Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Crop Physiology, Biotechnology Research Institute, Shahrekord University, Iran

2 Associate Professor,Department of Agronomy, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Water Engineering, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is one of the most important plants in family Lamiaceae that is involved in the treatment of diseases such as insomnia, anxiety, depression, neurological diseases, migraine, nervous disorders of the stomach. The most antioxidant activity of the plant was related to leaves, stems and flowers, respectively. The essential oil of lemongrass leaves had more antioxidant activity than stem and flower essential oils. Nowadays, drought stress is considered as the most important factor in reducing production, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Given the importance and role of medicinal plants in various industries, a significant point in the production of these plants is to increase their biomass production without the use of chemical inputs, especially in drought stress. It seems that application of plant growth promoting bacteria has positive effect on the yield and quality of medicinal plants under biological and non-biological stress conditions. Therefore, the present study was designed and conducted to investigate the effect of some plant growth-promoting bacteria on agromorphological traits of Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) in water deficit conditions.
Materials and methods
The factorial pot experiment was performed in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the open area of the research greenhouse of Shahrekord University, Faculty of Agriculture during 2009-2010 growing season. The experimental factors were water deficit stress at three levels (full irrigation, 75% and 50% of full irrigation) and bacterial inoculation treatments at eight levels (non-bacterial inoculation as control treatment, separate inoculation of Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium and Pseudomonas putida, bacterial inoculation of B. licheniformis * B. megaterium, P. putida * B. megaterium and B. licheniformis * P. putida as dual inoculation and bacterial inoculation of P. putida * B. licheniformis * B. megaterium as triple inoculation). After harvest, plant height, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, biological yield, root dry weight and root volume were measured. Leaf area was also measured using Digimizer software. Analysis of variance using SAS software, comparison of means by LSD test at 5% probability level and drawing graphs with Excel software were performed.
Results and discussion
The results showed that the main effects of different levels of water deficit stress on all studied traits except plant height were significant at the level of 1% probability. So that water stress at the level of 100% full irrigation increased plant height, leaf dry weight, stem dry weight, root dry weight, biological yield, leaf area and water use efficiency compared to 50% of full irrigation by 17.6%, 124.5%, 79.1%, 65.6%, 102%, 384.4% and 43% respectively. The main effects of bacterial inoculation treatments on plant height, leaf dry weight, biological yield, leaf area, root dry weight, proline content and water use efficiency were significant at 1% probability level and on root volume at 5% probability level, while on dry stem weight trait no significant effect. Interaction effects of bacterial inoculation treatments and different levels of water deficit stress on leaf area, root dry weight, root volume and proline content at 1% probability level, on leaf dry weight, biological yield and water use efficiency at 5% probability level were significant and on plant height and stem dry weight had no significant effect.
Conclusion
According to the results, all bacterial inoculation treatments in non-stress conditions were able to improve the studied traits, effectively while in stress conditions, bacterial inoculation treatments at 75% stress and 50% irrigation levels, except in plant height and water use efficiency and proline content at 50% irrigation level had no significant effect on other traits.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Akhtar, S.S., Amby, D.B., Hegelund, J.N., Fimognari, L., Großkinsky, D.K., Westergaard, J.C., Roitsch, T., 2020. Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 increases water use efficiency via growth stimulation in both normal and drought conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11, 1-12.
Aslam, M.U., Raza, M.A.S., Saleem, M.F., Waqas, M., Iqbal, R., Ahmad, S., Haider, I., 2020. Improving strategic growth stage-based drought tolerance in quinoa by rhizobacterial inoculation. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 51, 853-868.
Bates, L.S., Waldern, R.P., Tear, I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil. 39, 205-207.
Bosh, Z., 2019. The effect of plant growth promoting on morphophysiological indices, growth, yield and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) under water deficit stress. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shahrekord. Iran. [In Persian with English Summery].
Bosh, Z., Danesh-Shahraki, A., Ghobadinia, M., Saeidi. K., 2018. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on agro-morphological traits of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) under water deficit stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 12, 525-537. [In Persian with English summery].
 Davazdah Emami, S., Majnoun Hosseini, N., 2013. Cultivation and production of some medicinal plants and spices. University of Tehran Publications. 320p. [In Persian].
Farshi, A.A., Mir Latifi, M., 2003. Irrigation Water Management in the Field. National Iranian Irrigation and Drainage Committee Publications. 200p. [In Persian].
Garcia, J.A.L., Probanza, A., Ramos, B., Palomino, M., Mañero, F.J.G., 2004. Effect of inoculation of Bacillus licheniformis on tomato and pepper. Agronomie. 24, 169-176.
Getahun, A., Muleta, D., Assefa, F., Kiros, S., 2020. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from degraded habitat enhance drought tolerance of Acacia (Acacia abyssinica Hochst. ex Benth.) seedlings. International Journal of Microbiology. Article ID 8897998. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8897998
Glick, B.R., 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. Article ID 963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
Goswami, M., Suresh, D.E.K.A., 2020. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: a review. Pedosphere. 30, 40-61.
Kaymak, H.C., Yarali, F., Guvence, I., Donmeze, M.F., 2008. The effect of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on root formation of mint (Mentha piperita L.) cuttings. African Journal of Biotchnology. 7, 479-4483.
Khademian, R., Asghari, B., Sedaghati, B., Yaghoubian, Y., 2019. Plant beneficial rhizospheric microorganisms (PBRMs) mitigate deleterious effects of salinity in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Physio-biochemical properties, fatty acids composition and secondary metabolites content. Industrial Crops and Products. 136, 129-139.
Kumar, A., Patel, J.S., Meena, V.S., Srivastava, R., 2019. Recent advances of PGPR based approaches for stress tolerance in plants for sustainable agriculture. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 20, 1-10.
Liddycoat, S. M., Greenberg, B. M., Wolyn, D. J., 2009. The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on asparagus seedlings and germinating seeds subjected to water stress under greenhouse conditions. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 55, 388-394.
Lim, J. H., Kim, S.D., 2013. Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. The Plant Pathology Journal. 29, 201-208.
Mahmodi, R., Amini, K., Asadi Dashbolagh, J., Farhoodi, A., 2016. Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of the Melissa officinalis essential oil. The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 20, 49-57. [In Persian with English Summery].
Omidbaigi, R., 2015. Production and Processing of Medicinal Plants. Astan Quds Razavi Publications. 397p. [In Persian].
Ortíz-Castro, R., Valencia-Cantero, E., López-Bucio, J., 2008. Plant growth promotion by Bacillus megaterium involves cytokinin signaling. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 3, 263-265.
Rajabi-Khamseh, S., Danesh-Shahraki, A., Rafieiolhossaini, M., Saeidi. K., Ghobadinia, M., 2019a. Changes in agro-morphological traits of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) under plant growth promoting bacteria effect and drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 12, 793-804. [In Persian with English Summery].
Rajabi-Khamseh, S., Danesh-Shahraki, A., Rafieiolhossaini, M., Saeidi. K., Ghobadinia, M., 2019b. Effects of Plant growth promoting bacteria and irrigation levels on physiological traits and yield of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 13, 231-250. [In Persian with English Summery].
Saharan, B.S., Nehra, V., 2011. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sciences and Medicine Research. 21, 1-10.
Shirinbayan, S., Khosravi, H., Malakouti, M.J., 2019. Alleviation of drought stress in maize (Zea mays) by inoculation with Azotobacter strains isolated from semi-arid regions. Applied Soil Ecology. 133, 138-145.
Szabo, K., Radácsi, P., Rajhárt, P., Ladányi, M., Németh, É., 2017. Stress-induced changes of growth, yield and bioactive compounds in lemon balm cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 119, 170-177.
Thakur, M., Mittal, D., Khosla, P.K., Saini, V., Saini, R.V., Saini, A.K., 2021. Rhizobacteria associated with Spilanthes acmella Murr. confer drought-tolerance and plant growth promotion. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 11, 13155-13170.
Vardharajula, S., Zulfikar Ali, S., Grover, M., Reddy, G., Bandi, V., 2011. Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. Journal of Plant Interactions. 6, 1-14.
Vimal, S.R., Singh, J.S., Arora, N.K., Singh, S., 2017. Soil-plant-microbe interactions in stressed agriculture management: a review. Pedosphere. 27, 177-19