Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc. Student of Agronomy, Ilam University, Department of agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

4 Graduated with a PhD in Agronomy, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Under water stress conditions, intercropping can be used as a strategy for maximum use of sunlight and limited water resources. Due to the difference in morphological and physiological traits, the two plants corn and mung bean may be suitable for intercropping under drought stress; Therefore, this research was conducted with the aim of investigating the effects of drought stress on the physiological traits and yield of corn and mung beans in monocultures and intercropping in order to study the possibility of reducing water consumption in this production system.
Materials and methods
An experiment was carried out as a split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications at Ilam University during 2019-2020 growing season. The main plot were four water regimes including (40, 60, 80, and 100% of the plant's water requirement) and the subplots were include the planting pattern at four levels (additive intercropping series 100% corn + 50% mung bean, replacement intercropping series 50% corn + 50% mung bean and monocultures of mung bean and corn). The application of drought stress started after the establishment stage of the plant and continued until the harvest. At the end of the growth period, some physiological traits of both plants were measured, including photosynthetic pigments, photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, proline amount, leaf relative water content and grain yield. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Minitab 14 and SAS 9.1 softwares and the means compared by HSD test at 5% probability level (p≤0.05).
Results and discussion
The results showed the highest rate of photosynthesis (25.4 µmol CO2.m-2.s-1) was obtained in the treatment of 100% water requirement and the lowest rate of photosynthesis was obtained in 40% water requirement, which showed a decrease of 68.5% compared to the well-watered conditions. The rate of photosynthesis of corn in the replacement intercropping of 50% corn + 50% mung bean was 18.3% higher compared to monocultures corn. The highest rate of mung bean photosynthesis was observed in replacement intercropping under conditions of 100% water requirement and additive intercropping series under 80% water requirement, and the lowest rate of mung bean photosynthesis was observed in intercropping under conditions of 60 and 40% water requirement. Dehydration stress decreased the amount of total chlorophyll in mung beans and corn. The highest intercellular CO2 concentration (475.5 mmol of CO2.m-2.s-1) and the temperature of the corn leaf (36.7 °C) belonged to the 40% water requirement treatment. The rate of transpiration of corn and mung bean decreased by 55.56 and 61.43% in the condition of 40% water requirement compared to well-watered conditions. Water stress reduced the relative water content of corn and mung bean. The highest proline in corn and mung leaves (46.3 and 45.23 µmol.g-1.FW-1, respectively) was obtained in the treatment of 40% water requirement, which had no significant difference with 60% water requirement. Corn grain yield in the treatment of 40% water requirement showed a decrease of 52.76% compared to 100% water requirement. Monocultures (3945.8 kg.ha-1) and intercropping (3875.1 kg.ha-1) had the highest corn grain yield, and the lowest corn grain yield in replacement intercropping was 2700 kg ha-1. At all irrigation levels, the highest grain yield of mung bean was obtained in monocultures, and the yield decreased in additive and replacement intercropping, and additive intercropping had the lowest grain yield. The values of land equality ratio of all intercropping patterns were greater than one, which indicates the advantage of corn and mung bean intercropping patterns to use land and increase yield.
Conclusion
Considering the occurrence of recent droughts in arid and semi-arid regions of the country and the need for forage in these regions, the cultivation of forage plants, especially corn, is inevitable. Therefore, one of the appropriate strategies to protection in management and water consumption is the intercropping of this plant with plants of the legume such as mung bean. Intercropping can partially moderate the effects of drought stress on plant water conditions. In general, it seems that the patterns of intercropping and substitution, due to having higher grain yield potential, is a suitable strategy for producing higher yield and stability of this plant compared to monocultural under well-watered and stress water.
Acknowledgments
This research has been carried out using the research credits of Ilam University, by which we express our thanks and appreciation to the respected Assistance of Research and Technology of Ilam University.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Akhila, S.N., Abraham, T.K., Jaya, D.S., 2008. Studies on the changes in lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in drought stress induced cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) varieties. Journal of Environmental Biology. 29, 689-691.
Allmaras, R. R., Fritz, V. A., Pfleger, F. L., Copeland, S. M., 2003. Impaired internal drainage and Aphanomyces euteiches root rot of pea caused by soil compaction in a fine-textured soil Soil Tillage Research. 70, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00117-4
Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., Morshedloo, M.R., Maggi, F., 2018. Evaluation of yield, essential oil content and compositions of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) intercropped with faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Cleaner Production. 171, 529-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.062
Andjelkovic, V., Ignjatovic-Micic, D., Mladenovic, S., Vancetovic, J., 2012. Implementation of maize gentic resources in drought tolerance and grain quality improvement at maize research institute. Zemun Polje. Thiyrd International Scientific Smposium. Agrosym Jahorina 2012.
Ansari, M.A., Rana, K.S., Ansari, M.H., Baishya, L.K., Babu, S., Das, A., Hari, O.M., 2014. Effect of transpiration suppressants and nutrients under rainfed conditions: An integral view on crop productivity and biological indices in millet/pulses intercropping system. African Journal of Agricultural. 9, 334- 344. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.6958
Arnon, I., 1975. Physiological principles of dryland crop production. Physiological Aspects of Dryland Farming. US Gupta, ed. Oxfrd press. P. 3-14.
Baghbani-Arani, A., Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M., Mashhadi-Akbar-Boojar, M., Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A., 2017. Towards improving the agronomic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and pigments in fenugreek using zeolite and vermicompost under deficit water stress. Industrial Crops and Products. 109, 346-357.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.049
Baiazidi Aghdam, M.T., Mohammadi, H., Ghorbanpour, M., 2016. Effects of nanoparticulate anatase titanium dioxide on physiological and biochemical performance of Linum usitatissimum (Linaceae) under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 39, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-015-0227-x
Barbara, E.K., Nora, L.E., Edith, S., 2014. Compartment specific response of antioxidants to drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Science. 227, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.08.002
Bastam, N., Baninasab, B., Ghobadi, C., 2013. Interactive effects of ascorbic acid and salinity stress on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of pistachio seedlings. Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 88, 610-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2013.11513014
Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., Teare, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
Benami, A., Ofen, A., 1984. Irrigation Engineering- Sprinkler, Trickle and Surface Irrigation: Principles, Design and Agricultural Practices. Irrigation Engineering Scientific Publications. 257p.
Brooker, R.W., Bennett, A.E., Cong, W., Daniell, T.J., George, T.S., Hallett, D.D., Hawes, C.,. Lanneta, P.P.M., Jones, H.G., Karley, A.J., Li, L., McKenzie, B.M., Pakeman, R.J., Paterson, E., Schob, C., Shen, J., Squire, G., Watson, C.A., Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., White, P.J. 2015. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist. 206, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13132
Chapagain, T., Riseman, A., 2014. Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research. 166, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014
Cheng, L.I., Sun, B.C., Tang, H.J., Wang, T.Y., Yu, L.I., Zhang, D F., Xie, X.Q., Shi, Y.S., Song, Y.C., Yang, X.H., Li, J.S., 2017. Simple nonlinear model for the relationship between maize yield and cumulative water amount. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 30, 858-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61493-4
Fathi, Gh.,  2010. Effects of plant density on yield and yield components of mungbean in Khoozestan growing conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 41, 19-27. [In Persian with English summary].
Fu, J., Fry, J., Huang, B., 2004. Minimum water requirements of four turfgrasses in the transition zone. Horticultural Science. 39, 1740-1744. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.7.1740
Hamdani, J.S., Suradinata, Y.R., 2015. Effects of row intercropping system of corn and potato and row spacing of corn on the growth and yields of Atlantic potato cultivar planted in medium altitude. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research. 9, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajar.2015.104.112
Jaya, K.D., Bell, V.J., Sale, P.W., 2008. Modification of within-canopy microclimate in maize for intercropping in the lowland tropics. Available at: https://www.regional.org.au
Kaur, G., Singh, H.P., Batish, D.R., Kohli, R.K., 2012. Growth, photosynthetic activity and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum) after exposure of lead to soil. Journal of Environmental Biology. 33, 265-269.
Khajeh Khezri, A., 2017. Study the effects of different levels of drought stress on yield and some yield components in intercropping of Sorghum and Red Bean. MSc dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran. [In Persian].
Khajeh Khezri, A., Rezaei Estakhroeih, A., & Golestani Kermani, S., 2018. Evaluating the effects of alternative and regulated deficit irrigation on yield and some components in intercropping (Sorghum Red bean). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 41, 77-92. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22055/jise.2018.13614
Khatamipour, M., Asgharipour, M.R., Sirousmehr, A., 2014. Intercropping benefits of foxtail millet with mung bean as influenced by application of different manure levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 24, 75-86. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kimbal, B.A., Kobayashi, K., Bindi, M., 2002. Responses of agricultural crops to free air CO2 enrichment. Advances in Agronomy. 77, 293- 368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77017-X
L Des Marais, D., 2017. Drought Stress: Into the fourth dimension. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.
Lawlor, D.W., Cornic, G., 2012. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plants, Cell and Environment. 25, 275-294.
Lehmann, S., Funck, D., Szabados, L., Rentsch, D., 2010. Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino Acids. 39, 949-962.
Mead, R, Willey, R. W. 1980. The Concept of a 'Land Equivalent Ratio' and Advantages in Yields from Intercropping. Experimental Agriculture. 16, 217-229.
Najafinejad, H., Ravari, S.Z., Javaheri, M.A., 2019. Changes in forage yield and some agronomic and physiological characteristics of fodder, millet, sorghum and forage maize are affected by drought. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 4, 535-554. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.30495/jcep.2020.671172
Naresh, R.K., Purushottam, S.P., Dwivedi, A., Kumar, V., 2013. Effects of water stress on physiological processes and yield attributes of different mungbean varieties. African Journal of Biochemistry Research.7, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBR13.0677
Paudel, M.N., 2016. Multiple cropping for raising productivity and farm income if small farmers. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 37-45.
Rajasekar, M., Rabert, G.A., Manivannan, R., 2016. The effect of triazole induced photosynthetic pigments and biochemical constituents of Zea mays L. (Maize) under drought stress. Applied Nanoscience. 6, 727-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-015-0482-y
Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K.V., Vivekanandan, M., 2004. Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal Plant Physiology. 161, 1189-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
Sanchez, S.R., 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and proline accumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crops Research. 59, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00125-7
Seraa, I., Strever, A., Myburgh, P.A., Deloire, A., 2013. The interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 20, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12054
Sheteawi, S.A., Tawfik, K.M., 2007. Interaction effect of some biofertilizers and irrigation water regime on mung bean (Vigna radiate) growth and yield. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 3, 251-262.
Siyami, R., Mirshekari, B., Farahvash, F., Rashidi, V., Tarinejad, A., 2018.The effect of physical seed priming and water deficit stress on enzyme activity and seed yield of corn. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11, 127-136. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2018.372.1072
Stoltz, E., Nadeau, E., 2014. Effects of intercropping on yield, weed incidence, forage quality and soil residual N in organically grown forage maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crops Research. 169, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.004
Tanwar, S.P.S., Rao, S.S., Regar, P.L., Datt, Sh., Kumar, P., Jodha, B.S., Santra, P., Kumar, R., Ram, R., 2014. Improving water and Land use efficiency of fallow- wheat system in shallow lithic calciorthid soils of arid region: Introduction of bed planting and rainy season sorghum legume intercropping. Soil &Tillage Research. 138, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.12.005
Thapa, G., Dey, M., Sahoo, L., Panda, S.K., 2011. An insight into the drought stress induced alterations in plants. Biologia Plantarum. 55, 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-011-0158-8
Wang, J.P., Bughrara S.S., 2007. Monitoring of gene expression profiles and identification of candidate genes involved in drought responses in Festuca mairei. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 277, 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-007-0208-2
Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Wu, P., Chen, X., 2015. Effects of water limitation on yield advantage and water use in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) strip intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy. 71, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.007
Yamori, M., Hikosaka, K., Way, D.A., 2013. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynthesis Research. 13, 74-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9874-6
Zhang, F., Li, L., 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil. 248, 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022352229863
Ziyomo, C., Bernardo, R., 2013. Drought tolerance in maize: Indirect selection through secondary traits versus genome-wide selection. Crop Science. 53, 1269-1275. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.11.0651