Document Type : Original Article

Author

Research Assistant of Professor of Horticulture Crops Research Department,Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Selection efficiency requires complete and accurate knowledge of genetic parameters such as heritability, phenotypic and genotypic variation coefficient, environmental variance, selection response, genetic gain, genetic and phenotypic variance, genetic and phenotypic correlation between traits that the breeder consciously chooses the appropriate selection method in breeding populations. In this study, some genetic parameters for yield and soybean agronomic and reproductive period characteristics under normal and stress conditions were estimated and drought tolerant genotypes are determined by the Ideal Genotype Selection Index (SIIG).
Materials and methods
In 2013, in an experimental farm in Karaj, 50 soybean genotypes were cultivated in two normal and drought stress conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Irrigation cycle was determined based on the amount of evaporation from the surface of Class A pan. During the growth period, the reproductive period characteristics and after the ripening agronomic traits were evaluated. After collecting experimental data, analysis of variance, mean, minimum, maximum values of traits, heritability, phenotypic and genotypic variation coefficient, environmental variance, selection response, genetic gain, genetic and phenotypic variance, genetic and phenotypic correlation, and SIIG index method was used for grouping genotypes based on drought tolerance.
Results and discussion
Among the the reproductive period characteristics the highest and lowest genetic gain in normal conditions were 21.40 and 3.95% for day to the beginning of seed filling and the Reproductive relative duration respectively and in stress conditions were 21.9 and 7.3% for day to the beginning of seed filling and the Reproductive relative duration respectively.In normal conditions, the highest genetic gain was 0.52 for the number of pods per plant and the number of branches and the lowest genetic genetic gain was 0.14 for the number of nodes per stem. In stress conditions, the highest and lowest genetic gain were 104% and 0.14 for the number of pods per plant and the number of nodes per stem, respectively. In normal conditions, among the agronomic traits, the highest values of response to indirect selection of grain yield were 1.6 and 1.41 g, through 100-grain weight and number of seeds per plant respectively and in stress conditions, the highest values of response to indirect selection of grain yield were 1.04, 0.89 and 0.87, through The number of branches, number of seeds per plant and weight of 100 seeds were obtained respectively. Also, according to the Ideal Genotype Selection Index (SIIG), five genotypes were in the tolerant group, seven genotypes in the semi-tolerant group, 11 genotypes in the semi-susceptible group and 27 genotypes in the susceptible group. Roanak, Kabalovskaja and TMS genotypes were identified as the most drought tolerant and AGS 363, Hermen and Kuban as the most drought sensitive genotypes.
Conclusion
Based on the results, acceptable phenotypic and genotypic diversity in terms of agronomic traits was observed among the studied genotypes. Most of the genetic parameters measured were almost identical under both normal and stress conditions. The characteristics of the reproductive period had higher e selection response (direct and indirect), higher broadsense heretability and higher genetic gain than the agronomic characteristics. The highest indirect to direct selection efficiency for grain yield were obtained from number of seeds per plant and 100-seed weight under normal conditions,and The highest indirect to direct selection efficiencies were obtained from number of sub-branches, number of seeds per plant and 100-seed weight in stress conditions. Also in this study, based on the ideal genotype selection index (SIIG), Roanak, Kabalovskaja and TMS genotypes were identified as the most tolerant and AGS 363, Hermen and Kuban as the most sensitive genotypes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Aditya, J.P., Bhartiya, P., Bhartiya, A., 2011. Genetic variability, heritability and character association for yield and component characters in soybean (Glycine. max L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture. 12, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/12.1.877
Babaei, H.R., Zeinali-khaneghah, H., Talei, A.R., 2012. Genetic Analysis of agronomic traits and seed shattering resistance in soybean (Glycine max L.). Seed and Plant Improvement Journal. 28, 593-609. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22092/spij. 2017.111130
Bennani, S., Nsarellah, N., Jibene, M., Tadesse, W., Birouk, A., Ouabbou, H., 2017. Efficiency of drought tolerance indices under different stress severities for bread wheat selection. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 1, 395-405. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.17.11.04.pne272.
Board, J.E., Modali, H., 2005. Dry matter accumulation predictors for optimal yield in soybean. Crop Science. 45,1790-1799.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0602
Bouslama, M., Schapaugh, W.T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 24, 933-937.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
Choukan, R., Taherkhani, T., Channadha, M. R., Khodarahmi, M., 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance in grain maize inbred lines usines drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Agricaltural Sciences. 8,79-89. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.15625540.1385.8.1.7.6
Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. third edition, Langman Scientific and Technical. New York, USA.
Farshadfar, M., Farshadfar, E. 2008. Genetic variability and path analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces and lines. Journal of Applied Science. 8, 3951-3956. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.3951.3956
Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M.M., Safavi, S. M., 2018. Assessment of drought tolerance in land races of bread wheat based on resistance/ tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 6, 233-245.
Fehr, W.R., Caviness, C.E. 1977., Stages of Soybean Development. Special Report No. 80, Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture & Home Economics, Experimental Station. Iowa State University, USA. Coden: IWSRBC (80) 1-12 (1977)
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo CG (eds). Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. International symposium. Aug. 13-18. 1992. Shanhua, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.22001/wvc.72511
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal Agriculture. Research. 29, 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897.
Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R.G., Ricciardi, G.L., Borghi, B., 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory of drought and heat stress in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 77, 523-531. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130.
Giordani, W., Gonçalves, L.S.A., Moraes, L.A.C.,Ferreira, L.C.,Neumaier, N., Farias, J.R.B., Nepomuceno, A.L., de Oliveira, M.C.N., Mertz-Henning, L.M., 2019. Identification of agronomical and morphological traits contributing to drought stress tolerance in soybean. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 13, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.19.13.01.p1109
Iqbal, S., Mahmood, M., Tahira, M., Ali, M., Anwar, M., Sarwar. M., 2003. Path coefficient analysis in different genotypes of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 6, 1085-1087. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.1085.1087
Jiang, H., Egli. D.B., 1995. Soybean seed number and crop growth rate during flowering. Agronomy Journal. 87, 264-267. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020020x
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F., Comstock, R.E., 1955. Estimates of Genetic and Environmental Variability in Soybeans. Agronomy Journal. 47, 314-318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
Kahlon, C.S., 2010. Analysis of genetic improvement for soybean from 1950-2000. Doctoral Dissertations Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.USA. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.3872.
Kobraee, S., Shamsi. K., 2011. Evaluation of soybean yield under drought stress by path analysis. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 5, 890-895.
Kokuban, M., Shimada, S., Takahashi. M., 2001. Flower abortion caused by parenthesis water deficit is not attributed to impairment of pollen in soybean. Crop Science. 4, 1517–1521. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.4151517x
Kuswantoro, H., 2017. The role of heritability and genetic variability in estimated selection response of soybean lines on tidal swamp land. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agriculture Science. 40, 319 – 328.
Liu, Y., 2004. Physiological regulation of pod set in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during drought at early reproductive stages. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Sciences. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. Copenhagen. Denmark.
Machikowa, T., Laosuwan, P., 2011. Path coefficient analysis for yield of early maturing soybean. Songklanakarin Journal of Science Technology. 33, 365-368.
Mahbub, M.M., Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.S., Mahmud, F., Mir Kabir, M.M., 2015. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in soybean. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 15, 231-236. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2015.15.2.12524
Mejaya, M.J., Suhartina, S., Purwantoro, P., Nugrahaeni, N., Sundari, T., 2022. Genetic parameters of agronomic traits in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) genotypes tolerant to drought Cite as: AIP Conference Proceedings. 24–25 May 2021. Bogor, Indonesia. Retrieved april 10, 2022. from  https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075159
Mesfin, H.H., 2018. Path analysis, genetic variability and correlation studies for soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) for grain yield and Secondary traits at Asosa. Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 6, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJPBCS.2018.3.111418158
Moosavi, S.S., Yazdi-Samadi, B., Naghavi, M. R., Zali, A.A., Dashti, H., Pourshahbazi, A., 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. DESERT. 12, 165-178.
Nakawuka, C. K., Adipala, E., 1999. A path coefficient analysis of some yield component interactions in cowpea. African Crop Science Journal. 7, 327-331. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v7i4.27726
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin. J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. 21, 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x.
Soares, I.O., Bianchi, M.C., Bruzi, A.T., Gesteira, G.S., Silva, K.B., Guilherme, S.R., Cianzio, S.R., 2020. Genetic and phenotypic parameters associated with soybean progenies in a recurrent selection program. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 20,1- 8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332020v20n4a59
Teixeira, F.G., Hamawaki, O.T., Nogueira, A.P.O., Hamawaki, R.L., Jorge, G.L., Hamawaki, C.L., Machado, B.Q.V., Santana, A.J.O., 2017. Genetic parameters and selection of soybean lines based on selection indexes.Genetic Molecolar Research. 16,1-17. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16039750
Varnica, I., Petrovic, S., Reberic, A., Guberac, S., Jukic, K., Jukic, G.,2018. Characterization and interrelationships of soybean (Glycine max L.Merrill) yield components during dry and humid seasons. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 19, 466-481. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/19.2.2148
Vianna, M.S., Nogueira, A.P.O., Hamawaki, O.T., Sousa, L.B., Gomes, G.F., Glasenapp, J.S., Hamawaki, R.L., Silva, C.O., 2019. Selection of lineages, genetiv parameters and correlations between characters. Bioscience Journal.35, 1300-1314. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v35n5a2019-42656
Yan, R. L. C., Song, S., Wang, W., Wang, C., Li, H., Wang, F., Li, S., Sun, X., 2020. Screening diverse soybean genotypes for drought tolerance by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought tolerant coefficient of yield. BMC Plant Biology. Retrieved April 15, 2022. from https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02519-9.
Zali, H., Barati, A., 2020. Evaluation of selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) in other to selection of barley promising lines with high yield and desirable agronomy traits. Journal of Crop Breeding. 12, 93-104. https://doi.org/ 10.29252/jcb.12.34.93
Zhang, J., Song, Q., Cregan, P. B., Nelson, R. L., Wang, X., Wu, J., Jiang, G. L., 2015. Genome-wide association study for flowering time, maturity dates and plant height in early maturing soybean (Glycine max) germplasm. BMC Genomics.Retrieved april 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1441-4.