Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Agriculture-Ecology, University of Tehran, Aburaihan Campus, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Aburaihan Campus, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of cotton and fiber crop department, Tehran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Varamin, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Aburaihan Campus, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
In the near future, agricultural production will need to increase to feed the world's growing population with less fresh water available. Non-living stresses such as drought and salinity are common environmental factors that affect plant growth and are one of the most important factors determining the geographical distribution of vegetation and limiting the yield of agricultural products (Schulze et al., 2005; Gregory, 2006; Lin et al., 2006). One of the management options to minimize the impact of salinity and drought stress is to introduce species that tolerate these conditions with good adaptation in terms of quantitative and qualitative performance. Chenopodium quinoa is a crop that tolerates a combination of incompatible factors (Jacobsen et al., 2003). In this regard, in this study, the effect of irrigation cycle on morphological and physiological characteristics of different quinoa cultivars in Garmsar city was investigated.
 
Materials and methods
Plant materials including seeds of 3 new quinoa plant genotypes (Table 1) with variety of maturity and yield were obtained from Karaj Seed and Seedling Registration and Certification Research Institute. This experiment was carried out in 1397, in Garmsar Agricultural Research Station as a factorial in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Garmsar city with an average annual rainfall of 125 mm and an altitude of 850 meters above sea level has a hot and dry climate. The first factor was irrigation cycle at three levels (8, 12 and 16 days) and the second factor was genotype (Titicaca, Q26 and Q29). Due to the sensitivity of the plant at the time of germination and in order to establish it completely, the first two irrigations were performed equally for all treatments at intervals of 5 days.
 
Results and discussion
The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of irrigation cycle and genotype on all studied traits (plant height, main cluster length, and main cluster weight, number of branches per plant, 1000-seed weight, and yield per hectare and harvest index) was significant at 1% probability level. Comparison of the mean interaction of irrigation intervals and genotype showed that there was a significant difference between treatments in grain yield, main cluster length and cluster weight.
 
Conclusions
Increasing population and the need for more food put additional pressure on the environment, especially water resources and agricultural ecosystems. One of the plants that has been considered today due to climate change is quinoa (Salehi and Dehghani, 2018). The purpose of this study was to investigate the management of water resources and select the appropriate genotype for cultivation in Garmsar region. The results indicate that until the introduction of superior cultivars, Titicaca genotype has good yield potential for cultivation in this city and similar areas. Also, despite the high yield in the interval of irrigation once every 8 days, for better management of resources, the interval of irrigation once every 12 days can be used.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmadi, A., Backer, D.A., 2001. The effect of water stress on grain filling processes in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 136, 257-269.
Baqeri, M., 2017. Quinoa cultivation. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization [In Persian].
Daryanto, S., Wang, L., Jacinthe, P.A., 2017. Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review. Agricultural Water Management.179, 18–33.
Erdem, T., Erdem, Y. , Orta, A.H., Okursoy, H., 2006. Use of a crop water stress index for scheduling the irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 30, 11-20.
Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Vacher, J., Mamani, R., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Morales, B., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J., Taboada C., 2007. Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). European Journal of Agronomy 28, 427–36. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.008.
Goksoy, A.T., Demir, A.O., Turan, Z.M., Dagustu, N., 2004. Responses of sunflower to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages. Filed Crops Research. 87, 167-178.
Gregory, P.J., 2006. Food production under poor, adverse climatic conditions. In ‘Proceedings of IX ESA Congress’.4–7 September 2006, Warsaw. (European Society for Agronomy)
Howell, T., 2001. Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agronomy Journal. 93, 281–289. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.932281x
Jacobsen. S-E, Mujica, A., Jensen, C.R., 2003.The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International. 19, 99–109. Doi: 10.1081/FRI-120018872
Lin, K.H., Chao, P.Y., Yang, C.M., Cheng, W.C., Lo, H.F., Chang, T.R., 2006. The effects of flooding and drought stresses on the antioxidant constituents in sweet potato leaves. Botanical Studies. 47, 417–426.
Maarouf, M., Nagat, M., 2016. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) performance under the hot-dry weather of the Sudan. International Quinoa Conference 2016.
Mondal, M.H., Burn, W.A., Brenner, M.L., 1978. Effects of sink removal on Photosynth hesis and senescence in leaves of soybean plants. Plant Physiology. 61, 394-397.
Ragab, R., 2010.Preface: Salinity management in agriculture: the basis and applications. In ‘Manejo da Salinidade Na Agriculture: Estudos Basicos eAplicados’. (Eds Hans Raj Gheyi, Nildo da Silva Dias, deLacerda, Claudivan Feitosa), pp. 1–3. (Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologiaem Salinidade: Fortaleza, Brazil.
Razzaghi, F., Ahmadi, S.H., Jacobsen, S.E., Jensen, C.R., Andersen, M.N., 2012. Effects of salinity and soil–drying on radiation use efficiency, water productivity and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 198, 173-184.
Razzaghi, F., Jacobsen, S., Jensen, C.R., Neumann, M. 2015. Ionic and photosynthetic homeostasis in quinoa challenged by salinity and drought mechanisms of tolerance. Functional Plant Biology. 42, 136–148.
Royo, C., Aparicio, N., Blanco, R., Villegas, D., 2004. Leaf and green area development of durum wheat genotypes grown under Mediterranean conditions. European Journal of Agronomy. 69, 231- 233.
Salahverzi, Y., Tehranifar, A., Gozanchian, A., 2008. Investigation of green physiomrphological changes of native and foreign carpets in drought stress and re-irrigation, Iranian Horticultural Science and Technology. 9, 204-193. [In Persian with English summary].
Sharifan, H., Jamali, S., Sajadi, F., 2018. Investigation the effect of different salinity levels on the morphological parameters of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 22(2), 15-27. [In Persian with English summary].
 
Sanchez, H.B., Lemeur, R., Damme, P.V., Jacobsen, S.E., 2003. Eco physiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International. 19, 111-119.
Salehi, M., Dehghani, F., 2017. Quinoa, a quasi-grain suitable for saline water sources. (1st Ed). National Salt Research. [In Persian].
Jones, R., Ougham, H., Thomas, H., Waaland, S., 2012. Molecular Life of Plants. Wiley-Blackwell.
Schulze, E.D., Beck, E., Müller-Hohenstein, K., 2005. Plant Ecology. 702. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg
Smith, M., 2000. The application of climatic data for planning and management of sustainable reined and irrigated crop production. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology103, 99–108. Doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00121-0.
Sun, Y., Liu, F., Bendevis, M., Shabala, S., Jacobsen, S. 2014. Sensitivity of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties to progressive drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 200, 12–23.
Shabani, A., Kamgar-Haqiqi, A., Sepaskhah, A., Emam, Y., Honar, T. 2010. Effect of water stress on grain yield, yield components and quality of winter rapeseed (Brasica napus L.) cv. Licord. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12, 409-421. [In Persian].
Tavakoli, A., Hokm Abadi, H., Naderi Arefi, A., Hajji, A., 2016. Comparative advantage of Semnan agricultural products based on water productivity. Technical report, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AERI). [In Persian].