Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Horticultural Crops Sciences of Department Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol. Iran.

2 Expert., Soil and Water Research department, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol. Iran.

3 Assistant Prof.,Plant Protection Research Deparhnent, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol. Iran.

4 Expert., Soil and Water Research Department Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol, Iran.

5 Assistant Prof.,Seed and Plant Improvement Institiut. AREEO, Karaj, Iran

6 Expert., Horticultural crops Research department Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zabol. Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress is an important factors limiting growth and yield in crops that influencing 60% of agricultural lands in world (Shao et al., 2006). Rapeseed is one most important oil seeds in many arid and semi-arid regions, which often yield its limited due to water shortages and high temperatures during reproductive period (Ahmadi and Bahrani, 2009). The water deficiency can influence inversely the grain of canola but this effect depends on the genotype and, development and growth stage the plant adaption to the drought (Azizi et al., 1999). Increase percentage of seed and Silique abortion due to the reduction in provides photosynthetic products in the last season stress has been reported important reson reduction yield in rapeseed (Fanaei et al., 2013). Ahmadi and Bahrani (2009) reported that highest plant height, Siliques per plant, grain yield and oil yield were obtained in the full irrigation treatments, and the flowering was the most sensitive stage. Majidi, (2012) reported there is a significant variation in the tolerance to drought stress among cultivars and hybrids canola.  This experiment was conducted with the aim of determining most suitable time for the last irrigation for to minimize reduction grain and oil yield in canola cultivars.
Materials and Methods
In order to evaluate grain yield, oil and some agronomic traits of canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars in final irrigation times an experiment as split-plot was conducted based on randomized complete blocks design with 3 replications in Zahak research station during three cropping seasons (2008, 2009 and 2010). Time of irrigation were at six levels: (I1=Last irrigation 5 days after end of flowering), I2= Last irrigation at 20 percent remained flowers in plants, I3= Last irrigation in start of color changing in siliqes of origin stem. I4= Last irrigation at 50 percent of Siliqueding.  T5= Last irrigation at 10 percent of color that changed in siliqes of origin stem.  I6= Last irrigation in flowering, these treatments were assigned as main plots and rapeseed cultivars at three levels including; (V1= Hyola 401 V2=RGS003 and V3=Sarigol) were assigned as sub-plots. Fertilizers were applied at ratio of 150 kg/ha super-phosphate triple, 200 kg/ha sulphate dipotash, respectively prior to sowing, along 180 kg/ha pure N based on Urea at ratio 40,30 and 30 percent prior to sowing, rosset and flowering start stages respectively. All other agricultural practices were performed when they were required. A random sample of five plants was selected from each plot in physiological ripening to estimate the different parameters. Data were analyzed by using MSTAT-C statistical package. Duncan Multiple Range Test was used to do mean comparisons
Results & Discussion
The effect Time of irrigation and cultivar were showed significant different on grain yield, components yield. Highest number of Siliques per plant and seed in Silique were produced in I1 (control) and I3 treatments with a mean 167 and 160 Siliques in plant and 22 and 21 seed in Silique respectively and lowest achieved in I6 treatment, with mean of 123 Siliques in plant and 18 seed in Silique.  It seems that water deficiet in during reproductive phase causing Silique decreases by increasing the flower and Silique abortion. Many researchers have reported that flowering and Silique development stages have a high sensitivity to drought stress (Ahmadi and Bahrani, 2009؛ Fanaei et al., 2013). The highest number of seeds per silique, seed in Silique and 1000 seed wieght belonged to Hyola 401 and RGS003. Among levels of irrigation time, the highest 1000 seed weight was observed in treatments I3 (3.6 g), I1 (3.5 g), I4 (3.48 g) and lowest 1000 seed weight with mean 2.97 g in I6 treatment. The highest grain yield was applied to I1 treatment, and I3 treatment, the highest grain yield was applied in I1, and I3 treatments respectively with mean of 3340 and 3132 kg/ha. In these treatments, enough provide of water during growth different stages due to positive effect on yield components caused improved seed yield of canola. It has been determined that the flowering and Silique development stages have a high sensitivity to drought stress and stress in these stages will caused to more reduction in grain yield (Ahmadi and Bahrani, 2009؛ Fanaei et al., 2013؛ Sinaki et al., 2007؛). Hybrid Hyoli 401 and RGS 003 had the highest grain yield with 3169 and 3029 kg ha-1.
Conclusion

Based on the result, it can be concluded terminal irrigation for high grain and oil yield could be conducted 5 days after end of flowering or in start of color changing in siliques of origin stem in both Hyola401 cultivar and RGS003 in Sistan and similar regions.

Keywords

Ahmadi, M., Bahrani, M.J., 2009. Yield and yield components of rapeseed as influenced by water stress at different growth stages and nitrogen levels. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultuer and Environment Science. 5(6), 755-761.
Ahmadi, M. R., Javidfar, F. 2000. Screening and Breeding Techniques for Drought Resistance in Oleiferous Brassicae. Agricultural education Publication. 10p. [In Persian].
Albarrak, Kh.M., 2006. Irrigation Interval and nitrogen level effects on growth and yield of Canola (Brassica napus L.). Science Journal of King Faisal University. 7, 87-99.
Alizadeh, A., 2004. Water, soil and plant relationship. Ferdowsi University Publication, Mashhad, Iran, (6th ed). [In Persian].
Angadi, S.V., Cutforth, H.W., Mc Conkey, B. G., Gan, Y., 2003. Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Science. 43, 1358-1366.
Asgari, A., Moradi Dalini, A., 2007. Evaluation of yield, yield components and vegetative characters of oilseed rape cultivars in different planting dates in Haji Abad, Hormozgan. Plant and Seed Journal. 23(3), 419–430 [In Persian].
Azizi, M., Soltani, A., Khavari Khorsani, S., 1999. Brassica Oilseeds: Production and utilization. Jehad Daneshgahi Mashhad Press. 230 p. [In Persian].
Bray, E.A., Bailey, J., Weretilnyk, E., 2000. Responses to abiotic stresses, In: Buchanan, B., Gruissem,W., Jones, R. (eds.), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. American Society of Plant Physiology. 1158-1203.
Champolivier, L., Merrien, A., 1996. Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. on yield, yield Components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy. 5, 153 –160.
Daneshmand, A.R., Shirani Rad, A.H., Nour Mohammadi, G., Zareei, G.H., Daneshian, J., 2008. Effect of water deficit and different nitrogen rates on yield, yield components and physiological traits of two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources. 15(2), 99–112 [In Persian with English Summary].
Darjani, A., Shirani Rad, A.H., Gholipour, S., Haghighat, A., 2013. Investigation the effects of water stress on yield and yield components of canola winter varieties. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4 (3), 370-374.
Hosseini, S.M., Hassibi, P., 2011. Effects of Water Deficit Stress on Several Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 3(3):120-125
Faraji, A., 2005. Study of yield agronomic characters and traits correlation of eighteen spring canola cultivars in Gonbad Area. Seed and Plant. 21, 385-398 [In Persian with English Summary].
Faraji, A., Latifi, N., Soltani, A., Shirani Rad, A. H., 2009. Seed yield and water use efficiency of canola (Brassica napus L.) as affected by high temperature stress and supplemental irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 96, 132-140.
Faraji, A. 2009. Evaluation of drought and heat tolerance in two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Seed and Plant. 2(25), 169 - 181 [In Persian with English Summary].
Fanaei, H. R., Galavi, M., Kafi, M., Ghanbari Bonjar, A., Shirani-rad, A.H., 2009. Effect of potassium fertilizer and irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of Canola and Indian mustard species. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 11, 273-291 [In Persian with English Summary].
Fanaei, H.R., GHanbari, A., Akbarimoghadam, H., Galavi, M., Naruoyrad, M.R., 2008. Assessment of the yield components and some agronomic traits of rapeseed spring genotypes in Sistan region. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi. 79, 6-44. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fanaei, H. R., Galavi, M., Kafi, M., Shirani-rad, A.H., 2013. Interaction of water deficit stress and potassium application on potassium, calcium, magnesium Concentration and Oil of Two Species of Canola (Brassica napus L.) and Mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Knowlage. 23(3), 261-275. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fanaei, H.R., Akbarimoghaddam, H., Narouyirad, M.R., 2012. Evaluation response of different genotypes of spring canola to water deficit. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 3 (11), 2327-2332.
Fieldsend, J.K., Murray, F.E., Bilsborrow, P.E., Milford, G.F.J., Evans, E.J., 1991. Glucosinolate accumulation during seed development in winter-sown oilseed rape (B. napus). In: McGregor, D.I. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Rapeseed Congress, Saskatoon, Canada. Organizing Committee, Saskatoon. Pp. 686-694.
Grewal, H.S., 2010. Water uptake, water use efficiency, plant growth and ionic balance of wheat, barley, canola and chickpea plants on asodic vertosol with variable subsoil NaCl salinity. Agricultural Water Management. 97, 148-156.
Jensen, C.R., Mogensen, V.O., Mortensen, G., Fieldsend, J.K., Milford, G.F.J., Andersen, M.N., Thage, J.H., 1996. Seed glucosinolate oil and protein contents of field grown rape (B. napus L.) affected by soil drying and evaporative demand. Field Crops Research. 47, 93- 105.
Karkanis, A., Bilalis, D., Efthimiadou, A., 2011. Architectural plasticity, photosynthesis and growth responses of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) plants to water stress in a semi-arid environment. Australian Journal Crop Science. 5, 369-374.
Krogman, K.K., Hobbs, E.H., 1975. Yield and morphological response of rape (Brassica campestris L., Cv. Span) to irrigation and fertilizer treatments. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 55, 903-909.
Majidi, M. 2012. Identification of canola cultivars for drought tolerance in germination and seedling growth stages using principal component analysis. Journal Crop Production and Processing. 4, 41-52. [In Persian with English Summary].
 Mahajan, S., Tuteja, N., 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses. Archives of Biochemisty and Biophysics. 444, 139.158.
McCartney, C.A., Scarth, R., McVetty, P.B.E., Daun, J.K., 2004. Genotypic and environmental effects on saturated fatty acid concentration of canola grown in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences. 89, 749-756.
 Mendham, N.J., Salisbury, P.A., 1995. Physiology: Crop development, growth & yield. In: Kimber, D., Mc Gregor, D. I. (eds.). Brassica oil seeds. CAB International. London. Pp: 11-67.
Mirzaei, A., Naseri, R., Moghadam, A., Esmailpour-Jahromi, M., 2013. The Effects of Drought Stress on Seed yield and Some Agronomic Traits of Canola cultivars at Different Growth stages. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2 (11),115-121.
Pasban Eslam, B., 2009. Evaluation of physiological indices, yield and its components as screening technique for water deficit tolerance in oilseed rape cultivars. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology. 11, 413-422. [In Persian with English Summary].
Pasban Eslam, B., Shakiba, M. R., Neyshabouri, M. R., Moghaddam, M., Ahmadi, M. R. 2000. Evaluation of physiological indices as screening technique for drought resistance in oilseed rape. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences. 37, 143-152.
Rao, M.S.S., Mendham, N.J., 1991. Soil-plant-water relations of oilseed rape (Brassica napus and B. campestris). Cambridge Journal of Agricultur Science. 117, 197-205.
Shao, H., Liang, Z., Shao, M. 2006. Osmotic regulation of 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at soil water deficits. Colloids and Surfaces B: Bio interfaces. 47, 132–139.
Shirani Rad, A.H., Zandi, M., 2012. The effect of drought stress on qualitative and quantitative traits of spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Žemdirbystė=Agriculture. 99(1), 47–54
Shirani Rad, A. H., Naeemi, M., Nasr Esfahani, Sh., 2010. Evaluation of terminal drought stress tolerance in spring and winter rapeseed genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12 (2), 112-126 [In Persian with English Summary].
Sinaki, J., Majidi Heravan, M. E., Shirani Rad, A. H., Noormohammadi, Gh., Zarei, Gh., 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). American Eurasian Journal Agricultural and Environment Science. 2, 417- 422.