Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty member, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Birjand, Iran

2 PhD. of Agronomy, Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Birjand, Iran

3 Faculty member, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity stress is a serious threat of plant growth and production over the world. Soil salinity is the major problem, which affects the yield of wheat crop. It is commonly observed in arid and semi-arid regions of the world (Atlassi et al., 2009). Crop growth reduction due to salinity is generally related to the osmotic potential of the root-zone soil solution. The relative salt tolerance of wheat crop is 7.0 dS∙m−1 and its yield decrease is 25% at 9.0 dS∙m−1 (Kramer and Amtmann, 2012). The reduction in growth and yield varies between cultivars (Sultana et al., 2000). The varietal differences in salinity tolerance that exist among crop plants can be utilized through screening programs by exploiting appropriate traits for salt tolerance. The recently developed cultivars form a much diversed genetic base and may therefore possess a wider range of salts stress tolerance.

Materials and Methods
In order to study the effects of salinity stress on grain yield, yield components, morphological traits and concentrations of Na+ and K+ of eight wheat cultivars and elite lines, two separate experiments in randomized complete block design with three replications were conducted at two places of Amirabad (saline condition) and Mohammadieh (none saline condition) in 2009-2010. Four elite lines including MS-88-8, MS-88-16, MS-88-17 and MS-87-8 and four salt tolerant cultivars including Ofogh, Arg, Bam and Kavir investigated. The first experiment conducted at the Research Farm of Birjand University located in Amirabad region which texturally the soil was sandy clay loam, with pH=8.2 and EC=13.69 ds.m-1. The second experiment conducted at the South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center located in Mohammadieh region which texturally the soil was loam, with pH=8 and EC=4.79 ds.m-1. Investigated traits were including flag leaf area, spike length, peduncle length, plant height, number of grain per spike, thousand grain weight, biological yield, grain yield, harvest index, Na+ and K+ concentrations and stress indices. Data analyses were performed using two-way analysis of variance with SAS 9.1. Means of treatments were compared according to Duncan test at the 5% level.

Results and Discussion
Results showed that salt stress led to significant reduction on all morphological traits and had the most effect on plant height. Salt stress had no effect on number of grain per spike, 1000 grain weight, and Na+ and K+ concentration in shoot. Biomass and grain yield in salt stress condition decreased 38.2 and 44.5 percent, respectively. MS-87-8 and Ofogh with grain yield of 4.02 and 3.72 ton/ha were better than Bam and Kavir checks and same as Arg. The best indices for selection of tolerant cultivars were HARM, STI and GMP, which Arg and MS-87-8 identified as the most tolerant based on them.

Conclusion
The results of this experiment showed that salinity significantly reduced grain yield, biomass and morphological traits of wheat cultivars and promising lines. Meanwhile, Arg cultivar and then MS-87-8 line had the highest grain yield and identified suitable for saline condition. Due to the presence of salinity resistance genes, they can be used for breeding of cultivars with high potential yield and also to cultivate in saline conditions.

Keywords

Ahamadi, G., Zienali-Khaneghah, H., Rostamy, M.A., Chogan, R., 2000. The study of drought tolerance indices and biplot method in eight corn hybrids. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 31(3), 513-523. [In Persian with English summary].
Amini, A., Amirnia, R., Gazvini, H., 2016. Evaluation of relationship between physiological and agronomic traits related to salinity tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 17(4), 329- 348. [In Persian with English summary].
Asadi, M., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., Golkar, P., Naghavi, H., Nakhoda, B., 2012. Assessment of salinity tolerance of different promising lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Advances in Applied Science Research. 3(2), 1117-1121.
Ashraf, M., Athar, H.R., Harris, P.J.C., Kwon, T.R., 2008. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Advances in Agronomy. 97, 45-110.
Ashraf, M., Harris, P.J.C., 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science. 166, 3-16.
Canama, T., Li, X., Holowachukb, J., Yu, M., Xia, J., Mandal, R., Krishnamurthy, R., 2013. Differential metabolite profiles and salinity tolerance between two genetically related brown seeded and yellow-seeded Brassica carinata lines. Plant Science. 198, 17-26.
Collaku, A., Harrison, S.A., 2002. Losses in wheat due to water logging. Crop Science. 42, 444-450.
Colmer, T.D., Flowers, T.J., Munns, R., 2006. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 57, 1059-1078.
Dehdari, A., Rezai, A. and Mirmohamadi Maibody, S. A. M. 2006. Nuclear and cytoplasmic inheritance of salt tolerance in bread wheat plants based on ion contents and biological yield. Iranian Agricultural Research. 24(2) and 25(1), 15-26. [In Persian with English summary].
Dura, S.A.M., Duwayri, M.A., Nachit, M.M., 2011. Effects of Different Salinity Levels on Growth, Yield and Physiology on Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum). Jordan Journal of Agricultural Science. 7(3), 528-527.
El-Hendawy, S.E., Hu, Y., Yakout, G.M., Awad, A.M., Hafiz, S.E., Schmidhalter, U., 2005. Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. European Journal of Agronomy. 22, 243-253.
FAO, 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics. Rome, Italy. Available online as http//www.FAO. org/docrep/013/i2050e.pdf.
Farouk, S., 2011. Osmotic adjustment in wheat flag leaf in relation to flag leaf area and grain yield per plant. Journal of stress physiology and Biochemistry. 7(2), 117-138
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C.G. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Publication, Tainan, Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Part 1: grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agriculture. 29, 897- 912.
Francois, L.E., Donovan, T.J., Lorenz, K., Mass, E.V., 1989. Salinity effects on ray grain yield, quality, vegetative growth, and emergence. Agronomy Journal. 81,707-712.
Genc, Y., Mcdonald, G. K., Tester, M., 2007. Reassessment of tissue Na+ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment. 30, 1486-1498.
Goudarzi, M., Pakniyat, D.H., 2008. Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences. 4, 35-38.
Hajizad, S., Nakhoda, B., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., Tabatabaee, S.M.T., Zarandi, S., 2011. Indicators of salinity tolerance in 20 genotypes of bread wheat. Proceeding of The First National Conference on Modern Topics in Agriculture. September 10-12, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch, Iran. pp: 744-751. [In Persian with English summary].
Houshmand, S., Arzani, A., Maibody, S. A. M., Feizi, M., 2005. Evaluation of salt tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiments. Field Crops Research. 91, 345-354.
Inamullah, H., Ahmad, F., Sirajuddin, M., Hassan, G., Gul, R., 2006. Diallel analysis of the inheritance pattern of agronomic traits of bread wheat. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 38(4), 1169-1175.
Kafi, M., Jafarnezhad, A., Jamial-ahmadi, M., 2005. Wheat ecology, physiology and yield determination. Ferdowsi university of Mashhad Press. pp 478. [In Persian with English summary].
Kafi, M., Stwart, D.A., 1998. Effect of salinity on growth and yield of nine types of wheat. Agricultural and Food Science. 12(1), 77-85.
Kanafi Laskoukelayeh, M., Dehghani, H., Dvorak, J., 2015. Response of salt stress in some bread wheat varieties by tolerance indices. Cereal Research. 5(2), 145-157. [In Persian with English summary].
Leilah, A.A, Al-Khateeb, S., 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments. 61, 483–496.
Munir Ahmed, H., Khan, B.M., Khan, S., SadiqKissana, N., Laghari, S., 2003. Plant coefficient analysis in bread wheat. Asian Journal Plant Science. 2, 491-494.
Naghdipor, A., Khodarahmi, A., Porshahbazi, A., Eesmailzade, M., 2011. Factor analysis for grain yield and other traits in durum wheat. Journal Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 7, 84-96.
Poustini, K., Sio-Semardeh, A., 2007. Proline accumulation as a response to salt stress in 30 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 54(5), 925-934.
Ranjbar, G.H., Rousta, M.J., 2010. The most effective stability index for selection of wheat genotypes in saline condition. Soil Research Journal. 24(3), 283-290. [In Persian with English summary].
Rontein, D., Basset, G., Hanson, A.D., 2002. Metabolic engineering of osmoprotectant accumulation in plants. Metabolic Engineering. 4, 49-56.
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1984. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Sadat Noori, S.A., Roustaei, A., Foghi, B., 2006. Variability of salt tolerance for eleven traits bread wheat in different saline conditions. Agronomy Journal. 5(1), 131-136.
Shamsi, K., Kobraee, S., 2013. Biochemical and physiological responses of three wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) to salinity stress. Annals of Biological Research. 4(4), 180-185.
Singh, S.P., Diwivedi, V.K., 2002. Character association and path analysis in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). Agriculture Science Digest. 22, 225-547.
Sio-se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research. 98, 222-229.
Tester, M., Davenport, R., 2003. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany. 91, 503-527.