Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most important cereal used as staple food in Iran. Despite higher yield wheat potential in Iran, average grain yield of wheat in Iran is much less than most of the wheat growing countries of the world (FAO., 2013). Nowadays increase of population and need for food and limitation of water for food and limitation of water resources have, increase yield in the volum e of water have a crucial inpact. Limitation of water resources in order to increasing tolerant Cultivars to severe conditions with high water use productivity. Earlier research showed that irrigation consistently increased wheat yield (Rahim et al., 2007). Wajid et al. (2002) reported that wheat yield by applying irrigation at all definable growth stages. Jamal et al. (1996) concluded that grain yield of different wheat cultivars were significantly reduced by water stress at all critical growth stages and greatest reduction was at anthesis stage. The present study was therefore undertaken to examine the yield response of wheat cultivars to different water irrigation in Ramin climate conditions.
 
Materials and methods
In order to a field study pertaining to the effect of irrigation intervals on yield and yield components of wheat cultivars was conducted during 2011-2012 growing season at Agronomic Research Field of Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan. Khouzestan Province is south-western Iran, its covers and area 63633/6 km2 between lattitudes 29o-33o N and longitudes 47o 40`- 50o 33` E. The climate of the province is affected by weather systems from the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf so that the weather is typically that of a semi-arid/temperate climate. The experiment was laid out using RCBD with split plot arrangement. Treatment were three cultivars wheat (Chamran, Aflak and Verinak) which were kept in main plot and five irrigation intervals I1 (irrigation after two leaf stage), I2 (irrigation after two leaf stage + tillering stage), I3 (irrigation after two leaf stage + Tillering stage + booting stage), I4 (irrigation after two leaf stage + Tillering stage + booting stage + anthesis stage) and I5 (irrigation after two leaf stage + Tillering stage + bootingstage + anthesisstage + milking stage) that were placed in sub plots. Experiment was replicated thrice having plot size of 1.5m × 6m with six rows per plot. Half does of nitrogen and full does of phosphorus was applied during seed bed preparation while remaining half does of nitrogen was applied with first irrigation post emergency. Data on plant height, number of fertile tillers, number of spikelets per spike, number of fertile tillers, number of spikelets per spike, number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were recorded by using standard procedures. Data were analyzed statistically by using SAS analysis of variance technique and treatment means were compared by using least significant difference (LSD( test at 5% probability level (Steel and Torrie., 1984).
 
Results and discussion
Chamran cultivar recorded highest grain yield (4822.5 kg ha-1), number of tillers (335m-2) and harvest index (45/33) which were significantly higher than the other two cultivars. Highest grain yield in Chamran cultivar might be due to the increase in number of tillers m-2 (Sharif et al., 1999) and with higher 1000-grain weight (Wajid et al., 2002). Howover minimum plant height (73cm) and number of spikelets spike-1 (17) recorded at Chamran cultivar. Wheat crop supplied with five irrigations at irrigation after two leaf + Tillering + booting + anthesis + milking recorded the highest grain yield (5670.4 kg ha-1) which was significantly higher than all the other intervals irrigation. Interaction between cultivars and irrigation levels was significant for grain yield. At I5, cultivars Chamran and Aflak increased yields (52.68% and 57.07%) over I1 which were statistically at par with each other.
 
Conclusions
Finally, the results revealed that soil moisture stress causes low grain yield, by inducing low 1000-grain weight, number of tillers m-2. Thus, wheat, a staple food, appears to be suffering yield losses due to deficiency of irrigation water at any critical stage. Therefore, wheat grower must be careful about water stress on critical stage which can cause tremendous yield losses. It is also clear that there is a considerable span to exploit the yield potential of wheat cultivars in irrigation area of Iran.

Keywords

Ahmadi, A., Semardeh, A., Zali, A.A., 2004. A comparison between the capacity of photo assimilate storage and remobilization and their contribution on yield in four wheat cultivars under different moisture regimes. Iranian.Journal Agriculture Science. 35, 921-931.[In Persian with English Summary].
Asadi, H., 1999. Determination of susceptibility coefficient of wheat to water stress in different stages ofvegetative growth in Karaj area, M.Sc. Thesis of Pedology, Agricultural Department, Tehran University. [In Persian with English Summary].
Azizinya, SH., Ghannadha, M.R., Zali, A., Yazdi-Samadi, B., Ahmadi, A., 2005. An evaluation of quantitative traits related to drought resistance in synthetic wheat genotype stress and non-stress conditions. Iranian Journal Agriculture Science. 36, 281-293. [In Persian with English Summary].
Dencic, S., Kastori, R., Kobiljski, B., Duggan, B., 2000.Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and land races under near optimal and drought conditions.Euphytica. 113, 43-54.
Emam, Y., Ranjbari, A., Bohrani, M.J., 2007. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat genotypes under drought stress condition after anthesis. Journal Agriculture Natural Resource Science Technology. 11, 317-327. [In Persian with English Summary].
Entz, M.H., Flower, D.B., 1990. Differential agronomic responses of winter wheat cultivars to post-anthesis environment stress. Crop Sci. 30, 1119-1123.
FAO., 2013. Annual Report, http:// www.fao.org
Giunata, F., R. Motzo and M. Deidd., 1993.Effect of drought on yield end yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment.Field crop Research. 33, 399-409.
Government of Pakistan. 2009. Pakistan Statistical Year Book-2009. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Government of Pakistan.136 pp.
Hoshiar, R., Miri, H.R., Tadayon, M.S., 2011. Effect of remove irrigation in end growth stages on yield and yield components of wheat. Plant Eco-Physiology. 3, 1-15.[In Persian with English Summary].
Hussain, F., Khan, A., Jamal, M., 1987. Response of wheat cultivars to water stress. Sarhad Journal Agriculture. 3, 533-542.
Hussani, A., Maqsood, M., Ahmad, A., Wajid, A., Ahmad, Z., 1997.Effect of irrigation during various development stages on yield, components of yield and harvest index of different wheat cultivars.Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 34, 104-107.
Jahfari, H.A., 2004. Modeling the Growth, Radiation use efficiency and yield of new wheat cultivars under varying nitrogen rats. Agriculture Science Journal. 54, 432-443.
Jamal, M., Nazir, M.S., Shah, S.H., Nazir, A., 1996.Varietal response of wheat to water stress at different growth stages and effect on grain yield, straw yield, harvest index and protein contents in grain.Rachis. 15, 38-45.
McDonald, G.K., Sutton, B.G., Ellison., F.W., 1984.The effect of sowing date, irrigation and cultivar on the growth and yield of wheat in the Namoi River Valley, New South Wales.Irrigation Science. 5, 123-135.
Nourmand, F., Rostami, M.A., Ghannadha, M.R., 2014.A study of morpho-physiological traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), relationship with grain yield under normal and drought stress conditions.Iranian Journal Agricultural Sciences. 32, 785-794. [In Persian with English Summary].
Pannu, R.K., Singh, P., Chaudhary, B.D., Saugwan, V.P., Sharma, H.C., 1996. Ground watervtablelimit, the irrigation requirement of tall and dwarf wheat (Triticumaestivum L). Indian Journal Agronomy. 41(4): 568-572 (Wheat Barley and Triticale Abstracts. 3, 4583.
Rafiq, M., 2004. Effect of different levels of irrigation on growth, water use efficiency and yield of different wheat cultivars.Water Science Journal. 32, 12-25.
Rahim, A., Abbassi, M. Rashid, M., A.M. Ranjha, A.M., 2007. Methods of phosphorus application and irrigation schedule influencing wheat yield. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science. 44, 420-423.
Schillinger, W.F., 2005. Tillage method and sowing rate relations for dry land spring wheat, barley and oat. Crop Science. 45, 2636-2643.
Senobar, A., Dehghani, F., Tabatabaei, S.A., 2010. Effect of irrigation on yield, water use efficiencyand some properties qualitative wheat varieties. Water in Agricuture Journal. 24, 31-40. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sharif, M., 1999. Effect of irrigation at different growth stages on growth and yield performance of wheat cultivars.Agriculture Science Journal. 23, 32-46.
Shehzadi, S., 1999.Effect of different water regimes on growth, yield and anatomy of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Plant and Soil. 29, 1-15.
Slater, P.J., Goode, J.E., 1967. Crop Responses to water at different stages of growth. Common wealth Agricaltureal Bureau. Bookbaran International. Farnham Royal, Buck, England. 246pp.
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., 1984.Principles and Procedures of Statistics.McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc., Singapore.177 pp.
Tavakkoli, A.R., Owise, T.Y., 2002.The role of supplemental irrigation and nitrogen and in producing bread wheat in the high lands of Iran.Agricultural Water Management. 65, 225-236.
Thompson, J.A., Chase, D.L., 1992. Effect of limited irrigation on growth and yield of semi dwarf wheat in Southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 32, 725-730 (Field Crop Absracts. 4721; 1994).
Wajid, A., Hussain, A., Maqsood, M., Ahmad, A., Awais, A., 2002. Influence of sowing data and irrigation levels on growth and grain yield of wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 39, 22-24.
Winkel, A. 1989. Breeding for drought tolerance in cereals.Vortage fur- PflanzenzVehtuny 16, 368-375.