Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Nuclear Agriculture, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

3 Associated Professor of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.

5 Faculty of Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
The world population is predicted to increase beyond 8 billion by 2030 implying major challenges for agricultural sector to secure food availability (Smol JP , 2012).Wheat is one of the main cereal crops, cultivated to meet great demands of the population for human feeding. It is the most important staple for bread flour in Iran (Nour- mohamadi et al., 2009). A key challenge for plant growth is global water shortage (Flexas et al., 2013; Foley et al., 2011). A variety of strategies has been used to improve the drought tolerance of crops, including traditional selection methods and genetic engineering (Fleury et al., 2010). In this case, irradiation is an appropriate approach for improving the level of genetic variation a short time.
Materials and methods
This study was carried out to determine the response of mutant line# 'T65588' derived from 'Tabasi' radiated with Gamma rays to drought stress. Germination traits were investigated in osmotic stress induced by PEG and water related traits studied in drought stress at adult wheat stage both under completely randomized design with three replications.
Results and discussion
The results of analysis of variance indicated that germination features were intensely affected by the PEG treatment. Also genotypes differed significantly for germination rate, plumule length and radicle length. Significant drought stress × genotype effect in germination rate, plumule length, radicle length and plumule dry weight indicated that reaction of genotypes to polyethilenglycol was not simmilar. Drought significantly influenced water-related variables- RWC, RWL and ELWR- traits and caused depletion in RWL and increasing in RWC and ELWR.
Conclusions
Mutant line# 'T65588' in germination features had superiority on its wild genotype ('Tabasi') in drought stress conditions. Persistence in RWC content of cultivars in water stress conditions may serve as good indicator of drought tolerance. As mentioned above, the rate of increasing in RWC for mutant line#'T65588' was more than 'Tabasi'. RWC is closely related to cell volume, therefore it may more closely reflect the balance between water supply to the leaf and transpiration rate (Farquhar et al., 1989).  Schonfeld et al (1988) observed a decline in the amount of RWC in wheat due to drought stress and reported the highest RWC in the tolerant genotype. Several researchers have shown that low rate of water loss (RWL) from excised leaves are related to drought resistance, and may be used as screening criteria in breeding programs (Winter et al., 1988). Our result is consistent with Golestani Araghi and Asad (1998) findings, who observed decrease in the RWL under stress condition in wheat. Big reduction in RWL in  mutant line may indicate the more efficient use of water by 'T65588' mutant genotype. Based on Lonbani  and Arzani (2011) suggestion, among the plant water relation parameters, ELWR could be a superior indirect selection criterion for grain yield. This trait is moderately heritable (Clarke and Townley-Smith, 1986) and can be easily estimated in a large population (Dhanda and Sethi, 1998). The rate of increasing in ELWR in mutant line#'T65588' in comparison to its wild variety ('Tabasi') was more, which is an another validation for assertion of Mutant line# 'T65588' in germination features and also water-related variables in adult plant had superiority on its wild genotype in drought stress conditions.

Keywords

Bewley, J.D., Black, M., 1994. Seeds, Physiology of Development and Germination. New York: Plenum Press. 445p.
Clarke, J.M., Townley-Smith, T.F., 1986. Heritability and relationship to yield of excised leaf water retention in durum wheat. Crop Science. 26, 289-292.
Dhanda, S.S., Sethi, G.S., 1998. Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (triticum aestivum). Euphytica. 104, 39-47.
De, F., Kar, R.K., 1994. Seed germination and seedling growth of mung bean (Vigna radiate) under water stress induced by PEG-6000. Seed Science and Technology. 23, 301-304.
El_Tayeb, M.A., 2006. Differential Response of Two Viciafaba Cultivars to Drought: Growth, Pigments, Lipid, Peroxidation, Organic Solutes, Catalase, and Peroxi_dase Activity, Acta Agronomy. Hung. 54, 25–37.
Farquhar, G.D., Wong, S.C., Evans, J.R., Hubick, K.T., 1989. Photosynthesis and gas exchange. In H.G. Jones., Flowers, T.J., Jones, M.B., (eds), Plants under stress. Cambridge University Press, pp 47-69.
Farooq, S., Azam, F., 2002. Co-existence of salt and drought tolerance in Triiceae. Hereditas 135, 205-210.
Flexas, J., Niinemets, U., Galle, A., Barbour, M.M., Centritto, M., 2013. Diffusional conductances to CO as a target for increasing photosynthesis and photosynthetic water-use efficiency. Photosynthesis Research. 117, 1–3.
Fleury. D., efferies, S.J., Kuchel, H., Langridge, P., 2010. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 61(12): 3211-3222.
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston,M., Mueller, N.D. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 478, 337–342.
Golestani Araghi, S., Assad, M.T., 1998. Evaluation of four screening techniques for drought resistance and their relationship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica. 103, 293–299.
Geravandia, M., E. Farshadfara., D. Kahrizi, 2011. Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 58, 69–75.
Gunes, A., Inal, A., Adak, M.S., Bagci, E.G., Cicek, N., Eraslan, F., 2008. Effect of drought stress implemented at pre- or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 55, 59–67.
Hooshmandpanah, Z., Alamzadeh, A., Nakhoda, B., Kazemini, S.A and Heidari, B., 2010. Breeding of bread wheat cultivar "Shiraz" to tolerate drought stress using Gama irradiation. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian with English Summary].
Jajarmi, V., 2012. Effect of drought stress on germination indices in seven wheat cultivars (T. aestivum L.). Agronomy and plant Breeding. 8(4), 183-192.
Kaufman, M.R., Eckard, A.N., 1971. Evaluation of water stress control by polyethylene glycols by analysis of guttation. Plant Physiology. 47, 453-456.
Kouchaki, A., 1989. Aspects of drought tolerance in sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2(2), 81-77.
Lonbani, M., Arzani, A., 2011. Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal drought stress tolerance in triticale and wheat. Agronomy Research. 9(1–2), 315–329.
Macar, T.K., Turan, O., Ekmekci, Y., 2009. Effects of water deficit induced by PEG and NaCl on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars and lines at early seedling stages. G.U. Journal of Science. 22, 5-14.
Maguire, J.D., 1962. Speed of germination-aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigour. Crop Science. 2, 176–177.
Marjani, A., Farsi, M., Rahimizadeh, M., 2004. Investigation of drought tolerance of ten pea genotypes in seedling stage using polyethylene glycol 6000. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 12(1), 17-29.
Martin, M.A., Brown, J.H., Ferguson, H., 1989. RWC and leaf water potential differentiated drought tolerant and drought susceptible genotypes of barly. Agronomy Journal. 81, 100-105.
Merah, O., 2001. Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Agriculture Science. 137, 139-145.
Nour-Mohamadi G, Siadat A, Kashani A. 2009. Agronomy, Vol. 1: Cereal crops. Shahid Chamran University press. Iran-Ahwaz. 446 p.
Rauf, S., Sadaqat, H.A., 2008. Identification of physiological traits and genotypes combined to high achene yield in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under contrasting water regimes. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 1, 23-30.
Ritchie, S.W., Nguyen, H.T., Holaday, A.S., 1990. Leaf water content and gas exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science. 30, 105–111.
Schonfeld, M.A., Johnson, R.C., Carver, B.F., Mornhinweg, D.W., 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Science. 28, 526–531.
Silva, M.A., Jifon, J.L., Da Silva, J.A.G., Sharma, V., 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 19, 193-201.
Smol, J.P., 2012. Climate Change: A planet in flux. Nature. 483, S12–15.
Takel, A., 2000. Seedling emergence and growth of sorghum genotypes under variable soil moisture deficit. Agronomy Journal. 48, 95-102.
Winter, S.R., Musik, J.T., Porter, K.B., 1988. Evaluation of Screening Technique for Breeding Drought-resistant Winter Wheat. Crop Science. 28, 512-516.
Yang, R. C., Jana, S. J., Clark, M., 1991. Phenotypic diversity and associations of some potentially drought-responsive characters in durum wheat. Crop Science. 31, 1484–1491.