages. PhD thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary]
Sadeghi, B., 1991. Effect of irrigation and Nitrogen rates on cumin production. Iran industrial and science research organization. Khorasan institute.
Sarangi, D., Irmak, S., Lindquist, J. L., Knezevic, S. Z. & Jhala, A. J., 2015. Effect of Water Stress on the Growth and Fecundity of Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Science. 64, 42-52.
Singh, S.P., 1997. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crop Research. 53, 161-170.
Zabet, M., Hosein Zade, A.H., Ahmadi, A., Khialparast, F., 2003. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in mung bean (Vigna radiata). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 34(4), 889-899. [In Persian with English Summary]
Zand, A., Rahimiyan Mashhadi, H., Kochaki, A., Khalghani, J., Mousavi, K., Ramazani, K., 2010. Weed ecology management applications. (Translation).SID publications. Mashhad. P. 559