Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Southern Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Jiroft, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Most of the Produced fodder in Iran is provided by alfalfa and corn. These two forage products have a relatively high water requirement. Among cereal forage plants, sorghum is a great plant due to its high production capacity, adaptation to different climatic conditions and different uses. Iran, with an average rainfall of 240 mm per year, is classified as arid and semi-arid regions. One of the most fundamental issues of the country is water and irrigation. Food security concerns are a major threat due to climate change and water scarcity, hence replacing plants with high water use efficiency is essential. this experiment was carried out for 1(investigate the possibility of cultivating sorghum as a substitute for common forage plants in drought stress conditions in the south of Kerman province and 2) also to determine the most suitable sorghum cultivar under the different Irrigation levels in terms of forage characteristics in Jiroft region.
Materials and methods
In order to identify the most suitable cultivar resistant to drought sorghum, an experiment was carried out as strip plot design based on randomized completely block design with three replications in 2019-2020. Vertical plots were drought stress levels (irrigation after 90, 130, 180 and 220 mm evaporation from class A evaporation pan). Horizontal factors were sorghum genotypes (Speedfeed, Pegah, KFKFS18 and KFKFS2. Each experimental plot consisted of four planting lines. Plant density was 220,000 plants per hectare. The planting date was April 17th. The first irrigation was done after measuring soil moisture and calculating moisture deficiency. Irrigation was done uniformly every 5-7 days until the 4-leaf stage. The time of application of stress was after 4 to 6 leaf stage and ensuring complete establishment of plants. Early cultivars such as Speedfed were harvested based on the beginning of flowering and late cultivars were harvested based on 150 cm plant height by cutting from 10 to 15 cm above the soil surface. In each row, all plants were harvested from two middle lines of each plot and the fresh weight of leaves and stems was immediately measured. Water use efficiency in kilograms per cubic meter was calculated from the ratio of dry forage yield in kilograms per hectare per water consumption in cubic meters per hectare. Finally, combined analysis of variance of data was performed using SAS statistical software version 9. The means were compared using the LSD test at the level of 5% probability.
Results and discussion
Combined analysis of variance showed that the interaction effect of irrigation regimes and cultivars was significant on fresh forage yield, leaf and stem fresh and dry weight, plant height and leaf area. Mean comparison of simple effects were studied only for dry forage yield and water use efficiency. The results showed that Speedfeed cultivar had the highest fresh forage yield (298.42 tons.ha-1) at the 90 mm level irrigation. Lowest forage yield (142.49 tons.ha-1) resulted from the combination of KFS18 and irrigation after 220 mm evaporation. Highest dry forage yield was obtained at 90 mm irrigation level (46.22 tons.ha-1). Lowest dry forage yield (39.70 tons.ha-1) was related to the irrigation after 220 mm evaporation from the surface of evaporation pan. Speedfeed and KFS18 had the highest and lowest dry forage yield (41.69 and 31.17 tons.ha-1), respectively. The highest and lowest water use efficiency were related to Speedfed and KFS18 (4.08 and 3.68 Kg.m-3), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between 90 mm (4.76 Kg.m-3) and 220 mm (4.49 Kg.m-3) levels of irrigation.
Conclusions
According to the results of the experiment, speedfeed cultivar with irrigation after 130 mm evaporation from the surface of evaporation pan can be suggested for forage production in southern Kerman province.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ahmed, S.E., El Naim, A.M., Dagash, Y.M., 2017. Agronomic performance of forage Sorghum genotypes as affected by watering Interval in semi-arid environment. World World Journal of Agricultural Research. 5, 1-4.
Alizadeh, A., 2001. The Relationship Between Water, Soil and Plants (second edition). Astan Quds Razavi Publications, 354 pages. [In Persian]
Amaral, S.R., Lira, M.A., Tabosa, J.N., Santos, M.V.F., Mello, A.C., Santos, V.F., 2003. Behavior of sweet sorghum lines exposed to water deficit under controlled condition. Pesquisa Agropecaria Brasileira. 38, 973-979.
Allen, R.G., Jensen, M.E., Wright, J., Burman, R.D., 1989. Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration. Agronomy Journal. 81, 650-662.
Berenguer, M.J., Faci, J.M., 2001. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) yield compensation processes under different plant densities and variable water supply. European Journal of Agronomy. 15, 43–55.
Chatterjee, B.N., Das, P.K., 1989. Forage Crop Prduction. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Rs 120. ISBN 81 204 0398 3.
Emam, Y., Maghsoudi, K., Moghimi, N., 2013. Effect of Water Stress and Nitrogen Levels on Yield of Forage Sorghum. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 3, 145-155. [In Persian with English Summary].
Emam, Y., 2007. Cereal Production. 3rd ed., Shiraz University Press., Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian].
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2018. Statistics: FAOSTAT agriculture. Retrieved March.8.2018 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
Farooqi, A.A., Bssreeramu, Kh., 2004. Cultivation of Spice Crops. Universities Press. pp: 128-148.
Fazeli Rostampour, M., 2018. Evaluation of dry matter performance and water use efficiency of forage sorghum in dehydration conditions and application of superabsorbent. Scientific Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 10, 10-28. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fooman, A., 2011. Agriculture And Breeding of Sorghum. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. [In Persian].
Fooman, A., 2007. Forage Sorghum and Its Planting, Holding and Harvesting Instructions. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. [In Persian].
Gholami, H., Amir Sadeghi, M., 2018. Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum and Its Use in Animal Nutrition. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. [In Persian].
Habibi, M., Abdi, M., Mehrpooyan, M., 2013. Study of forage quality characteristics in two cultivars of Speedfeed and Pegah forage sorghum under low water conditions. The Second National Conference on Modern Agriculture. Saveh. Iran. [In Persian].
Haji Hassani Asl, N., Rushdi, M., Khalili Mahalleh, J., Rezadoost, S., Shirani Rad, A.H., Moradi Aghdam, A., 2010. Yield and yield components of three forage plants under drought stress conditions in Khoy. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 2, 236-246. [In Persian with English Summary].
Howell, T.A., Yazar, A., Schneider, A.D., Duser, D.A., Copeland, K.S., 1995. Yield and water use efficiency of corn in response to lepa irrigation. Transacation of the ASAE. 38, 1737-1747.
Innes, P., Black, W., 2001. The effect of drought on water use and yield of two sorghum genotypes. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 96, 603-610.
Karimi, A., Naderi, M., 2007. Investigation of the effects of application of superabsorbent polymer on yield and water use efficiency of forage maize in soils with different textures. Agricultural Research. 7, 87-98.
Khazaei, A., Fooman, A., Rahjoo, V., Golzardi, V., 2019. Agriculture and Characteristics of Introduced Sorghum Cultivars. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. 136 pages. [In Persian].
 Loni, A., Sabzi, H., 1992. Comparison of the performance of forage sorghum in different dates. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. [In Persian].
Maghtouli, M., Chaichie, M.R., Hadadchi, V.G., 2001. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and water stress at different growth stages on the amount of acid procik and forage quality of sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 8, 103-114. [In Persian with English Summary].
Miller, R.W., Donahue, R.L., 1990. Soils: An Introduction to Soils and Plant Growth (No. Ed. 6). Prentice-Hall International Inc.
Moaaveni, P., Heidari, V.Y., 2004. Study of plant density and irrigation intervals on grain yield and some physiological traits in forage sorghum. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 4, 374-382. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mousavi Fazl, S., 2018. Reaction of Forage Sorghum Cultivars to the Amount of Irrigation Water. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops. 7, 115-126. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mousavi Fazl, S., Akhyani, A., Atarodi, S., 2018. Effect of irrigation water and potassium fertilizer on the forage yield of sorghum with the aim to determine the yield function - water – fertilizer (Pegah Variety). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering. 40, 83-97. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mousavi, G., Mirhadi, M.J., Siadat, A., Mohamadi, G.N.R., Darvish, F., 2009. Effect of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency of sorghum and forage millet. Journal of New Agricultural Science. 15, 101-113. [In Persian with English Summary].
Najafinejad, H., Ravari, S.Z., Javaheri, M.A., 2019. Changes in forage yield and some agronomic and physiological characteristics of fodder, millet, sorghum and forage maize are affected by drought. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 4, 535-554.
Panda. R.K, Behera, S.K., Kashypa, P.S., 2004. Effective management of irrigation water for maize under stressed conditions. Agricultural and Food Engineering. 66, 181-203.
Rahnama, A., Absalan, S.H., Makvandi, M.A., 2008. Effect of irrigation deficient on yield and components of three cultivars of forage sorghum. Journal of Research in Agronomy Science. 1, 11-22. [In Persian with English Summary].
Razmi, N., Ghasemi, M., 2007. Effect of different irrigation regimes on growth, grain yield and its components of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cultivars under Isfahan conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 9, 169-183. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rastegar S., Zakeri, O., Zakeri, D., 2016. Effects of drought stress on vegetative growth and biochemical changes of six ornamental species in tropical. Journal of Plant Process and Function. 5, 157-164. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rust, S.R., Ritchie, H.D., Hesterman, O.B., Kells, J.J., 1988. Annual sum forage production in Michigan. Cooperation Extension Service, Michigan University Extension Bulletin. E-2126.
Tabatabai, S.A., Mirabzadeh Ardakani, M., 2009. Seed Sorghum. Agricultural Education Publishing Publications. [In Persian].
Stickler, F.C., Wearden, S., Pauli, A.W., 1961. Leaf area determination in grain sorghum 1. Agronomy Journal. 53, 187-188.
Tesfaye, K., 2017. Genetic diversity study of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moenc) genotypes, Ethiopia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Agriculture and Environment. 9, 44-54.
Torabi, A.R., Farahbakhsh, H., Khajoui Nejad, G.R., 2013. Investigation of different irrigation regimes and superabsorbent of zeolite on yield and yield components of forage sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Crop. 15, 1-14. [In Persian with English Summary].
Vahidi, H., Khajoeinejad, G.R., Rezaei Estakhroeih, A., 2015. Grain yield and water use efficiency of five sorghum cultivars under different irrigation regimes in Kerman. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 13, 461-470. [In Persian with English Summary].
Valad Abadi, A., Mazaheri, D., Noormohammadi, G., Dezfouli, A., 2000. Performance of the effect of drought stress on quality and quantitative characters of corn, sorghum and millet. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2, 39-47. [In Persian with English Summary].
Wall, J.S., Ross, W.M., 1970. Sorghum Production and Utilization. Avi Publ. Co.: Westport, CT.