Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D student, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

2 Professor, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is the most common abiotic stress in crops. The study of agro-morphological traits and their relation to grain yield can be helpful in determining the most important agro-morphological traits affecting grain yield and their use in indirect selection. As the water resources available for agriculture become more limited, developing drought tolerant lines is significantly important. The purpose of this study was to identify the most important traits affecting grain yield in rainfed conditions and to use these traits in clustering to identify the best genotypes for introducing or conducting crosses to create new breeding populations.

Materials and methods
This research was carried out to investigate the relationship between agronomic traits and yield using 132 spring wheat genotypes in alpha-lattice design with two replications at the Agricultural Research Station of Gonbad-e-Kavos. Pedigree information is available on the CIMMYT Web site (http://orderseed.cimmyt.org/iwin/iwin-fb-table.php). Each replicate contained 12 blocks, and in each incomplete block, 11 genotypes were placed. Each variety was cultivated in four lines with a length of 1 meter and 0.2 meter lines spacing. Each plot was planted based on seed rate of 140 kg ha-1. Cultivation was carried out in rainfed condition. Characteristics of grain yield (g/m2), biomass (g), harvest index, number of spikes, height (cm), days to heading, days to maturity, grain filling duration, seed filling rate (g/m2/day), Flag leaf area (cm2), flag leaf specific area (cm2/g), leaf dry weight (g), 1000 grain weight (g), spike length (cm), spike weight (g) and grain weight per spike (g) were evaluated for all genotypes.

Results and discussion
The highest correlation was observed respectively between yield with seed filling rate (0.839), harvest index (0.838), biomass (0.858), 1000 grain weight (0.579), grain weight per spike (0.437), and weight of the spike (0.409). Yield had a negative and significant correlation with days to maturity (-0.566) and days to heading (-0.446). The negative and significant correlations between yield under rainfed conditions and days to maturity are a mechanism for avoiding drought stress at the end of the season. The genotypes that earlier complete their physiological maturity could run away from drought stress at the end of the season and do not face stress. Seed filling rate and days to heading were introduced into the model as important traits affecting grain yield. These traits account for 78.1% of the variation in yield. Path analysis indicated that seed filling rate had the most direct effect on yield (0.773). Also, the days to heading had a direct effect of -0.285 on performance. Cluster analysis in this study was conducted with the aim of grouping the studied genotypes in terms of performance related traits. Group 5 and 7 were superior to other groups in terms of traits. The yield of genotypes No. 38, 39 and 52 was 572.5, 578.3 and 535.8 g/m2, respectively. Genotype No. 20 earlier heading than other genotypes. This genotype ranked second among the other genotypes for days to maturity. Therefore, this genotype has the ability to escape from the end-season stresses. Genotype No. 39 had the highest 1000 grain weight and the highest grain weight per spike.

Conclusions
None of the genotypes in Group 5 or 7 were superior to all performance related attributes. Therefore, in order to aggregate the characteristics associated with performance in a genotype, crossing of several genotypes and the production of breeding populations using these crosses should be used. Genotypes No. 20, with the least days to heading and the least days to maturity, genotypes No 12, 38, 39, 52, 67 and 85 with high seed filling rate and genotypes No. 103, 85, 39 and 20 with the highest thousand seed weight for Crossings and production of breeding populations can be used. It is suggested that a research be carried out in a few years using genotypes in groups 5 and 7 to select the best genotypes among them more confidently.

Keywords

Ahmadi, A., Baker, D.A., 2001. The effect of water stress on grain filling processes in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science. 136, 257-269.
Anonymous. 2018. XLSTAT manual. https:// help.xlstat.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2178395- download- the- xlstat- help-documentation
Assanga, S.O., Fuentealba, M., Zhang, G., Tan, C., Dhakal, S., Rudd, J.C., Ibrahim, A.M., Xue, Q., Haley, S., Chen, J., Chao, S., 2017. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and its components in a US popular winter wheat TAM 111 using 90K SNPs. PloS one. 12, p.e0189669.
Blum, A., 1998. Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation. Euphytica, 100, 77-83.
Bruce, W.B., Edmeades, G.O., Barker, T.C., 2002. Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. Journal of experimental botany. 53, 13-25.
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A.M., Francia, E., Mare, C., Tondelli, A., Stanca, A.M., 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research. 105, 1-14.
Chandra, D., Islam, M.A., Barma, N.C.D., 2004. Variability and interrelationship of nine quantitative characters in F5 bulks of five wheat crosses. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 7, 1040-1045.
Ebrahimnejad, S., Rameeh, V., 2016. Correlation and factor analysis of grain yield and some important component characters in spring bread wheat genotypes. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova. 16, 5-15.
Farshadfar, E., 2006. Multivariate Principles and Procedures of Statistics. Razi University Press. 734p. [In Persian].
Ghaderi, M. G., Zeinali Khanghah, H., Hosseinzadeh, A. H., Taleei, A. R., Naghavi, M. R., 2009. Evaluation of relationships between grain yield, yield components and the other characteristics associated with grain yield in bread wheat using multivariate statistical analysis. Journal of Iranian Field Crop Research. 7, 573-583. [In Persian with English summary].
Golparvar, A. R., Ghannadha, M. R., Zali A.A., Ahmadi, A., 2002. Evaluation of some morphological traits as selection criteria for improvement of bread wheat. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 4, 202-207. [In Persian with English summary].
Hokmalipour, S., Seyedsharifi, R., 2015. Effect of seed inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr) affected by different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on the yield and some physiological parameters of barley (Hordeum vulgar L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 12, 822-833. [In Persian with English summary].
Janmohammadi, M., Ahmadi A., Poustini, K., 2011. Effect of leaf area reduction and nitrogen application on stomatal characteristics of flag leaf and grain yield of wheat under deficit irrigation. Journal of Crop Production. 3, 177-194. [In Persian with English summary].
Kandic, V., Dodig, D., Jovic, M., Nikolic, B., Prodanovic, S., 2009. The importance of physiological traits in wheat breeding under irrigation and drought stress. Genetika. 41, 11 -20.
Khalilzadeh, G.R., 2018. Genetic investigation of grain yield and its components in bread wheat genotypes using diallel method. Iranian Journal of Dryland Agriculture. 6,165-186. [In Persian with English summary].
Leilah, A. A., Al-Khateeb, S. A., 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments. 61, 483-496.
Mohammadi, S., 2014. Evolution of grain yield and its components relationships in bread wheat genotypes under full irrigation and terminal water stress conditions using multivariate statistical analysis. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 2, 99-109. [In Persian with English summary].
Moosavi, S.S., Kian Ersi, F., Afiuni, D., Abdollahi M.R., 2016. Evaluation of grain yield of bread wheat (triticum aestivum l.) promising lines and detection of yield related agro-morphological traits under terminal moisture stress. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 5, 91-103. [In Persian with English summary].
Ricards, R.A., 1996. Defining selection criteria improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation. 20, 157-166.
Senobar, A., Tabatabayi, S. A., Dehghani, F., 2011. Effect of irrigation intervals on grain yield, yield components and harvest index of bread wheat cultivars in Yazd region. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 3, 95-104. [In Persian with English summary].
Shahid Masood, M., Javaid, A., Ashiq Rabbani, M., Anwar. R., 2005. Phenotypic diversity and trait association in bread wheat (triticum aestivum L.) landraces from Baluchistan, pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 37, 949-957.
Tavakoli, A.R., 2012. Correlation coefficient, path analysis and drought tolerance indices for wheat under deficit irrigation conditions and nitrogen levels. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 10, 198-206. [In Persian with English summary].
Zarebayati, A., Khodarahmi, M., Mostafavi, K., 2017. Relationship among traits and path analysis for grain yield of winter wheat cultivars under normal and drought stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 13, 85-95. [In Persian with English summary].