Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

2 nal Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Yazd, Iran

3 al and National Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Mashahd, Iran

4 ral and National Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran

5 Agricultural and National Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Bushehr, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Quinoa is a dicotyledonous plant from the Amaranthaceae family. Due to the high nutritional value, several breeding programs have been started on quinoa in different parts of the world. The goals of the breeding programs are to increase yield, reduce sensitivity to day length, increase seed size, reduce seed saponin content, and resistance to powdery mildew and seed color. The purpose of this research is to select high-yielding and adapted quinoa lines using different parametric and non-parametric methods.
Materials and methods
The advance quinoa line NSRCQ8 (B), NSRCQ7 (C), Sadoq (D), NSRCQ9 (E) with the Titicaca as control (T) in five regions, Yazd (Sadoq Salinity Research Farm, National Salinity Research Center), Sabzevar (Sabzevar Research Station), Shiraz (Khorameh), Bushehr (Ahram) and Iranshahr (Bampur) were evaluated in the form of randomized complete block design during two years 2019-2019. Planting date in Sabzevar was August 15 with irrigation water salinity of 2.8 and soil saturated extract salinity of 4.5 dS m-1, Yazd was 23th of Augest with irrigation water salinity of 12 and soil saturated extract salinity of 16.4 dS m-1, Shiraz on August 20 and in the second year, August 25 with irrigation water salinity of 11.2 and soil saturated extract salinity of 8.5 dS m-1 and Iranshahr on December 15 with irrigation water salinity of 2.8 and soil saturated extract salinity of 9 dS m-1 and Bushehr 22nd of November and in the second year on the first day of January with the irrigation water salinity of 6 and the salinity of the saturated soil extract of 10 dS m-1 and the planting date of the first year of Gorgan was the first of March without the need for irrigation. Yield and weight of 1000 seeds, saponin content and size of seeds were measured. The saponin content was determined using the method of Koziol, 1991. Bartlett's test was performed to check the uniformity of variance of environments and then statistical analysis was performed with SAS software. For the purpose of statistical analysis, line was defined as a fixed factor and year and place were defined as random factors, and the F test was performed according to the mathematical expectation of mean square of variation sources. Considering the significance of the interaction effect of genotype in year and place, stability analysis was done using different parametric and non-parametric methods with Stabilitysoft software.
Results and discussion
The results of combined analysis showed that the interaction effect of place and year on grain yield and foam height was significant. The interaction effect of line and place in year on measured traits was significant. The interaction effect of year and location on grain yield and foam height was significant. The results of simple mean comparison showed that the highest grain yield belonged to line D. The thousand kernel weight of line D was 2.6 g on average and 40% of the seeds were placed in the large class. The lowest loss percentage related to D line was 9%. Stability analysis with GGEbiplot method showed that line D is located at the top of the polygon and showed a high private adaptability with all environments except Bushehr in the first year. According to Wricke (1962) (Wᵢ²) line D was ranked 1. According to Finlay and Wilkinson's index (bᵢ), number less than one is the least sensitive to environmental changes, and line D had the lowest (0.9). Eberhart and Russell index (s²dᵢ) showed that line D was ranked 1. Line D is ranked 1 based on Shukla's index (σ²ᵢ). Total rank stability statistic (KR) as another measure to determine the stability of genotypes was presented by Kang. Based on this, the genotype with the lowest value is selected as the most stable. The lowest amount was observed in line D (2) and the highest amount was observed in line B (6). Based on the average of the total ranks, line D (1.44±1.09) had the most stability and line B had the least stability based on parametric and non-parametric indicators of stability. Based on the results of GGEbiplot method and non-parametric and parametric methods, line D had the highest performance and stability.
Conclusion
Evaluating parametric and non-parametric methods and GGEbiplot method showed similar results and led to the selection of D line. In addition to stability, this line had a yield of 800 kg ha-1 higher than Titicaca variety. The amount of seed saponin was half of that in Titicaca variety. Due to the stability and higher performance of this line, as well as the higher tolerance to salinity, this line was introduced and named as Sadoq variety. Also, in addition to the yield, thousand kernel weight and the amount of saponin were also affected by the environment.
Acknowledgments
This project has been carried out with the financial support of the Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization. We appreciate all the provincial colleagues.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abugoch James, L.E., 2009. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. In: Steve, L.T. (ed.), Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. Academic Press. p. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58001-1
Acikgoz, E., Ustun, A., Gul, I., Anlarsal, E., Tekeli, A.S., Nizam, I., Avcioglu, R., Geren, H., Cakmakci, S. Aydinoglu, B., 2009. Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 7, 96-1062171-9292. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009071-402
Alcocer, E., Choquecallata, S., López G. & Marca, F., 2017. Development of Quinoa and Corn Extrusions. In: Records of the Scientific and Technological Symposium on Sustainable Production of Quinoa and Related Species [Memoria de la Jornada Científica y Tecnológica de la Producción Sostenible de Quinua y Especies Afines], pp. 130-132. CIQ, Bolivia. Available at: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FCircular%252520Letters%252FCL%2525202020-25%252FCL2019-92-CPL_Comments_CompilationFRENCH.pdf
Böndel, K.B., Schmid, K.J., 2021. Quinoa Diversity and Its Implications for Breeding. In: S. M. Schmöckel, editor The Quinoa Genome. Springer International Publishing, Cham. p. 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65237-1_7
Cancino-Espinoza, E., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Quispe, I., 2018. Organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) production in Peru: Environmental hotspots and food security considerations using Life Cycle Assessment. Science of the Total Environment. 637, 221-2320048-9697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.029
Chokan, R., 2007. Genetic analysis methods Quantitative traits in plant breedingSeed and plant breeding Institute, Karaj-Iran. [In Persian].
Dendy, D.A., Dobraszczyk, B.J., 2004. Cereales y productos derivados, Química y tecnología. Ed. Acribia. Zaragoza, España. 403-421.ISBN: 978-84-200-1022-9
Eberhart, S.T., Russell, W., 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science. 6, 36-400011-183X. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Fiallos-Jurado, J., Pollier, J., Moses, T., Arendt, P., Barriga-Medina, N., Morillo, E., Arahana, V., de Lourdes Torres, M., Goossens, A., Leon-Reyes, A., 2016. Saponin determination, expression analysis and functional characterization of saponin biosynthetic genes in Chenopodium quinoa leaves. Plant Science. 250, 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.05.015
Finlay, K., Wilkinson, G., 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 14, 742-754. http://doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742
Francis, T., Kannenberg, L., 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 58, 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-157
Graf, B.L., Rojas‐Silva, P., Rojo, L.E., Delatorre‐Herrera, J., Baldeón, M.E., Raskin, I., 2015. Innovations in health value and functional food development of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 14, 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12135
Huehn, M., 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory. Euphytica. 47, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024241.
Jafari, T., Farshadfar, E., 2018. Stability analysis of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) by GGE biplot. Cereal Research. 8, 199-208. [In Persian with English summary]. https://doi.org/10.22124/c.2018.6232.1243
Jamshidmoghaddam, M., Pourdad, S., 2013. Evaluation of seed yield adaptability of spring safflower genotypes using nonparametric parameters and GGE biplot method in rain-fed conditions. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 29, 2008-6954. [In Persian with English summary]. https://doi.org/10.22092/spij.2017.111142
Jarvis, D.E., Ho, Y.S., Lightfoot, D.J., Schmöckel, S.M., Li, B., Borm, T.J., Ohyanagi, H., Mineta, K., Michell, C.T., Saber, N., 2017. The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature. 542, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21370
Kang, M., 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications. 16, 113-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23782771
Khodarahmi, M., Soughi, H., Jafarby, J., Khavarinejad, M.S., 2021. Stability Analysis of Bread Wheat Genotypes by using GGE Biplot Method in Caspian Sea Regions. Journal of Crop Breeding. 13, 83-90. [In Persian with English summary]. https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.13.40.83
Koziol, M.J., 1991. Afrosimetric estimation of threshold saponin concentration for bitterness in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 54, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740540206
Liu, C., Ma, R., Tian, Y., 2022. An overview of the nutritional profile, processing technologies, and health benefits of quinoa with an emphasis on impacts of processing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 13, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2155796
Mohammadi, R., Haghparast, R., Amri, A., Ceccarelli, S., 2009. Yield stability of rainfed durum wheat and GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment trials. Crop and Pasture Science. 61, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP09151
Mota, C., Santos, M., Mauro, R., Samman, N., Matos, A.S., Torres, D., Castanheira, I., 2016. Protein content and amino acids profile of pseudocereals. Food Chemistry. 193, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.043
Nassar, R., Huehn, M., 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics. 43, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531947
Plaisted, R., Peterson, L., 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal. 36, 381-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852735
Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Poczai, P., Siddique, K.H., 2019. STABILITYSOFT: A new online program to calculate parametric and non‐parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applications in Plant Sciences. 7,1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1211
Roustaie, M., Moghaddam, M., Mahfouzi, S., Mohammadi, A., 1996. Comparison of stability of grain yield in wheat and barley cultivars in dry lands. Proceeding of the 4 th Iranian Crop Sci Congress. Isfahan. University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. [In Persian].
Roustaie, M., Sadeghzadeh Ahari, D., Hesami, A., Soleymani, K., Pashapour, H., Nader Mahmoudi, K., Pour Siah Bidi, M., Ahmadi, M., Hassanpour Hosni, M., Abediasl, G., 2003. Study Of Adaptability And Stability Of Grain Yield Of Bread Wheat Genotypes In Cold And Moderate-Cold dryland Areas. Seed and Plant Journal. 19, 263-275. [In Persian with English summary]. https://sid.ir/paper/357880/en
Ruiz, K.B., Biondi, S., Oses, R., Acuña-Rodríguez, I.S., Antognoni, F., Martinez-Mosqueira, E.A., Coulibaly, A., Canahua-Murillo, A., Pinto, M., Zurita-Silva, A., 2014. Quinoa biodiversity & sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development. 34, 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0195-0
Sabaghnia, N., Mohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R., 2013. Interpreting genotype× environment interaction of beard wheat genotypes using different nonparametric stability statistics. Agriculture and Forestry, Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo. 59, 21-35. UDC (UDK) UDK 633.11
Salehi, M., Dehghani, F., 2024. Determination of salinity stress tolerance threshold of quinoa genotypes under field conditions. Enviromental Stresses in Crop Science. 16 (4), 1123-1137. [In Persian with English summary]. https://doi.org/10.22077/ESCS.2023.5309.2138
Salehi, M., Pourdad, S.S., 2021. Preliminary evaluation of the quinoa seed yield under rainfed spring cropping in warm and temperate regions. Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal. 10, 23-39. [In Persian with English summary]. https://doi.org/10.22092/idaj.2021.342612.302
Shukla, G., 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity. 29, 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1972.87
Soughi, H., Vahabzadeh, M., Arabi, M.K., Jafarby, J., Khavarinejad, S., Ghasemi, M., Fallahi, H., Amini, A., 2009. Study on grain yield stability of some promising bread wheat lines in northern warm and humid climate of Iran. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 25, 211-222. [In Persian with English summary].  https://doi.org/10.22092/spij.2017.111023
Thennarasu, K., 1995. On Certain Non-parametric Procedures for Studying Genotype-Environment Inertactions and Yield Stability. IARI, Division of Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi. Corpus ID: 202933464
Vaezi, B., Ahmadi, J., 2010. Assessment of genotype× environment interaction and stability of yield in advanced barley lines in rain fed conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 41, 395-402. [In Persian with English summary].  https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20084811.1389.41.2.18.9
Van Loo, E., Trindade, I.L.L., Borm, T.T., 2016. Marker Development for Bitter-Tasting-Saponin Gene in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). https://edepot.wur.nl/394421
Wricke, G., 1962. Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Z. pflanzenzuchtg. 47, 92-96. https://www.scirp.org/(S(lz5mqp453edsnp55rrgjct55.))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2658333
Yan, W., 2001. GGEbiplot—A Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two‐way data. Agronomy Journal. 93, 1111-1118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x