Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Crop Horticulture Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Iran.

2 Department of Eco-Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
The area, production and productivity of maize have increased several-fold over the last five decades. In Asia, maize has recorded the fastest annual growth (around 4%), as compared to other cereals. In 2015 with about five million tons of corn, Iran was world’s fifth largest corn importer. Maize is one of the main crops for poultry and livestock feed in Iran. Maize is the number three crop after wheat and rice in terms of area and production and number two, only after wheat in terms of productivity. The average of area in Kermanshah province in recent years has been more than 45,000 hectares.
But in 2015 this amount has decreased by 30 thousand hectares, 15580 hectares, which is the main reason for water scarcity in the region. On the other hand application of chemical fertilizers in conventional agriculture severe environmental problems, increased production costs and negative effects on biological cycles causes. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers on yield and yield components of Maize under normal and deficit irrigation condition in western Iran region and looking for the best biological treatments could be applied to the maize to get a high yield in addition to keep our environment clean and safe.

Materials and methods
Field experiments were conducted for two years (2014 – 2015) at the agricultural research farm, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre in Kermanshah, Iran. In this research, effects of vermicompost and Azotobacter as a boifertilizers and chemical fertilizers on yield and yield components of Maize under normal and deficit irrigation was investigated in two sites. Sites included normal irrigation and deficient irrigation (65% optimum water requirement) and each site was conducted as the factorial split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications and three factors. Treatments included Azotobacter in the main plots (non-inoculation and inoculation), vermicompost (consuming 0, 2, 4 and 6 ton/ha) and chemical fertilizers included N,P,K in tree levels (100% recommendation based on soil test, 50% recommendation and no fertilizer) in the sub plots. Irrigations were done at 7 day intervals. Irrigation treatments (deficit and adequate irrigation) in the middle phase of growth stage (approximately V6) began. Beginning on these dates, water was applied at weekly intervals based on the amount of evapotranspiration for the previous week as determined by the on-site weather station using a modified version of the Penman FAO equation. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance to compare mean by least significant difference (LSD) by SAS statistical software and graphs were performed by EXCEL.

Results
The yield of maize was significantly influenced by deficient irrigation; Results showed that during the both research years, grain yield was decreased from 8.2 ton/ha to 4.4 ton/ha by deficient irrigation. Although, application of vermicompost led to increase in grain yield, the highest grain yield was related to integrated treatments 6 ton/h vermicompost and 100% chemical fertilizers recommendation based on soil test. Results also indicated that the use of 6 ton/ha vermicompost and Azotobacter in soil, 50% of the maize fertilizer supplied. The results showed that combined use of bio-fertilizers with chemical fertilizers increased the grain yield. Therefore the uses of biological fertilizers significantly reduce the consumption of chemical fertilizers and reduce the adverse environmental effects. On the other hand from this experiment, application of vermicompost in combination with chemical fertilizers showed better performance than only chemical fertilizers, even in 100% recommendation based on soil test treatments. It can be stated that the increase in growth parameters of maize are due to greater availability of nitrogen in full organic and integrated treatments. In full chemical treatments most of nitrogen would be leached from the soil profile. In addition, high porosity and water holding capacity of vermicompost that helps in better aeration and drainage. Moreover use of 6 ton/ha vermicompost and Azotobacter in treatments with no chemical fertilizers produced 7 and 4.4 ton/ha grain yield in normal and deficit irrigation respectively.

Keywords

 
Afarinesh, A., Fathi, G., Chugan, R., Syadat, S.A., Alamisaid, G., Ashrafizadeh, S.R., 2016. Effect of drought stress on physiological traits of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 5(18), 195-205. [In Persian with English Summary]
Ahmadabadi, Z., GhajarSepanlou, M., RahimiAlashti, S., 2012. Effect of vermicompost on physical and chemical properties of soil. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 15(58), 125-137. [In Persian with English summary].
Akbasova, A., Sainova, G., Aimbetova, I., Akeshova, M., Sunakbaeva, D., 2015. Impact of vermicompost on the productivity of agricultural crops. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 6(4), 2084-2088.
Arrudaa, L., Beneduzi, A., Martins, A., Lisboa, B., Lopes, C., Bertolo, F., Passaglia, M., Vargas K., 2013. Screening of Rhizobacteria isolated from maize (Zea mays L.) in Rio Grande do sol state (South Brazil) and analysis of their potential to improve plant growth. Applied Soil Ecology. 63, 15- 22.
Atta, Y., Abdel-fatah, A., Gaafar, I., AbdouHassan, W., 2015. Validation of accurate determination of Maize water requirements in Nile Delta. Proceedings of the 26th Euro-mediterranean regional conference and workshops. Innovate to improve Irrigation performances. 12-15 October 2015, Montpellier, France.
Babaogli, F., RahimzadehKhoeai, F., Mehrdad, Y., 2012. Effect of biological fertilizer on yield and yield components of corn (Zea mays) CV. S.C. 504 in drought condition. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. 2(3), 117-122.
Bahrani, A., Heidari Sharifabad, H., TahmasebiSavestani, Z., Moafpourian, GH., Ayenehband, A., 2009. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) response to nitrogen and postanthesis water deficit. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 6(2), 231- 239.
Daryanto, S., Wang, L., Jacinthe, P., 2016. Global synthesis of drought effects on Maize and Wheat production. PLoS ONE 11(5).
Delgosha, l., Mansorifar, S., Sadatasilan, K., Asghari, H., 2015. Effects of organic fertilizer, bio and chemical fertilizer on yield and forage protein of corn Maxima hybrid. Proceedings of the Second Conference of New Findings in Environment and Agriculture Ecosystems. 11 Sep. 2015. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Earl, H., Davis, R., 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of Maize. Agronomy Journal. 95(3), 688-696.
El-Karmany, M., 2001. Effect of organic manure and slow-release fertilizer on the productivity of wheat in sandy soil. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 49(4), 379-385.
Hegde, D., Dwived, B., Sudhakara, S., 1999. Biofertilizers for cereal production in India-a review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 69, 73-83.
Jahan, M., Koocheki, A., Ghorbani, R., Rejali, F., Aryayi, M. and Ebrahimi, E., 2009.The effect of biological fertilizers application on some agroecological characteristics of corn under conventional and ecological cropping systems. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(2), 357-390. [In Persian with English summary].
Jalilian, A., Ghobadi, R., Farnia, A., 2011. Effects of drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer on grain quality traits of corn 704 hybrid. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on New Ideas in Agriculture, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan branch. 16-17 February 2011, Isfahan, Iran [In Persian]
Kader, M., Main, M., Hoque, M., 2002. Effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat. On Line Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(4), 259-261.
Lunven, P., 1992. Maize in human nutrition. FAO, Food and Nutrition Series, No. 25, FAO code: 80, AGRIS: SO1. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0395E/T0395E00.htm.
Namazi, E., Lak, S., Fathinejad, E., 2015. Effect of vermicompost and chemical nitrogen fertilizer application on the various functioning of Maize seeds. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 3(3), 261-268
Nardi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A., Vianello, A., 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 34, 1527-1536.
 O’Leary, M., 2016. Maize: From Mexico to the world. CIMMYT. Retrieved Jun 24, 2018, from http://www.cimmyt.org/maize-from-mexico-to-the-world
Rezvantalab, N., Pyrdshty, R., Bahmanyar, M.,  Abbasian, A., 2015. Effect of sewage sludge and mineral fertilizers on the concentration of some micronutrients in leaves and seeds corn. Journal of Iranian Plant Ecophysiological Research.  8 (32), 21-30. [In Persian with English Summary].
Tartoura, A., 2010. Alleviation of oxidative-stress induced by drought through application of compost in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 9(2), 208-216.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K., Matson, P., Naylor, R., Polaskt, S., 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 8(418), 671-677.
Weggler-Beaton, R., Graham, D., Melaugin, M., 2003. The influence of low rates of arid- dried on yield and phosphorus and zinc nutrition of wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 41, 293- 308.
Yadav, P., Sadhu, A., Swarnkar, P., 2007. Yield and quality of multi-cut forage sorghum (Sorghum sudanense) as influenced by integrated nitrogen management. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 52(4), 330-334.
Zahir, A., Arshad, M., Frankenberger, W., 2004. Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria: Applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy. 81, 97-168.
Zotarelli, L., Dukes, M., Romero, C., Migliaccio, K., Kelly, T., 2015. Step by Step Calculation of the Penman-Monteith Evapotranspiration (FAO-56 Method). Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension. AE459. Retrieved Aug 4, 2018, from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.