Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

2 Research Instructor, South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran

3 Associate Prof., Yazd Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The combination of the effects of drought stress and soil salinity causes a severe limitation in the production of agricultural crops. Irrigation with saline water has caused the expansion of more saline lands. Salt tolerant genotypes are very important in the development of agricultural systems suitable for saline lands. Soil salinity through soil amendment and or the cultivation of tolerant crops can be adjusted. Of course, soil amendment is a costly process and the cultivation of tolerant species and varieties is the most practical solution in conditions where soil salinity is low. It is clear that the genotypes show a significant difference in response to salinity stress. One of the ways to deal with salinity is to select and find salinity-tolerant cultivars through the use of breeding methods. It is also possible to select and modify salinity-tolerant species in some fodder plants of temperate regions. This research was modified, with the aim of evaluation of selected barley genotypes from past years' experiments, under salinity stress conditions and identification and introduction of tolerant genotypes and direct and indirect use of them in breeding programs.
Materials and methods
In this experiment, the genotypes were evaluated during two crop years in the form of a rectangular lattice design with three replications at the research station of South Khorasan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Birjand. The experiment was conducted under normal conditions and salt stress separately. In order to compare these genotypes with modified cultivars, six cultivated barley cultivars, including two salinity-tolerant controls, including Mehr and Khatam cultivars and the semi-sensitive Yusuf control, were also included in the experiments (Table 1). In addition to evaluating the phenological traits of days to flowering and days to maturity, the traits of plant height, seed yield, and 1,000-seed weight were recorded. Stress indices including stress tolerance index (STI) were calculated based on grain yield in barley genotypes.
Results and discussion
The combined analysis of phenological, morphological and agronomic traits in the evaluated genotypes in two cropping years and two normal conditions and salinity stress showed that the interaction effect of year, salinity stress and genotype on the traits is significant. This showed that the reaction of genotypes was different in different years and different salinity conditions, so the results in different years were analyzed separately. In the salt research station in the first year of the experiment, genotypes number 31 (TN4006), 30 (TN3947), 50 (TN5008) and 28 (TN3646) along with Yusuf, Nusrat and Gohran cultivars, in terms of agronomic traits and stress indices were superior. While in the second year, the top genotypes were genotypes No. 44 (TN4904), 25 (TN3477), 23 (TN3470) and 32 (TN4104) along with Nimroz and Mehr cultivars.
Conclusion
The information related to the trend of temperature changes and rainfall in different months in Birjand showed that the amount of rainfall was significantly higher in the first year of the experiment. In addition to reducing the salinity of the soil by adjusting the temperature, it reduces the amount of evaporation and transpiration and the intensity of the salinity stress. Therefore, it seems that the level of salinity stress was milder in the first year and more intense in the second year, and this was also observed in the stress intensity index. Based on this, the difference in the results in the two years of the experiment can be justified, in other words, in the first year, tolerant genotypes were introduced in mild stress and in the second year, tolerant genotypes were introduced in severe stress. Overall, these results showed that climate changes in different years have a great impact on the response of genotypes to salinity stress.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Ali, M. R., Uddin, M. Sh., Ara Bagum, Sh., 2007. Identification of salt tolerant barley genotypes for coastal region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 36, 151-155. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v36i2.1504
Ashraf, M., Waheed, A., 1990. Screening of local/exotic accessions of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic) for salt tolerance at two growth stages. Plant and Soil. 128,167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011106
Al-Menale, H. S., Calingari, P. D., Forster, B. P., 2005. Development of salt tolerant barley for sustainable agriculture in Kuwait. Options Mediterraneennes, series A. 81, 369-372.
Bagcı, S., Ekiz, H., Yilmaz, A., 2003. Determination of the salt tolerance of some barley genotypes and the characteristics affecting tolerance. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27, 253-260.
Barrett-Lennard, E.G., Anderson, G.C., Holmes, K.W., Sinnott, A., 2016. High soil sodicity and alkalinity cause transient salinity in south-western Australia. Soil Research. 54, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR15052
Demiral, M.A., Aydin, M., Yorulmax. A., 2005. Effect of salinity on growth chemical composition and anti-oxidative enzyme activity of two malting barley cultivars. Turkish Journal of Biology. 29, 117-123.
Epstein, E., Norlyn, J.D., Rush, D.W., Kingsbury, R.W., Kelly, D.B., Cunningham, G.A., Wrona, A.F., 1980. Saline culture of crops: a genetic approach. Science. 210,399–404. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.210.4468.399
Flowers, T.J., 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 55, 307–319.https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh003
Firoozi, B., Sofalian, O., Shokrpour, M., Rasoulzadeh, A., Ahmadpoor, F., 2013. Evaluation of spring wheat genotypes using drought tolerance indices and principle component analysis. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences.5, 99-113. [In Persian with English summery]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2013.118
Fischer, A. A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 894-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Ghasemi, F., Jakeman, A.J., Nix, H.A., 1995. Salinization of land and water resources: human causes, extent, management and case studies. UNSW press, CAB International, Sydney, Wallingford.
Hillel, D., 2000. Salinity management for sustainable irrigation: integrity science, environment and economics. The world Bank. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4773-X
Javed, M.M., Al-Doss, A.A., Tahir, M.U., Khan, M.A., El-Hendawy, S., 2022. Assessing the suitability of selection approaches and genetic diversity analysis for early detection of salt tolerance of barley genotypes. Agronomy. 12, 3217.
Khodadadi, M., Dehghani, H., Jalali Javaran, M., 2017. Quantitative genetic analysis reveals potential to genetically improve Fruit Yield and Drought Resistance Simultaneously in Coriander. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8, 568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00568
Mansour, E., Moustafa, E.S.A., Abdul-Hamid, M.I.E., Ash-shormillesy, S.M.A.I., Merwad, A.M.A., Wafa, H. A., Igartua, E., 2021.Field responses of barley genotypes across a salinity gradient in an arid Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management. 258, 107206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107206
Neumann, P., 1997. Salinity resistance and plant growth revisited. Plant, Cell and Environment. 20, 1193–1198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13653040.1997.d01-139.x
Peck, A.J., Hatton, T., 2003. Salinity and the discharge of salts from catchments in Australia. Journal of Hydrology. 272, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00221694(02)00264-0
Rengasamy, P., 2002. Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 42, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA01111
Shekari, F., Karimi. A., 2000. Tolerance of barley cultivar at the germination to different concentration of anions is saline soils of Tabriz pLain. Agronomy Journal. 86, 232-236. [In Persian with English summery].
Shahmoradi, Sh., Tabatabaie, S. A., Pouresmaeil, M., 2018. Analysis and classification of salt tolerance in native barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Science. 19, 319-333. [In Persian with English summery]. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.15625540.1396.19.4.4.6
Shahmoradi, S., Ghotbi, V., 2022. Evaluation of of Iranian rye (Secale cereale L.) ecotypes under late season drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 15, 19-29. [In Persian with English summery]. https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2020.3507.1867
Tao, R., Ding, J., Li, C., Zhu, X., Guo, W., Zhu, M., 2021. Evaluating and screening of agro-physiological indices for salinity stress tolerance in wheat at the seedling stage. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12, 646175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.646175