Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology. Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology. Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran. Iran

2 Department of Cereal Research. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII). Agricultural Research. Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Karaj. Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Drought is one of the most important factors limiting the environment for plant growth and productivity, especially in the flowering and filling stages of barley. A study was conducted to compare some statistical methods and different indicators of stress tolerance with the aim of introducing an ideal method for selecting drought tolerant lines. After wheat, barley is one of the most important crops. Barley is the fourth cereal crop in the world after wheat, corn and rice. One of the factors affecting the production of plants is water defecit, and barley has more efficient mechanisms against water shortage than other grains. Because it has higher relative drought tolerance compared to other grains. In these arid and semi-arid regions like Iran, the presence of drought stress during plant growth is a natural problem.
Materials and methods
In this study, 18 diverse barley lines at two water levels (normal conditions and water deficit stress) were examined. This experiment was performed as a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute of Karaj, Iran in 2020. Drought tolerance and susceptibility indices were assessed. These indices included stress sensitivity index, mean productivity, tolerance, stress tolerance index, geometric mean productivity, harmonic mean productivity, performance under stress conditions (Ys) and normal (Yp) conditions. Correlation coefficient between yield in drought and irrigation conditions and other stress indicators was estimated according to statistical techniques. Correlation between indices and grain yield under stress and normal conditions was calculated using Minitab software. Selection based on multiple traits in breeding programs is likely to be effective in improving grain yield under drought stress conditions. The purpose of this study is to identify the most suitable indicators and compare different stress tolerance indicators to select high-yielding and drought-tolerant lines and to identify the superior barley line.
Results and discussion
The highest GMP and MP were related to 4 and 13 lines. Based on tolerance index (TOL), genotype 1 had the lowest and line 7 showed the highest level of tolerance, respectively. Based on MP and GMP indices, 4, 7 and 13 lines had high drought tolerance. A high positive and significant correlation was observed between MP, GMP, Ys, Yp, which indicates that these indices are suitable for identifying drought tolerant lines. Based on the results of the principal component analysis and the bi-plot diagram, it was observed that the lines tolerant to drought stress are almost consistent with the clustering pattern of tolerant lines and the lines sensitive to drought stress are also consistent with the clustering of sensitive lines. MP and GMP indices are suitable for evaluating drought tolerance because they showed a high correlation with grain yield under normal conditions and under water stress. The closeness of 4 and 13 lines to GMP, MP, HARM, Ys indicates the tolerance of these lines to drought stress and therefore they can be suggested as drought tolerant lines.
Conclusion
Selection of drought tolerant lines based on a combination of tolerance indices can provide useful criteria for drought tolerance. A high positive and significant correlation was observed between MP, GMP, Ys, Yp, which indicates that these indices are suitable for identifying drought tolerant lines. These results help the modifier to select lines in different environments. Principal component analysis showed that it is important to introduce genotypes with desirable traits such as genotypes with high yield and resistance to drought stress. It is possible to speed up the improvement of new barley cultivars by using stress tolerance indicators by breeders. In general, 4, 7, and 13 lines were drought tolerant and can be used for barley improvement programs. Based on principal component analysis, drought sensitive and tolerant lines were consistent with cluster analysis. Exploiting the results of the present study can help breeders to select and identify genotypes that have relative tolerance to drought stress.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
 Allel, D., BenAmar, A., Badri, M., Abdelly, C., 2019. Evaluation of salinity tolerance indices in North African barley accessions at reproductive stage. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 55, 61-69.
Abdolshahi, R., Safarian, A., Nazari, M., Pourseyedi, S., Mohamadi-Nejad, G., 2013. Screening drought-tolerant genotypes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using different multivariate methods. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 59, 685-704.
Akçura, M., Partigoç, F., Kaya, Y., 2011. Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in Turkish bread wheat landraces. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 21,700–709.
Amiri. R., Bahraminejad. S., Sasani. S. Ghobadi. M., 2014. Genetic evaluation of 80 irrigated bread wheat genotypes for drought tolerance indices. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 20, 101-111.
Bahrami, F., Arzani, A., Rahimmalek, M., 2021. A novel tolerance index to identify heat tolerance in cultivated and wild barley genotypes. bioRxiv. 2020-05.
Bihamta, M., Shirkavand, M., Hasanpour, J., Afzalifar, A., 2018. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding. 9, 119-136. (In Persian)
Bouslama. M., Schapaugh. W.T., 1984. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance 1. Crop Science. 24, 933–937, http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.001118x002400050026x .
Cabello, R., Monneveux, P., De Mendiburu. F., Bonierbale, M., 2013. Comparison of yield-based drought tolerance indices in improved cultivars. genetic stocks. and landraces of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica. 193, 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0887-1.
Ceccarelli, S.,  Grando, S., 2007. Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica. 155, 349–360.
Chaves, M.M., Oliveira, M.M., 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botnay. 55, 2365–2384.
Chaves, M.M., Maroco, J.P., Pereira, J.S., 2003. Understanding plant responses to drought: from genes to the whole plant. Function Plant Biology. 30, 239-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/FP02076.
Clarke, JM., DePauw, RM., Townley-Smith, TF., 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science. 32, 723–728.
Dadbakhsh, A., Sepas, A.Y., Aminzadeh, G., Hasanpanah, D., Mollasadeghi, V., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening bread wheat genotypes in end-season drought stress conditions. Advance Environment Biology. 5, 1040–1045.
Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M.M., Safavi, S. M., 2018. Assessment of drought tolerance in land races of bread wheat based on resistance/tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 1, 143-158
Fernandez., G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress. Aug. 13–16. Shanhua. Taiwan. 257–270.
Fischer, R.A., Wood, J.T., 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars: III. Yield association with morphophysiological traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 30, 1001-1020.
Haddadin, M.A., 2015. Assessment of drought tolerant barley varieties under water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 5, 131-137.
Hajibarat, Z., Saidi, A., Mosuapour Gorji, A., Ghaffari, M.R., Zeinalabedini, M., 2020. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Under Water Deficit. Journal of Crop Breeding. 12, 102-112. (In Persian)
Hittalmani, S., Huang, N., Courtois, B., Venuprasad, R., Shashidhar, H.E., Zhuang, J.Y,. Zheng, K.L., Liu, G.F. Wang, G.C., Sidhu, J.S., Srivantaneeyakul, S., 2003. Identification of QTL for growth-and grain yield-related traits in rice across nine locations of Asia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 107, 679-90.
Hossain, A., da Silva, J.A., Lozovskaya, M.V., Zvolinsky, V.P., 2012. High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in South-Eastern Russia: I. Phenology and growth. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.19, 473-87.
Ilkler, E., Tatar, O., Aykut, Tonk, F., Tosun, M., 2011. Determination of Tolerance Level of Some Wheat Genotypes to Post Anthesis Drought. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 16, 59- 63.
Jafari, A., Paknejad, F., Jami Al-Ahmadi, M., 2012. Evaluation of selection indices for drought tolerance of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. International Journal Plant Production. 3, 33–38.
Kaspar, T.C., Pulido, D.J., Fenton, T.E., Colvin, T.S., Karlen, D.L., Jaynes, D.B., Meek, D.W., 2004. Relationship of corn and soybean yield to soil and terrain properties. Agronomy Journal. 96, 700-709.
Khokhar, M.I., da Silva, J.A.T., Spiertz, H., 2012. Evaluation of barley genotypes for yielding ability and drought tolerance under irrigated and water-stressed conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences. 12, 287–292
Lipkovich, I. A., Smith, E. P., 2002. Biplot and singular value decomposition macros for excel. Journal of Statistics Software.7, 1-14.
Mardeh, A.S.S., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., Mohammadi. V., 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crop Research. 98, 222–229
Mitra. J., 2001. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science. 80, 758-763.
Mohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R., Abdipour, M., 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes under dryland and supplemental irrigation conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 487–493.
Nouri, A., Etminan, A., Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Mohammadi. R., 2011. Assessment of yield, yield-related traits and drought tolerance of durum wheat genotypes (Triticum turjidum var. durum Desf.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 5, 8-16.
Ouk, M., Basnayake, J., Tsubo, M., Fukai, S., Fischer, K. S., Cooper, M., Nesbitt, H., 2006. Use of drought response index for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Research. 99, 48-58.
Patel. J., Patel. A., Patel. C., Mamrutha, H., Pradeep, S., Pachchigar, K.P., 2019. Evaluation of selection indices in screening durum wheat genotypes combining drought tolerance and high yield potential. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8, 1165-1178.
Plaut, Z., 2003. Plant exposure to water stress during specific growth stages. Encyclopedia of Water Science. 673-675
Ramezani, M., Rahimi, M., Samezade, L.H., Rahimi, F., 2008. The Evaluation Of Grouping Accuracy Of Different Cluster Analysis Methods. 207-218.
Rosielle, A.A., Hamblin. J., 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment 1. Crop Science. 21.943–946.
Safari, P., Danyali, S.F., Rahimi, M., Mahdavi Meyghan, A., 2019. Application of Gibbs Variable Selection Approach to Study Genetic Control of Water Deficient Stress Tolerance in Wheat. Journal of Crop Breeding. 11. 168-177, (In Persian)
Sardouie-Nasab, S., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., Nakhoda. B., 2014. Field screening of salinity tolerance in Iranian bread wheat lines. Crop Science. 54, 1489–1496
Schneider. KA., Rosales‐Serna. R., Ibarra‐Perez. F., Cazares‐Enriquez. B,Acosta‐Gallegos. JA., Ramirez‐Vallejo. P., Wassimi. N., Kelly. JD., 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science. 37, 43-50.
Thornton, PK., Ericksen, PJ., Herrero, M., Challinor, AJ., 2014. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Global Change Biology. 20, 3313-3328.
Tousi Mojarrad, M., Ghanadha, MR., Khodarahimi, M., Shahabi, S., 2005. Factor analysis for grain yield and other attributes in bread wheat. Journal Pazhohesh Sazandegi. 66, 9–16.
Um, M.J., Kim, Y., Park, D., 2018. Evaluation and modification of the drought severity index (DSI) in East Asia. Remote Sensing of Environment. 209, 66-76.
Zeng, L., Shannon, M.C., Grieve, C.M., 2002. Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic parameters. Euphytica. 127, 235–245.