Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology. College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

3 Seed and Plant Improvement Institue (SPII), Mashhad, Iran

4 Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology. College of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
To improve a complex character such as grain yield with low heritability, indirect selection through other characters and selection index based on different effective traits were used. Grain yield has quantitative heritance and can be affected by environment severely; therefore selection for genetic improvement only based on yield may have low efficiency. But selection based on proper index can be one of the most effective methods for indirect selection of yield and yield components simultaneously.
Materials and methods
In order to determine selection index for improvement of maize yield, 14 single cross maize hybrids (including 12 promising maize hybrids and KSC704 and KSC705 cultivars as control cultivars) were planted in two separate experiments (Saline stress and normal condition) based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replication in Khorasan Razavi agricultural and natural resources research and education center (TOROQ Station and Abbas Abad Station), Mashhad Iran on 2017-2018. In this study silage yield, Dry Forage yield, number of total leaves, Ear Diameter, Ear Length, Ear Height, Kernel depth, anthesis silking interval (ASI) and Plant Height appearance was measured randomly from 10 sample. Then some of morphological and phonological traits, yield and yield components were recorded.
Results and discussion
The results of ANOVA showed significant differences between hybrids for many of measured traits in both conditions (P≤0.01). Thus, selection will be effective due to existence of enough variation. The results of correlation, multiple regression and principle component analysis were used for identification of traits that are more effective on grain yield. Selection indices were calculated based on results of stepwise regression considering to phenotype, genotypic and economic values. Based on stepwise regression results in normal condition, Plant Height, Number of Ear, Dry Forage Yield, Days to anthesis, Number of Leaves totally could explain 77.84 percent of gain yield variation, then these traits were used to calculate selection index. In Saline stress condition, Number of Ear, Ear Length, Days to anthesis, Number of Leaves, Plant height could explain 76.90 percent of grain yield variation that these traits were used to calculate of selection index. Smith-Hazel and Pesk-Baker selection indexes for dry silage yield performance, leaf total number, number of cob, plants length and days to pollination in non-stressed condition and number of cob, days to pollination, leaf total number and plants length were calculated under stressed situation. Moreover, relative efficiency of selection and expected gain of selection index using the Smith – Hazel index was higher than the Pesk – Baker index. The highest relative efficiency of selection under non-stressed condition was measured in index number 5 (Smith – Hazel 5) while in saline stressed condition it was achieved in index number 4 (Smith - Hazel 4).
Conclusion
In summary, by adjusting phenotype values in mentioned traits in index equivalent, the amount of each index was determined. Finally Based on grain yield and selection indices, 20 percent of the best genotypes were selected by each selection indices. The highest selection indices were obtained for the hybrids 1, 5, 2, 8 and 6 in normal condition and hybrids 13, 3, 4, 10 and 8 in saline condition.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alinia, N., Bagheri, A., Moshtaghi, N., Khavari Khorasani, S., 2016. Evaluation of yield and related traits in new forage maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) by principal component analysis. The Second National Congress on the Development of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. May 11, 2016, Gorgan, Iran. [In Persian].
Asghar, M.J., Mehdi, S.S., 2010. Selection indices for yield and quality traits in sweet corn. Pakistan Journal of Botani. 42(2), 775-789.
Baker, R.J., 1986. Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. CRC Press. Inc. 218p.
Caker, R., 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stage on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89, 1-16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005
Chandra, S., Nigma, S.N., Cruickshank, A.W., Bandyopadhyaya, A., Harikrishna, S., 2003. Selection index for identifying high-yielding groundnut genotypes in irrigated and rainfed environments. Annals of Applied Biology. 143, 303-310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2003.tb00298.x
Dorraji, S.S., Golchin, A., Ahmadi, S. 2010. The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 38(7), 584-591.‏   https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000017.
Eshghi, R., Ojaghi, J., Salayeva, S., 2011. Genetic gain through selection indices in hulless barley. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 13, 191-197.
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wakeel, A., Siddique, K.H., 2015. Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms and management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 35(2), 461-481. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0287.
Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd ed. Longman, Newyork.
Fazlalipour, M., Rabiei, B., Samizadeh, H., Rahimsouroush, H., 2007. Use of coefficient path analysis for base and optimum selection indices in rice. Journal of Agricultural Science, 17, 97-112. [In Persian with English Summary].
Golbashy, M., Shoa Hosseini, M., Khavari Khorasani, S., Farsi, M., Zarabi, M., 2009. Effect of drought stress on yield, yield components, morphological traits of single cross and three way cross of corn. Abstract book of the National Conference on Consumption Pattern Reforms in Agriculture and Natural Resources. P: 225. DOR: 20.1001.1.22286128.1393.6.14.4.5 [In Persian with English Summary].
Gravois, K.A., McNew, R.W., 1993. Genetic relationship among and selection for rice yield and yield component. Crop Science. 33, 249-252.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300020006x
Hoffman, G.J., Mass, E.V., Prichard, T.L., Meyer, J.L., Roberts, R., 1983. Salt tolerance of Corn in the Delta. California Agriculture. 37, 10-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00285555
Jannink, J.L., Orf, J.H., Jordan, N.R., Shaw, R.G., 2000. Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Science, 40,1087-1094  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041087x
Kaddah, F., Malek, T., 1961. Salinity effects on the groth of corn at different stages of development. Agronomy Journal. 56, 214-217. https://doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2020.06.008
Khavari Khorasani, S., Musayabadi, J., Mahdi Nejad, N., Ismaili, A., Siah Sar, B., 2009. Grouping of new maize hybrids (Zea mays. L.) based on morphological traits, yield and its components. Journal of Agricultural Ecology. 4(2), 616-609. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kumar, S., Malik, S.S., Jeena, A.S., Malik, S.K., 2008. Interrelationships among the yield attributes and intergeneration correlation as a mean of testing effectiveness of early generation testing in wheat (T. aestivum L.). Progressive Research, 3, 25-30. https://doi.org/30.9877/jpr 2008.31.771.
Molazem, D., 2013. Growth and accumulation of sodium in some genotypes of maize (Zea mays L) under salt stress and evaluate the correlation between them. Life Science Journal. 10, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1525.013.sj.053.013.
Monirifar, H., 2010. Evaluation of selection indices for Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2, 84-87. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb213563.
Munns, R., Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Reviews in Plant Biology, 59, 651-81.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607. 092911.
Nawor, A.A., Ibrahim, M.E., Khalili, A.N.M., 1991. The efficiency of three conventional selection indices in corn. Annals of Agricultural Scienc, 29, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1991/s11032-991-0681-1
Rabiei, B., Valizadeh, M., Ghareyazie, B., Moghaddam, M., 2004. Evaluation of selection indices for improving rice grain shape. Field Crops Research, 89, 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.016.
Rezaei, A., 1994. Selection indicators in plant breeding. Proceedings of the 3rd Iranian Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding, University of Tabriz, p.13. [In Persian].
Saburi, H., Rabiei, B., Fazlalipour, M., 2008. Use of selection indices based on multivariate analysis for improving grain yield in rice. Rice Science, 15, 303-310. [In Persian with English Summary]
Smith, H.F., 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenenics. 7, 240-250.
Yu, X., Liao, Y., Oladipo, I.O., 2014. Effect of salinity water irrigation on maize growth in northwest region. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 6, 300-305.
Younesi, O., Sharifzadeh F., Fattahi Nisyani. F., 2009. A study of root allelopathic effects of cool season crops on seedling emergence and early growth of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 40(3), 56-63. [In Persian with English Summary].