Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. in Plant Breeding of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, respectively, in Agricultural University, Shiraz University.

2 Assistant Prof. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, respectively, in Agricultural University, Shiraz University.

3 Associated Prof. of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, respectively, in Agricultural University, Shiraz University.

Abstract

Introduction
Barley is the fourth most important cereal worldwide and it is well adapted to some of abiotic stresses.Late season drought stress is the most important limiting factor in production of barley. The existence of variations in response to drought stress, promotes breeders to look for the new genetic variations among barley genotypes in order to improve yield under water stress conditions (Jallel et al., 2004). Drought tolerance indices based on grain yield in both normal and water stress conditions enable breeders to identify drought tolerant genotypes (Zare et al., 2012).
 
Materials and methods
In order to identify barley drought tolerant genotypes and correlation between yield components and drought tolerance indices, 79 foreign genotypes and an Iranian control variety were evaluated under normal irrigation and water stress conditions in an experimental field at college of agriculture, Shiraz University, during growing season 2012-13. The experiment was conducted as split plot based on randomized complete block design in three replicates. Each barley genotype was grown on 4 rows of 2 meters length. In normal irrigation treatment, plants were irrigated every week to field capacity level, while irrigation was completely stopped after 3-leaf stage in water stress treatment. Yield and yield components including number of spikes, number of seeds per spike, thousand grain weight and biological yield were measured in both normal irrigation and water stress conditions. The following drought tolerance indices were calculated using grain yield under normal irrigation and water stress conditions: Stress susceptibility index (SSI) (Fisher et al., 1978), Mean Productivity (MP) and Tolerance index (TOL) (Rosielle et al., 1981), yield index (YI) (Lin et al., 1986), Harmonic Mean Productivity (HMP), Stress Tolerant Index (STI) and Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) (Fernandez, 1992).
 
Results and discussion
Biological yield, spikes number and thousand grain weight exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the stress tolerance indices. The high correlation between drought tolerance indices and thousand grain weight (Shahmoradi et al., 2011), number of spikes and biological yield (Dolatpanah et al., 2011) have been also reported in previous researches. Among various drought tolerance indices, MP, GMP, HMP and STI demonstrated highest positive and significant correlation with yield under both normal irrigation and water stress conditions and they were introduced as the best indices for identification of drought tolerant genotypes. These results are in consistence with the reports in a similar research carried out by Khokhar et al. (2012). In addition, according to results of principal component analysis, the first two components named as tolerant and yield stability component and susceptibility component, respectively, were able to explain 97% of the total variation. Based on different statistical analyses, the genotypes number 88 and 145 were identified as the most drought tolerant genotypes. Cluster analysis based on tolerance indices and yield under both normal and water stress conditions classified 80 varieties into four separate groups related to their response to water stress conditions.
 
Conclusion
The yield components of thousand grain weight and number of spikes as well as biological yield can effectively contribute to selection of barley drought tolerant genotypes as it was demonstrated by their high correlation with drought tolerance indices. The results of this research on identification and clustering of tolerant and susceptible barley genotypes can be used in barley breeding programs and to increase the diversity of Iranian barley germplasm towards production of new drought tolerant cultivars.

Keywords

Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Baum, M., 2007. Participatory plant breeding in water limited environment. ExperimentalAgriculture. 43, 1-25.
Ceccarelli, S., 2010. Drought and drought resistance. Encyclopedia of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Food. 1, 205–207.
Dolatoanah, T., Rostaie, M., Ahalpazsnd, F., Mohealipor, N., 2011. Effect of drought stress on grain yield and yield components of winter and facultative barley genotypes in maragheh region. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 1(29), 257-275.[M1] 
Eivazi, A.R., Mohammadi, S., Rezaei, M., Ashoriand, S., Pour, F.H., 2013. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought tolerance indices in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) accessions. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production.4(4), 813-821.
Emam, Y., 2010. Cereal Production. 4thed, Shiraz University Press. 190 p.
FAO database collection retrieved June 15, 2015, from http// www.fao.org.
Farshadfar, E., Zamani, M.R., Matlabi M., Emam-Jome, E.E., 2001. Selection for drought resistance chickpea lines. Journal of Agricultural Science. 32, 65-77.
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. p. 257-270. In proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops to temperature and water stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan.
Firoozi, B., Sofalian, O., Shekarpour, M., Razoulzade, A., Ahmad pour, F., 2013. Evaluation of spring wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices and principle component analysis. Environmental Stresses in Crop Science. 5(2), 99-113.
Fisher, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912.
Golparyar, A.R., Ghanadha, M.R., Zali, A.A., Ahmadi, A., Harvan E.M., Ghasemipirbalooti, A., 2006. Factor analysis of morphological and morpho-physiological traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought and non-drought stress conditions. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 72, 52-59.
Gonzalez, A., Bermjo, V., Gimeno, B.S., 2010. Effect of different physiological traits on grain yield in barley grown under irrigated and terminal water deficit conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 148, 319-328.
Jallel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farook, M., Somasundaram, R., Panneerselvam, R., 2009. Drought characteristics and pigments compositions. International Journal Agricultural Biotechnology. 11, 100-105.
Khokhar, M.I., Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Spiertz, H., 2012. Evaluation of barley genotypes for yielding ability and drought tolerance under irrigated and water-stressed conditions. American Eurasian Journal Agricultural Environment Science. 12(3), 287-292.
Paolo, E.D., Rinaldi, M., 2008. Yield response of corn irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Research. 105, 202-210.
Lin, C.S., Binns, M.R., Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science. 26, 894-900.
Moghaddam, A and M. H. Hadizadeh, L.P., 2002. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 18(3), 255-272.
Nazari, L., Pakniyat, H., 2010. Assessment of drought tolerance in barley genotypes. Journal of Applied Sciences.10, 151-156.
Pask, A.J.D., Pietragalla, J., Mullan, D.M., Reynolds, M.P., 2012. PhysiologicalBreeding II: A Field Guide to Wheat Phenotyping. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Rajjala, A., Hakala, K., Makela, P., Muurinen S., Peltonen-Sainio, P., 2009. Spring wheat response to timing of water deficit through sink and grain filling capacity. Field Crops Research. 114, 263-271.
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-stress Environments. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Shafiee Khorshidi, M., Bihamta, M.R., Khialparast, F., Naghavi, M.R., 2013. Comparison among some common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought tolerance using stress indices. Iranian Crop Science Journal. 44(1), 95-107.
Shahmoradi, S., Shafaoddin, S., Yousefi, A., 2011. Phenotypic diversity in barley ecotypes of arid-zone of Iran. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 27(4), 495-515.
Shiri, M., Aliyev, R.T., Choukan, R., 2010. Water stress effects on combining ability and gene action of yield and genetic properties of drought tolerance indices in maize. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 4, 75-84.
Pouriamchi, H.M.A., Bihamta, M.R., Peighambari, S.A., Naghavi, M.R., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in Kabuli type Chickpea genotypes. Seed and Plant Improvement journal. (3), 1-27.
Vaezi, B., Bavei, V., Ghanavati, M., Ebrahimpor, F., 2011. Evaluation of barley lines for drought tolerance under field condition. Agronomy Journal. 97, 10-20.
Zakizadeh, M., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Kahrizi, D., 2010. Study on genetic variation and relationship between plant characteristics and grain yield in long spike bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes-using multivariate analysis. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12 (2), 18-30.
Zare, M., Azizi, M.H., Bazrafshan, F., 2011. Effect of drought stress on some agronomic traits in ten barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Technical Journal Engineering and Applied Science. 1(3), 57-62.
Zare, M., 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for the selection of Iranian barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(93), 15975-15981.