Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran

2 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Western Azerbaijan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran- Orumieh, Iran

3 Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Hamedan, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses, which decreases crop yields and limits the land use. Three hectares of agricultural land are being destroyed in each minute by salinity In Iran, salinity is one of the most important factors which limit the agriculture. Salt stress studies were very important in the most sugar beet planting regions of Iran based on sugar beet experts and farmers opinions producing sugar beet salt tolerant varieties, improving planting methods, irrigation and fertilizer use are the most Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) strategies for optimizing the production in saline lands.

Materials and methods
In order to investigate the effect of salinity stress on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet genotypes in normal and salinity stress conditions an experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design with three replications in Miandoab Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Station at 2016-17 Crop seasons. In this research, 16 sugar beet genotypes were tested under two normal conditions and saline conditions with salinity of 12.1 dS/m. In this research, root yield, sugar content, white sugar content, sugar yield, the amount of sodium, nitrogen, and potassium of root, white sugar yield percent of sugar extraction was measured.Data was analyzed by using SAS 9.2 software.

Results and discussion
The results showed that the effect of the environment on all studied traits wasn’t significant. Differences between genotypes were significant for all traits except for white sugar content, also the interaction of genotype in environment on all traits except the white sugar content was significant. Results showed that the highest root yield, white sugar yield and sugar yield in normal and salinity conditions were allocated to genotypes 14 and 15. Based on the results of correlation analysis in both environmental conditions, white sugar yield had positively and significantly correlated with root yield, white sugar content and sugar yield. Based on the results of stepwise regression analysis, root yield, percent of sugar extraction and sugar yield in normal conditions with justified 93 percent of white sugar yield variation and in salt stress condition with justified 84 percent of the total white sugar yield variation were identified as the most effective traits on white sugar yield.

Conclusions
In the present study, there was no significant difference between two years in term of studied traits. It can be concluded that climate conditions in the two years studied did not have a significant difference in terms of effect on the studied traits. In the present study, there wasn’t significant difference between normal and salinity stress conditions in terms of all traits and salinity Therefore, it can be said that sugar beet genotypes were resistant to salinity. In both environmental conditions, genotypes number 14 and 15 had the highest root yield, white sugar yield and sugar yield, Selection of these genotypes is recommended for future breeding programs. In both normal and salinity conditions root yield, percent of sugar extraction and sugar yield recommended as Criteria for selecting high-yielding genotypes.

Keywords

Abbas, F., Mohanna, A., Allaham, G.H., Jabbar, A., 2012. Osmotic regulation of sugar in terms of salinity. Sugar Journal. 28, 80-67. [In Persian with English summary].
Abbasi, Z., Arzani, A., Majidi, M.M., Rajabi, A., Jalali, A., 2019. Genetic analysis of sugar yield and physiological traits in sugar beet under salinity stress conditions. Euphytica. 215, 1-12
Abbasi Z., Arzani, A., Magidi, M.M., Mashayekhi, P., 2015. Evaluation of new sugar beet hybrids based on stress tolerance indices in saline conditions. Arid Biome. 5, 77-53. [In Persian with English summary].
Abbasi, Z., Arzani, A., Majidi, M., Nachtigall, M., Frese, L., 2012. Joint Meeting of ECPGR and WBN (Lille, France), p. 21.
Abdollahyan Noghabi, M., Mohammadian, R., Taleghani, D.F., Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., 2014. Sweett Research. Sugar Beet Seed Institute Press, 169p. [In Persian].
Anagholi, A., Rajabi, A., Khayamim, S. 2019. Screening salt-tolerant sugar beet genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Pharmacophore. 9, 60-71.
Bakhshi Khaniki, G., Javadi, S., Mehdikhani, P., Tahmasebi, D., 2011.Investigation of drought stress effects on some quantity and quality characteristics of new sugar beet genotypes. New Cellular-Molecular Biotechnology Journal. 1, 65-74.
Bashiri, B., Mir Mahmoodi, T., Fotohi, K., 2015. Evaluation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes for their trait associations under saline conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysioloy. 9, 243- 258. [In Persian with English summary].
FAO AGL. 2000. http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/ agll/spush
Fotoohi, K., Mesbah, M., Sadeghian Motahar, Y., Rangi, Z., Orazizade, M., 2006. Evaluation of salinity tolerance in sugar beet genotypes. Journal of Sugar Beet. 22, 1-18. [In Persian with English summary].
Jahad Akbar, M.R, Ebrahimian, H.R., Vahedi, S., 2012. Response of sugar beet to saline irrigation water in different growth stages. Sugar Beet Journal. 27, 53-66. [In Persian with English summary].
Joshi, A. K., 2011. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Florida: CRC Press
Khayamim, S., Noshad, H., Jahadakbar, M.R., Fotuhi, K., 2017.Review on sugar beet salt stress studies in Iran. 3rd International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Sciences (ABS 2017). 26–29 June 2017, Qingdao, China
Maas, E.V., 1990. Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji, K.K. (ed.), Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. ASCE Pub. New York. pp: 262-303.
Maas, E.V., Grattan, S.R., 1999. Crop yield as affected by salinity. Agricultural Drainage; Agronomy Monograph. 38, 55-107.
Munns, R., 2011. Advances in Botanical Research, Massachusetts: Academic Press.
Ober, E., Bloa, M.L., Clark, C.J.A., Royal, A., Jaggard, K.W., Pidgeon, J.D, 2005. Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Research. 91, 231-249.
Orazizadeh, M. Moharamzadeh, M., 2009. Investigating commercial monogerm sugar beet varieties in different regions of the country, Final Report of Research Project Sugar Beet Seed Institute. [In Persian].
Qureshi, A.S., Qadir, M., Heidari, N., Tural, H., Javadi, A., 2007. A review of management strategies for salt prone land and water resources in Iran. Working Paper 125 (Iran: national Water Management Institute). [In Persian].
Rajabi, A., Khayamim, S., Abbasi, Z., Ober, E., 2014. Salt stress and sugar beet improvement: Challenges and opportunities. In: Ahmad, P., Wani, M.R., Azooz, M.M., Phan Tran, L.S. (Eds.), Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes. Springer, London. pp. 121-150.
Shannon, M.C. 1984. Breeding, selection and the genetics of salt tolerance. In: Staples, R.C., Toenniesen, G.H. (eds.). Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Crop Improvement. John Wiley and Sons. pp: 231-254.
Taleghani, D., Gohari, G., Tohidloo, V., Roohi A., 2008. Study water and nitrogen use efficiency under optimum and stress conditions, in two sugar beet planting patterns. Final Report of Research Project, Sugar Beet Seed Institute. 2008. [In Persian].
Zaman, M., Shahid, S.A., Heng, L., 2018. Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques. Springer, 183p