The effect of light quantity at different growth stages on agronomic traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate of Agronomy, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), similar to that of other crops, is influenced by various environmental factors, particularly light intensity. Light plays a fundamental role in plant growth and development, serving as the primary energy source for photosynthesis, the synthesis of organic compounds, and the formation of plant tissues. Light intensity influences plant morphology by regulating leaf size, stem branching, root formation, and other structural traits, thereby ensuring a balanced allocation of resources and promoting coordinated growth among all plant organs. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of light intensity at different growth stages of chickpea and to elucidate how different light levels influence its growth and developmental processes.
 
Materials and methods
The experiment was carried out at the Research Farm of the Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, during the 2012–2013 growing season. A factorial experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The experimental factors consisted of light intensity (100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and no direct light) applied at different growth stages (vegetative, reproductive, and the entire growth period) of the chickpea cultivar ILC482. Rows were spaced 25 cm apart with a planting density of 40 plants per square meter. The planting date, early vegetative growth, early flowering, and ripening (harvest) stages occurred on November 3, March 13, April 28, and June 12, respectively. Plant height, total dry weight, grain yield, number of seeds per plant, number of pods per plant, and 1000-seed weight were measured at harvest. Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software, and treatment means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test at the 5% probability level.
 
Results and discussion
In general, the reduction of light intensity during the entire growth period had a pronounced adverse effect on yield and yield component traits. The impact of reduced light intensity was greater during the reproductive stage than the vegetative stage. Overall, decreasing light intensity led to a decline in yield traits and their components. Compared with 100% full light, under 75% light intensity during the vegetative stage, biological yield, grain yield, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, and 1000-seed weight decreased by 24%, 30%, 28%, 27%, and 3.5%, respectively. During the reproductive stage, these reductions were even more severe (30%, 35%, 40%, 40%, and 4.5%, respectively). Reduced light intensity at the vegetative and reproductive stages primarily affected grain yield through changes in the number of seeds per plant, while the 1000-seed weight exerted the least influence. Leaf dry weight and leaf area index also declined with decreasing light intensity. Under full shading, leaf area decreased by 50%, 45%, and 55% during the vegetative, reproductive, and total growth stages, respectively, compared with the control. During the flowering stage, chlorophyll a content varied across light intensities, whereas chlorophyll b consistently decreased with decreasing light intensity. In general, the total chlorophyll content (a + b) was highest under full light conditions, and gradually decreased as light intensity diminished. Light intensity significantly affected the concentration of water‑soluble carbohydrates in leaves and stems. The higher levels of soluble sugars in stems and leaves during the vegetative stage compared to the reproductive stage may be attributed to a more extended compensation period under light stress during vegetative growth. In contrast, shading during the reproductive stage allowed only a limited compensation period, resulting in lower soluble sugar contents.
 
Conclusion
Even a 25% reduction in light intensity significantly decreased biological and grain yields, number of seeds per plant, 1000-seed weight, leaf dry weight and area, chlorophyll a, b, and total (a + b), as well as water-soluble carbohydrates in leaves and stems. Overall, chickpea growth is highly dependent on light intensity. A reduction in available light due to cloudy conditions (short- or long-term), mixed cropping with taller companion plants, or competition with weeds significantly reduces growth and yield, as chickpea is weak in competing for light resources.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bai, Z., Mao, S., Han, Y., Feng, L., Wang, G., Yang, B., Zhi, X., Fan, Z., Lei, Y., Du, W., Li, Y., 2016. Study on light interception and biomass production of different cotton cultivars. PloS One. 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156335
Balfagón, D., Zandalinas, S. I., GómezffCadenas A., 2019. High temperatures change the perspective: Integrating hormonal responses in citrus plants under coffoccurring abiotic stress conditions. Physiologia Plantarum. 165, 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12815
Chen, Y., Ghanem, M.E., Siddique, K.H., 2017. Characterizing root trait variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm. Journal of Experimental Botany. 68, 1987-1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw368
Chen, Z., Shah Jahan, M., Mao, P., Wang, M., Liu, X., Guo, S., 2021. Functional growth, photosynthesis and nutritional property analyses of lettuce grown under different temperature and light intensity. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 96, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2020.1807416
Dutta, S.S., Tyagi, W., Pale, G., Pohlong, J., Aochen, C., Pandey, A., Pattanayak, A., Rai, M., 2018. Marker–trait association for low-light intensity tolerance in rice genotypes from Eastern India. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 293, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1478-6
Fan, Y., Chen, J., Cheng, Y., Raza, M.A., Wu, X., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, R., Wang, X., Yong, T., Liu, W., Liu, J., Du, J., Shu, K., Yang, W., Yang, F., 2018. Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure, and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PloS One. 13, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198159
FAOSTAT, 2022. The food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (UNFAO, Rome, Italy). Chickpea production in 2022.
Gao, J., Shi, J., Dong, S., Liu, P., Zhao, B., Zhang, J., 2017. Grain yield and root characteristics of summer maize (Zea mays L.) under shade stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 203, 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12210
Gao, Y.B., Zheng, W.W., Zhang, C., Zhang, L.L., Xu, K., 2019. High temperature and high light intensity induced photo inhibition of bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) by disruption of D1 turnover in photosystem II. Scientia Horticulturae. 248, 132-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.007
Gaur, P.M., Samineni, S., Thudi, M., Tripathi, S., Sajja, S.B., Jayalakshmi, V., Mannur, D.M., Vijayakumar, A.G., Ganga Rao, N.V., Ojiewo, C., Fikre, A., Kimurto, P., Kileo, R.O., Girma, N., Chaturvedi, S.K., Varshney, R.K., Dixit, G.P., 2019. Integrated breeding approaches for improving drought and heat adaptation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Breeding. 138, 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12641
Gong, W., Jiang, C., Wu, Y., Chen, H., Liu, W., Yang, W., 2015. Tolerance vs. avoidance: Two strategies of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings in response to shade in intercropping. Photosynthetica. 53, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0103-8
Hussain, S., Iqbal, N., Rahman, T., Liu, T., Brestic, M., Safdar, M. E., Asghar, M.A., Farooq, M.U., Shafiq, I., Ali, A., Shoaib, M., Chen, G., Qin, S., Liu, W., Yang, W., 2019. Shade effect on carbohydrates dynamics and stem strength of soybean genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 162, 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.011
Khalid, M., Raza, M., Yu, H., Sun, F., Zhang, Y., Lu, F., Si, L., Iqbal, N., Khan, I., Fu, F.L., Li, W.C., 2019. Effect of shade treatments on morphology, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.). Applied Ecology Environmental Research. 17, 2551–2569. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_25512569
Lake, L., Sadras, V.O., 2014. The critical period for yield determination in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research. 168, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.08.003
Lorenzo, C.D., Alonso Iserte, J., Sanchez Lamas, M., Antonietti, M.S., Garcia Gagliardi, P., Hernando, C.E., Dezar, C.A.A., Vazquez, M., Casal, J.J., Yanovsky, M.J., Cerdán, P.D., 2019. Shade delays flowering in Medicago sativa. The Plant Journal. 99, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14333
Mitache, M., Baidani, A., Bencharki, B., Idrissi, O., 2024. Exploring the impact of light intensity under speed breeding conditions on the development and growth of lentil and chickpea. Plant Methods. 20, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01156-9
Mobini, S.H., Lulsdorf, M., Warkentin, T.D., Vandenberg, A., 2016. Low red: Far-red light ratio causes faster in vitro flowering in lentil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 96, 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2015-0282
Naveed, M., Shafiq, M., Nadeem, M., Haq, A.U., Zahid, M.A., 2020. " Noor-2013" a bold seeded and high yielding chickpea kabuli variety developed indigenously. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 30, 885–894. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2020.4.0104
Park, Y., Runkle, E.S. 2017. Far-red radiation promotes growth of seedlings by increasing leaf expansion and whole-plant net assimilation. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 136, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.12.013
Pierik, R., Testerink, C., 2014. The art of being flexible: How to escape from shade, salt, and drought. Plant Physiology. 166, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.239160
Ramegowda, V., Senthil, A., Senthil-Kumar, M., 2024. Stress combinations and their interactions in crop plants. Plant Physiology Reports. 29, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-024-00785-5
Shafiq, I., Hussain, S., Raza, M.A., Iqbal, N., Asghar, M.A., Reza, A., Fan, Y., Mumtaz, M., Shoaib, M., Ansar, M., Manaf, A., Yang, W., Yang, F., 2021. Crop photosynthetic response to light quality and light intensity. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 20, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63227-0
Sulistyowati, D., Chozin, M., Syukur, M., Melati, M., Guntoro, D., 2016. Selection of shade-tolerant tomato genotypes. Journal of Applied Horticulture. 18, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2016.v18i02.27
Szymanska, R., Ślesak, I., Orzechowska, A., Kruk, J., 2017. Physiological and biochemical responses to high light and temperature stress in plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 139, 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.002
Toyama, T., Hanaoka, T., Yamada, K., Suzuki, K., Tanaka, Y., Morikawa, M., Mori, K., 2019. Enhanced production of biomass and lipids by Euglena gracilis via co-culturing with a microalga growth-promoting bacterium, Emticicia sp. EG3. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 12 (205), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1544-2
Wang, X., Gao, X., Liu, Y., Fan, S., Ma, Q., 2020. Progress of research on the regulatory pathway of the plant shade-avoidance syndrome. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00439
Wimalasekera, R., 2019. Effect of light intensity on photosynthesis. Photosynthesis, Productivity and Environmental Stress. 4, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119501800.ch4
Yang, C., Li, L., 2017. Hormonal regulation in shade avoidance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8, 1527. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01527
Yang, F., Fan, Y., Wu, X., Cheng, Y., Liu, Q., Feng, L., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Yong, T., Liu, W., Liu, J., Du, J., Shu, K., Yang, W., 2018. Auxin to gibberellin ratio as a signal for light intensity and quality in regulating soybean growth and matter partitioning. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00056
Yang, F., Feng, L., Liu, Q., Wu, X., Fan, Y., Raza, M.A., Cheng, Y., Chen, J., Wang, X., Yong, T., Liu, W., Liu, J., Du, J., Shu, K., Yang, W., 2018. Effect of interactions between light intensity and red-to-far-red ratio on the photosynthesis of soybean leaves under shade condition. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 150, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.03.008
Yeasmen, N., Orsat, V. 2024. Industrial processing of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) for protein production. Crop Science. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21361
Yu, W., Liu, Y., Song, L., Jacobs, D.F., Du, X., Ying, Y., Shao, Q., Wu, J., 2017. Effect of differential light quality on morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activity in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 36, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-016-9625-y
Zhang, J., Chen, W., Dell, B., Vergauwen, R., Zhang, X., Mayer, J., Ende, W., 2015. Wheat genotypic variation in dynamic fluxes of WSC components in different stem segments under drought during grain filling. Frontiers in Plant Science. 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00624
Zheng, D.M., Wang, X., Liu, Q., Sun, Y.R., Ma, W.T., Li, L., Yang, Z., Tcherkez, G., Adams., M.A., Yang, Y., Gong, X.Y., 2024. Temperature responses of leaf respiration in light and darkness are similar and modulated by leaf development. New Phytologist. 241, 1435-1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19428
Zhou, R., Yu, X., Huang, S., Song, X., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.O., 2020. Genotype dependent responses of chickpea to high temperature and moderately increased light. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 154, 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.06.030

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 29 October 2025
  • Receive Date: 28 July 2024
  • Revise Date: 05 December 2024
  • Accept Date: 09 December 2024