Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gorgan, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Coriander is an annual herb of the umbel family and is belonged from North Africa to south-western of Asia. Coriander is one of the important medicinal plant that used in the pharmaceutical industry and it mainly cultivated and widely distributed for the fruits. The dried fruits are widely employed as a condiment, especially for flavoring of sauces, meat products and bakery and confectionery items. Also, coriander fruits are as a source of essential oils and fatty oil. Water deficit stress is one of the most important factors limiting the growth and survival of plants in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Water is a major component of the fresh produce and significantly effects on weight and quality of plants. Also, water deficit may cause significant changes in the yield and composition of essential oils in aromatic and medicine plants. So that, was reported that water deficit increased essential oil percentage in coriander but decreased essential oil yield. Iran with an average annual rainfall of 240 mm is included among arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Of the million hectares of cultivated region, only five millions are under irrigation because of intense water limitations. However, Iran is one of the world’s commercial coriander producers. Coriander has been cultivated for many years in different parts of Iran. Therefore, development of drought-tolerant cultivars with high essential oil yield is important in coriander. This research was conducted in order to evaluate the effect of drought stress on morphological, physiological and phytochemical characteristics of endemic coriander genotypes.
Materials and Methods
F2 generations derived from half-diallel crosses of six endemic coriander genotypes including Isfahan, Hamedan, Bushehr, Mazandaran, Markazi and Alborz, together with their parents were evaluated in randomized complete block design with three replications in each experiment during growing season of 2016 in the research field of Tarbiat Modares University. Plants were treated with different levels of water treatment: well watered (WW), moderate water stress (MWS) and severe water stress (SWS). Data were collected on fruit yield, oil content and oil yield. GGE biplot statistical method (genotype effect + genotype × environment interaction) was used to study stability of genotypes in the studied environments.
Results and Discussion
Results of Combined analysis of variance indicated that the effects of environments, genotypes and genotype × environment interaction were significant, suggesting that the genotypes responded differently in the studied environment conditions. So, there was the possibility of stability analysis. Results of stability analysis using GGE biplot method indicated that the two first and second principal components of the GGE biplot explained 71.9% of the total essential oil yield variation. Based on the hypothetical ideal genotype biplot, the genotypes G17 (Mazandaran  Hamadan) and G4 (Alborz   Mazandaran) were better than the other genotypes across environments for essential oil yield and stability and had the high general adaptation to all environments. Furthermore, the genotype G18 (Mazandaran   Bushehr) in E2 and E3 environments and genotype G9 (Markazi   Mazandaran) in E1 environment were superior genotypes with the high specific adaptation. Comparison of the studied environments showed that the E2 and E3 environments were quite similar in ranking, grouping and assessing stability of the genotypes, whereas the E1 environment was different from the other environments. Overall, the results showed that all environments had high discriminating ability so that could able to show differences between genotypes. The moderate stress environment was the nearest environment to ideal environment that had the highest discriminating ability and representativeness.
Conclusion
Generally, the results indicated that all environments had high discriminating ability so that could able to show differences between genotypes. Also, the genotypes G17 and G4 as stable and drought tolerant genotype can be considered as donor parent which contains drought tolerance genes and could be used to improve coriander high essential oil yield in drought condition.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank from the Gene bank of the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute of Karaj, Iran for making available plant materials.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alinian, S., Razmjoo, J., 2014. Phenological, yield, essential oil yield and oil content of cumin accessions as affected by irrigation regimes. Industrial Crops and Products. 54, 167-174.
Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H., Gholizadeh, A., 2021. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in winter rapeseed cultivars and lines using multivariate method of additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 11, 95-108. [In Persian with English Summary].
Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H.R., Gholizadeh, A., 2020. Evaluation of seed yield stability of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes using non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding. 12, 202-212. [In Persian with English Summary].
Allahgholipour, M., 2016. Genotype × environment interaction effect in rice genotypes using GGE Biplot. Cereal Research. 6, 1-14. [In Persian with English Summary].
Amiri Oghan, H., Rameeh, V., Faraji, A., Fanaei, H.R., Kazerani, N.K., Rahmanpour, S., 2020. Evaluation of seed yield stability of spring rapeseed genotypes using GGE biplot analysis. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal. 36, 207-222. [In Persian with English Summary].
Badri, H., Mohammadi, R., Etminan, A., 2018. Study of genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of durum wheat genotypes under rainfed and supplemental irrigation conditions by GGE biplot. Cereal Research. 8, 73-83. [In Persian with English Summary].
Blanche, S.B., Myers, G.O., 2006. Identifying discriminating locations for cultivar selection in Louisiana. Crop Science. 46, 946-949.
Changizi, M., Choukan, R., Heravan, E.M., Bihamta, M.R., Darvish, F., 2014. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and stability of corn hybrids and relationship among univariate parametric methods. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 94, 1255-1267.
Choukan, R., 2011. Genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction effects on the performance of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Crop Breeding Journal. 1, 97-103. [In Persian with English Summary].
Dehghani, H., Ebadi, A., Yousefi, A., 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal. 98, 388-393.
Dehghani, M., Majidi, M., Saeidi, G., Mirlohi, A., Amiri, R., Sorkhilalehloo, B., 2015. Application of GGE biplot to analyse stability of Iranian tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) genotypes. Crop and Pasture Science. 66, 963-972.
Eberhart, S.T., Russell, W., 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science. 6, 36-40.
Falconer, D.S., 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd Ed. Longman, London, UK.
Gauch, H., Zobel, R.W., 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science. 37, 311-326.
Gauch, H.G., 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science. 46, 1488-1500.
Hemmati, I., Pourdad, S.S., Choukan, R., 2018. Studying the genotype × environment interaction under different conditions of moisture stress using graphical GGE biplot analysis in synthetic varieties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 11, 471-480. [In Persian with English Summary].
Jafari, T., Farshadfar, E., 2018. Stability analysis of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) by GGE biplot. Cereal Research. 8, 199-208. [In Persian with English Summary].
Jamshidmoghaddam, M., Pourdad, S.S., 2013. Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran. Euphytica. 190, 357-369.
Khodadadi, M., Dehghani, H., Javaran, M.J., Christopher, J.T., 2016. Fruit yield, fatty and essential oils content genetics in coriander. Industrial Crops and Products. 94, 72-81.
Moreno-Gonzalez, J., Crossa, J., Cornelius, P., 2004. Genotype × environment interacion in multi-environment trials using shrinkage factors for AMMI models. Euphytica. 137, 119-127.
Najafi Mirak, T., Dastfal, M., Andarzian, B., Farzadi, H., Bahari, M., Zali, H., 2018. Evaluation of durum wheat cultivars and promising lines for yield and yield stability in warm and dry areas using AMMI model and GGE biplot. Journal of Crop Breeding. 10, 1-12. [In Persian with English Summary].
Pourdad, S.S., Jamshidi Mohjadam, M., 2013. Study on genotype × environment interaction through GGE biplot for seed yield in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in rain-fed condition. Journal of Crop Breeding. 5, 1-13. [In Persian with English Summary].
Rakshit, S., Ganapathy, K., Gomashe, S., Rathore, A., Ghorade, R., Kumar, M.N., Ganesmurthy, K., Jain, S., Kamtar, M., Sachan, J., 2012. GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype, environment and their interactions in sorghum multi-location data. Euphytica. 185, 465-479.
Sabaghnia, N., Dehghani, H., Sabaghpour, S.H., 2008. Graphic analysis of genotype by environment interaction for lentil yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal. 100, 760-764.
Saleem, R., Ashraf, M., Khalil, I.A., Anees, M.A., Javed, H.I., Saleem, A., 2016. GGE Biplot: stability a windows based graphical analysis of yield stability and adaptability of millet cultivars across Pakistan. Academia Journal of Biotechnology. 4, 186-193.
Segherloo, A.E., Sabaghpour, S., Dehghani, H., Kamrani, M., 2010. Screening of superior chickpea genotypes for various environments of Iran using genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) biplot analysis. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 2, 286-292.
Setimela, P., Vivek, B., Bänziger, M., Crossa, J., Maideni, F., 2007. Evaluation of early to medium maturing open pollinated maize varieties I n SADC region using GGE biplot based on the SREG model. Field Crops Research. 103, 161-169.
Shiri, M.R., Bahrampour, T., 2015. Genotype × environment interaction analysis using GGE biplot in grain maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under different irrigation conditions. Cereal Research. 5, 83-94. [In Persian with English Summary].
SPSS, Inc., 2010. SPSS 20. Users Guied. Chicago, USA.
Temesgen, M., Alamerew, S., Eticha, F., 2015. GGE Biplot Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Bread Wheat Genotypes in South East Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 11, 183-190.
Yan, W., Cornelius, P.L., Crossa, J., Hunt, L., 2001. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Science. 41, 656-663.
Yan, W., Hunt, L., Sheng, Q., Szlavnics, Z., 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science. 40, 597-605.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and
agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L., 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science. 47, 643-655.
Yan, W., Rajcan, I., 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science. 42, 11-20.
Yau, S., Ortiz-Ferrara, G., Srivastava, J., 1991. Classification of diverse bread wheat-growing environments based on differential yield responses. Crop Science. 31, 571-576.
Zeleke, A., Berhanu, F., 2016. AMMI and GGE models analysis of stability and GEI of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology Agricuiture and Helathcare. 6, 127-135.
Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.J., Gauch, H.G., 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal. 80, 388-393