Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Soil and Water Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity is one of the major environmental factors affecting the crop production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), specially, in arid and semi arid regions of the world. Remediation of saline soils and improvement of irrigation techniques are considered as alleviating methods in salt affected soils, but due to considerable costs, these methods are not feasible in every condition. Screening of varieties with tolerance to salt stress on the basis of yield, yield components and salinity tolerance indices is a suitable approach to deal with salinity and is important for future breeding programs (Houshmand et al. 2005; Poustini and Siosemardeh 2004; Saqib et al. 2005). Current study was carried done to evaluate different wheat lines and cultivars under saline condition of Zarindasht region; and to introduce a salt tolerant genotype for such circumstances.
 
Materials and methods
A field experiment was carried done to asses 14 wheat lines and cultivars under saline condition of Zarindasht region for two consecutive years. The experiment was in a completely randomized block design with four replications. Studied cultivars were: Chamran (as control), Sistan, Parsi, Haji Abad, Yavarous and Behrang. Also studied lines included of Line 34 and Line 73 which in companion with Sistan and Parsi cultivars were obtained from Yazd National Salinity Research Center. Lines 4 and 5 were the genotypes which had shown a considerable drought tolerance in experiments carried done in Fars Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources of Fars province. Other lines such as Ug 520, S-83-3, D-81-18, Line A were genotypes which had an optimum yield output in Darab region. The average soil and water salinity of the experiment location were about 6 and 9 dS m-1 respectively. In both years of the experiment leaf samples were collected at earring stage and sent to laboratory for analysis. The concentration of sodium, potassium and chlorine were measured in the prepared samples. During growing season days to spick and days to maturity were recorded in different lines and cultivars. At the harvest time, plant height, grain yield and thousand seed weight were determined. All data were subjected to compound variance analysis and means were compared with Duncan’s multiple range test.
 
Results and discussion
Results indicated that the highest yield belonged to Ug 520 genotype in both years of the experiment (2660 and 3170 kg ha-1 for first and second years of the experiment respectively). According to the obtained data for two year mean, Ug 520 showed 39 percent increase in yield production as compared to control. The evaluation of two-year yield means showed that after Ug 520, Line 5, Line 73, Line 4, Sistan, D-81-18, Line 34 and Parsi had greater grain yield than control (Chamra cultivar with 2095 kg ha-1). As it was expected durum wheat lines and cultivars had higher thousand seed weight than other genotypes. Shortest and longest period to reach to spiking stage were belonged to Behrang and Ug 520 respectively. Similar results were achieved for days to maturity. In respect to leaf analysis results showed that the lowest potassium concentration was observed in Behrang, while the highest concentration occurred in Ug 520. Approximately a vice versa trend took place for leaf sodium concentration, so that, Ug 520 had the lowest sodium concentration and the highest concentration was observed in another durum wheat cultivar (Yavarous). Grain yield of lines and cultivars showed a negative correlation with sodium concentration in plant leaf, while this relation was positive for potassium concentration and potassium to sodium ratio.
 
Conclusion
Results of the present study indicated that early ripening lines and cultivars with the ability to take up higher concentrations of potassium or lower concentrations of sodium had higher potential to tolerate salinity stress and produce greater yield than susceptible ones. Among studied genotypes, Ug 520 with highest yield, earliest ripening, and optimum salinity tolerance indices was recognized as the best genotype to be planted in Darab and Zarindasht regions.
 
 Acknowledgments
The authors thank Yazd National Salinity Research Center for funding this project and providing the required seeds of wheat lines and cultivars.
 

Keywords

 
Ashraf, M., Foolad, M.R., 2007. Improving plant abiotic-stress resistance by exogenous application of osmoprotectants glycine betaine and proline. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 59, 206-216.
Ashraf, M., 1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plant. Critical Review in Plant Science. 13, 17-42.
Banuls, J., Primo-Millo, E., 1995. Effects of salinity on some citrus scion-combinations. Annals ofBotany. 76, 97-102.
Bouyoucos, C.J., 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle-size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal. 54, 406-465.
Cominelli, E., Conti, L., Tonelli, C., Galbiati, M., 2013. Challenges and perspectives to improve crop drought and salinity tolerance. New Biotechnology. 30(4), 355-361.
El-Hendawy, S.E., Hu, Y., Yakout, G.M., Awad, A.M., Hafiz, S.E., Schmidhalter, U. 2005. Evaluating of salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. European Journal of Agronomy. 22, 243-253.
Ferreira-Silva, S.L., Silveira, J., Voigt, E., Soares, L., Viegas, R., 2008. Changes in physiological indicators associated with salt tolerance in two contrasting cashew rootstocks. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 20(1), 51-59.
Houshmand, S., Arzani, A., Maibody, S.A., Feizi, M., 2005. Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiments. Field Crop Research. 91, 345-354.
Jackson, M. L., 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jafar, M.Z., Farooq, M., Cheema, M. A., Afzal, I., Basra, S. M.A., Wahid, M.A., Aziz,T., Shahid, M., 2012. Improving the performance of wheat by seed priming under saline conditions. 198(1), 38-45.
Kashem, M., Asultana, N., Ikeda, T., Hori, H., Loboda, T., Mitsui, T., 2000. Alteration of starch-sucrose transition in germination wheat seed under sodium chloride. Salinity Journal of Plant Biology. 43, 121-127.
Khan, M. H., Panda, S.K., 2008. Alterations in root lipid peroxidation and antioxidative responses in two rice cultivars under NaCl-salinity stress. Acta Physiological Plant. 30, 89-91.
Patterson, B., Macrae, E., Ferguson, I., 1984. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Annual Biochemical. 139, 487-492.
Poustini, K., Siosemardeh, A., 2004. Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress. Field Crop Research. 85, 125-133.
Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Koocheki, A., 2001.Research history on salt affected lands of Iran: Present and future prospects–Halophytic ecosystem. International Symposium on Prospects of Saline Agriculture in the GCC countries, Dubai, UAE.
Saqib, M., Zorb, C., Rengel, Z., Schubert, S., 2005. The expression of the endogenous vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters in roots and shoots correlates positively with the salt resistance. Plant Science. 169, 959-965.
Shannon, M., 1997. Adoption of plants to salinity. Advances in Agronomy. 60, 75-120.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Washington. DC. USDA Handbook No. 60.
Watanabe, F.S., Olsen, S.R., 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorous in water and NaHCO3 extract from soil. Soil Science of American Procedure. 29, 677-678.
Yang, C., Wang, L., Liu, J., Shi, D., Wang, D. 2009. Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of barley plants. Photosynthetica. 47, 79–86.