Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Student. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Birjand

2 Assistant. Professor. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Islamic Azad University, Maybod Branch

3 M Sc. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Islamic Azad University, Maybod Branch

Abstract

Introduction
Drought stress is one of the most important abiotic stress that leads to decreasing yield of crops, particular cereals, not only in Iran but also around the world. Accessing to sufficient nutrients like potassium is one of the ways that increase crop resistance. Potassium is an essential element to growing plants. This element is a multitasking nutrient in plants that use in activation of enzymes, osmotic control, carbohydrate production and partitioning and anion cation balance. So because of Hulless Barley importance for human, animals and birds feed,  drought expansion in Iran and around the world, importance of potassium element to decrease drought stress effects, metabolic process improvement and plant photosynthesis, an experiment to find out the effects of drought stress and potassium on yield and yield components of Hulless Barley conducted.
 
Materials and methods
To find out effects of different irrigation regimes and different amounts of potassium on yield and yield components of Hulless Barley, a split plot experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replicates was conducted at the Research Farm of Islamic Azad University, Meybod Branch in 2012. Each block was consist of 3 main plots and 4 sub plots in each main plot. Main plot was consist of irrigation cycles: 7 days irrigation (control), 14 days irrigation (moderate stress) and 21 days irrigation (extreme stress). Sub plot was consist of 4 levels nutrient elements: 0, 100, 200 and 300 kg.ha-1 potassium sulphate. Different potassium levels were applied before sowing. At the end of growing season, grain yield, straw yield, biological yield measured. Also Fertile tiller number, grain number per spike and 1000 grain weight of Hulless Barley measured as yield components.
 
Results and discussion
Results showed that most yeild(3147.5 kg.h-1) and yield components achieved in 7 days irrigation cycle. Yield components decreased 12 and 43 percentage by increasing irrigation cycle to 14 and 21 days. Seed yield was 2761 and 1792 kg.h-1 at 14 and 21 irrigation cycle. Also potassium sulfate application improved agricultural characteristics and decreased negative effects of drought stress. Result showed that increase potassium sulphate application from 0 upto 300 kg.h-1 had significant effect on seed yield, but there was no significant difference between 200 and 300 kg.h-1 application. Maximum harvest index (36.1%) achieved at 200 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications. Minimum harvest index (32%) achieved at 0 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications. Maximum fertile tillers (1.2) was in 7 days irrigation cycle + 200 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications and minimum fertile tiller was in 21 days irrigation cycle + 200 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications. In 7 days irrigation cycle and 14 days irrigation cycle, 100 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications caused to increasing fertile tiller number. More potassium sulphate application had no significant effect on fertile tiller number. Also results showed that increase potassium sulphate application from 0 upto 100 kg.h-1 lead to increasing grain number per spike from 26.6 to 31. Among different amounts of potassium suphate application, no potassium sulphate application treatment had the lowest (30.9 gr) 1000 grain weight and 300 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate applications had highest (34 gr) 1000 grain weight.
 
Conclusion
Results showed in no water limitation condition recommended 7 days irrigation cycle for maximum yield. Results showed Hulless Barley can tolerate moderate water stress, so in water limitation condition 14 days irrigation cycle application can suggest for achievement acceptable biological yield of Hulless Barley. According to this experiment results, potassium nutrition can improve yield characteristics in water limitation. There was no significant difference between 200 or 300 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate application, so for reduce negative enviromental effects, 200 kg.h-1 potassium sulphate application can suggest for achievement acceptable yield of Hulless Barley.

Keywords

Ahmed, S., Gilani, M., 2002. Drought resistance: A potential wayto increase dry land crop production in highland Balochistan. Asian Journal ofPlant Science. 5, 264-263.
Bertsch, P.M., Thomas, W., 1985. Potassium status of temperate region soils. In: Potassium in Agriculture. ASA-CSSA-Modison, Wiscansin., USA.
Bruck, H., Payne, W.A., Sattelmacher, B., 2000. Effects of phosphorus and water supply on yield, transpiration, water–use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination of pearl millet. Crop Science. 40, 120-125.
Chaves, M.M., Flexas, J., Pinhiero, C., 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress:regulation from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany. 103, 51–60.
Demidchik, V., Cuin, T.A., Svistunenko, D., Smith, S.J., Miller, A.J., Shabala, S., Sokolik,A., Yurin, V., 2010. Arabidopsis root K+-efflux conductance activated by hydroxylradicals: single-channel properties, genetic basis and involvement in stressinducedcell death. Journal of Cell Science. 123, 1468–1479.
Ehdaie, B., Barnhart, D., Waines, J.G.,2005. Genetic analysis of transpiration efficiency carbon isotope discrimination and growth characters in bread wheat. In: Stableisotopesand Plant Carbon-Water Relations. Academic Press., Massachusetts.
El-Sayed, A.A., 2002. Improvement of food hull - less barley in Egypt. Paper presented inthe food earley workshop organization by ICARDA and FAO, 14-17 January 2002. Rom, Italy.
Emam, y., 2007. Cereal Crops. Third edition. Shiraz University Press. 580p. [In Persian].
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2013. http://faostat.fao.org /site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor.  Accessed 22 November 2013. New York, USA.
Fathi, G., Mc-Donald, G. K., 1997. Comparison of six barley cultivars under drought stress during grain filling nitrogen transfer in the greenhouse, Agriculture Journal. 20, 61-73. [In Persian with English Summary].
Guo, P., Baum, M., Grando, S., Ceccarelli, S., Bai, G., Li, R., 2009. Differentially expressedgenes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes inresponse to drought stress during the reproductive stage. Journal Experiment Botany. 60,31–44.
Hameed, A., Goher, M., Iqbal, N., 2013. Drought induced programmed cell death and associated changes in antioxidants, proteases, and lipid peroxidation in wheat leaves. Biologia Plantarum. 57, 370–374.
Heidari, M., 2007. Response of Plants to Environmental Stresses. First edition. Aras rayane Publishing. 420p. [In Persian].
Janská, A., Hodek, J., Svoboda, P., Záme9cník, J., Prášil, I.T., Vlasáková, E., Milella, L.,Ovesná, J., 2013. The choice of reference gene set for assessing gene expressionin barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under low temperature and drought stress. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 288, 639–649.
Jahan Byn, Sh., Tahmasebi Savenstani, Z., Modars Sanvy, A., Karimzadeh, G., 2001. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components and naked barley genotypes resistance indices. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and natural resources. 4, 34-25. [In Persian with English Summary].
Khazaee, H.F., Kafi, M., 2001. Effects of water stress on root and shoot growth and dry matter distribution in resistant and susceptible wheat varieties. Journal of agricultural research.1, 43-33. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kinet, J.M., Peet, M.M., 1997. Tomato. In: physiology of vegetable crops. CAB International., New York. pp. 207-258.
Koocheki, A., Hosseini, V., Nassiri-mahaliti, M., 2002. Water relations of plants and soils. Mashhad Jahad Daneshgahi Press. 370p.[In Persian].
Koocheki, A., Rashid mohasel, H., Nassiri, M., Sadr Abadi, R., 1992. Principles of physiology, growth and development of crops. Razavi Publications. 404 p. [In Persian].
Malakoti, M. j., Keshvarzm, P., Karimiyan, V. N., 2008. A comprehensive approach to identify and recommend the optimal fertilizer for sustainable agriculture. The seventh edition of the review is complete, Tarbiat Modarres University Press. 358p. [In Persian].
Ministry of Agriculture., 2008. The results of the survey, wheat and barley: Agricultural statistic (2007-2008). 62p. [In Persian].
Nikkhah, H.R., Saberi, M.H., Mahlouji, M., 2010. Study of effective traits on grain yield of two and six row barleygenotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) under terminal drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12(2), 170-184. [In Persian with English Summary].
Plaut, B., Butow, J., Blunemthal, C.S., Wrigley, C.W., 2004. Trunsport of dry matter into developing wheat kernels and is contribution to graibyield under post – an thesis water deficit and evaluated temperature. Field crops Research. 86, 185–198.
Sadras, V.O., and Milro, S.P., 1996. Soil-water thresholds for the responses of leaf expantion and gas exchange: A review. Field Crops Research. 47, 253-266.
Solomon, S., 2007. Climate Change 2007- the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press., London.
Subhani, G. M., Abdullah, Ahmad, J., Anwar, J., Hussain, M., Mahmood, A., 2015. Identification of drought tolerant genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare l.) through stress tolerance indices. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 25(3), 686-692.
Tas, S., Tas, B., 2007. Some physiological responces of drought stress in wheat genotypes with different ploidity in turkey. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 3, 178-183.
Wang, M., Zheng, Q., Shen, Q., Guo, S., 2013. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 14, 7370–7390.
Xiong, L., Schumaker, K.S., Zhu, J.K., 2002. Cellsignaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. The plantCell. 14, 165-183.
Yadav, R., Gayadin, S., Jaiswal, A.K., 2001. Morpho-physiological changes and variable yield of wheat genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Indian Journal Plant Physiology. 6, 390-394.
Zeng, F., Konnerup, D., Shabala, L., Zhou, M., Colmer, T.D., Zhang, G., Shabala, S.,2014.Linking oxygen availability with membrane potential maintenance and K+retention of barley roots: implications for waterlogging stress tolerance. PlantCell Environment. 37, 2325–2338.