Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Plant Breeding, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

2 Associated Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Saravan. Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

5 Ph.D., Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University,Western Azerbaijan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Maize, like other plants, faces various environmental constraints during its growth period, such as the lack of nutrients. In calcareous soils, zinc deficiency reduces growth and yields. One of the important methods for improving tolerance to environmental stresses is the study of plant genotypes under stress conditions. In order to distinguish genotypes tolerant to stressful conditions, several tolerance indices are used. Genotypes are divided into 4 groups based on their reactions to normal and stressful environmental conditions. Group A includes genotypes that show good performance in both stress and normal conditions. Group B includes genotypes that show good performance only in stress-free environment. Group C includes genotypes that show good performance only in stressful environment and group D includes genotypes that show low performance in both stress and normal conditions. This experiment was carried out with the aim of evaluating the tolerance of maize genotypes to zinc deficiency by using stress tolerance indices.
 
Materials and methods
Ninety-three maize genotypes were evaluated morphologically under optimal and zinc deficiency conditions using alpha lattice design with two replications in field conditions at Zabol Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, during 2 successive crop years (2020 and 2021). Based on the grain yield of maize genotypes under optimal and zinc deficiency conditions, 10 stress tolerance indices including tolerance index (TOL), mean productivity index (MP), geometric mean productivity index (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI) , abiotic tolerance index (ATI), stress sensitivity index (SSI), drought stress resistance index (DI), harmonic mean (HM), modified stress tolerance index (MPSTI), and modified stress tolerance index in moderate and severe stress (MSSTI) were calculated. Pearson's and partial correlations between indices were calculated using corrplot package in R and SPSS version 26 softwares. A three-dimensional diagram was drawn to identify genotypes tolerant to zinc deficiency with high yield in both normal and zinc deficiency conditions using Statistica version 10 software, in which the grain yield under stress conditions was considered on the X axis, grain yield in optimal conditions was considered on the Y axis and one of the selected indices was considered on the Z axis. Principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering using Ward's method on standardized data were done using the factoextra and Cluster packages in R software, respectively.
 
Results and discussion
Based on the results of analysis of variance, statistically significant difference was observed among the studied maize genotypes in terms of grain yield under optimal and zinc deficiency conditions, as well as all calculated stress tolerance indices. The t-test showed statistically significant difference between the average seed yield of the genotypes in optimal (77.85 g pl-1) and zinc deficiency onditions (61.86 g pl-1). Grain yield in optimal conditions showed a positive and significant correlation with all indices except DI index. The highest correlation was related to MP, MpSTI, GMP, STI, ATI and HM indices. Grain yield under zinc deficiency conditions showed a negative and significant correlation with SSI (-0.45), TOL (-0.41) and ATI (-0.28) indices. Other indices showed a positive and significant correlation with grain yield under zinc deficiency conditions. The positive and significant correlation of GMP, MP, STI and HM indices with grain yield in both optimal and zinc deficiency conditions indicates that these indices are the best and most appropriate indices to identify and select maize genotypes tolerant to deficiency stress. Principal component analysis showed that the first two components explained about 95.42% of total variations. Cluster analysis classified maize genotypes into 5 groups comprising 27, 9, 23, 17 and 17 genotypes per each group, respectively. The genotypes classified in group 4, 2 and 1 were identified as highly tolerant (stable), tolerant and sensitive to Zn deficiency stress, respectively.
 
Conclusion
High genetic diversity was obtained between the studied genotypes in terms of grain yield and stress tolerance indices. Using the three-dimensional diagram, the genotypes tolerant to zinc deficiency with high yield in both optimal and zinc deficiency conditions were separated from each other. Also, the use of multivariate analyses was not only able to differentiate high-performance genotypes in both optimal and stress conditions, but also distinguished stable genotypes in stress conditions from unstable genotypes. So, Ma004, Ma027, Ma028, Ma038, Ma045, Ma083, Ma091, Ma105, Ma115 genotypes can be introduced as tolerant to zinc deficiency with stable performance for use in breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afshari, R., Sabouri, A., Esfahani, M., Kafi Ghasemi, A., 2017. Evaluation of tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes using tolerance indices and biplot analysis. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 48, 843–854. [In Persian with English Summary] https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2017.215828.654176
Alloway, B.J., 2008. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition, Second edition. International fertilizer Industry Association and International Zinc Association, Brussels, Belgium.
Arzhang, S., Darvishzadeh, R., Alipour, H., 2023. Screening of maize (Zea mays L.) lines using selection indices for salinity stress tolerance. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 16, 949-967. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.5194.2120
Beigzadeh, N., Rashidi, V., 2016. Evaluation of agro-physiological traits of bean genotypes under drought stress and non-stress conditions at reproductive stage. Seed and Plant Journal. 32, 215-230. [In Persian with English Summary]
Bidinger, F., Mahalakshmi, V., Rao, G.D.P., 1987. Assessment of drought resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L. Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 38, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9870049
Blasco, B., Navarro-León, E., Ruiz, J. M., 2018. Oxidative stress in relation with micronutrient deficiency or toxicity. In: Hussain, M.A., Kamiya, T., Burritt, D.J., Tran, L.P., Fujiwara, T. (eds.), Plant Micronutrient Use Efficiency. Academic Press, United Kingdom, pp. 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812104-7.00011-3
Blum, A., 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environment. CRC Press., Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351075718
Bonea, D., 2020. Grain yield and drought tolerance indices of maize hybrids. Notulea Scientia Biologicea. 12, 376-386. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb12210683
Cakmak, I., Graham, R., Welch, R. M., 2002. Agricultural and molecular genetic approaches to improving nutrition and preventing micronutrient malnutrition globally. In: Cakmak, I.,  Welch, R.M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, pp. 1075-1099
Cakmak, I., Kutman, U., 2018. Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: a review. European Journal of Soil Science. 69, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12437
Darvishzadeh, R., Pirzad, A., Hatami-Maleki, H., Poormohammad Kiani, S., Sarrafi, A., 2010. Evaluation of the reaction of sunflower inbred lines and their F1 hybrids to drought conditions using various stress tolerance indices. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 8, 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010084-1398
Erfani, F., Shokrpour, M., Momeni, A., Erfani, A., 2013. Evaluation of drought tolerance in rice varieties using yield-based indices at vegetative and reproductive stage. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 22 (4), 135-147. [In Persian with English Summary]
Etminan, A., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Shooshtari, L., Yousefiazarkhanian, M., morAdkhAni, H., 2019. Determining the best drought tolerance indices using artificial neural network (ANN): Insight into application of intelligent agriculture in agronomy and plant breeding. Cereal Research Communications. 47, 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.057
Farshadfar, E., Sutka, J., 2002. Screening drought tolerance criteria in maize. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 50, 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.50.2002.4.3
Farshadfar, A., 2000. Selection for drought resistance in bread wheat lines. Agricultural Sciences and Technology. 14, 161-171. [In Persian with English Summary]
Feizi, M., Solouki, M., Sadeghzadeh, B., Fakheri, B., Mohammadi, S.A., 2020. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for barley landraces under irrigated and dry conditions. Bioscience Journal, 36, 1518-1527. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C.G. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. AVRDC Publication, Tainan,  pp. 257- 270.
Fischer, R., Maurer, R.,1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Geravandi, M., Farshadfar, E., Kahrizi, D., 2010. Evalution of drought tolerance in bread wheat advanced genotypes in field laboratory conditions. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal. 26, 233-252. [In Persian with English Summary]
Golparvar, A., Majidi Harvan, I., Ghassemi Pirbaloti, E., 2003. Genetic improvement yield potential and water stress resistance in wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Research in Agricultural Science. 13, 13–21. [In Persian with English Summary]
Hanway, J., 1982. How a Corn Plant Develops. Special Report No. 48, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service.
Hotz, C., Brown, K.H., 2004. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for itscontrol. Food Nutrition Bulletin. 25, 94–204. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75182010000200014
Kamrani, M., Mehraban, A., Shiri, M., 2018. Identification of drought tolerant genotypes in dryland wheat using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 10, 13–26. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.10.28.13
Kandel, M., Ghimire, S.K., Ojha, B.R., Shrestha, J., 2019. Evaluation of heat stress tolerance indices in maize inbred lines. Malaysian Journal of Applied Sciences. 4, 57-68
Kazerani, B., navabpour, S., Sabouri, Sabouri., Ramezanpour, S.S., Zaynali Nezhad, KH., Eskandari, A., 2019. Evaluation and selection of rice mutant lines based on drought tolerance indices. Journal of Plant production. 25, 15-31. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22069/jopp.2018.13685.2228
Lan, J., 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agric Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica. 7, 85-87.
Lestari, A.P., Suwarno, Trikoesoemaningtyas, Sopandie, D., Aswidinnoor, H., 2019. Estimation for stress tolerance indices of rice genotypes in low nitrogen condition. The Agricultural Science Society of Thailand. 52, 180-190
Marschner, H., 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Second edition. London, Academic Press.
Mehraban, A., Tobe, A., Gholipouri, A., Amiri, E., Ghafari, A., Rostaii, M., 2018. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and yield stability of wheat cultivars to drought stress in different growth stage. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences. 7, 8-14.
Mitra, J., 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science. 80, 758-763.
Molla Heydari Bafghi, R., Baghizadeh, A., Mohammadinezhad, G., 2017. Evaluation of salinity and drought stresses tolerance in wheat genotypes using tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 9, 27–34. [In Persian with English Summary]
Moosavi, S.S., Yazdi Samadi, B., Naghavi, M.R., Zali, A.A., Dashti, H., Pourshahbazi, A., 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert. 12, 165-178. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jdesert.2008.27115
Pandey, N., Gupta, B., Pathak, G.C. 2012. Antioxidant responses of pea genotypes to zinc deficiency. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 59, 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443712010141
Pour‐Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Moghaddam Vahed, M., Poczai, P., Siddique, K.H.M., 2019. iPASTIC: An online toolkit to estimate plant abiotic stress indices. Applications in Plant Sciences, 7, p.e11278. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11278
Rosielle, A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Sadeghzadeh, B., 2015. Soil-zinc application required to improve bread and durum wheat production under cold rainfed conditions.Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal. 4, 149-162. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22092/idaj. 2016.106098
Safaei Chaeikar, S., Rabiei, B., Samizadeh, H., Esfahani, M., 2008. Evaluation of tolerance to terminal drought stress in rice (Oryza Sativa L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 9, 315-331. [In Persian with English Summary]
Shahrokhi, M., Khavari Khorasani, S., Ebrahimi, A., 2020. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of super sweet maize (Zea mays L. var. saccharata) inbred lines. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(3), 435-448. http://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v42i3.2574
Soleimani, A., Bihamta, M.R., Peyghambari, S.A., Maali Amiri, R., 2019. Evaluation of late season drought in barley genotypes using some drought tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 9, 166–176. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.9.23.166
Tabkhkar, N., Rabiei, B., Samizadeh Lahiji, H., Hosseini Chaleshtori, M., 2018. Assessment of rice genotypes response to drought stress at the early reproductive stage using stress tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 7, 83–106. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.29252/jcpp.7.4.83
Tahmasbali, M., Darvishzadeh, R., Fayaz Moghaddam, A., Alipour, H., 2021. Selection of tolerant genotypes to broomrape Orobanche cernua stress in oriental tobacco Nicotiana tabacum genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Journal of Applid Research in Plant Protection. 9, 83-100. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22034/arpp.2021.12247
Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Hussain, M., 2019. Improving the productivity, profitability and grain quality of Kabuli chickpea with co-application of zinc and endophyte bacteria Enterobacter sp. MN17. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 66, 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1644501
White P.J., Pongrac, P., 2017. Heavy-metal toxicity in plants. In: Shabala, S. (ed), Plant Stress Physiology. Cabi, Wallingford UK, pp. 300-331. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780647296.0300