Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Students, University of Birjand, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, University of Birjand, Iran

3 Plant and Environmental Stresses Research Group, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Birjand, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Water Science and Engineering, University of Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Environmental disorders that significantly disturb the growth and yield of plants are considered as stress conditions and cause disturbances in biological. Drought stress is one of these environmental conditions which has been increased as a result of climate change and has been a negative effect on the yield of crops in the world. Every year about 12 million hectares of productive land has become dry and barren due to human activities and climate. More than 6000 varieties of quinoa are cultivated by farmers in the worlds. Quinoa is a plant responds to drought stress through escape, tolerance and avoidance of drought and has an extraordinary capacity for cultivation in dry and low-water soils because of its capabilities such as low inherent need for water, the maintenance of leaf surface and the ability to resume the speed of photosynthesis after drought stress. Titicaca, Redcarina and Giza-1 are three quinoa cultivars. Titicaca and Redcarina, were registered on December 14, 2009 and January 31, 2005, respectively, and are native to Denmark and Netherlands, respectively, and Giza1 is native to Egypt. Increasing yield in water deficit conditions requires the identification of genotypes resistant to drought stress. Different quantitative indicators have been provided to evaluate the reaction of genotypes in environmental conditions and also to determine their tolerance and sensitivity.
Materials and methods
In order to evaluate the indicators of drought stress tolerance of quinoa cultivars, a factorial experiment with four stress levels (100, 75, 50 and 25% of water requirement) and three varieties of quinoa (Titicaca, Giza-1 and Redcarina) were conducted with three replications in two locations (Birjand and Sarbisheh region) and two planting dates, spring (March) and summer (July) in 2018 and 2019. Evaluation of cultivars in terms of drought tolerance was done using stress sensitivity indices, such as tolerance (TOL), mean productivity (MP), stress tolerance index (STI), geometric mean productivity (GMP) and harmonic mean (HM). Decomposition into main components on yield under stress and non-stress conditions and drought stress tolerance indices were displayed in the form of a biplot diagram using STATISTICA software.
Results and discussion
The results showed that in both regions the highest amount of STI, MP, GMP and HM indices, were recorded for Redcarina variety in all three levels of drought stress at spring cultivation, but they were belonged to Giza-1 at summer cultivation. Due to the dispersion of the results, SSI and TOL indices had less diagnostic power to evaluate the drought tolerance of quinoa cultivars. Principal components analysis showed that Redcarina cultivar was collinear with yield vector in stress condition and MP, GMP, STI and HM indicators and was located in yield potential and tension tolerant area in bi-plot diagram in two regions (Birjand and Sarbisheh) at spring cultivation. In summer cultivation, Giza-1 variety was located at sensitive to stress area and yield potential in bi-plot diagram and was collinear with grain yield vectors in non-stress conditions and MP, GMP, STI and HM indices in two regions. This showed the more yield of this variety in non-stress condition. In most of the planting dates and places were studied, Titicaca cultivar had collinearity with SSI vector or located at the closest position to this vector, which indicated that this cultivar was sensitive to stress.
Conclusion
In general, in July, Giza-1 variety and in March Redcarina variety were the most tolerance varieties and Titicaca was most sensitive cultivar to drought stress.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Ahmadi, G., Zienaly KhaneGhah, H., Rostamy, M.A., Chogan, R., 2000. The study of drought tolerance indices and biplot methode in eight corn hybrids. Iranian Journal Agriculture Science. 31, 513-523. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.9.21.89
Al-Naggar, A.M., Abd El-Salam, R.M., Badran, A., El-Moghazi, M., 2017. Genotype and drought effects on morphological, physiological and yield traits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research. 3, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAAR/2017/36655
Bagheri, M., 2018. Handbook of quinoa cultivation. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute Publication. 48 P. [In Persian].
Bavandpori, F., Farshadfar, E., Farshadfar. M., 2022. Evaluation of drought tolerance among wheat landraces based on yield and integral selection indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 14, 873-886. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2021.3482.1865
Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S.E., Verniau, A., 2016. The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00622
Bazile, D., Pulvento, C., Verniau, A., Al-Nusairi, M.S., Ba, D., Breidy, J., Hassan, L., Mohammed, M.I., Mambetov, O., Otambekova, M., Sepahvand, N.A., Shams, A., Souici, D., Miri, K., Padulosi, S., 2016. Worldwide evaluations of quinoa: Preliminary results from post international year of quinoa FAO projects in nine countries. Frontiers in plant science. 7, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00850
Bidinger, F.R., V.Mahalakshmi, G., Rao, D., 1987. Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9870037
Bolori, P., Rashidi, V., Yarnia, M., Razban Haghighi, A., Soltani, M., 2011. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance indices in sunflower cultivars. Journal of Crop Production Research. 3, 133-142. [In Persian].
Chaghakaboodi, Z., Zebarjadi, A., Kahrizi, D., 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerance of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes in laboratory and field conditions. Seed and Plant Journal. 28, 17-38. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/SPIJ.2017.111089
Daneshian, G., Ahmadi, M., 2023. Evaluation of drought tolerance in selected soybean lines. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 33(1), 157-175. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/SAPS.2022.49272.2781
Farshadfar, A., Zamani, M.R., Tebali, M., Imam Juma, A.A., 2001. Selection for drought resistance in chickpea lines. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 32, 65-77. [In Persian].
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Aug. 13-16, Shanhua, Taiwan, 1992, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.22001/wvc.72511
Fghire, R., Anaya, F., Ali Issa, O., Wahbi, S., 2017. Physiological and growth response traits to water deficit as indicators of tolerance criteria between quinoa genotypes. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences. 8, 2084-2093.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Gholami, Sh., Rostami, T., Ahmadi, K.H., Amini Dehaghi, M., Bagheri, M., 2021. The effect of salicylic acid on germination of tow genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd L.) under drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 14, 157-170. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22077/ESCS.2020.2658.1696
Golestani, M., Pak Niyat, H., 2007. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in sesame lines. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resorrces. 11, 141-149. [In Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763594.1386.11.41.12.4
Issa Ali, O., Fghire, R., Anaya, F., Benlhabib, O., Wahbi, S., 2019. Physiological and morphological responses of two quinoa cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought stress. Gesunde Pflanzen. 71, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-019-00460-y
Jabbari, H., Akbari, G.A., Daneshian, J., Alahdadi, I., Shahbazian, N., 2008. Utilization ability of drought resistance indices in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) hybrids. Crop Production.,1 1-17. [In Persian w]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2008739.1387.1.4.1.8
Jacobsen, S.E., 2017. The scope for adaptation of quinoa in Northern Latitudes of Europe. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 203, 603- 613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12228
Jacobsen, S.E., Liu, F., Jensen, C.R., 2009. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.). Horticultural Scientia. 122, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.05.019
Jaikishun, S., Li, W., Yang, Z., Song, S., 2019. Quinoa: in perspective of global challenges. Agronomy. 9, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040176
Kamrani, M., Farzi, A., and Ebadi, A., 2015. Evaluation of grain yield performance and tolerance to drought stress in wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Cereal Research. 5, 231-246. [In Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22520163.1394.5.3.3.8
Khojamli, R., Zaynali Nezhad, KH., Nasrollahnejad Ghomi, A.A., Bagherikia, S., 2022. Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes under drought stress conditions in seedling stage using drought indices. Environmental Sresses in Crop Sciences. 14, 887-899. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22077/ESCS.2020.3202.1820
Lamaoui, M., Jemo, M., Datla, R., and Bekkaoui, F., 2018. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Frontiers in Chemistry. 6, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.0002
Laxa, M., Liebthal, M., Telman, W., Chibani, K., Dietz, K.J., 2019. The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants. 8, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8040094
Mohammad Ali Pouriamchi, H., Bi Hamta, M.R., Propheti, S.A., Naqvi, M.R., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in Kabuli type chickpea genotypes. Seed and Plant Journal. 27, 393-409. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/SPIJ.2017.111071
Molla Heydari Bafghi, R., Baghizadeh, A., Mohammadinezhad, Q.H., 2016. Evaluation of salinity and drought stresses tolerance in wheat genotypes using tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 9, 27-43. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.9.23.9
Naeimi, M., Akbari, GH.A. ShiraniRad, A.H., Modares Sanavi, S.M.A., Sadat Nori, S.A., Jabbari, H., 2009. Evaluation of drought tolerance in different Canola cultivars based on stress evaluation indices in terminal growth duration. Crop Production. 1, 83-98. [In Persian]. https://dorl.net/20.1001.1.2008739.1387.1.3.6.1
Nourmand Moayyed, F., Rostami, M.A., Ghannadha, M.R. 2001. Evaluation of drought resistance indices in bread wheat (Triticum aeativum L.). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 32, 795-805. [In Persian].
Passioura, J.B., 2006. Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce-from breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management, 80, 176-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.012
Passioura, J.B., 2007. The drought environment: Physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58,113–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl212
Pour Esmael, M., Kanouni, H., Asterki, H., Hajhassani, M., Mirakhorli, A., 2017. Screening of drought tolerant genotypes in Kabuli chickpea core collection. Seed and Plant Journal. 33, 353-372. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/SPIJ.2017.113587
Rojas, W., Pinto, M., Alanoca, C., Gómez-Pando, L., León-Lobos, P., Alercia, A., Diulgheroff, S., Padulosi, S., and Bazile, D., 2015. Quinoa genetic resources and ex situ conservation, Chapter 1-5, 56–82.
Rosielle, A.T., Hambelen, J., 1981. Theatrical’s aspect of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Saberi, M.H., Nikkhah, H.R., Tajally, H., Arazmgo, E., 2015. Effects of terminal season drought stress on yield and choosing best tolerance indices in promising lines of barley. Applied Field Crops Research (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi). 28, 124-132. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/AJ.2016.109588
Sadeghi Shua, M., Paknejad, F., Shahbaz Panahi, B., Nasri, R., 2012. Evaluation of drought resistance indices in bread wheat. National non-operating defense conference in the agricultural sector. Qeshm. November 30, 2012. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/322718
Samadzadeh, A.R., Zamani, G.R., Fallahi, H.R., 2020. Possibility of quinoa production under South-Khorasan climatic condition as affected by planting densities and sowing dates. Applied Field Crops Research. 33, 82-104. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/AJ.2020.125793.1392
Shibani Rad, A., Farshad Far, E., Najafi, A., 2017. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance in some bread wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 9, 1-14. [In Persian].
Solimani, A., 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance in barley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) by using drought tolerance indices. Crop Physiology Journal. 8, 95-110. [In Persian].  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286128.1401.14.41.12.3
Vahdi, N., and GholiNezhad, A. 2015. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some soybean cultivars. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture. 29, 1-9. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/JWRA.2015.101321
Vandkarimi, A., Poor Esmaeil, M., Vaezi, SH., Ebrahimi, A., 2015. Evaluation and comparison of drought tolerance indices in Desi chickpea genotypes using multivariate analysis methods. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 46, 169-179. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2015.54865
Yousofi Azar, M., Rezai, A.M., 2008. Assessment of drought tolerance in different breeding lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Water and Soil Science (Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources). 11, 113-121. [In Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24763594.1386.11.42.10.4
Zakavati Asl, B., Ajli, J., Mehr Poyan, M., Faramarzi, A., 2012. Evaluation drought stress tolerance and sensitivity indices and their relation with grain yield on advanced wheat genotypes at Ardabil region. Journal of Research in Crop Sciences. 4, 13-20. [In Persian].