Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Instructor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Intercropping, defined as planting two or more crops simoultanously in a same field during a specific growing season, is an agronomical operation which has important advantages such as improving water use efficiency, increasing land use efficiency and yield compared with sole crop systems. Because of lowering available water for agronomical operations, water conservation methods are in high importance in agronomical systems. Partial root zone irrigation has been considered during recent years. In this method, half of root system is irrigated and other half is subjected to dry soil. In wheat maize intercropping it has been reported that partial root zone irrigation improved water use efficiency (Yanh et al., 2011). The purpose of this experiment was evaluating the effect of water deficit induced by partial root zone irrigation in growth and grain yield of maize and mung bean in intercropping and sole cropping systems to assess the possibility of improving water use efficiency.
 Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a field experiment during 2016-17 growing season in Lorestan province. A tw-factors factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications was employed to compare the treatments. The fist factor was irrigation (including conventional irrigation (I1) and partial root zone irrigation (I2)) which was applied after seedling establishment. The second factor was planting pattern including sole maize, sole mung bean, within-row intercropping and between-row intercropping. Water consumption and leaf area index were measured during growing period. At harvest time, grain yield and yield components were determined. Water use efficiency was measured by dividing grain yield on water consumption. Land equivalent ratio was used to evaluate the advantage of intercropping.
 Results and Discussion
The highest grain yield of maize was recorded in sole cropping system under conventional irrigation. The lowest grain yield of maize was achieved in between-row intercropping under partial root zone irrigation. There was a reduction in grain yield with lowering water availability. Leaf area index of maize in partial root zone irrigation system was lower than that of conventional irrigation. Partial irrigation reduced all yield component of maize including grain number and weight. However, the effect of water deficit on grain weight was more than grain number. Lower plant number per unit area can be considered as a cuase of the lower grain yield of maize in between-row intercropping. Furtheremore, reducing leaf area index under partial root zone irrigation showed a reduction in leaf size and number, resulting in lower solar radiation absorption and, finally, reduction of photo assimilates synthesis.
     The highest yiel of mung bean was achieved under conventional irrigation and sole cropping system which was not significanlt difference with within-row intercropping. Mung bean produced the lowest grain yield in between-row intercropping in partial root zone irrigation. Generally, partial root zone irrigation reduced mung bean grain yield in all treatments with the amount of 29%, 22% and 21% for soel cropping, between-row intercropping and within-row intercropping, respectively.
   Although the highest grain yield was achived from maize sole cropping under conventional irrigation, the highest waer use efficiency of this treatment was lower than that of sole maize and within-row maize-mung bean intercropping. In all treatment, water use efficiency was improved by applying the partial root zone irrigation system which its highest value was recorded for maize-mung eban intercropping (43%) and mung bean sole cropping (39%). Land equivalent ratio of both interropping systems under partial and conventional irrigation was more than one, indicating the advantage of intercropping. The advantage of within-row intercropping under both irrigation systems was two times more than that of sole cropping.
 Conclusion
Yield and yield components of maize and mung bean were reduced under partial root zone irrigation due to the reduction of grain weight and number. Reduction of water consumption through partial root zone irrigation improved water use efficiency. The results of this experiment revealed that maize mung bean intercropping under partial root zone irrigation can produce optimum grain yield while improving water use efficiency.

Keywords

Beddington, J.R., Asaduzzaman, M., Clark, M. E., Bremauntz, A.F., Guillou, M.D., Howlett, J.B., Jahn, M. M., Lin, E., Mamo, T., Negra, C., Nobre, A., 2012. What next for agriculture after Durban? Science. 335(6066), 289–290.
Dhima, K.V., Lithourgidis, A.S., Vasilakoglou, I.B., Dordas, C.A., 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research. 100, 249-256.
Due, T.S., Kang, S.Z., Zhang, J.H. Li, F.S., 2006. Yield and physiological responses of cotton to partial root-zone irrigation in the oasis of northwest China. Agricultural Water Management. 84, 41-52.
Eskandari, H., Alizadeh-Amraie, A., 2016. Dry matter production and weeds growth in additive series of maize and cowpea intercropping in the consumption of some environmental resources under north Khuzestan climatic conditions. Research in Field Crops. 2(2), 46-57. [In Persian with English Summary].
Eskandari, H., Ghanbari, A., 2010. Influence of different intercropping pattern of corn and cowpea on light interception, forage yield and weed biomass. Production Science. 1(20), 49-57. [In Persian with English Summary].
Eskandari, H., Ghanbari, A., 2011. Evaluation of competition and complementarity of corn and cowpea intercropping for nutrient consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2(21), 67-75. [In Persian with English Summary].
Eskandari, H., Javanmard, A., 2013. Evaluation of forage yield and quality in intercropping patterns of maize and cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 4(23), 101-111. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fallahi, G., Hatami, A., Naseri, R., 2013. Growth analysis of six corn hybrid under drought conditions in Kermanshah province, Iranian Journal of Crop Physiology. 7(2), 181-196. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fathi, G., 2010. Effect of density on yield and yield component of mung bean cultivars under Khuzestan climate conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 1(41), 19-27. [In Persian with English Summary].
Gholinezhad, E., Ayenehband, A., Hassanzadeh Ghourt tapeh, A., Noormohammadi, G., Bernousi, I., 2010. Effect of irrigation regime on water and nitrogen use efficiency in sunflower at various levels of n-application and plant density under Urmia climate conditions. Journal of Soil and Water Science. 1(20), 27-45. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hauggaard- Nielsen, H., Ambus, P., Jensen, E.S., 2003. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea–barley intercropping. Field Crops Research. 70, 101-109.
Horst, M.G., Shamutalov, S.S., Goncalves, J.M., Pereira, L.S., 2007. Assessing impacts of surge-flow irrigation on water saving and productivity of cotton. Agricultural Water Management. 87, 115-127.
Hu, T., Yuan, L., Wang, J., Shaozhong, K., Fusheng, L., 2010. Antioxidation responses of maize roots and leaves to partial root zone irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 98, 164-171.
Jahansooz, M.R., Yunusa, I.A.M., Coventry, D.R., Palmer, A.R., Eamus, D., 2007. Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 26, 275-282.
Javanmard, A., Eskandari, H., 2014. Investigation of some competition and forage quality indices in different intercropping patterns of maize with vetch, common bean, bitter vetch and berseem clover. Journal of Crop Production. 7(3), 89-108. [In Persian with English Summary].
Javanmard, A., Dabbagh Mohammadi-Nasab, A., Nasiri, Y., Shekari, F., 2014. Evaluation of forage yield and some advantage of intercropping of maize and some legumes in double cropping system. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 12, 39-51. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kang, S.Z., Zhang, J.H., 2004. Controlled alternate partial root zone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany. 55, 2437-2446.
Khorammi-Vafa, M., Eftekhari-Nasab, N., Sayadan, K., Najafi, A., 2011. Water use efficiency in intercropping of pumpkin with chickpea and mung bean in different levels of nitrogen consumption. Journal of Agroecology. 3(2), 245-253. [In Persian with English Summary].
Miri, H. R., Shokani, M.M., Armin, M., 2016. Reaction of yield and yield components of maize under relative drought of root and potassium fertilizer. Journal of Agronomy. 111, 35-43. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mojadam, M., Modhej, A., 2012. Effect of nitrogen level on water use efficiency yield and yield component of maize in optimum and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 10(3), 546-554. [In Persian with English Summary].
Moradi, A., Ahmadi, A., Hosseinzadeh, A., 2008. Agronomical-physiological reaction of mung bean to sever and mediate drought stress during vegetative and reproductive growth stages. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 45, 569-671. [In Persian with English Summary].
Noryani, H., 2013. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of mung bean in different planting densities. Crop Physiology Journal. 18, 35-47. [In Persian with English Summary].
Nouriazhar, J., Ehsanzadeh, P., 2007. Evaluation of some growth indices and yield of five maize hybrid under two irrigation regime in Isfahan region. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 41, 261-272. [In Persian with English Summary].
Paknezhad, F., Vazan, S., Ajeli, J., Mirakhori, M., Nasri, M., 2010. Effect of drought stress and irrigation method on yield and yield component of two maize hybrids. Agroecology Journal. 18, 17-26. [In Persian with English Summary].
Raseduzzaman, M., Jensen, E.S., 2017. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy. 91, 25-33.
Shokoohfar, A. R., Abufetilenezhad, S., 2013. Effect of drought stress on some physiological properties and biological yield of mung bean cultivars in Dezful. Crop Physiology Journal. 17, 49-59. [In Persian with English Summary].
Taie, J., Ghanbari, A., Jokar, M., 2008. Intercropping is a way for increasing water use efficiency. Proceeding in First International Conference in Water Crisis. Zabol. University. Zabol. Iran.
Tang, L.S., Li, Y., Zhang, J.H., 2007. Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial root zone irrigation. Field Crops Research. 100, 117-124.
Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Chen, X., 2015. Effects of water limitation on yield advantage and water use in wheat/maize strip intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy. 71, 149-159.
Yang, C., Huang, G., Chai, Q., Luo, Z., 2011. Water use and yield of wheat/maize intercropping under alternate irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China. Field Crops Research. 124, 426-432.
Zang, S. Z., Zhang, L., Liang, Y. L., Hu, X. T., Cai, H. J., Gu, J., 2002. Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the loess plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management. 55, 203-216.