Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Plant Breeding, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student of Plant Breeding, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Drought as one of the most important environmental stresses and limiting production of crops such as wheat, often leads to a significant decline in production. Identify and use specific physiological traits in breeding programs and also producing cultivars with characteristics consistent with drought conditions is one of the most important steps in drought stress studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diversity of bread wheat landraces in response to drought stress based on some agro-physiological traits (grain yield, gas exchange parameters, relative water content, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents) and also to exploring the possibility of selecting superior agro-physiological traits in identify drought tolerant genotypes using integrated selection index.

Materials and methods
This experiment was conducted on 19 landraces of bread wheat in a randomized complete block design with three replications under normal and rainfed conditions in the Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran during 2011-2012 cropping season. Sowing was done by hand at five row plots, 2 m length, and 0.20 m row spacing as 400 seeds per square meter density. Chemical fertilizers were not used during the research. The weeds control wad done by hand and using 2,4-D herbicide before stem elongation stage of wheat. Non-stressed plots were irrigated according to regional needs at heading, flowering and kernel filling stages. At full physiological maturity, two middle rows of each plot at both conditions were harvested to determine kernel yield per unit area.

Results
The mean of grain yield in irrigated and rainfed conditions were 1651 and 1273 Kg/ha, respectively, means that drought stress reduced grain yield as much as 22.86% but it increased proline by 253%. The considerable variation was not observed among genotypes in both conditions for gas exchange traits, except stomatal conductance. All the gas exchange-related traits were reduced due to drought stress so that the stomatal conductance had the highest reduction by 45%. Genotypes number 4, 9, 18 and 11 were known as tolerant genotypes based on all studied traits using integrated selection index. In ranking method which calculated based on all studied traits under rainfed conditions, mean rank, standard deviation of ranks and rank sum parameters, genotypes number 5, 2, 15 and 18 with the lowest rank sum were identified as the most drought tolerant genotypes by consideration the rank of each genotypes for kernel yield under both conditions, the value of studied traits and the integrated selection index, while genotypes number 3, 9, 13 and 10 as the most sensitive. In examining the relationship between various physiological indicators of drought tolerance, grain yield under both conditions and integrated selection index, using Biplot, the PCA1 and PCA2 axes justifed 51.46 % of total variation.

Conclusions
Integrated selection index introduced genotypes 4 (WC-4530), 9 (WC-47381), 18 (WC-47636) and 11 (WC-4566) as the most drought tolerant. Principal component analysis showed that integrated selection index (ISI) had close relationship with chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoid, leaf temperature, proline concentration, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance and grain yield under both conditions, therefore these traits were identified as superior traits for selecting drought tolerant genotypes using biplot graph.

Keywords

Abdoli, M., Saeidi, M., Jalali-Honarmand, S., Mansourifar, S., Ghobadi, M.E., 2013. Evaluation of some physiological and biochemical traits and their relationships with yield and its components in some improved wheat cultivars under post-anthesis water deficit. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 6(1), 47-63. [In Persian with English summary].
Alavi Sini, S.M., Saba, J., Nasiri, J., 2013. Evaluation of some physiological traits in drought tolerant lines of bread wheat in rainfed conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 29-1(4), 637-657. [In Persian with English summary].
Amiri, R., Bahraminejad, S., Sasani, S., 2013. Evaluation of genetic diversity of bread wheat genotypes based on physiological traits in non-stress and terminal drought stress conditions. Cereal Research. 2(4), 289-305. [In Persian with English Summary].
Araus, J.L., Salfer, M.P., Royo, C., Serett, M.D., 2008. Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 27, 377-412.
Atteya, A.M., 2003. Alteration of water relations and yield of corn genotypes in response to drought stress. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology. 29(1-2), 63-76.
Bahraminejad, S., Keshvari, R., Amiri, R., 2015. Evaluation of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes using drought tolerance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 8(2), 259-272. [In Persian with English summary].
Bates, L.S., Waldern, R.P., Teave, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress standies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-107.
Behra, R.K., Mishra, P.C., Choudhury, N.K., 2002. High irradiance and water stress induce alterations in pigment composition and chloroplast activities of primary wheat leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology. 159, 967-973.
Blum, A., Ebercon, A., 1981. Cell membrance stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Science. 21, 43-47.
Blum, A., Gozlan, G., Mayer, I., 1981. The manifestation of dehydration avoidance in wheat breeding germplasm. Crop Science. 21, 495-499.
Blum, A., 2011. Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments. Springer Verlag.
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Impiglia, A., 1998. Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica. 103, 307-318.
Farshadfar, E., Mohammadi, R., Aghaee, M., Sutka, J., 2003. Identification of QTLs involved in physiological and agronomic indicators of drought tolerance in rye using a multiple selection index. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 51(4), 419-428.
Farshadfar, E., Elyasi, P., 2012. Screening quantitative indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) landraces. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2(3), 577-584.
Farshadfar, E., Jalali, S., Saeidi, M., 2012. Introduction of a new selection index for improvement of drought tolerance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2(4), 1181-1187.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Egert, M., Tevini, M., 2002. Influence of drought on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress in leaves of chives (Allium choenoprasum). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 48, 43-49.
Gregersen, P.L., Holm, P.B., 2007. Transcriptome analysis of senescence in the flag leaf of wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 5, 192-206.
Gupta, N.K., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., 2001. Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationships with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 186, 55-62.
Haddadin, M.F., 2015. Assessment of drought tolerant barley varieties under water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 5(2), 131-137.
Hao, Z., Li, X.H., Su, Z.J., Xie, C.X., Li, M.S., Liang, X.L., Weng, J.F., Zhang, D.G., Li, L., Zhang, S.H., 2011. A proposed selection criterion for drought resistance across multiple environments in maize. Breeding Science. 61, 101-108.
Ilker, E., Tatar, Ö., Aykut Tonk, F., Tosun, M., 2011. Determination of tolerance level of some wheat genotypes to post-anthesis drought. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 16(1), 59-63.
Khakwani, A.A., Dennett, M.D., Munir, M., 2011. Drought tolerance screening of wheat varieties by inducing water stress conditions. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 33(2), 135-142.
Khalili, M., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Naghavi, M.R., 2013. Screening of drought tolerant cultivars in barley using morpho-physiological traits and Integrated Selection Index under water deficit stress condition. Advanced Crop Science. 3(7), 462-471.
Koc, N., Barutcular, C., Genc, I., 2003. Photosynthesis and productivity of old and modern durum wheat in a Mediterranean environment. Crop Science. 43, 2089-2098.
Lawlor, D.W., 1995. The Effect of Water Deficit on Photosynthesis. pp. 129-160. In: Smirnof, N. (ed.) Environment and Plant Metabolism, Flexibility and Acclimation. BIOS Scientific Publisher. London.
Lichtenthaler, H., Wellburn, A.R., 1983. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions. 603, 591-592.
Mafakheri, A., Siosemardeh, A., Bahramnejad, B., Struik, P.C., Sohrabi, E., 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 4(8), 580-585.
Mohammadi, M., 2008. Study of the possibility of using synthetic wheat derivatives under warm and dry conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 24(3), 487-500. [In Persian with English summary].
Mohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R., Abdipour, M., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5(4), 487- 493.
Reynolds, M.P., Mujeeb-Kazi, A., Sawkins, M., 2005. Prospects for utilizing plant- adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought – and salinity- prone environments. Annals of Applied Biology. 146, 239-259.
Robin, S., Pathan, M.S., Courtois, B., Lafitte, R., Carandang, S., Lanceras, S., Amante, M., Nguyen, H.T., Li, Z., 2003. Mapping osmotic adjustment in an advanced back-cross inbred population of rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 107, 1288-1296.
Roohi, E., Siosemardeh, A., 2008. Study on gas exchange in different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 24(1), 45-62. [In Persian].
Roshanfekr dezfuli, H., Nabipour, M., Moradi, F., Meskarbashee, M., 2012. Effect of temperature change on stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content of wheat. The Plant Production (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 34(2-A), 39-52. [In Persian with English summary].
Sadegzadeh, N., Hajiboland, R., Sadegzadeh, B., 2014. Different physiological response to drought in bread and durum wheat genotypes. Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal. 2(1), 21-32. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sanchez, F.J., De Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L., Ayerbe, L., 2003. Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water stress. Field Crops Research. 86, 81-90.
Shangguan, Z., Shao, M., Dyckmans, J., 2000. Effects of nitrogen nutrition and water deficit on net photosynthetic rate chlorophyll florescence in winter wheat. Plant Physiology. 156, 45-51.
Siosemardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Ebrahimzadeh, H., 2003. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to photosynthesis and their relationship with drought resistance in wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 34(4), 93-106. [In Persian with English Summary].
Szabados, L., Savouré, A., 2010. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Sciences. 15(2), 89-97.
Yang, J., Zhang, J., 2006. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist. 169(2), 223-236.