Document Type : Original Article

Author

Head of Jahad Agricultural Organization of Northern Khorassan, Bojnord, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress as the most extending abiotic stress has critical role on seed yield of canola in the dried and semidried regions of the world. Also, Climate changes affected canola production especially in Iran which had more fluctuant precipitation during spring. All growing and physiological aspects of canola plant is adversely affected by reduction of rainfall and increasing temperature milieu so that yield descend. There are many reports which announced vast genetic diversity among different species of canola in response to drought stress and results show that B. juncea had higher seed yield in drought stress condition than B. napus andB. rapa. Many traits and criteria are recommended for screening desired genotypes on the basis: 1) approved their role on drought resistance and yield, 2) comfortable measurement and suitable emergence in life cycle, 3) high heritability and 4) low time and expense for about 8 to 10 percent improvement at dried conditions. Effectiveness of used traits and criteria were investigated by many researchers and they reported that GMP, MP and STI are better than others due to their higher correlation coefficients with seed yield.
Materials and Methods
In order to study drought tolerance indices of 9 cultivars from 3 species of Brassica genous (B.napus, B. rapa, B. juncea), an experiment at 2 conditions including: terminal growth drought stress and control in 3 years, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011, was conducted in the form of RCBD with 3 replicates in agricultural and natural research center of Khorassan-e razavi, Iran. Drought stress in terminal growth drought condition was applied by the initiation of reproductive growth after winter low temperatures on the basis of 110 mm evaporation from Class A pan in stress condition and 60 mm evaporation in control condition. Seed yield was measured on the basis of two middle rows after removing of marginal effect and drought resistance indices for each year calculated.
Results and Discussion
Combined analysis showed that effect of year on seed yield was significant and the highest seed yield (3025.8 kg/ha) obtained at the 1st year of experiment due to higher precipitation and lower temperature during terminal growth and prolonging of growth duration for 25 -34 days in comparing with 2nd and 3rd years. Also, means comparison of seed yield for 3 years showed that canola seed yield at non-stress condition was 2527.7kg/ha and 2049.28kg/ha at stress conditions averagely. Different cultivars showed significant dissimilar responses of seed yield at drought stress conditions with unequal precipitation in three years of experiments. Hyola401, Hyola 330 from B.napus species produced the highest seed yield either in drought stress or control conditions. Bp.18 and Landrace cultivars from B. juncea species had the lowest seed yield equal to 1469.8 and 1581.9 kg/ha, respectively. Drought resistance indices; MP, GMP, and STI showed maximum correlation with seed yield in both condition (drought stress and control).
Conclusion   
Successful genotypes in restricted irrigation treatment had mainly higher potential yield than others and so this character is suggested for the first step of genotype screening. These genotypes will be introduced if they had also rational yield in limited water condition. This screening strategy can be authorized using STI, MP and GMP indices but using of stability indices such as YSI and YR mislead us for proper selection to have prosperous cultivars for years with high spring rainfall which happen unpredictably due to climatic variation at recent years. Totally, Hayola 401 and Hayola 303 are recommended according to their long term average yield in three years of experiment at both conditions and MP, GMP and STI criteria.

Keywords

Ackman, R. G., 1994. “Canola Fatty Acids—An Ideal Mixture for Health, Nutrition and Food Use,” In: F. Shahidi, Ed., Canola and Rapeseed: Production, Chemistry, Nutrition and Processing Technology, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 81-89.
Aliakbari M., Razi H., Kazemeini, S. A., 2014. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars Using Drought Tolerance Indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2, 696-705.
Choghakaboodi, Z., Zebarjadi, A., Kahrizi, D., 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerance in canola genotypes in farm and laboratory condition. Seed and Plant Improvements Journal. 17, 28-37 (in Persian).
Clark, J. M., Depauw, R. M., and Townley-Smith, T.F., 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science. 32,723-728.
Donatelli, M., Hammer, G. L., and Vanderlip, R. L., 1992. Genotype and water limitation effects on phonology, growth and transpiration efficiency in grain Sorghum. Crop Science. 32,781-786.
Farooq M., Wahid A., Kobayashi N., Fujita D., Basra SMA., 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag (Germany). 29 (1),185-212.
Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M. M., & Safavi, S. M., 2013. Assessment of drought tolerance in land races of bread wheat based on resistance/tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 1(2), 143-158.
Fernandez, G. C. J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C. G (Ed), Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, Pub., Tainan. Taiwan.
Finlay, K. W., and Wilkinson, G. N., 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 14, 742-754.
Fischer, R. A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Part 1: grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Gan, Y., Malhi, S. S., Brandt, S., Katepa-Muponwa F., and Kutcherm, H. R., 2007. Brassica juncea canola in the northern great plains: responses to diverse environments and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal. 99, 1208-1218.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L., and Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531.
Jahangiri, S. and Kahrizi, D., 2015. Study of genetic variation and drought tolerance in commercial rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Genetic Resources, 1(2), 73-82.
Kakaei, M., Zebarjadi, A., Mostafaei, A., Rezaeizadeh, A., 2010. Identification of Rapeseed drought tolerance genotypes using tolerant indices.  Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 2, 107-124.
Kohli, M. M., and McMahon, M. A., 1988. A perspective of research needs for non-irrigated tropical conditions, wheat production constraints in tropical environments CIMMYT, Mexico. pp. 330-347.
Naeemi M., Akbari Gh. A., Shirani Rad A. H., 2007. Investigation of some morphological and agronomical traits of rapeseed cultivars in response to withheld irrigation at reproductive growth stages. Agricultural Research. 7(3), 223–234 (in Persian).
Nazaripour, H. And Mansouri Daneshvar, M. R., 2014. Spatial contribution of one-day precipitations variability to rainy days and rainfall amounts in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 11, 1751-1758.
Passioura, J., 1983. Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural water management. 7(1), 265-280.
Passioura, J., 1997. Drought and drought tolerance. In Drought tolerance in higher plants: genetical, physiological and molecular biological analysis. Springer, p. 1-5.
Peterson, C. J., Graybosch, R. A., Baenziger, P. S., and Grombacher, A. W., 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Science. 32(1), 98-103.
Pordad, S. S., Alizadeh, Kh., Azizinejad, R., Abdollah, SH,. Eskandari, M., Kheyavi, M., Nabati, E., 2008. Evaluation drought resistance in spring Carthamus tinctorius in different area. Journal of Sciences and Technologyof Agriculture and Natural Resources.12, 403-415 (in Persian)
Rad, A. H. S. and Abbasian, A., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in winter rapeseed cultivars based on tolerance and sensitivity indices. Žemdirbystė (Agriculture), 98(1), 41-48.
Reynolds, M. and Tuberosa, R., 2008. Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biology. 11, 171–179.
Rice, R., 1994. “Mediterranean Diet,” Lancet, Vol. 344, No. 8926, pp. 893-894. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92869-X
Richards, RA, Thurling, N., 1978b. Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. II.* Growth and development under natural drought stresses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 479–490. 
Richards RA, Thurling, N., 1978a. Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. I. Sensitivity at different stages of development. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 469–477. 
Richards, R. A., and Thurling, N., 1979. Genetic analysis of drought stress response in rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus). III. Physiological characters. Euphytica. 28(3), 755-759.
Richards., R.A., 1978. Genetic analysis of drought stress response in rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus). I. Assessment of environments for maximum selection response in grain yield. Euphytica. 27, 609-615
Rosielle, A. A., and Hombling, J., 1984. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Saba, J., M. Moghaddam K. Ghassemi and M. R. Nishabouri., 2001. Genetic properties of drought resistance Indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 3, 43 – 49.
Sinaki, J. M., Majidi Heravan, E. A., Shirani Rad, H., Noormohamadi, G., and Zarei, G., 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science.  2(4), 417-422.
Tester, M., and Langridge, P., 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science. 327(5967), 818-822.
Thomas, H., 1997. Drought resistance in plants. In: Basra, S. A. and Basra, R. K. (eds), mechanisms of environmental stress resistance in plants. IPH Publishers, New Delhi, India. Pp. 1-42.
Wright P.R., Morgan J.M., and Jessop R.S., 1996. Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: plant water relations and growth. Field Crops Research. 49, 51-64.
Zebarjadi, A.R., 2008. Study on effects of drought stress on yield and yield components in some of rapeseed (Brassica napus) winter genotypes. Final report of research No. 542. Razi University.