Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Lecturer, Department of Agriculture, Payam Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran.

2 Prof., Department of Agronomy, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Associate Prof., Department of Agronomy, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Corn (Zea mays L.) is the world’s third most important cereal after wheat and rice grown primarily for grain and secondarily for fodder (Nelson, 2005).Sweet corn is used as a fresh or processed vegetable.Sweet corn contains higher kernel protein, oil,starch, sugar contents and many other nutrients than the other maize types(Abolhasani et al., 2004). Sweet corn is favorable for fresh consumption because of its delicious taste,delicate crust and soft and sugary texture compared to other corn varieties. The human body needs nutritious food to stay healthy(Baybordi, 2006 ;Soriano et al., 2004). Drought is one of the factors,which threatens the agricultural products in most parts of the world . Shortage of water, on the other hand, is an important limiting factor in crop production.

Materials and methods
This test was conducted in agricultural year of 2015 in factoriel split plot style in completely randomized block design in three replicates in the Azad University research field of Arak (34°40′ N 58°25′ E and height of 1150 m). The soil of experimental plot was loam, pH 7.70,EC 1.20 dSm-1, organic carbon 1.50%,available nitrogen 0.02%, phosphorus 0.6% and potassium 0.2%.Experiment treatments including irrigiation patterns were carried out at three levels of conventional furrow irrigation (I1), fixed every other furrow irrigation (I2) and alternate every other furrow irrigation (I3). Subplots were considered with three levels of without zinc spray(control)(zn1), drop zinc spray(2/(1000 ) lit/ha )(zn2)and fast zinc spray(2/(1000 ) lit/ha ) (zn3)and Chase(v1) and Challenger (v2) as sweetcorn varieties.

Results and discussion
The ANOVA results showed that the effect of irrigation pattern at 1% level and the effects of foliar application of zinc and the effects of different genotypes and their interactive effects on Chlorophyll a were significant at 1% probability level. The comparison of varieties showed that Challenger had the highest chlorophyll a (0.889 gr.grfw)compared to chase hybrid(0.779 gr.grfw) during full irrigation,alternative and furrow irrigiation condition by 14.37% .In examining the interactive effect of treatments it was observed that the maximum Chlorophyll a belonged to I1ZN3V2 treatment (control irrigation, fast zinc and Challenger hybrid) by 0.995 gr.grfw and the lowest belonged to I2Zn2V1 treatment (furrow irrigation, Drop zinc and Chase hybrid) by 0.598 gr.grfw that were significantly different at 1% level.

Conclusion
Foliar application of zing has a significant effect on yield and yield components and physiological parameters of corn, so that we witnessed 11.65% of the increase of grain yield in fast zinc treatment than the control treatment without foliar application of zinc which could result from the stimulation of grain metabolism and consequently the prevention of damage to proteins, chlorophyll, nucleic acids and enzymes which cause the growth of plant chlorophyll and its higher storage in grains. According to the results of the research, in case of water restriction, the alternate irrigation pattern can be applied because the decrease of yield in such conditions was insignificant in comparison to the normal irrigation particularly in Challenger hybrid. Moreover, the foliar application of zinc, particularly zinc sulfate with fast zinc composition leads to the stable yield in stress conditions which can be proposed to the farmers in Markazi Province and Arak.

Keywords

Anderson, A., Kara, S., 2012. The effect of boron (B) application on the nutrient contents of maize in zinc (Zn) deficient soils. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2, 1-4.
Armit, J., Zieinal, M., Rostami, A., Chogun, R., 2012. Study of drought resistance in commercially late maturing dent corn hybrids. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 31: 891-907. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Ashraf, M., 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnology Advances. 27, 84-93.
Aston, O., Shirak, H., Nels, K., Sevy, M., Amerian, R., 2014. Effect of water stress and different nitrogen rates on phenology, growth and development of corn.Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 14, 116-12. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Ayad, H., Davis, R., 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation, use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal. 95, 688-696.
Balnus, E., Rinaldi, M., 2015. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research. 105, 202-210.
Bates, I.S., Waldren, R., Teare, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water- stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Benjamin, D., Ritchie, T., 2007. Short-and long-term responses of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit. Agronomy Journal. 84, 107-113.
Cakir, N., 2004. Cereal Production. 3rd ed., Shiraz University Press, 190 p. [In Persian]. 
Cakmak, M., 2008. Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Second Edition, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 997p.
Emam, Y., Seghateleslami, M.J., 2005. Crop Yield, Physiology and Processes. Shiraz University Press, 593p. [In Persian]. 
Friedrik, R., 2012. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89, 1-16.
Ghatavi, R., Kiniry, F., Arkin, F., 2012. Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal. 81, 61-65. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Grotz, S., Jones, F., Crookston, M., 2006. Effect of water deficit during grain filling on the pattern of maize kernel growth and development. Crop Science. 27, 726-730.
Harinasot, M., Jaafari, F., Mollahosseini, R., 2006. The effects of drought stress and plant density on yield and some agronomic traits of maize (SC 301). Journal of Research in Agricultural Science 2: 13-24.
Majidian, M., Ghadiri, A., 2014. Effect of water stress and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer during different growth stages on grain yield, yield components, water use efficiency and some physiological characteristics of corn (Zea mays L). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science. 33, 521-533. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Moison, M., Sharifi, A., 2006. Drought responses of tropical corn. I. Leaf area and yield components in field. Maydica. 35, 221-226.
Nayeri Khamsi, M.R., Emam, Y., 2007. Cultural management under drought stress. National Drought Seminar, Issues and Mitigation, 13-15 May, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University. pp. 156-171. [In Persian]. 
Panley, O., Shaw, A., 2006. The effects of soil moisture stress at different stages of growth on the development and yield of corn. Agronomy Journal. 52, 272-274.
Pierson, J.O., Tarkalson, D., Irmak, S., Davison, D., 2012. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management. 96, 1387-1397.
Pretty, S.R., Pandi, A., Nezak, A., 2010. The effects of drought stress at different phenological stages on growth indices of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 1(2), 69-77. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Rakers, J., 2013. Physiological bases for yield differences in selected maize cultivars from Central America. Field Crops Research. 42, 69-80.
Salardini, H., Moradi, R., Saed, A., 2004. Investigation of drought stress in different stages on yield and yield components of four maize hybrids. 1st International Conference on Water Recourses, Iran, P.6. [In Persian]. 
Salehian, Kh., Mazaheri, D., Peyghambari, E., 2014. Effect of four irrigation intervals on three sunflower cultivars. Desert. 9(2), 255–266. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Sawan, A., Ojha, N., 2001. Principles of Agricultural Engineering.Vol. II, Jain Brothers Publisher, New Delhi, 320p.
Scot, P., Aboudrare, A., 2009. Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environment. Europeanm Journal of Agronomy. 21, 433-446.
Shirazi, F., Allahdadi, G., Akbari, M., Behbahani, R., 2013. Impact of super absorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max L.), under drought stress condition. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 10(23), 4190-4196. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Soleimani, H., Asuirn, C., 2014. Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. 98, 801-807. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Soleymanifard, A., Pourdad, R., Naseri, A., 2011. Effect of planting patternon honological characteristics and growth indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13(2), 282-298. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
Taddayon, J., Ehsanzedeh, M., 2009. Study of relationship of some growth indices and yield of five corn hybrids at two irrigation regime in Esfahan region. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 41, 261-272. [In Persian with English Summary]. 
William, J., Westgate, M., 2013. Maize kernel set at low water potential. I: Sensitivity to reduce assimilates during early kernel growth. Crop Science. 31, 1189-1195.