Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Student, Department of Crop Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, and MSc. of University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

2 Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran.

3 Associated Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran

4 Associated Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran

5 Assistant Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress is one of the most important factors limiting crop productivity, and reduce crop production more than 50% in the world (Lata et al., 2011). Development of drought-resistant plants can be a useful strategy for avoiding drought induced damages to the crops. Using C4 plants such as foxtail millet is a suitable alternative (Vitkauskaite and Venskaityte, 2011). These plants are known to be resistance to water shortage. Drought stress effect on physiological traits such as Osmotic adjustment, chlorophyll pigmant and morphological trait such as plant height and ear length (Mohammadkhani and Heidari, 2008). Understanding the physiological and morphological basis of drought tolerance and its relation with yield in this plant would possibly contribute greatly to the understanding and planting development of drought resistant plants species. In this regard howeverlittle information is available on millet. So the aim of this study was to evaluate the physiological and morphological traits under drought stress in millet.
 
Material and methods
This study was carried out in Research field of Birjand University in 2014. A split-plot arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block design with four replications was used. The main factor was drought stress with three levels including 100, 75 and 50 percent of plant water requirement (non-stress control, moderate stress and severe stress respectively) and the sub-factor was millet cultivar with three levels (including Bastan, KFM5 and KFM20).. Osmolyte regulated and photosynthesis pigments was measured 30and 45 days after drought stress (Schlegel, 1956; Bates et al., 1973; Sairam and Saxena, 2000). Seed yield and its component and morphological traits were measured after plant maturity. Software SAS software (ver 9.1 windows edition) was used for statistical analysis and means were compared using tukey test.
 
Results and discussion
Results showed that drought stress at different growth stages increased proline content and soluble Carbohydrates and reduced photosynthesis pigment and carotenoid content compared to control treatment. Drought stress also reduced plant height, internode length, ear length, number of ears per square meter, number of grains per ear, seed weight and seed yield compared to control treatment but had no effect on the number of nodes per plant. Highest and lowest seed yield was observed in control treatment(461.88 g.m-2) and severe stress (171.08 g.m-2) respectively. Reduced height possibly resulted in reduced yield by affecting radiation use efficiency. According these results plant height, ear length, seed number in ear a,d 1000 seed weight have direct effects on seed yield in Foxtail Millet so that their enhancement would result in seed weight improvement.
 
Conclusions
 According to results a reduction in height, osmolyte compatible and carotenoids are Compatibility and drought resistance mechanisms.

Keywords

Abbad, H., Jafari, E.L., Bort, S.A., Araus, J.L., 2004. Comparative relationship of the flag leaf and the ear photosynthesis with the biomass and grain yield of durum wheat under a range of water conditions and different genotypes. Agronomy. 24, 19-28.
Ajithkumarand, P., Panneerselvam, R., 2013. Osmolyte accumulation, photosynthetic pigment and growth of setaria italica under droght stress. Asian Pacific Journal. 2, 220-224.
Alizadeh, O., Majidi, I., Nadian, H., Nour-Mohammadi, G., Amerian, M., 2007. Effect of water stress and nitrogen rate of yield and component of Maize. Journal of Agriculture Science Islamic Azad University. 13, 427-434. [In Persian with English summary].
Andualem, W., Tadesse, D., 2011. Correlation and path coefficient analyses of some yield related traits in finger millet  germplasms in northwest Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(22), 5099-5105
Anjum, F., Yaseen, M., Rasul, E., Wahid, A., Anjum, S., 2003. Water stress in barley, effect on chemical composition ond chlorophyll content. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science. 40, 45-49
Akram, M., 2011.Growth and yield component of wheat under water stress of different growth stages. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture Resource. 36, 455-468.
Ashraf, M., 2007. Role of glysine betain and protein in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 59, 206-216
Bukhat, N.M., 2005. Studies in yield and yield associated traits of wheat genotype under drought conditions. M.Sc Thesis department Agronomy. Sindth Agriculture University, Tandojam. Pakistan
Bates, L.S., Waldron, R.P., Teare, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-208.
Boyer, JS., 1988. Cell enlargement and growth induced water potential. Physiologia Plantarum. 73(2), 311-316
Channappagoudar, B.B., Hiremath, S.M., Biradar, N.R., Koti, R.V., Bharamagoudar, T.D., 2008. Physiological basic of yield variation in foxtail millet. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science. 20, 481-486.
Choi, WY, Kang, SY, Park, HM, Kim, SS, Lee, KS, Shin, HT., 2000. Effect of water stress by PEG on growth and physiological traits in rice seedling. Korean Journal of Crop Science. 45, 112-117.
Choudhary, NL., 2005. Expression of deltal-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gen during drought in rice. India Biochemistry and Biophysics. 42, 366-370.
Davoodi, N., Seghateslami, M.J., moosavi, S.GH., Azari Nasrabad, A., 2013. The effect of foliarapplication of nano-zinc oxide on yileld and water use efficiency in Foxtall Millet in drought stress conditions. Environmetaln Stresses in Crop Sciences. 6, 37-46. [In Persian with English summary].
Dencic, S., Kastori, R., Kobilgsky, B, Duggan, B., 2000. Evaluation of grain yield and its component in wheat cultivar and land races under near optimal and drought conditions. Euphytica. 113(1), 43-52
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., Basra, S.A.M., 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy and Sustainable Development. 29, 185-212.
Fang, Z., Boukamp, J.C., Solomos, T., 1998. Chlorophyll activities and chlorophyll degradation durinf leaf senescence in on yellowing mutant and wild type of Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Experimental Botany. 49, 503-510
Gupta, N.K., Gupta S., Kumar, A., 2001. Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield in wheat cultivar at different growth stages. Journal of Agronomy. 86, 1437-1439
Heidari zooleh, H., Jahansooz, M.R., Yunusa, I., Hosseini, S.M.B., Chaichi, M.R., Jafari, A.A., 2011. Effect of alternate irrigation on root-divided Foxtail Millet. Australian Journal of Science. 5, 205-213.
Hui-Ping, D., Chan-juan, Sh., An-Zhi, W., Tuxi, Y., 2012. Leaf senescence and photosynthesis in foxtail (Setaria italica L.) varieties exposed to drought conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6(2), 232-237.
Jaleel, C., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq, M., Somasundaram, R., 2009. Drought stress in plant: A review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 11, 100-105
Kafi, M., Borzoee, A., Salehi, M., Kamandi, A., Masoumi, A., Nabati, J., 2010. Physiology of Environmental Stresses in Plants. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad publication. 502p.[In Persian].
Kariola, T., Brader, G., Li, J., Palva, E.T., 2005. A damage control enzyme, effects the balance between defense pathway in plant. The Plant Cell. 17, 282-294.
Khazanedari, L., Zabol Abbasi, F., Ghandhari, Sh., Kouhi, M., Malbousi, Sh., 2009. Drouhjt prediction in Iran next 30 years. EMS Annual Meeting Abstract,Vol 6.
Keshavars, L., Farahbakhsh, H., Golkar, P., 2012. Effects of drought stress and absorbent polymer on morph-physiological traits of Pear Millet. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Science. 3, 148-154.
Keshavars, L., Farahbakhsh, H., Golkar, P., 2013. Effects of different irrigation and superabsorbent levels on physio-morphological traits and forage yield of Millet. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science. 13, 1012-1018.
Khazaei, H,R., Mohammad abadi, A,A., Borzooei, A., 2002. The effect of drought stress on morphological and physiological characteristics of millets. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research. 3(1), 35-44. [In Persian with English summary].
Lata, C., Sarita, J.H., Prasad, M., Sreenivasulu, N., 2011. Differential antioxidative responses to dehydration-induced oxidative stress in core set of foxtail millet cultivars. Protoplasma. 248, 817-828
Liu, H.P., Dong, B.H., Zhang, Y.Y., Liu, Z.P., and Liu, Y.L., 2004. Relationship between
 osmotic stress and the levels of free, conjugated and bound polyamines in leaves of wheat seedlings. Plant Science, 166, 1261-1267.
Lovisolo, C., Schuber, NK., 1998. Effect of water stress on vessel size xylem hydrolic conductivity in vicia. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1998, 693-700
Mahalakshmi, V., Bidinger, F.R., 1985. Flowering response of pearl millet to water stress during panicle development. Annals of Applied Biology. 106, 571-578
Maqsood, M., Azam Ali, S.M., 2007. Effect of environment stress on growth radiation use effiviency and yield of finger millet. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 39, 463-474.
Mark, T., Antony, B., 2005. Abiotics stress tolerance in grasses from model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiology. 137, 791-793.
Mattews, K.B., Reddy, D.M., Ranj., Peacock, J.K., 1990. Response of four Sorghum lines to mid-season drought. I. Growth, water use and yield. Field Crop Research. 25, 279-296.
Mohamad khani, N., Heidari, R., 2008. Drought-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and prolin in two maize varieties. World Applied Sciences Journal. 3, 448-453.
Mohammadi, R., Haghparast, R., 2011. Evaluation of rainfed promising wheat breeding lines on farmers field in west of Iran. International Journal of Plant Breeding. 5, 30-36
Moosavi, Gh., Mirhadi, M., Saadat, A., 2011. Effect of deficit-irrigation and nitrogen levels on yield and water use efficiency of sorghum and pearl millet (Pennisetum). Journal of Modern Science. 5, 101-114.
Nageswara, R.R.C., Talwar, H.S., Wright, G.C., 2001. Rapid assessment of specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using chlorophyll meter. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186(3), 175-182.
Nakhaei, A., Arazmjo,E., Abbasi, M.R., 2011. Determination of terminal drought tolerant accessions in millet by drought tolerance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences.5, 115-124. [In Persian with English summary].
Osborn, C.P., Frekleton, R.P., 2009. Ecological selection pressures for C4 photosynthesis in the grasses. Proceedings of Royal Society Botany. 276, 1753-1760.
Panneerselvam, M., 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 11, 100-105.
Razmjoo, K., Heidarizadeh, P., Sabzalian, M.R., 2008. Effect of salinity and drought stresses on growth parameter and essential oil content of Matricaria chamomile. Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 10, 451-454.
Reddy, A. R., Ramachandra, R. K., Chaitanya, V., Vivekanandan, M., 2004. Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 161, 1189-1202.
Sairam,R.K., Saxena, D.C., 2000. Oxidative stress and antioxidant in wheat genotypes: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184, 55-61.
Santhakamar, G., 1999. Correlation and path analysis in Foxtail Millet. Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture University. 24.
Schlegel, H.G., 1956. Die Verwertung organischer sauren durch chlorella in lincht. Plant. 47, 510-515.
Seghatoleslami, M.J., Kafi, M., Majidi, E., 2008. Effect of deficit irrigation of yield, WUE and some morphological and physiological traits of three millet species. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 40, 1555-1560.
Shooshi Dezfooli, A., Mehrani, A., 2011. Investigation of correlation between yield and component yield in Foxtail Millet species. Journal of Agronomy Science.41, 413-421. [In Persian with English summary].
Siles, M.M., Ken Russell, W., David, D., Lenis, A., 2004. Heterosis for grain yield and other agronomic traits in Foxtail Millet. Crop Science. 44, 1960-1965.
Singh, Kp., 2001. Effect of water stress and seed germnation and seedling growth of some wheat genotype. Jrusted Journal of Millennium Acta Plant Science. 14, 23-26
Tatar, O., Gevrek, MN., 2008. Influence of water stress on proline accumulation, lipid peroxidation and water content of wheat. Asian Journal Plant Science. 7, 409-412
Trovato, M., Mattioli, R., Costantino, P., 2008. Multiple role of prolin in plant stress tolerance and development. Rendiconti Licei 19, 325-346.
Tuinstra, M.R., Grote, E.M., Goldsbrough, P.B., Ejeta, G., 1997. Genetic analysis of postflowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor  Moench. Molecular Breeding. 3, 439–448.
Van osterom, E.J., Hammer, G.L., 2008.Determination of grain number in sorghum. Field Crop Research, 108, 259-268.
Vitkauskaite, G., Venskaityte, L., 2011. Differences between C3 (Hordeum vulgare L.) and C4 (Panicum miliaceum L.) plants with respect to their resistance to water deficit. Agriculture. 98(4), 349-356.
Wright, G.C., Nageswara, R.C., Farquhar, G.D., 1994. Water use efficiency and carbon isotop discrimination in peanut under water deficit conditions. Crop Science, 34, 92-97.
Xoconstle-Cazares, B., Ramirez-Ortega, F.A., Flores-Lenes, L. and Ruiz-Medrano, R., 2010. Drought tolerance in crop plants. American Journal of Plant Physiology, 5, 214–256.
Zhang, J., Kirkham, M.B., 1995. water relations of water stressed, split-root C4 (Sorghum binocolor) and C3 (Helianthus annus) plants. American Journal of Botany. 82, 1220-1229.