Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Asssistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Safflower is an oilseed plant tolerant to water deficit, and have an important role in oil production. Drought stress is the most important factor limiting crop yields in many parts of the world, including Iran. Nitrogen plays a key role in plant growth and this role is highly related to the amount of water and how it is distributed. Bacteria of the genus Azotobacter are one of the most important growth-promoting bacteria in plants due to their abundance and extent of spread, which is able to improve the availability of nitrogen. In areas where most rainfall occurs in winter and early spring, crops will face water constraints at the end of the growing season. In such conditions, finding cultivars and lines that have good performance in non-stress and drought stress conditions and have a suitable response to Azotobacter and nitrogen fertilizer is of special importance.The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the response of safflower genotypes to the application of Azotobacter and nitrogen fertilizer under different moisture conditions.
Materials and methods
This experiment was carried out during two growing seasons (2015/2016 and 2016/2017), in Sarableh Agricultural Research Station, Ilam Province. The factorial scheme 4 × 6 experiment was performed in both years in a randomized complete block design with three replications under terminal drought stress and non-stress conditions. The distance between these two environments was considered to be 10 meters so that the humidity of the two adjacent environments did not affect each other. Experimental factors included seed inoculation with A. chroococcum using urea chemical fertilizer at four levels [without using any N fertilizer source (control), seed inoculation with A. chroococcumalso without use N fertilizer, seed inoculation with A. chroococcum + 50% N of urea fertilizer source, and 100% N of urea fertilizer source], and six safflower genotypes (312-S6-697, PI-401478, PI-253895, PI-306974, Padideh, and Sina).After harvesting and determining grain yield in both experimental conditions, stress tolerance indices including stress sensitivity index (SSI), mean productivity (MP), tolerance (TOL), geometric mean yield (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI) and Modified stress tolerance indices (MSTI) were calculated. Statistical calculations of analysis of variance and mean comparisons were performed using SAS 9.1 software. STATGRAPH software was used to principal component analysis and drawing biplot diagrams.
Results and discussion
The results showed that among the nitrogen source treatments, the highest percentage of grain yield reduction with 48% in drought stress conditions compared to non-stress conditions was related to the application of 100% nitrogen chemical fertilizer. This result shows that in drought stress conditions, the application of 100% nitrogen fertilizer due to the increase of biological substances, causes an imbalance between the roots and plant aerial parts in water absorption and water loss through transpiration by aerial organs, which in Extremely serious damage to the economic sector of the plant.Azotobacter inoculation + 50% nitrogen fertilizer application had the highest mean productivity index and the lowest stress sensitivity index among nitrogen source treatments, although it was not significantly different from other nitrogen source treatments. These results indicate that the use of Azotobacter in combination with the application of 50% nitrogen fertilizer reduces the damage caused by drought stress in safflower. Sina cultivar was the most tolerant genotype under drought stress under Azotobacter inoculation and 100% nitrogen fertilizer application. In conditions of inoculation with Azotobacter + 50% of nitrogen fertilizer application, Sina and Padideh cultivars are located in the area of high production potential and low drought sensitivity in the vicinity of vectors related to drought tolerance indices
Conclusion
Sina cultivar in inoculation treatment with Azotobacter and consumption of 100% nitrogen fertilizer, Padideh cultivar in addition to Sina cultivar in combined application of Azotobacter + 50% nitrogen fertilizer had the highest tolerance to terminal drought stress; Therefore, in selecting drought tolerant genotypes, special attention should be paid to nitrogen source factor.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
AhmadpourAbnvi, S., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., Shamsaddinsaied, M., 2019. Effect of biological and chemical phosphorus fertilizer on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under low irrigation conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 29, 269-284. [In Persian with English Summary].
Aktas, H., 2016. Drought tolerance indices of selected landraces and bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes derived from synthetic wheats. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 14, 177-189.
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements.  AOAC Press Inc, Washington.
Amini, H., Arzani, A., Karami. M., 2014. Effect of water deficiency on seed quality and physiological traits of different safflower genotypes. Turkish Journal of Biology. 38, 271- 282.
Ayadi, S., Karmous, C., Chamekh, Z., Hammami, Z., Baraket, M., Esposito, S., Rezgui, S., Trifa. Y., 2015. Effects of nitrogen rates on grain yield and nitrogen agronomic efficiency of durum wheat genotypes under different environments. Annals of Applied Biology. 168, 264-273.
Barbottin, A., Lecomte, C., Bouchard, C., Jeuffroy, M., 2005. Nitrogen remobilization during grain filling in wheat: genotypic and environmental effects. Crop Science. 45, 1141-1150.
DoulatiPasham, K., Akbarpour, O., Eisvand, H., 2019. Evaluating drought tolerance indices in bread wheat cultivars using bootstrap method. Cereal Research. 8, 455-469. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fanaei, H.R., Narouirad. M.R., 2014. Study of yield, yield components and tolerance to drought stress in safflower genotypes. Journal of Crop Production. 7, 33-51. [In Persian with English Summary].
Farshadfar, E., Sutka. J., 2002. Screening drought tolerance criteria in maize. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 50, 411– 416.
Farshadfar, M., Safari, H., Shirvani, H., Amjadian, M., Rahmati, H., 2019. Study of drought stress of hybrid corns (Zea mays) using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Plant Production Sciences. 8, 95-106. [In Persian with English Summary].
Feiziasl, V., Fotovat, A., Astarae, A. R., Lakzian, A., Mousavi, S.B., 2014. Effect of optimized nitrogen application in reducing drought stress effect on grain yield of some rainfed bread wheat genotypes. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 30, 169-198. [In Persian with English Summary].
Fernandez, G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. p. 257-270. in C.G. Kuo (ed.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, 13-18 Aug. 1992. The World Vegetable Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Fischer, A. A., Maurer, R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research. 29, 894-912.
Gadri, K., Mohammadi, S., Dadashi, M., Majidi, A., 2020. The response of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes to nitrogen fertilizer application under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 13, 73-84. [In Persian with English Summary].
Irum, A. QTahir,., M. M., Abbasi, M. K., Ali, A., Rasheed. A., 2019. Morphological and phenological responses of sunflower to nitrogen fertilization and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria under rainfed conditions in Pakistan: Morpho-phenological responses of sunflower to plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and nitrogen. Life and Environmental Sciences. 56, 41–48.
Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., Hochman, Z., 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-A review. Field Crops Research. 143, 4-17.
Jnawali, A. D., Ojha, R. B., Marahatta. S. 2015. Role of Azotobacter in soil fertility and sustainability–a review. Advances in Plants Agriculture Research. 2, 250-253.
Kamaei, R., Faramarzi, F., Parsa, M., Jahan. M., 2019. The effects of biological, chemical, and organic fertilizers application on root growth features and grain yield of Sorghum. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 42, 2221-2233.
Kolaeiyan, A., Gholami SefidKuhi, M. 2012. Introducing the best method for determining the effective rainfall of rice cultivation in ghaemshahr. p. 129-137. Proceedings  3rd National Conference on Comprehensive Water Resources Management. 10-11 Sep. 2012. Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran. [In Persian].
Matsumura, E. E., Secco, V. A., Moreira, R. S., Santos, O. J. P., Hungria, M., Oliveira, A.L.M., 2015. Composition and activity of endophytic bacterial communities in field-grown maize plants inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Annals of Microbiology. 65, 2187–2200.
Menezes, C. B., Ticona-Benavente, C.A., Tardin, F.D., Cardoso, M.J., Bastos, E.A., Nogueira, D.W., Portugal, A.F., Santos, C.V., Schaffert. R.E., 2014. Selection indicesto identify drought-tolerant grain sorghum cultivars. Genetics and Molecular Research. 13, 9817-9827.
Mojadam, M., 2017. Effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics and seed yield of sunflower at different levels of nitrogen. Electronic Journal Crop Production. 9, 121-136. [In Persian with English Summary].
Naghavi, M.R., Moghadam, M., Toorchi, M., Shakiba. M.R., 2016. Evaluation of spring wheat cultivars based on drought resistance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding. 8, 192-207.
Omidi, A. H., Khazaei, H., Monneveux, P., Stoddard. F., 2012. Effect of cultivar and water regime on yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 17, 10-15.
Rosielle, A. A., Hamblin, J. 1984. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science. 21, 943-946.
Sadeghzadeh Hemayati, S., Fasahat, F., 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and their correlations in sugar beet lines. Journal of Sugar Beet. 32, 13-27. [In Persian with English Summary].
Sedlar, O., Balik, J., Kozlovsky, O., Peklova, L., Kubesova, K., 2013. Dynamics of the nitrogen uptake by spring barley at injection application of nitrogen fertilizers. Plant, Soil and Environment. 59, 392–397.
Shafighi, A., Ardakani, M., Shirani Rad, A., AlaviFazel, M., Rafiei, F., 2021. Identification of tolerate rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars to drought tolerance indices under late sowing date. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 15, 73-90. [In Persian with English Summary].
Shaharoona, B., Naveed, M., Arshad, M., Zahir. Z.A., 2008. Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonads for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 79, 147–155.
Soleymanifard, A., Fasihi, K., Nasrirad, H., Naseri. R., 2012. Evolution of stress tolerance indices in durum wheat genotypes. Journal of Plant Production Research. 17, 39-58. [In Persian with English Summary].
Takeda, S., Matsuoka, M., 2008. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population change. Nature. 9, 444-457.
Yari, P., Keshtkar, A., Sepehri. A., 2015. Evaluation of water stress effect on growth and yield of spring safflower. Plant Production Technology. 6, 101-117. [In Persian with English Summary].