Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Soil and Water Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Environmental stresses are the most important factors reducing the yield of agricultural crops in the world. Salinity stress affects 20% of the worl’s arable lands, which increases day by day due to climate change and human activities. Wheat has great genetic diversity for salt tolerance. Improvement and development of salinity tolerant cultivars is a suitable solution to reduce the negative effects of salinity. This research was conducted to investigate and determine the most tolerant varieties and promising lines of wheat to different levels of irrigation water salinity.
Materials and methods
In order to evaluate the response of bread wheat cultivars and lines to different levels of salt water and to determine the salinity tolerance indices, a factorial greenhouse experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications in the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Fars province in 1399-1400 years. The light condition of the greenhouse was natural and its temperature was in balance with the outside environment. The experimental factors included wheat genotypes and different degrees of salt water. Wheat genotypes including commercial cultivars and some promising lines including Sistan, Narin, Brat, Sarang, Shush, Ayeneh, Sahar, Mehrgan, Ms-90-15, Ms-92-8, Ms-93-5, Ms-93-6, Ms-93-14, Ms-93-16 and S-94-12 were investigated. The salinity treatments tested with salinities lower and higher than the tolerance limit of wheat in values of 1, 10 and 16 dS m-1. Grain yield (g pot-1) and yield components including 1000 grain weight, number of fertile spikes per pot, number of grains per spike and biological yield (g pot-1) were recorded. Also, using the grain yield data, stress tolerance indices were calculated for medium and severe salt stress. Also, selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique was used in order to investigate genetic diversity and integrate different indices into one selection index. Data variance analysis for different traits was done using SAS statistical software version 9.1. and mean comparison was done using Duncan's multi-range test at 5% probability level.
Results and discussion
Medium salt stress caused a decrease of 30, 26, 24, 26 and 20% in grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per pot, number of grains per spike and 1000 seed weight of genotypes compared to control respectively. These reductions for severe salt stress were 53, 50, 42, 43 and 33% respectively. Mean comparison for the average of all cultivars in salinity levels showed that Sarang, Mehrgan, Brat, Sistan, Narin and S-94-12, without significant differences, had the highest biological yield, respectively. Also, for other yield components, the same genotypes along with Shush had the highest amount without significant difference. For grain yield, Sarang, Mehrgan, S-94-12, Barat, Shush, Narin and Sistan genotypes had the highest values. In the medium saline environment, S-94-12 and MS-92-8 lines had the lowest and highest percentage of grain yield reduction, respectively, compared to the non-saline environment. For severe salinity environment, the same reductions were observed in Mehrgan variety and MS-93-6 line. Based on the obtained results, the use of saline water of 10 ds/m decreased the grain yield of Sistan, Narin, Ms-90-15, Ms-92-8, Ms-93-5, Ms-93-6, and Ms-93-14, Ms-93-16, Brat, Sarang, Shush, Ayeneh, Sahar, Mehrgan and S-94-12 by 32.6, 36.2, 24, 40.5, 29.8, 32.5, 32.3, 26, 27.3, 30.5, 36.6, 21.7, 26.8, 30.2 and 15.6% respectively compared to non-saline irrigation water. These reduction values for 16 dS m-1 were 47.3, 56.3, 47.8, 50.6, 57, 65.4, 56.2, 50.2, 51.2, 50.5, 50.6, 46.6, 50.8, 47.3, 43.4 and 48.8%. Sodium content of leaves increased significantly with increase in salinity stress. The lowest sodium content with the amount of 0.257 and 0.259 percent was observed in Mehrgan and Sarang. Leaf potassium content in Sistan, Mehrgan, Brat, Sarang and S-94-12 showed a significant increase compared to other genotypes. Mehrgan and Sarang cultivars had the lowest ion leakage with the amount of 33.04 and 34.44%, respectively. The highest ion leakage was observed MS-93-6, MS-93-14, MS-93-5 and MS-93-16 lines. In order to increase the selection efficiency of superior genotypes, in addition to stress tolerance indices, the selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) was used to integrate all stress tolerance indices into a single index. Investigation of the relationships between genotypes using the biplot analysis method and salinity tolerance indices showed that MP, GMP, HM and STI indices had a positive and significant correlation with yield in all levels of salinity.
Conclusion
The results of the biplot analysis and the relatively high correlation between yield under normal and stress conditions showed that cultivars that have high yields under normal conditions will also show high yield under salinity stress conditions. Also, based on stress tolerance indices as well as SIIG selection index, Mehrgan, Sarang and Brat cultivars as well as promising line S-94-12 in greenhouse test conditions (under natural ambient light and temperature conditions), had better yield under saline conditions. The reason for this could be the greater adaptability of these cultivars to the climatic conditions of the introduced region compared to other investigated cultivars, including the cultivars introduced for saline conditions of other regions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
 Ahmad, R., Hussain, S., Anjum, M.A., Khalid, M.F., Saqib, M., Zakir, I., Hassan, A., Fahad, S., Ahmad, S., 2019. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense mechanisms in plants under salt stress. Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: Agronomic, Molecular and Biotechnological Approaches, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_8
Alkharabsheh, H. M., Seleiman, M. F., Hewedy, O.A., Battaglia, M. L., Jalal, R. S., Alhammad, B. A., Schillaci, C., Ali, N., Al-Doss, A., 2021. Field crop responses and management strategies to mitigate soil salinity in modern agriculture: A review. Agronomy. 11, 2299. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112299
Amiri, R., Bahraminejad, S., Sasani, S. Ghobadi, M., 2014. Genetic evaluation of 80 irrigated bread wheat genotypes for drought tolerance indices. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 20, 101-111. http://agrojournal.org/20/01-17.pdf
Arora, N. K., 2019. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability. 2, 95–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w
Askar, M., Yazdansepas, A., Amini. A., 2011. Evaluation of winter and facultative bread wheat genotypes under irrigated and post-anthesis drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 26, 313-329. [In Persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/146990/en
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W. T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 24, 933-937. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
Choukan, R., Taherkhani, T., Ghannadha, M. R., Khodarahmi, M., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in grain maize inbred lines using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 8, 79-89. [In Persian]. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1385.8.1.7.6
 Elfanah, A.M., Darwish, M.A., Selim, A.I., Shabana, M.M., Elmoselhy, O.M., Khedr, R.A., Ali, A.M., Abdelhamid, M.T., 2023. Spectral reflectance indices’ performance to identify seawater salinity tolerance in bread wheat genotypes using genotype by yield* trait biplot approach. Agronomy. 13, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020353
Farhangian-Kashani, S., Azadi, A., Khaghani, S., Changizi, M., Gomarian, M., 2021. Association analysis and evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat genotypes using SSR markers. Biologia Futura. 72, 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-021-00088-y
Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M. M. Safavi, S. M., 2018. Assessment of drought tolerance in landraces of bread wheat based on resistance/tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 1, 143-158. https://www.ijabbr.com/article_33588_6a397d1346494ba7c0c3f78d97cdf663.pdf
Fernandez, G., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo, C. G. (ed.). Proceeding of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetable and other food crops to temperature and water stress. Taiwan, 13-18 August. pp: 257-270. https://doi.org/10.22001/wvc.72511
Fischer, R. A., Wood, T., 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars ІІІ. Yield association with morphological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 30, 1001-1020. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9791001
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat stress in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
Giraldo, P., Benavente, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Gimenez, E., 2019. Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: a bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy. 9, 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070352
Houshmand, S., A. Arzani, S.A. Maibody., M. Feizi., 2005. Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiments. Field Crops Research. 91, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.08.004
Hu, P., Zheng, Q., Luo, Q., Teng, W., Li, H., Li, B., Li, Z., 2021. Genome-wide association study of yield and related traits in common wheat under salt-stress conditions. BMC Plant Biology. 21, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02799-1
Igrejas, G., Branlard, G., 2020. The importance of wheat. Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Springer, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3
James, R. A., Rivelli, A. R., Munns, R., von Caemmerer, S., 2002. Factors affecting CO2 assimilation, leaf injury and growth in salt-stressed durum wheat. Functional Plant Biology, 29, 1393-1403. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02069
Ma, Y., Dias, M.C., Freitas, H. 2020. Drought and salinity stress sesponses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11, 591911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.591911
Miransari, M., Smith, D., 2019. Sustainable wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in saline fields: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 39, 999-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1654973
Mohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R., Abdipour, M., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5, 487-493. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.281651288962837
Munns, R., Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59, 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
Mushtaq, Z., Faizan, S., Gulzar, B., 2020. Salt stress, its impacts on plants and the strategies plants are employing against it: A review. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology 8, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2020.80315
Ndiate, N.I., Saeed, Q., Haider, F.U., Liqun, C., Nkoh, J.N., Mustafa, A., 2021. Co-application of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance, growth and lipid metabolism of maize (Zea mays L.) in an alkaline soil. Plants. 10, 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112490
Netondo, G. W., Onyango, J. C., Beck, E., 2004. Sorghum and salinity: II. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of sorghum under salt stress. Crop Science. 44, 806. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.8060
Patterson, B., Macrae, E., Ferguson, I., 1984. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Annual Biochemical. 139, 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90039-3
Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mehrvar, M.R., Sanjani, S., Amini, A., Nikkhah-Chamanabad, H., Asadi, A., 2021. Effects of salinity stress on seedling biomass, physiochemical properties, and grain yield in different breeding wheat genotypes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 43, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-021-03265-7
Ramadas, S., Kumar, T., Singh, G.P., 2020. Wheat production in India: Trends and prospects. Recent Advances in Grain Crops Research. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86341
Rosielle, A., J. Hamblin., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Sairam, R.K., Dharmar, K., Chinnusamy, V., Meena, R.C., 2009. Water logging-induced increase in sugar mobilization, fermentation, and related gene expression in the roots of mug bean (Vigna radiata). Journal of Plant Physiology. 6, 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.005
Shahmoradi, SH., and Zahravi, M., 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm from warm and dry climates of Iran. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 32, 181-200 [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/spij.2017.111296
Shen, Z., Pu, X., Wang, S., Dong, X., Cheng, X., Cheng, M., 2022. Silicon improves ion homeostasis and growth of liquorice under salt stress by reducing plant Na+ uptake. Scientific Reports. 12, 5089. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09061-8
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditioning. Field Crop Research. 98, 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
Tahmasebi, S., M. Dastfal, H. Zali., M. Rajaei. 2018. Drought tolerance evaluation of bread wheat cultivars and promising lines in warm and dry climate of the south. Cereal Research. 8, 209-225. https://doi.org/10.22124/c.2018.10434.1398
Talebi, R., Fayaz, F., Naji, A. M., 2009. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat. General and Applied Plant Physiology. 35, 64-74. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20133138198
Wu, H., Zhang, X., Giraldo, J. P., Shabala, S., 2018. It is not all about sodium: revealing tissue specificity and signalling roles of potassium in plant responses to salt stress. Plant and Soil. 431, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3770-y
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2002. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420040371
Yousofi, M., Rezaei, A. M., 2008. Assessment of drought tolerance in different breeding lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 42, 113-122. [In Persian]. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1386.11.42.10.9
Zali, H., Barati, A., 2020. Evaluation of selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in other to selection of barley promising lines with high yield and desirable agronomy traits. Journal of Crop Breeding. 12, 93–104. ‎ http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/jcb.12.34.93
Zali, H., Sofalian, O., Hasanloo, T., Asghari, A., Hoseini, S. M., 2015. Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique: Introduction of new method. Biological Forum – An International Journal. 7, 703-711. https://www.researchtrend.net/bfij/pdf/117%20HASSAN%20ZALI.pdf
Zali, H., Sofalian, O., Hasanloo, T., Asghari, A., Zeinalabedini, M., 2016. Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding. 78 , 77-90. [In Persian]‎ http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22286128.1395.8.20.7.4