Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Agricultural College, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.

2 PhD student of Plant Gentics and Breeding, Agronomy and Plant Breeding department, Gorgan University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Black beans are a variety of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and belong to the legumes. Black beans contain a wide range of flavonoids, as well as some phenolic acids. The problems of production of this product, which reduces yields, are non-biological stresses, including drought. About 60% of the world's cultivateted bean is at risk of intermittent drought or at the end of the season. Several indices have been proposed to assess the response of genotypes under different environmental conditions and to determine their resistance and susceptibility, which helps to select drought tolerant genotypes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of drought stress on yield and yield components of black bean genotypes and to evaluate the response of these genotypes to drought stress by indices of drought tolerance.

Materials and methods
14 bean genotypes including 11 black bean genotypes and 3 other genotypes (which were control genotypes) were obtained from the Gene Bank of Agricultural and Natural Resources department in Karaj in two completely randomized block designs with 3 replications in two adjacent plots In the educational research farm of Ilam University in the city of Mehran was cultivated. In the first experiment, irrigation was carried out as normal and irrigation intervals based on 50 ml evaporation from the evaporation pan. In the second experiment, water stress was applied at flowering stage. At this stage, the irrigation interval was based on 100 ml evaporation from the pan. The measured traits included number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, grain yield and 100 grain weight. After data collection, analysis of variance and mean comparison by LSD method were performed for the studied traits. In addition, in order to determine resistant and stress resistant cultivars, various indices related to stress resistance including SSI (stress susceptibility index), STI (stress tolerance index), TOL (stress tolerance index), MP (average productivity index), GMP (Geometric Productivity Indicator) and Harm (Harmonic Average Index) were calculated. In order to determine the best index, the correlation of genotypes yield under stress condition (YS) and without stress (YP) with drought tolerance index was calculated.

Results and discussion
The results of combined analysis of the data showed that the effect of environment and genotypes on all traits was significant and the diversity between the studied genotypes was observed in terms of traits under normal and stress conditions. In terms of yield, 1140 and 1170 genotypes had the highest and lowest yields respectively. In general, all traits were changed due to stress and their mean values decreased under stress conditions. The percentage of grain yield under stress was estimated to be 24.26%. The most changes due to drought stress in genotypes related to yield, pod number and plant height. The most changes were due to drought stress in yield, pod number and plant height of black bean genotypes. Based on the Principal Component Analysis on the six indicators, YP and YS in the genotypes evaluated, it was found that the two main components justify 98.9% of the total variation. The first component expresses 68.6 percent of the total variation. The highest positive factor in the linear composition of the first component was YP, YS, MP, GMP, and STI. Based on the analysis of the main components on the six indicators, YP and YS in the genotypes evaluated, it was found that the two main components justify 98.9% of the total variation. The first component expresses 68.6 percent of the total variation. The highest positive factor in the linear composition of the first component was YP, YS, MP, GMP, and STI.

Conclusions
Based on the findings of this study, yield loss in drought stress conditions in black bean genotypes was mainly due to the reduction in the number of pods per plant. According to correlation of YS and drought tolerance indices, STI, GMP and MP were the best indices of drought tolerance under stress conditions. Therefore, based on these indices, among the genotypes of black beans, 1183 genotype as the most tolerant (with 8.07 g per plant) and genotypes 1187 and 1177 as the most sensitive genotype to drought stress (respectively, with yield 4. 17 and 5.22 g per plant) were selected. Also, control genotypes (256, Talash and Daneshkadeh) had higher yields (respectively 18.72, 13.56 and 14.21 g per plant respectively) and, for most of the indices, were more resistant than black bean genotypes. By using bi-plot of the Principal Component, genotype 1183 selected as the most tolerant drought stress.

Keywords

Abebe, A., Brick M.A., Kirkby R.A., 1998. Comparison of selection indices to identify productive dry bean lines under diverse environmental conditions. Field Crops Research. 58, 15-23.
Abreu, I., Mazzafera, N.P., 2005. Effect of water and temperature stress on the content of active constituents of Hypericum brasiliense choisy plant. Physiology and Biochemistry. 43, 241-248.
Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Adams, M.W., 1991. Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science. 117, 213–219.
Assady, B., Dorri, H.R., Ghadiri, A., 2011. Evaluation of Chitti Bean Genotypes to Drought Stress Using Stress Tolerance Indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 27(4), 615-630. [In Persian with English Summary].
Bagheri, A., Mohamadi A., Dinghazali, F., 2001. Agronomy and Breeding Beans (Translation). Jahade-e-Daneshghahi Mashhad Press [In Persian].
Beebe, S.E., Rao, I.M., Cajiao, C., Grajales, M., 2008. Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favourable environments. Crop Science. 48, 582-592.
Broughton, W.J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., Vanderleyden, J., 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - model food legumes. Plant and Soil. 252, 55-128.
Deproost, P., Elsen, F., Geypens, M. 2004. High yields of mechanically harvested snap beans as induced by moderate water stress during flowering. Acta Horticultura. 664, 205-212.
Fernandez, A.C., Nishida, W., da Costa Proenc, R.P., 2010. Influence of soaking on the nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cooked with or without the soaking water: a review. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 45, 2209–2218.
Fernandez, G.C., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. pp: 257-270. In: Kuo, C.G. (ed.), Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. AVRDC, Shunhua, Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Khaghani, Sh., Bihamta, M.R., Changizi, M., Dori, H.R., Khaghani, Sh., Bakhtiari, A., Safapour, M., 2009. Compare quantitative and quality traits in white and red bean in common irrigation and drought stress. Journal of Environmental Stress in Plant Sciences. 1(2), 169-181. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kotchoni, S.O., Bartels, D., 2003. Water stress induces the up-regulation of a specific set of genes in plants: Aldehyde dehydrogenases as an example. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. Special Issue, 37-51.
Lopez, F.B., Johansen, Chauhan, C.Y.S., 1996. Effect of timing of drought stress on phenology, yield and yield components of a short-duration pigeon pea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 177, 311-320.
Majnoun Hosseini, N., 2008. Grain legume production. University of Tehran Press [In Persian].
Munoz-Perea, C.G., Wright, R.A.J., Westermann, D., Teran, H., Dennis, M., Hayes, R., Singh, S.P., 2005. Drought resistance, water use efficiency and nutrient uptake by old and new dry bean cultivars. Bean Improvement Cooperative. 48, 144-145.
Naseh-Ghafoori, I., Bihamta, M.R., Zali, A., Afzali mohamadabadi, M., Dori, H., 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components and determination of the best drought stress index in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Plant Production. 17(4), 71-89. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nunez Barrios, A., Hoogenboom, G., Nesmith, D.S., 2005. Drought stress and distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Scientia Agricola. 62, 18-22.
Padilla-Ramirez, K. S., Acosta-Gallegos, K. A., Acosta- Diaz, E., Mayek-Perez, N., Kelly, J. D., 2005. Partitioning and partitioning rate to seed yield in drought stressed and non-stressed dry bean genotypes. Bean Improvement Cooperative. 48, 153-153.
Pilbeam, C.J., Akatse, J.K., Hebblethwaite, P.D., Wright, C.D., 1992. Yield production in two contrasting forms of spring-sown faba beans in relation to water supply. Field Crops Research. 29, 273-287.
Ramírez-Vallejo, P., Kelly, J.D., 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica. 99, 127–136.
Rosales-Serna, R., Ramírez-Vallejo, P., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A., Castillo-González, F., Kelly, J. D., 2000. Grain yield and drought tolerance of common bean under field conditions. Agrociencia. 34, 153–165.
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. 21(6), 943-946
Schneider, K.A., Rosales-Serna, R., Ibarra-Perez, R., Cazares-Enriquez, B., Acosta-Gallegos J., Ramírez-Vallejo, A.P., Wassimi N., Kelly, J.D., 2004. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science. 37, 43–50.
Shafiee Khorshidi, M., Bihamta, M.R., Khialparast, F., Naghavi, M.R., 2013. Comparison of some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought tolerance.  Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 44(1), 95-107. [In Persian with English Summary].
Simon, J.E., Bubenheim, R.D., Joly, R.J, Chrles, D.J., 1992. Water stress induced alternation in essential oil content and composition of sweet basil. Journal of Essential Oil Research. 4, 71-75.
Teran, H., Singh, S.P., 2002. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science. 42, 64-70.
Turtola, S., Manninen, A.M., Rikalaand, R., Kainulainen, P., 2003. Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in scots pine and Norway spruce seedling. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 29, 1981-1995.
Wang, S., Meckling, K.A., Marcone, M.F., 2011. Synergistic, additive, and antagonistic effects of food mixtures on total antioxidant capacity. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry. 59(3), 960-8.
Zabet, M., Hosein Zade, A.H., Ahmadi, A., Khialparast, F., 2003. Effect of water stress on different traits and determination of the best water stress index in mung bean (Vigna radiata). Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science. 34, 889-898. [In Persian with English Summary].
Zlatev, Z.S., Yordanov, I.T., 2004. Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. 30, 3-18.