Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Agrotechnology (Crop Physiology), Islamic Azad University of Parsabad Moghan, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Pars Abad Moghan Islamic Azad University, Pars Abad Moghan, Iran

4 Assistant professor, Horticulture Crops Research Department. Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ardabil, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Ardabil Branch Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is considered one of the most important factors limiting crop performance worldwide. Consumption of humic acid on plants, in addition to soil fertility, increases plant tolerance to drought and soil water holding capacity. Chitosan is also a natural biopolymer modified from chitin and non-toxic, biodegradable, and environmentally friendly substances that acts as a potential stimulant in agriculture. Chitosan and humic acid reduce the negative effects of abiotic stresses. Accordingly, due to the drought crisis in arid and semi-arid regions, in this study, the modulating effect of humic acid and chitosan foliar application on wheat tolerance to drought stress at the end of the season was investigated.
Materials and methods
This experiment was performed to study the effect of foliar application of chitosan and humic acid on improving drought tolerance of wheat genotypes in the form of split split plots based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plot includes irrigation treatments at two levels (full irrigation and cessation of irrigation in spike stage), sub-plots including three wheat genotypes including Mihan, CD-93-9, and CD-93-10, and sub-plots including humic acid and chitosan foliar application levels (Zero, 2 g.L-1 of humic acid, 3 ml.L-1 of chitosan and the combination of humic acid and chitosan). The experiment was carried out on a field in Ardabil Agricultural Research Station. Sowing was done in October 2020 with a planting density of 450 seeds per square meter. Chemical fertilizer based on NPK soil test at 50, 100, and 20 kg.ha-1, respectively was added to the soil before planting. Each genotype was planted in 1.5 cm by 7 m plots. The length of each row was 7 m and the distance between the rows was 20 cm and the seeds were sown at a depth of 5 cm. STAR 2.01 statistical software was used to analyze the data including data analysis of variance and comparison of means by LSD method at a 5% probability level.
Results and discussion
The results showed that the interaction effect of cultivar × stress × foliar application was significant in all studied traits including plant height, number of seeds per spike, number of spikes, spike length, and grain yield, except the number of tillers per plant and 1000-seed weight. Regarding the number of tillers per plant, the interaction of cultivar × foliar application was significant and for 1000-seed weight, the interaction of cultivar × stress and stress × foliar application was significant. Although there were differences in the response of wheat genotypes to the foliar application under both stress and non-stress conditions, in most traits such as number of tillers, number of seeds per spike, spike length, plant height, and 1000-seed weight, the best result was the simultaneous use of chitosan and humic acid. Was obtained. Also, both under non-stress and under stress conditions, the highest grain yield of the studied genotypes was obtained in simultaneous foliar application of chitosan and humic acid. In general, it can be concluded that the combination of chitosan and humic acid (2 g.L-1 humic acid and 3 ml.L-1 chitosan) significantly showed the best results in increasing the yield and yield components of wheat compared to the control treatment in both non-stress and the end of the season drought stress conditions.
Conclusion
Foliar application of humic acid and chitosan increased and improved the studied traits, both under drought stress and non-stress conditions in wheat genotypes compared to non-foliar application. The maximum number of tillers, number of seeds per spike, number of spikes, spike length, 1000-seed weight, and grain yield were obtained by foliar application of chitosan and humic acid under both full irrigation and stress conditions. Therefore, it is recommended to use simultaneous spraying of chitosan and humic acid to increase tolerance and achieve higher performance. Also, the study of different concentrations of these two substances in combination with each other and at different stages of wheat growth can determine the best dose and time of their consumption in this strategic crop, which is recommended to conduct studies in this regard.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Abd El Gawad, H.G., Bondok, A.M., 2015. Response of tomato plants to salicylic acid and chitosan under infection with tomato mosaic virus. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 15, 1520-1529. https://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2015.15.8.12735.
Abdel-Mawgoud, A.M.R, Tantawy, A.S., El-Nemr, M.A. Sassine, Y.N., 2010. Growth and yield responses of strawberry plants to chitosan application. European Journal of Scientific Research. 39, 170-177.
Abdel-Rahman, H.M., Zaghloul, R.A., Hassan, E.A., El-Zehery, H.R.A., Salem, A.A., 2021. New strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in combinations with Humic Acid to enhance Squash growth under saline stress. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 61, 129-146. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2021.58052.1425.
Abu Zinada, I.A., Sekh Eleid, K.S., 2015. Humic acid to decrease fertilization rate on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 3, 234- 238. https://dx.doi.org/10.11648/J.AJAF.20150305.20.
Andrade, F., Mendonca, E., Silva, I., Mateus, R., 2004. Low molecular weight and humic acids increase phosphorus uptake and corn growth in Oxisoils. Humic Substances and Soil and Water Environment. 211-214.
Behboodi, F., Tahmasbi Sarvestani, Z., Kasaei, M.Z., Modares Sanavi, A.M. Sorooshzadeh, S.A., 2019. Effect of foliar application and application of chitosan nanoparticles on chlorophyll, photosynthesis, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress after pollination. Journal of Plant Process and Function, 8, 271-285. [In Persian with English Summary].
Chen, B., Zhu, Y.G., 2006. Humic acids increase the phytoavailability of Cd and Pb to wheat plants cultivated in freshly spiked, contaminated soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 6, 236-242. https://dx.doi.org/10.1065/JSS2006. 08.178.
Doroodian, M., Sharghi, Y., Alipour, A., Zahedi, H., 2016. Yield and yield components of wheat as influenced by sowing date and humic acid. International Journal of Natural Sciences. 5, 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ijns.v5i1.28605.
Farnia, A., Moradi, E., 2015. Effect of soil and foliar application of humic acid on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences (IJBPAS). 4, 706-716.
Farouk, S., Mosa, A., Taha, A., Ibrahim, H.M., El-Gahmery, A., 2011. Protective effect of humic acid and chitosan on radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. sativus) plants subjected to cadmium stress. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry. 7, 99-116. Corpus ID: 43954564.
Guan, Y.J., Hu, J., Wang, X.J., Shao, Ch.X., 2009. Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. Journal of Zhejiang University Science. 10, 427-433. https://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0820373.
Gutteiri, M.J., Stak, J.C., Obbrain, K., Souza, E., 2001. Relative sensitivity of spring wheat grain yield and quality parameters to moisture deficit. Crop Science. 41, 327-335. https://dx.doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2001.412327x.
Hafez, Y., Attia, K., Alamery, S., Ghazy, A., Al-Doss, A. Ibrahim, E., Rashwan, E., El-Maghraby, L., Awad, A., Abdelaal, Kh., 2020. Beneficial effects of Biochar and Chitosan on antioxidative capacity, osmolytes accumulation, and anatomical characters of water-stressed Barley plants. Agronomy. 10, 3-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050630.
Hidangmayum, A., Dwivedi, P., Katiyar, D., Hemantaranjan, A., 2019. Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 25, 313–326. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0633-1.
Kandil, H., Gad, N., Abed El Moez, M.R., 2015. Response of okra (Hibiscus esculantus) growth and productivity to cobalt and humic acid rates. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 8, 1782-1791.
Karimi, S., Abbaspour, H., Sinaki, J.M., Makarian, H., 2012. Effects of water deficit and chitosan spraying on osmotic adjustment and soluble protein of cultivars castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry. 8, 160-69.
Kaya, M., Atak, M., Khawar, K.M., Ciftci, C.Y., Ozcan, S., 2005. Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with zinc and foliar spray of humic acids on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 7, 875- 878. https://dx.doi.org/1560–8530/2005/07–6–875–878.
Khan, R., Manzoor, N., Zia, A., Ahmad, I., Ullah, A., Shah, S.M., Naeem, M., Ali, Sh., Khan, I.H., Zia, D., Malik, M., 2018. Exogenous application of chitosan and humic acid effects on plant growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum). International Journal of Biosciences. 12, 43-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/12.5.43-50.
Kilic, H., Yagbasanlar, Y., 2010. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 38, 164-170. https://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nbha_3814274.
Malerba, M., Cerana, R., 2015. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species indefense/stress responses activated by chitosan in sycamore cultured cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 16, 3019–3034. https://dx.doi.org 10.3390/ijms16023019 .
Malerba, M., Cerana R., 2016. Chitosan effects on plant systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 17, 996. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390_ijms17070996.
Mansour, E.R., Mesairy, M.M.A.E., 2015. Effect of humic acid and chitosan on growth and yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) under saline conditions. Egyptian Journal of Desert Research. 65, 47-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/EJDR.2015.5798.
Masjedi, M.H., Roozbehani, A., Baghi, M., 2017. Assessment effect of chitosan foliar application on total chlorophyll and seed yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water stress conditions. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science. 3(4), 14-26.
Mauromicale, G., Angela, M.G.L., Monaco, A.L., 2011. The effect of organic supplementation of solarized soil on the quality of tomato. Scientia Horticulturae. 129, 189-196. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.024.
Mehrpuyan, M., Timas, Gh., Aminzadeh, Gh.R., 2010. Effect of sowing date and seed density on morphological characteristics and yield of two bread wheat cultivars in Moghan region. Journal of Research in Crop Sciences. 9, 37- 49. [In Persian with English Summary].
Mondal, M.M.A., Malek, M.A., Puteh, A.B., Ismail, M.R., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Naher, L., 2012. Effect of foliar application of chitosan on growth and yield in okra. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6, 918-921.
Moradian, P., Kazemi Arbat, H.A., Rezaei Morad Alla, M., 2015. Evaluation of some morphological and physiological traits of bread wheat lines and cultivars. Journal of Crop Plant Ecophysiology. 1, 57- 70. [In Persian with English Summary].
Muriefah, SH.A., 2013. Effect of chitosan on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants grown under water stress conditions. Global Science Research Journals. 1, 001-008.
Rezaeizadeh, M., Sayfzadeh, S., Shirani Rad, A.H., Valadabadi, S.A., Hadidi Masouleh, E., 2019. Influence of drought stress and chitosan on fatty acid compounds of rapeseed varieties. Iranian Journal of Plant Physiology. 9, 2819- 2825. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/IJPP.2019.667143.
Richards, R.A., Condon, A.G., Robetzke, G.J., 2001. Traits to improve yield in dry environments. Pp: 88-100. In: Reynolds, M.P., J.I. Ortiz-Monasterio, A. McNab. (eds.). Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. CIMMYT. Mexico.
Rizk, F.A, Shaheen, A.M., Singer, S.M., Sawan, O.A., 2013. The productivity of potato plants affected by urea fertilizer as foliar spraying and humic acid added with irrigation water. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2, 76-83.
Rosa, C., Castilhos, R., Vahl, L., Costa, P., 2004. Effect of fulvic acids on plant growth, root morphology and macronutrient uptake by oats. Humic Substances and Soil and Water Environment. 207-210.
Salek Zamani, A., Tavakoli, A.R., 2005. The effect of seed rate on grain yield and its components of three new variety and line of rainfed wheat. Iranian journal of Crop sciences. 6, 214- 223 pp. [In Persian with English Summary]. https://dx.doi.org/20.1001.1.15625540.1383.6. 3.4.3.
Samarah, N.H., 2005. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronmy for Sustainabe Development. 25, 145- 149. https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:2004064.
Shahryari, R., 2016. Evaluation of genetic variation of bread wheat genotypes for some morphological and physiological characteristics under drought stress condition. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 10, 413- 430. [In Persian with English Summary].
Shahryari, R., Mollasadeghi, V., 2011(a). Harvest index and its associated characters in winter wheat genotypes against terminal drought at presence of a peat derived humic fertilizer. Advances in Environmental Biology. 5, 162-165.
Shahryari, R., Mollasadeghi, V., 2011(b). Increasing of wheat grain yield by use of a humic fertilizer. Advances in Environmental Biology. 5, 516-518.
Shamsipoor, M. Fotovat, R., Jabari, F., 2010. Correlation between chlorophyll content index and grain yield of wheat under drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 2, 8- 16. [In Persian with English Summary].
Shehata, S.A., Fawzy, Z.F., El-Ramady, H.R., 2012. Response of cucumber plants to foliar application of chitosan and yeast under greenhouse conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 6, 63-71.
STAR, version 2.0.1., 2014. Biometrics and Breeding Informatics, PBGB Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Laguna.
Torfi, F. and Shokoofar, A., 2019. Effect of humic acid on yield and physiological properties of wheat in deficit-irrigation conditions, Journal of Crop Science, 9, 121- 132. [In Persian with English Summary].
Yoon-Ha Kim Y.H., Khan, A.L., Shinwari, Z.K., Kim, D.H., Waqas, M., Kamran, M., In-J L., 2012. Silicon treatment to rice (Oryza sativa L. cv ‘Gopumbyeo’) plants during different growth periods and its effects on growth and grain yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 44, 891-897.
Youssef, E.A., Ali Hozayen, A.M., 2019. Study the effect of chitosan on some growth and yield parameters in wheat grown under water stress condition. Plant Archives. 19, 684- 694.
Zeng, D., Luo, X., 2012. Physiological effects of chitosan coating on wheat growth and activities of protective enzyme with drought tolerance. Open Journal of Soil Science, 2, 282-288. https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2012.23034