Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate of Agrotechnology, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Waterlogging stress is a common agricultural problem in many regions across the globe. Crop productivity is threatened primarily by waterlogging in rainfed areas. Plant growth and crop production is constrained severely by waterlogging in many regions around the world. Waterlogging significantly reduces the grain yield. Moreover, oil yield reduces mainly due to a significant decrese in grain yield under waterlogging stress condition. Waterlogging at different growth stages has different effects on crop growth and yield. In most crop plants, it was shown the different adverse effects of waterlogging on yield determination at the vegetative and reproductive stages. However, the effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on safflower under field conditions is not yet known.
 
Materials and methods
In the current study, in order to study of the influence of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the morphological traits and grain yield of safflower under field conditions, a field experiment was carried out during 2020-2021 growing season in a split plot arrangement in randomized complete blocks design using three replicates per treatment. The study site was located at the research farm of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran. The plants were grown in the filed to ensure the environmental conditions found in flooded soils. Three waterlogging treatments were applied to plants as main plots: Well-drained controls watered weekly, mild stress (waterlogged for 24 h) and severe stress (waterlogged for 48 h). Waterlogging treatments implemented at the vegetative and reproductive stages as sub plots. After the waterlogging period, waterlogging treatments were watered with sufficient water (80% field capacity) until the end of the experiment.
 
Results and discussion
The waterlogging treatments at vegetative and reproductive stages significantly decreased biological yield, grain yield, number of sub-branches, branche number, capitulum number per plant, grain number per capitulum, grain number per plant, 1000-grain weight and oil yield. There was no significant difference between growth stages in terms of all traits except for capitulum number per plant and the number of sub-branches. The mild and severe waterlogging stress at both growth stages was led to a significant reduction in grain yield by 34 and 39%, respectively, compared to control. The waterlogging treatments at different growth stages differently reduced the grain yield. The maximum decrease was found when waterlogging occurred for 48 h at the reproductive stage. The reduction in the number of sub-branches was associated with capitulum number per plant and grain number per plant. Under waterlogged conditions, the reduction in capitulum number per plant was mainly due to the decrease in the number of sub-branches.
 
Conclusion
These findings indicate that safflower is more sensitive to waterlogging at the reproductive stage. The effect of waterlogging stress on grain and oil yield varied between two growth stages and waterlogging durations. Under waterlogging condition, grain yield loss occurred mainly due to a decrease in the number of sub-branches, branch number, capitulum number per plant, grain number per head and grain number per plant, which led to a significant decrease in grain yield and ultimately reducing the oil 

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Arbona, V., Hossain, Z., López-Climent, M. F., Pérez-Clemente, R. M., Gómez-Cadenas, A., 2008. Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to waterlogging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiology Plantarum. 132, 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01029.x
Ashraf, M.A., 2012. Waterlogging stress in plants: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7, 1976-1981. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJARX11.084
Bailey-Serres, J., Voesenek, L.A.C.J., 2008. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59, 313-339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752
Banat, F., Pal, P., Jwaied, N., Al-Rabadi, A. 2013. Extraction of Olive Oil from Olive Cake using Soxhlet Apparatus. American Journal of Oil and Chemical Technologies. 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14266/ajoct14-1
Belford, R.K., Cannell, R.Q., Thomson, R.J., 1985. Effects of single and multiple waterloggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 36, 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740360304
Brennan, R.F., Mason, M.G., Walton, G.H., 2000. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica napus L.) seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 23, 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382020
Cannell, R.Q., Belford, R.K., Gales, K., Dennis, C.W., Prew, R.D., 1980. Effects of waterlogging at different stages of development on the growth and yield of winter wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 31, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310203
De San Celedonio, R.P., Abeledo, L.G., Miralles, D.J. 2014. Identifying the critical period for waterlogging on yield and its components in wheat and barley. Plant and Soil. 378, 265-277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42952797
De San Celedonio, R.P., Abeledo, L.G., Mantese, A.I., Miralles, D.J., 2017. Differential root and shoot biomass recovery in wheat and barley with transient waterlogging during preflowering. Plant and Soil. 417, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3274-1
Ding, J., Liang, P., Wu, P., Zhu, M., Li, C., Zhu, X., Gao, D., Chen, Y., Guo, W., 2020. Effects of waterlogging on grain yield and associated traits of historic wheat cultivars in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Field Crops Research. 264, 107695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107695
Fazeli, S.B., Rahnama, A., Hassibi, P., 2022. Effect of waterlogging stress on yield and yield components and photosynthetic characteristics of two Mung bean cultivars in Ahvaz conditions. Plant Productions. 45, 95-108. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2020.30538.180
Ferrante, A., Savin, R., Slafer, G.A., 2013.Floret development and grain setting differences between modern durum wheats under contrasting nitrogen availability. Journal of Experimental Botany. 64, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers320
Grassini, P., Indaco, G.V., Pereira, M.L., Hall, A.J., Trápani, N., 2007. Responses to short-term waterlogging during grain filling in sunflower. Field Crops Research. 101, 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.12.009
GRDC., 2017. GrowNotes Safflower Northern, Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia.
Gutierrez Boem, F.H., Lavado, R.S., Porcelli, C.A., 1996. Note on the effects of winter and spring waterlogging on growth, chemical composition and yield of rape seed. Fied Crops Research. 47, 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00025-1
Huang, B., Johnson, J.W., 1995. Root respiration and carbohydrate status of two wheat genotypes in response to hypoxia. Annals of Botany. 75, 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1041
 Hussain, M.I., Lyra, D.A., Farooq, M., Nikoloudakis, N., Khalid, N., 2016. Salt and drought stresses in safflower: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8
Khan, S., Anwar, S., Kuai, J., Noman, A., Shahid, M., Din, M., Ali, A., Zhou, G., 2018. Alteration in yield and oil quality traits of winter rapeseed by lodging at different planting density and nitrogen rates. Scientific Reports. 8, 634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18734-8
 Koutroubas, S. D., Papakosta, D. K., Doitsinis. A., 2008. Nitrogen utilization efficiency of safflower hybrids and open-pollinated varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research. 107, 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.009
Kumar, S., Ambreen, H., Murali, T.V., Bali, S., Agarwal, M., Kumar, A., Goel, S., Jagannath, A., 2015. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in a global reference collection of 531 accessions of Carthamus tinctorius L. (safflower) using AFLP markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 33, 1299-1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0828-8
Marti, J., Savin, R., Slafer, G.A., 2015. Wheat yield as affected by length of exposure to waterlogging during stem elongation. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 201, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12118
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. 2022. Annual harvested area, production, and yield in 2021-2022. [In Persian].
Ploschuk, R.A., D.J. Miralles., T.D. Colmer., E.L. Ploschuk., G.G. Striker., 2018. Waterlogging of winter crops at early and late stages: Impacts on leaf physiology, growth and yield. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 1863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01863
Ploschuk, R.A., Mirales, D.J., Colmer, T.D., Striker, G.G., 2020. Waterlogging differentially affects yield and its components in wheat, barley, rapeseed and field pea depending on the timing of occurrence. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 206, 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12396
Saini, H.S., Westgate. M.E., 2000. Reproductive development in graincrops during drought. Advances in Agronomy. 68, 59-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60843-3
Shabala, S., 2011. Physiological and cellular aspects of phytotoxicity tolerance in plants: the role of membrane transporters and implications for crop breeding for waterlogging tolerance. New Phytologist. 190, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03575.x
Shahrokhnia, M.H., Sepaskhah, A.R., 2017. Physiologic and agronomic traits in safflower under various irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization. Industrial Crops and Products. 95, 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.021
Shao, G.C., Lan, J.J., Yu, S.E., Liu, N., Guo, R.Q., She, D.L., 2013. Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Photosynthetica. 51, 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-013-0039-9
Sheikh Mamo, B., Rahnama, A., Hassibi, P., 2023. The influence of terminal heat stress onphysiological and yield characteristics of promising sunflower cultivars in Ahvaz climate condition. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 16, 835-851. [In Persian with English Summary].  https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2023.4928.2107
Tian, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Zhang, F., Li, J., Yan, F., Dong, Y., Feng, B., 2021. How does the waterlogging regime affect crop yield? A global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12, 634898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634898
Wang, C., Hai, J., Yang, J., Tian, J., Chen, W., Chen, T., Wang, H., 2016. Influence of leaf and silique photosynthesis on seeds yield and seeds oil quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). European Journal of Agronomy. 74, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.008
 Wang, X., Deng, Z., Zhang, W., Meng, Z., Chang, X., Lv M., 2017. Effect of waterlogging duration at different growth stages on the growth, yield and quality of cotton. PLoS ONE 12, e0169029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169029
Wollmer, A.C., Pitann, B., Muehling, K.H., 2018. Waterlogging events during stem elongation or flowering affect yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) but not seed quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 204, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12244
Wu, X., Tang, Y., Li, C., Wu, C., Huang, G., 2015. Chlorophyll fluorescence and yield responses of winter wheat to waterlogging at different growth stages. Plant Production Science. 18, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.18.284
Zandi, R., Rahnama, A., Meskarbashi, M., 2023. Effect of deficit irrigation regimes on photosynthetic, morpho-physiological and yield traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) in Ahvaz climate condition. Crop Physiology Journal. 15, 19-40. [In Persian with English Summary]. http://cpj.ahvaz.iau.ir/article-1-1614-fa.html
Zhang, Y., Song, X., Yang, G., Li, Z., Lu, H., Kong, X., Eneji, A.E., Dong, H., 2015. Physiological and molecular adjustment of cotton to waterlogging at peak-flowering in relation to growth and yield. Field Crops Research. 179, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.001