Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sc. Students, Agronomy and plant breeding department, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan

2 Assistant Professor, Agronomy and plant breeding department, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan

3 Associate Professor, Agricultural and natural resources research center of Yazd

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the yield and yield components of promising lines of barley under saline irrigation water (ECw=10 dS/m) at experimental farm of Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Yazd, located in Ardakan during the 2012-2013 growing season. 18 promising lines and two control lines (EMBS-89-18 and Line-4-salt) were studied in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Seedling emergence percent, plant height, number of infertile and fertile tillers, spike length, number of seed per spike, spike yield, seed weight, hectoliter weight, protein, phosphorus and ash content of grain were measured. Salinity has no significant effect on field emergence percentage. There were significant differences in most studied traits among the lines. However, lines were divided into four groups, based on the yield and yield components. A group that consisted 6 lines along with control line EMBS-89-18, produced more yield than other lines. Thus, these lines could be considered for more investigations for cultivation in saline areas. Based on the agronomic characteristics, it can be said that barley genotypes with restricted and faster tillering, higher reproductive components per spike, seed weight and biomass were more tolerant to salinity which could produce acceptable grain yield under these conditions. The stepwise regression analysis showed that 1000-seed weight justified 52% of the variation in grain yield per plant, therefore, it could be concluded that 1000- seed weight was the most important yield component under saline condition.

Keywords

Ali, M. M., Shalim, M., Bagum, S., 2007. Identification of salt tolerant barley genotypes for coastal region of bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 36, 151-155.
Alshammary, S., Qian, Y., Wallner, S., 2004. Growth response of four turfgrass species to salinity. Agricultural Water Management. 66, 97-111.
Arzani, A., 2002. Grain yield performance of durum wheat germplasmes under Iranian dryland and irrigated field conditions. Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 34, 9-18.
Azari, A., 2011. Evaluation of biological responses of canola to salinity stress for producing a recombinant population. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Trabiat Modares University, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bremner, J.M., 1965. Inorganic forms of nitrogen. pp1216-1246. In: C.A. Black (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. American Society of Agronomy.
Dillon, W.R., Goldstein, M., 1984. Multivariate analysis: Method of applications. John Wiley and Sons., New York.
Ghoulam, C., Foursy, A., Fares, A., 2002. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 47, 39-50.
Ghobadi, M., Jahanbin, Sh., Motalebi, R., Parvizi, Kh., 2012. The effect of phosphorus biofertilizers on yield and phosphorus uptake in potato. Soil and Water Research Institute. 23, 125-138. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hu, Y., Schmidhalter, U., 1997. Interactive effects of salinity and macronutrient level on wheat Composition. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 20, 1169-1182.
Jabari. M., Zolfaghari. F., 2014. Evaluate of yield and traits in relation to seed yield in barley lines under drought stress and non-stress condition using factor analysis. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science. 31-39. [In Persian]
Kafi, M., Haghnia, G.H., Zamani, G.R., Rostami, M., 2011. Interactions of salinity stress and mineral nutrition on yield and yield component of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agronomy Journal. 91, 104-110. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kafi, M., Zand, E., Kamkar, B., Mahdavi Damghani, A., 2006. Plant Physiology2. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication. 729p. [In Persian].
Khajehpour, M.R., 2010. Principles and Fundamentals of Crop Production (Third edition). ACECR Isfahan university of technology Publication. 1026p. [In Persian].
Naroui Rad, M, R., Farzanju, M., Fanay, H, R., Ghasemy, A., 2006. The study genetic variation and factor analysis for morphological characters of wheat native accessions of Sistan and Baluchistan. Agronomy Journal.  73, 50-57. [In Persian with English Summary]
Oraby, H., and Ahmad, R., 2012. Physiological and biochemical changes of CBF3 transgenic oat in response to salinity stress. Plant Science. 186, 331-339.
Radmehr, A., 2010, Results Demographics wheat and barley. Retrieved May 17, 2014 from http://www.maj.ir/Portal/Home/-Default.aspx?CategoryID=95a8e7d0-e5f0-4f2d-a241-792106c74dcc.
Rahnama, A., Pustini, K., Sasani, SH., Isvand, H., 2012. Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress. Chamran University of Ahvaz Publication. 435p. [In Persian].
Shahbazi, M., Kalate Arabi, M., Hasani far, A.M., 2010. Study of Iranian Landraces Wheat in Salt-affected Soils of Golestan Province. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 41, 447-458. [In Persian].
Simane, B.J., Peacock, M., Struik, P.C., 1993. Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drough resistant and susceptible cultvars of durum. Plant and Soil Improvement Journal. 157,155-166.
Taday'oun, M.R., Imam, Y., 2007. Physiological and morphological responses of two barley cultivars to salinity and in relation to grain yield. Water and Soil Science. 11, 253-232. [In Persian].
Tavakoli, E., Fatehi, F., Coventry, S., Rengasamy, P., MacDonald, G., 2010. Additive effects of Na+ and Cl ions on barley growth under salinity stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. 62, 2189-2203.
Wang, X., Cai, Q. S., 2006. Steel slag as an iron fertilizer for corn growth and soil improvement in a pot experiment. Pedosphere. 16, 519-524.
Zadox, J.C., Chang, T.T., Konzak, C.F., 1974. Adecimal cod for the growth of cereals. Weed Research. 14, 415-421.