Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc student, Agronomy & Plant Breeding Department, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

2 Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

3 Department of Seed and Plant Improvement Research, Safiabad Agricultural Research, Education and Natural Resources Center, AREEO, Dezful, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is considered a strategic and essential product for global food security and is used in human food and animal feed. Recent droughts and, in some cases, the ban on planting maize as a water-consuming crop have caused the yield and cultivated area of this valuable crop to decrease. Therefore, planning based on adaptation to drought is necessary for the sustainability of maize production. Water stress is one of the most critical environmental stresses in agriculture, so many efforts have been made to maintain plant yield under drought conditions. Water deficit stress negatively affects the growth and productivity of crop plants in various ways. Different crop plants have complex mechanisms that respond to water deficits. Drought resistance in these plants is influenced by several factors, including environmental humidity, the intensity of the stress, the phenological stage in which the stress occurs, and plant nutrition. The use of stress tolerance indices, which are calculated based on yield under stress and non-stress conditions, is effective in selecting high-yielding and stress-tolerant genotypes.
Materials and methods
The present experiment was carried out in the research farm of Yasouj University located in the Dashtrom region (51º E and 30º N, 1734 m altitude), Yasouj, Iran in 2023. To investigate the effect of drought stress on the yield and yield components of some maize hybrids to identify tolerant cultivars, the number of ten maize hybrids was evaluated in two separate experiments under normal and drought stress conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replications at the research farm of Yasouj University. The number of kernels per ear, the kernels per row, 200-kernel weight, grain yield, harvest index, stress susceptibility index (SSI), tolerance index (TOL), stress tolerance index (STI), geometrical mean productivity (GMP) and mean productivity (MP) were calculated. To check the homogeneity of variance in two experiments, Bartlett's test was performed for the evaluated traits. Analysis of variance based on combined analysis, mean comparison and principal components analysis was done using R software version 4.2.1, and some graphs were drawn using Excel software.
Results and discussion
The results of the combined analysis variance of the data showed that the interaction of Irrigation and genotype on the traits of kernel per ear, kernel per row, and 200-kernel weight was significant. In the same way, the results showed that the main effects of irrigation and genotype on grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index were significant. The results of mean comparisons showed that yield and yield components in all the studied genotypes decreased under stress conditions. Moreover, slicing the interaction effect of genotype at two irrigation levels indicated that genotype 1 was superior in terms of the number of kernels per ear and the 200-kernel weight compared with other genotypes and had more grain yield and biological yield. The results of principal components analysis based on tolerance indices located the studied genotypes in four regions and the first and second two components explained about 100% of the data variation. Considering that genotypes 1, 3, and 400 are located in region A, and give higher grain yield and yield components, it is recommended to plant in the region under normal and stress conditions. In addition, if there are no limitations on water resources, hybrids 4 and 410 may also be suitable.
Conclusion
Considering that genotype 1 had higher grain yield and yield components, and its performance stability, based on the biplot graphic representation, it was located in region A along with 3 and 400 hybrids. Therefore, it is recommended for planting in the region under stress-free and stressful conditions. In addition, if there are no restrictions on water resources in the region, in addition to this hybrid, hybrid 4 as well as 410 could be recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afarinesh A, Fathi G, Chugan R, Syadat S A, Alamisaid G, Ashrafizadeh S R., 2016. Effect of drought stress on physiological traits of maize (Zea mays l.) hybrids. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 5, 195-205 [In Persian with English Summary] http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.18.195
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO Publication, 327p.
Bafkar, A., Farhadi Bansouleh, B., Karimi, A., 2013. Estimation of crop coefficients (KC) of grain corn s.c. 704 using the physiological properties (case study: Kermanshah- Mahidsht). Water and Soil. 27, 832-838. [In Persian with English Summary] https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.28205
Fernandez, G.C., 1993. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Symposium of AVRDC, 13-16 Aug. Taiwan.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer. R., 1978. Drought tolerance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Haji Babaei, M., Azizi, F., 2012. Response of new siliage maize hybrids to drought stress using drought tolerance indices. Agroecology Journal. 8, 23-32 [In Persian with English Summary]. https://www.magiran.com/p1071341
Hong, W. and Ji-Yan, J., 2007. Effects of zinc deficiency and drought stress on plant growth and metabolism of reactive oxygen species in maize (Zea mays L.). Agricultural Sciences in China. 6, 988-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(07)60138-2
Khatibi, A., Omrani, S., Omrani, A., Shojaei, S. H., Mousavi, S.M.N., Illés, Á., ... Nagy, J., 2022. Response of maize hybrids in drought-stress using drought tolerance indices. Water, 14, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071012
Kojic, D., S. Pajevic, A. Jovanovic-Galovic, J. Purac, E. Pamer, S. Skondric, S. Milovac, Z. Popovic, G. Grubor-Lajsic., 2012. Efficacy of natural aluminosilicates in moderating drought effects on the morphological and physiological parameters of maize plants (Zea mays L.). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 113-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162012000100010
Liao, Q., Ding, R., Du, T., Kang, S., Tong, L., Li, S., 2022. Stomatal conductance drives variations of yield and water use of maize under water and nitrogen stress. Agricultural Water Management, 268, 107651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107651
Mohammadi Behmadi, M, Armin, M., 2017. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components of different corn cultivars in delayed planting conditions. Applied Research of Plant Ecophysiology. 4, 17-34 [In Persian with English Summary] http://arpe.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-243-en.html
Moharramnejad, S., Sofalian, O., Valizadeh, M., Asgari, A., Shiri, M.R., 2016. Response of antioxidant defense system to osmotic stress in maize seedlings. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 25, 805-811. https://www.prt-parlar.de/download_list/?c=FEB_2016#
Nasrollahzade, V., Yusefi, M., Ghosemi, A., Bandehhagh, A., 2018. Grain yield, yield components and relative water content in maize (Zea mays l.) Under water deficit stress and two mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Agricultural Science and sustainable production. 77, 81-92. [In Persian with English Summary] https://sustainagriculture.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_6974.html?lang=en
Noein, B., Soleymani, A., 2022. Corn (Zea mays l.) Physiology and yield affected by plant growth regulators under drought stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 41, 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10332-3
Payero, J.O., Tarkalson, D.D., Irmak, S., Davison, D., Petersen, J.L., 2009. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1387-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.022
Rabbani, J, Emam, Y., 2011. Yield response of maize hybrids to drought stress at different growth stages. Journal of Crop Production and Processing; 1, 65-78 [In Persian with English Summary] http://jcpp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1386-en.html
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. 21, 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Rezaizad, A., Taimori, B., Mehrabi, A.M., 2017. Response of some maize hybrids to water stress. Environmental Stresses in crop Sciences, 11, 301-312. [In Persian with English Summary] https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2017.511.1101
Safian, N., Naderi, M.R., Torabi, M., Soleymani, A., Salemi, H. R., 2022. Corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) yield and nutritional quality affected by drought stress. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 45, 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102486
Sanders, O.T.R., Shaw, M., 2014. Temperature and soil water effects on maize growth, development yield, and forage quality. Crop Science. 36, 341-348. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600020022x
Santos, A.D.O., Von Pinho, R.G., Souza, V.F.D, Guimarães, L.J.M., Balestre, M., Pires, L.P.M. Silva, C.P.D., 2020. Grain yield, anthesis-silking interval and drought tolerance indices of tropical maize hybrids. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 20(1), e176020110. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332020v20n1a10
Shiri, M.R., Choukan, R., Aliyev, R. T., 2016. Drought stress effects on gene action and combining ability of maize inbred lines. Seed and Plant Journal. 31, 421-440. [In Persian with English Summary] https://doi.org/10.22092/spij.2017.111268
Sheoran S, Kaur Y, Kumar S, Shukla S, Rakshit S, Kumar R., 2022. Recent advances for drought stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays l.): present status and future prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13, 872566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.872566
Snyder, R.L., 1992. Equation for evaporation pan to evapotranspiration conversions. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 118, 977-980. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:6(977)
Tabatabaei, S.A., Shakeri, E., 2015. Effect of drought stress on maize hybrids yield and determination of the best hybrid using drought tolerance indices. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 8, 121-125. [In Persian with English Summary] https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2015.208
Zareabyaneh, H., Noori, H., Liaghat, A., Noori, H., Karimi, V., 2011. Comparison of Penman- Monteith FAO Method and a Class Pan Evaporation with Lysimeter Measurements in Estimation of Rice Evapotranspiration in Amol Region. Physical Geography Research. 76, 71-83. [In Persian with English Summary]   https://jphgr.ut.ac.ir/article_23071_en.html?lang=en