Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Former graduate student of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Crop Ecology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

5 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Legumes contain an average of 18-32% protein and are an important source of protein for low-income people (Majnoun Hussein, 2008). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Is known for its resistance to moisture changes; this plant shows physiological and morphological changes under conditions of water scarcity (Ghorbanli et al., 2001). Chickpea grows in a wide range of weather conditions from the subtropical to Mediterranean regions of western Asia, northern Africa, and southern and southwestern Europe (Toker et al. 2007). Environmental stresses are the most important factor that limits crop production of chickpea. The most critical environmental stresses that have a negative effect on crop production are water and heat stresses (Rahbarian et al. 2011). By applying the effect of different levels of irrigation and plant density on yield and yield components of chickpea, grain yield, 1000-seed weight, the number of pods per plant and harvest index decreased during drought stress (Raei et al., 2008). Severe drought stress, by reducing the water uptake by the roots, disrupts the transfer of sap in the phloem, which ultimately leads to a decrease in nutrient uptake and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (Armand et al. 2016). Plant density is one of the most important management factors on crops that will affect plant yield. When competition for growth increases, the yield will be decreased. The selection of appropriate plant density should be based on environmental factors such as cultivar, cultivation target, weed competition, seed size, soil moisture content, and plant characteristics including plant height, plant density, leaf angle, and production capacity of the growing environment (Khajehpour, 2008). According to the above, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of different levels of irrigation and planting density on some agronomic traits of white chickpea in Karaj.
Material and methods
To investigate the effect of water regime and plant density on some agronomical traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum), a split-plot experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications conducted at the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Karaj, Iran in 2015. The water levels included eight levels (I1 =full irrigation at all growth stages, I2 = irrigation to grain filling and then stop, I3 = irrigation to podding and then stop, I4 = irrigation to flowering and then cut, I5 = 50% of full irrigation at all growth stages, I6 = 50% of full irrigation to grain filling and then stop, I7 = 50% of full irrigation to podding and then stop, I8 = 50% of full irrigation to flowering and then stop, considered as the main factor and plant density at three levels (30, 40 and 50 plants.m-1) as subplots. Geographical characteristics of this farm include 1321 meters above sea level, longitude 51 degrees east, latitude 35 degrees and 48 minutes north. This region has a hot and dry climate with an average rainfall of 33 years, about 248 mm.
Results and discussion
The results showed that increasing water deficit stress reduced the growth traits and ultimately the grain yield of chickpea cultivar ILC 482. Increasing plant density increased the growth traits of yield components and grain yield. The highest grain yield (2892 kg. ha-1) was obtained in full irrigation (I1), and the lowest (1075 kg. ha-1) gained from I4. The highest grain yield (2068 kg. ha-1) was acquired at 40 plants m-1.
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that low water stress reduced the yield of chickpeas, but since Iran has low average rainfall, it is possible to achieve a good yield by using 50% irrigation at all stages of growth.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alizadeh, A., 2004. Soil, water, plant relationship (4th Ed.). University of Emam Reza Press, 470p [In Persian].
Armand, N., Amiri, H., Ismaili, A., 2016. Interaction of methanol spray and water‐deficit stress on photosynthesis and biochemical characteristics of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Sadry. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 92, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12548. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Barzali, M., 2018. Studying of plant density and supplemental irrigation effects on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield under rainfed condition in east of Golestan. Dryland Legume.1, 16- 28. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bayat. A.A., Sepehri, A., Ahmadvand, G., Dorri, H.R., 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12(1), 42- 54 [In Persian with English Summary].
Behboudian, M.H., Ma, Q., Turner, N.C., Palta, J.A., 2001. Reactions of chickpea to water stress: yield and seed composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 81, 1288-1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.939.
Boomsma, C.R., Vyn, T.J., 2008. Maize drought tolerance: potential improvements through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis?. Field Crops Research. 108, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.03.002
Boutraa, T., Sanders, F.E., 2001. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 187, 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00525.x
Emam, Y., Shekoofa, A., Salehi, F., Jalali, A.H., 2010. Water stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 9, 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2010.530256
Fallah, S., Ehsanzadeh, P., Daneshvar, M., 2005. Grain yield and yield components in three chickpea genotypes under dryland conditions with and without supplementary Irrigation at different plant densities in Khorram-Abad, Lorestan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 36(3), 719-731. [In Persian with English Summary].
FAOSTAT data., 2018. http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data/QC. Last updated June 15, 2020
Ganjeali, A., Nezami, A., 2008. Ecophysiology and yield barriers in pulse crops. In: Parsa, M., Bagheri A. (eds.), Pulses. Jehad Daneshgahi Mashhad Publisher, 522p. [In Persian].
Jalilian, J., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., Sabbaghpour, S.H., 2005. The effect of density and supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four chickpea (Cicer aritinum) cultivars under dry land condition. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 12, 1-9. [In Persian with English Summary].
Khajehpour, M.R., 2008. Principles and foundations of agriculture. Jihad University Publishing Center, Isfahan Industrial Branch. 398p. [In Persian].
Molina, J.C., Moda-Cirino, V., Júnior, N.D.S.F., de Faria, R.T., Destro, D., 2001. Response of common bean cultivars and lines to water stress. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 1(4), 363-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332018v18n1c16
Mousavi, S.K., Pezeshkpour, A., Khorgami, A., Noori, M.N., 2010. Effects of supplemental irrigation and crop density on yield, and yield components of Kabuli chickpea cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 7, 657-672. [In Persian with English Summary].
Naim, A.H., Awadelkaraim, A.H., Sershen, F.E., Ahmed, F., 2017. Effect of irrigation regime and plant density on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield in the semi-arid environment of Sudan. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 7(6), 142-151.
Nayyar, H., Sigh, S., Kaur, S., Kumar, S., Upadhyaya, H.D., 2006. Differential sensitivity of macrocarpa and microcarpa types of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to water stress: Association of contracting stress response with oxidative injury. Integrative Plant Biology. 48, 1318-1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00350.x
Pang, J., Turner, N. C., Khan, T., Du, Y. L., Xiong, J. L., Colmer, T. D., ... and Siddique, K. H., 2017. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to terminal drought: leaf stomatal conductance, pod abscisic acid concentration, and seed set. Journal of Experimental Botany. 68, 1973-1985. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw153
Raei, Y., Demaghsi, N. and Seyed Sharifi, R., 2008. Effect of different levels of irrigation and plant density on grain yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) deci type cv. Kaka. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 9, 371-381. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rahbarian, R., Khavari-Nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A., Najafi, F., 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. 53, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-011-0007-2
Terzi, R., Sağlam, A., Kutlu, N., Nar, H., Kadioğlu, A., 2010. Impact of soil drought stress on photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and antioxidant enzyme activities of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars. Turkish Journal of Botany. 34, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-0905-20
Thangwana, N.M., Ogola, J.B.O., 2012. Yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum): Response to genotype and planting density in summer and winter sowings. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment.10, 710-715.
Toker, C., Canci, H., Yildirim, T., 2007. Evaluation of perennial wild Cicer species for drought resistance. Genetic resources and crop evolution. 54, 1781-1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9197-y
Zhang, H., Pala, M., Oweis, T., Harris, H., 2000. Water use and water-use efficiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR99059