Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Plant Breeding-Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Professor, Institute of Biotechnology, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity stress is one of the main abiotic stress factors and environmental problems affecting crop yields worldwide, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Land salinization is increasing, with 10 million ha of agricultural land destroyed annually. An increase in the concentration of salts in soil solution or irrigation water adversely affects plant growth and productivity, which can substantially reduce yield production. Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most important cereal grain after rice and wheat, due to its high yield and nutritive value and also known as the queen of cereal crops and is moderately sensitive to salinity stress. Accurate screening of maize tolerant genotypes using selection indices for salinity stress tolerance is an efficient approach to improve salinity tolerant crop plant genotypes, as well as reduce the effect of salinity on this crop.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted at the Urmia University Research Farm in 2017 to evaluate the influence of salinity stress (8 dSm-1) on the grain yield of 86 maize lines, as well as identify salt-tolerant maize lines based on selection indices for salinity stress tolerance. The pot experiments in normal and salinity stress conditions were set up in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Ten selection indices for salinity stress tolerance including Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Tolerance Index (TOL), Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Mean Productivity (MP), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP), Harmonic Mean (HM), Abiotic Tolerance Index (ATI), Drought resistance Index (DI), Modified Stress Tolerance Index in normal condition (MpSTI), and Modified Stress Tolerance Index in stress condition (MsSTI) were calculated based on grain yield of lines under normal and salinity stress conditions.
Results and discussion
A wide range of genetic variability was obtained among the studied maize lines in terms of grain yield under normal and salinity stress conditions as well as in terms of selection indices for salinity stress tolerance, which provided suitable conditions for evaluating tolerance indices and selection of tolerant lines. STI, MP, GMP, and HM had the highest correlation with grain yield in both normal and salinity stress conditions and were suitable to screen salt-tolerant and high-yielding maize lines. The three-dimensional (3D) plot obtained from these indices showed that the lines Ma025, Ma010, Ma026, Ma011, Ma009 Ma015, Ma116, Ma012, Ma028, and Ma062, which were in group A, had high yields in both normal and stress conditions. The results obtained from the use of principal component analysis showed that the first two principal components account for 93% of the total variance. The first component, called yield potential, had a very significant correlation with STI, MP, GMP, HM, DI, MpSTI, and MsSTI and was able to separate high-yielding maize lines in both normal and stress conditions. The second component, called sensitive or tolerant to salinity stress, had a very high correlation with SSI, TOL, and ATI and was able to distinguish stable maize lines. According to the hierarchical cluster analysis, a total of 86 maize lines were grouped in three tolerant, semi-tolerant, and sensitive clusters somehow this clustering was completely consistent with the separation of maize lines by the first principal component. In addition, each of these clusters had two subclusters that were separated according to the second principal component, so that in each cluster, the lines that had high yield stability were placed in the first subcluster, and the lines that had lower yield stability were placed in the second subcluster. Thus, Ma010, Ma026, Ma009, Ma027, Ma023, Ma007, and Ma005 were introduced as salt-tolerant maize lines with stable yields to use in breeding programs.
Conclusion
Based on the available findings, the present study, as the first study on a large number of maize lines (86 lines) in the country, evaluated salinity stress tolerance using selection indices. The results of this study revealed the importance of using selection indices for stress tolerance as a reliable and useful tool to improve salinity stress tolerance in maize lines. Accordingly, STI, MP, GMP, and HM were identified as the most appropriate indices for the selection of tolerant and stable maize lines using multivariate statistical methods. It is recommended that the selected maize lines be considered as parent lines in future breeding programs in order to improve salinity stress tolerance and stable grain yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Acosta-Motos, J.R., Ortuño, M.F., Bernal-Vicente, A., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Sanchez-Blanco, M.J., Hernandez, J.A., 2017. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy. 7, 18.
Anwaar, H.A., Perveen, R., Mansha, M.Z., Abid, M., Sarwar, Z.M., Aatif, H.M., Umar, U.U.D., Sajid, M., Aslam, H.M.U., Alam, M.M., Rizwan, M., Ikram, R.M., Alghanem, S.M.S., Rashid, A., Khan, K.A., 2020. Assessment of grain yield indices in response to drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 27, 1818-1823.
Arzhang, S., Darvishzadeh, R., Alipour, H., 2021. Evaluation of genetic diversity of maize lines (Zea mays L.) under normal and salinity stress conditions. Cereal Research. 11, 243-266. [In Persian].
Blum, A., 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environment. CRC press. Boca Raton, FL. Pp. 38-78.
Bonea, D., 2020. Grain yield and drought tolerance indices of maize hybrids. Notulea Scientia Biologicea. 12, 376-386.
Clarke, J.M., Depauw, R.M., Townley-Smith, T.F., 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science. 32, 723-728.
Darvishzadeh, R., Pirzad, A., Hatami-Maleki, H., Poormohammad Kiani, S., Sarrafi, A., 2010. Evaluation of the reaction of sunflower inbred lines and their F1 hybrids to drought conditions using various stress tolerance indices. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 8, 1037-1046.
Ekbic, E., Cagıran, C., Korkmaz, K., Arsal Kose, M., Aras, V., 2017. Assessment of watermelon accessions for salt tolerance using stress tolerance indices. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 41, 616-625.
El-Wakeel, S.E., Abdel-Azeem, A.M., Mostafa, E.E.I., 2019. Assessment of salinity stress tolerance in some barley genotypes. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 64, 195-206.
FAO. 2022a. Global Symposium on Salt-Affected Soils: Outcome document. Rome.
FAO. 2022b. Halt soil salinization, boost soil productivity – Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Salt-affected Soils. 20–22 October 2021. Rome.
Farshadfar, E., Mohammadi, R., Farshadfar, M., Dabiri, S., 2013. Relationships and repeatability of drought tolerance indices in wheat-rye disomic addition lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 7, 130-138.
Farshadfar, E., Sutka, J., 2002. Screening drought tolerance criteria in maize. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 50, 411-416.
Feizi, M., Solouki, M., Sadeghzadeh, B., Fakheri, B., Mohammadi, S.A., 2020. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for barley landraces under irrigated and dry conditions. Bioscience Journal. 36, 1518-1527.
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Taiwan. Pp, 257-270.
Fischer, R.A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 29, 897-907.
Fortmeier, R., Schubert, S., 1995. Salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.): The role of sodium exclusion. Plant, Cell and Environment. 18, 1041–1047.
Genc, Y., Oldach, K., Verbly, A.P., Lott, G., Hassan, M., Tester, M., Wallwork, H., McDonald, G.K., 2010. Sodium exclusion QTL associated with improved seedling growth in bread wheat under salinity stress. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 121, 877-94.
Hohls, T., 2001. Conditions under which selection for mean productivity, tolerance to environmental stress, or stability should be used to improve yield across a range of contrasting environments. Euphytica. 120, 235-245.
Jafari, A., Paknejad, F., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M., 2009. Evaluation of selection indices for drought tolerance of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. International Journal of Plant Production. 3, 33-38.
Kandel, M., Ghimire, S.K., Ojha, B.R., Shrestha, J., 2019. Evaluation of heat stress tolerance indices in maize inbred lines. Malaysian Journal of Applied Sciences. 4, 57-68.
Katerji, N., Van Hoorn, J.W., Hamdy, A., Karam, F., Mastroruilli, M., 1994. Effect of salinity on emergence and on water stress and early seedling growth of sunflower and maize. Agricultural Water Management. 26, 81-91.
Lan, J., 1998. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agric Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica. 7, 85-87.
Lestari, A.P., Suwarno, Trikoesoemaningtyas, Sopandie, D., Aswidinnoor, H., 2019. Estimation for stress tolerance indices of rice genotypes in low nitrogen condition. The Agricultural Science Society of Thailand. 52, 180-190.
Lohaus, G., Hussmann, M., Pennewiss, K., Schneider, H., Zhu, Jian‐Jun., Sattelmacher, Burkhard., 2000. Solute balance of a maize (Zea mays L.) source leaf as affected by salt treatment with special emphasis on phloem re translocation and ion leaching. Journal of Experimental Botany. 51, 1721-1732.
Mehraban, A., Tobe, A., Gholipouri, A., Amiri, E., Ghafari, A., Rostaii, M., 2018. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and yield stability of wheat cultivars to drought stress in different growth stage. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences. 7, 8-14.
Mitra, J., 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science. 80, 758-762.
Moosavi, S.S., Yazdi Samadi, B., Naghavi, M.R., Zali, A.A., Dashti, H., Pourshahbazi, A., 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert. 12, 165-178.
Munns, R., Day, D.A., Fricke, W., Watt, M., Arsova, B., Barkla, B.J., Bose, J., Byrt, C.S., Chen, Z.H., Foster, K.J., Gilliham, M., Henderson, S.W., Jenkins, C.L.D., Kronzucker, H.J., Miklavcic, S.J., Plett, D., Roy, S.J., Shabala, S., Shelden, M.C., Soole, K.L., Taylor, N.L., Tester, M., Wege, S., Wegner, L.H., Tyerman, S.D., 2019. Energy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants. New Phytologist. 225, 1072-1090.
Ray, D.K., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C., Foley, J.A., 2013. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE. 8, e66428.
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin, J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943–946.
Schneider, K.A., Rosales-Serna, R., Ibarra-Perez, F., Cazares-Enriquez, B., Acosta-Gallegos, J.,  Ramirez-Vallejo, P., Wassimi, N., Kelly, J.D. Serna-Berna, R., Ibarra-Velarde, F., Enriquez, B., Gallegos, J., Vallejo, P., 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science. 37, 51-60.
Shahrokhi, M., Khavari Khorasani, S., Ebrahimi, A., 2020. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of super sweet maize (Zea mays L. var. saccharata) inbred lines. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(3), 435-448.
Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi, V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research. 98, 222–229.
Smajgl, A., Toan, T.Q., Nhan, D.K., Ward, J., Trung, N.H., Tri, L.Q.,  Tri, V.P.D.,  Vu, P.T., 2015. Responding to rising sea levels in the Mekong Delta. Nature Climate Change. 5, 167–174.
Wasae, A., 2021. Evaluation of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in haricot bean varieties exposed to stress at different growth stages. Hindawi: International Journal of Agronomy. Article ID 6617874, 9 pages.
Yassin, M., Fara, S.A., Hossain, A., Saneoka, H., El Sabagh, A., 2019. Assessment of salinity tolerance bread wheat genotypes: using stress tolerance indices. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 28, 4199-4217.