Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in crop physiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, and Scientific Board Member of Horticulture and crops Research Department, South Kkhorassan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education center, AREEO, Birjand, Iran.

2 Associated Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University.

3 Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Iran

5 Associated Professor of Khorassan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education center, AREEO, Mashad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Crop yield, including sorghum, is limited under drought conditions, as one of the most important abiotic stresses. Although sorghum can be able to deal with a lot of stress like heat, drought and salinity, but in arid and semiarid areas is usually affected by water stress in the reproductive stage and after the flowering and its yield is reduced. There are significant differences between sorghum genotypes about tolerant to periods of drought stress and reactions to these periods. Some researchers emphasize on the characteristics of flag leaf water relations, especially because of its remarkable interaction with resistance to drought stress. Morphophysiological traits including leaf relative water content widely were used as selection parameter in addition to grain yield for drought tolerance in various crops. In this study, some traits such as cell membrane stability and relative water content and the response of yield and yield components of sorghum genotypes under drought stress treatments (irrigation cut off at vegetative and reproductive growth stage and normal irrigation) were evaluated in field conditions.
 
Materials and methods
In order to evaluate the effect of water stress on grain yield and its components, cell membrane stability and relative water content of leaf (RWC) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), a field experiment as a split plot design was carried out with 3 replications in 2014 at the research farm of the southern khorassan Agriculture and natural resources research and education center. Water stress treatments including normal irrigation (control), irrigation cut off in vegetative growth stage(emergence of terminal leaf as rolled) and irrigation cut off in generative growth stage(50% of plants in start of flowering) as the main plot and 10 genotypes of sorghum including KGS29, MGS2, Sepideh, KGFS27, MGS5, KGFS5, KGFS17, KGF13 and KGFS30 was considered as sub plots. To determine the yield components, half a meter in length of each plot was harvested and the number of plants, number of panicle, grain weight, and number of seeds per panicle were recorded. To determine the yield and biological yield and harvest index after the removal of 2 and a half meter of margin line and beginning and end of each plot, plants was harvested from the surface of 3 square meters, after drying, biological yield of each plot was determined. To calculate the relative water content (RWC), flag leaf samples were taken from each plot and the samples were weighed immediately and then refrigerated for 24 hours in distilled water untill their full swelling, then the excess water was taken by tissue paper and then put into the oven at 72 ° C for 48 hours. After drying, the samples are weighed and leaf relative water content was calculated through wetherley formula (wetherley). To calculate the amount of damage to the membrane or membrane permeability, three plants of each plot were randomly selected and their flag leaf were removed. Then 4 discs of the leaves prepared was puted in distilled water for 24 hours at refrigerator temperature (4 ° C). Electrical conductivity of water in wich leaves had been laid was measured by the electrical conductivity meter (EC meter) and resulting values were used for calculations. After collecting data on yield and its components, simple analysis of variance was done using SAS software. The means comparison was done using LSD test at the 5% probability level.
 
Results and discussion
Results showed that water stress had significantly effect on grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, 1000 seed weight and seed number per panicle, cell membrane permeability and Relative water content of leaf and caused to decrement of Them. The grain yield reduction was about 42% at the highest level of water stress in comparison with the control. Also the genotypes were significantly different about all above characteristics. The genotype KGFS13 had the highest grain yield, biological yield and harvest index. Interaction between water stress and genotype showed significant effect on all traits except for 1000 seed weight and cell membrane permeability. The highest value for (RWC) was belonging to severe water stress. Also with increase of water stress, cell membrane leakage increased, as the lowest value of cell membrane leakage and therefore the highest membrane stability was belong to normal irrigation and the lowest membrane stability was commonly belong to medium and severe water stress.
 
Conclusion
There are significant differences between sorghum genotypes about tolerant to periods of drought stress and reactions to these periods, also grain yield and its components, biological yield, harvest index, relative water content and cell membrane stability were different between genotypes and water stress treatments. Generally, water relations in flag leaf and cell membrane permeability can be used as criteria for assessment of drought tolerance as well as grain yield.

Keywords

Abbad, H., Jafari, E.L., Bort, S.A., Araus, J.L., 2004. Comparative relationship of the flag leaf and the ear photosynthesis with the biomass and grain yield of durum wheat under a range of water conditions and different genotypes. Agronomie. 24, 19-28.
Aggarwal, P.K., Sinha, S.K.,1984. Differences in water relations and physiological characteristics in leaves of wheat associated with leaf position on the plant. Plant Physiology. 74, 1041-1045.
Ali, M.A., Abbas, A., Niaz, S., Zulkiffal, M., Ali, S., 2009. Morpho-physiological criteria for drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at seedling and post-anthesis stages. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 11, 647-680.
Aruna, C., Audilakshm, S., 2008. A strategy to identify potential germplasm for improving yield attributes usingdiversity analysis in sorghum. Plant Genetic Resources. 6, 187-194.
Baili, P., Sui Fang, G., Geti, D., Sunzhao, H., Lu Yin, Y., Zhou Guang, S., 2006. Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status, membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize. Pedosphere. 16(3), 326-332.
Beheshti, A.R. and Behboodi, B. 2010. Dry matter accumulation and remobilization in      grain sorghum genotypes (sorghum bicolor L. Monech) under drought stress condition.    Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(3), 185-189.
 Bdukli, E., Celik, N., Turk, M., Bayram, G., Tas, B., 2007. Effects of post anthessis drought stress on the stem- reserve mobilization supporting grain filling of two- rowed barley cultivars at different levels of nitrogen. Bio Science. 7(6), 949-953.
Blum, A., 1996. Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve utilization. In: Braun, H.J., Altay, F., Kronstas, W.E., Beniwal, S.P.S., McNab, A. (eds), Prospects for Global Improvement. Procceeding of the 5th International Wheat Conference. Ankara, Turky. pp.135-142.
Brevedan, R.E., Egli, D.B., 2003. Short periods of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence, and yield of soybean. Crop Science. 43, 2083-2088.
Colom, M.R., Vazzana, C.,2003. Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought sensitiveweeping lovegrass plants. Environmental Experiments of Botany. 49, 135-144.
Ejeta, G. Knoll, J.E., 2007. Marker-assisted selection in sorghum. In: Varshney, R.K., Tuberosa, R. (eds.), Genomic-assisted Crop Improvement. Genomics Applications in Crops. 2, 187–205.
FAO. 2012. Statistical Book.
Fischer, R.A., Wood, J.T., 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III. yield association with morpho-physiological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 30, 1001-1020.
Gambin, B.L., Borras, L., 2007. Plasticity of sorghum kernel weight to increased assimilate availability. Field Crops Research. 100, 272-284.
Gan, S., Amasino, R.M., 1997. Making sense of senescence. Plant Physiology. 113, 313-319.
House, L.R., 1985. A Guide to Sorghum Breeding. ICRISAT. Patancheru P.O. Andhrapradesh. 344-502. India.
Jaleel C, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Somasundaram R and Panneerselvam. 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 11:100-105.
Kebede, H., Subudhi, P.K., Rosenow, D.T., Nguyen, H.T., 2001. Quantitative trait loci  influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 266–276.
Khalili, A., Akbari, N., Chaichi, M.R., 2008. Limited irrigation and phosphorus fertilizer effects on yield and yield components of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. var. Kimia). American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science. 3(5), 697-702.
Kumari Vinodhana, N., Ganesamurthy, K., 2010. Evaluation of morpho-physiological characters in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes under post-flowering drought stress. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4),585-589.
Kramer, P.J., 1983. Water relation of plants. Academic Press, INC. USA.
Liang, Z., Zhang, F., Shao, M., Zhang, J., 2002. The relations of stomatal conductance, water consumption, growth rate to leaf water potential during soil drying and rewatering cycle of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 43, 187-192.
Maman, N., Mason, S.C., Lyon, D.J., Dhungana, P.,2004.Yield Components of Pearlmillet and Grain Sorghum across Environments in the Central Great Plains. Crop Science. 44, 2138-2145.
Martinez, D.E., Luquez, V.M., Bartoli, C.G., Guiamet, J.J., 2003. Persistence of photosynthetic components and photochemical efficiency in ears of water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiology. 119, 1-7.
Mattews, K.B., Reddy, D.M., Ranj., Peacock, J.K., 2004. Response of four Sorghum lines to mid season drought. I. Growth, water use and yield. Field Crop Research. 25, 279-296.
Mc Dermitt, D.K., 1990. Sources of error in the estimation of stomatal conductance and transpiration from porometer data. Horticultural Science. 25, 1538-1548.
Prasad, P.V.V., Pisipati, S. R., Mutava, R.N., Tuinstra, M.R., 2008. Sensitivity of grain sorghum to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Science. 48, 1911– 1917.
Premachandra, G.S., Saneoka, H., Fujita, K., Ogata, S., 1992. Leaf drought relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, picuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing drought deficits in sorghum. Journal of Experimental Botany. 43, 1569-1576.
Rascio, A., Russo, M., Platani, C., Difonzo, N., 1998. Drought intensity effects on genotypic differences in tissue affinity for strongly bound water. Plant Science. 132,121-126.
Richards, R.A., Rebetzke, G.J., Condon, A.G., Van Herwaarden, A.F., 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science. 42, 111-131.
Richards, R.A., 1996.Increasing the yield potential of wheat: Manipulating sources and sinks. In: Reynolds, MP., Rajaram, S., Macnab, A. (eds). Increasing yield potential in wheat: Breaking the barriers. Mexico: CIMMYT. pp.134-149.
Rodriguez, D.J., Romero-Garcia, J., Rodriguez-Garcia, R., Sanchez, J.A.L., 2002. Characterization of proteins from sunflower leaves and seeds: Relationship of biomass and seed yield. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. 1, 143-149.
Saeidi, M., Moradi, F., Ahmadi, Spheri, R., Najafian, G., Shabani, A., 2010. The effect of terminal water stress on physiological characteristics and sink-source relations in two bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 12(4), 392-408. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sairam, R.K., Rao, K.V., Srivastava, G.C., 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to longterm salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science. 163. 1037–1046.
Schaffert, R.E., Albuquerque, P.E.P., Duarte, J.O., Garcia, J.O., Gomide, R.L., Guimares, C.T., Magalhes, P.C., Magalhes, J.V., Queiroz, V.A.V., 2011. Phenotyping sorghum for adaptation to drought, Part II. In Monneveux, P., Ribaut, J.M. (eds), Drought Phenotyping in Crops: from Theory to Practice. Generation Challenge Programme.
Sinclair, T., Bennetto, R.D.M., Muchow, R.O., 1990. Relative sensivity of grain yield and biomass accumulation to drought in field grown maize. Crop Science. 30, 690- 693.
Slafer, G.A., Savin, R., 1994. Sink-source relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Research. 37, 39-49.
Specht, J.E., Hume, D.J., Kumudini, S.V., 1999. Soybean yield potential-a genetic andphysiological perspective. Crop Science. 39, 1560-1570.
Thomas Robertson, M.J., Fukai, S., Peoples, M.B., 2004. The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mung bean. Field Crops Research. 86(1), 67-80.
Tuinstra, M.R., Grote, E.M., Goldsbrough, P.B., Ejeta, G., 1997. Genetic analysis of postflowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Molecular Breeding. 3, 439–448.
Van Oosterom, E.J., Hammer, G.L., 2008. Determination of grain number in sorghum. Field Crop Research. 108, 259-268.
Vinod, M.S., Sharma, N., Manjunatha, K., Kanbar, A., Prakash, N.B., Shashidhar, H.E., 2006. Candidate genes for drought tolerance and improved productivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Bioscience. 31, 69–74.
Wardlaw, I.F., Willenbrink, J., 1994. Carbohydrate storage and mobilization by the culm of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase. Australian Journal of Plant Physiolgy. 21, 255-271.
Weatherley, P.E.1950. Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytologist, 49, 81-87.
Yang, J., Zang, J., 2006. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist. 169, 223-236.