Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Crop Physiology, University of Birjand,Birjand, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

3 Plant and Environmental Stress Research Group, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Camelthorn (Alhagi camelorum Fisch.) is a perennial plant with shrub growing form belonging to Fabaceae family, which is native to large area from Mediterranean to Russia. Camelthorn is very high tolerant to salinity and this is one of the halophytic plants. By using halophytic plants, many products can be produced in saline areas, which one of these products is forage needed by livestock. One of the most important areas for the development of camelthorn cultivation is saline lands that have been excluded from cultivation due to irrigation with saline water for many years that increasing soil salinity. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the plant forage quality in field conditions with irrigation by saline water.
 Materials and methods
The experiment was conducted as split-factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replication in two locations (Farms of the Faculty of Agriculture in the Birjand University and Hojjatabad farm of Peyvand Khavaran Agro- Industry in Sarbishe) at years of 1399. The effect of location was considered fixed. The Experimental factors was included ecotype at two levels (Voshmgir and Korond), Plant density at two levels (10 and 20 plant per square meter) irrigation water salinity at 3 levels (3.5, 7.5 and 12 dS/m). The main plots were included irrigation water salinity levels and the sub-plots were included from a combination of density and ecotype levels. The amounts of crude protein, crude fatty acids, crude ash, acid detergent fiber, neutrals detergent fiber, Metabolizable energy, and digestible dry matter of camelthorn forage were measured at the end of the growing season.
Results and discussion
The results showed that by increasing salinity to 7.5 ds/m had not significant effect on the crude protein percentage, but with a further increase in salinity to 12 dS/m the crude protein was decreased (7.2%) significantly compared to control (Figure 2a). The forage fatty acids of Sarbishe were significantly higher (5.3%) than Birjand, which is due to the lower temperature of Sarbisheh region. The crude forage ash content in Birjand was significantly higher (5.3%) than Sarbishe (Figure 1a).With increasing the density from 10 to 20 plants per square meter the forage ash was increased (7.5%) significantly (Table 5). In Birjand, Metabolizable energy was increased (2.2 %) significantly with increasing plant density, but in Sarbishe, increasing density had not effect on this trait (Figure 5a). Irrigation water salinity application in both places and ecotypes studied was not significant effect on the metabolizable energy of camelthorn forage. Voshmgir ecotype in Birjand had significantly (11.4%) more acid detergent fiber than Korond ecotype, but the difference between these ecotypes was not significant in Sarbishe (Table 7). With increasing plant density in Birjand, the value of acid detergent fiber was decreased (7.9%) significantly but the difference between two plant densities was not significant in Sarbishe (Figure 6). At the 12 dS/m irrigation water salinity level, increasing the plant density let to a decrease (14.5%) of neutral detergent fiber, while increasing the plant density at lower irrigation water salinity levels had no effect on this trait (Table 3).
Conclusion
Although increasing the irrigation water salinity led to a significant reduction in camelthorn forage protein, but the amount of protein obtained at 12 dS/m irrigation water salinity (12.29%) was also acceptable. High irrigation water salinity levels in both ecotypes and locations did not lead to a significant reduction in forage metabolizable energy, so it is possible to produce adequate quality forage by cultivation camelthorn with saline water. Korond Ecotype was more suitable for cultivation in Birjand and Voshmgir ecotype was more suitable for cultivation in Sarbishe and produced better forage in these locations. In saline conditions, it is better to cultivate camelthorn with high plant density, because in this case, the amount of forage fiber will decrease and the forage quality will increase.

Keywords

Main Subjects

 Al-Dakheel, A.J., Hussain, M.I., Rahman, A., 2015. Impact of irrigation water salinity on agronomical and quality attributes of Cenchrus ciliaris L. accessions. Agricultural Water Management, 159, 148–154.
Amiri, B., Assareh, M.h., Jafari, M., Rasuli, B., and Jafari, A.A. 2012. Effect of NaCl and Na2SO4 on germination and seedling growth of Salicornia herbacea and Alhagi persarum. Iranian journal of Range and Desert Research, 19, 233-243. [In Persian]
Annicchiarico, P., Scotti, C., Carelli, M., Pecetti, L., 2010. Questions and avenues for lucerne improvement. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 46, 1–13.
Araus, J.L., Rezzouk, F.Z., Thushar, S., Shahid, M., Elouafi, A., Bort, J., Serret, D., 2021. Effect of irrigation salinity and ecotype on the growth, physiological indicators and seed yield and quality of Salicornia europaea. Plant Science, 304, 1-13.
Arzani, H., Motamedi, J., Zare Chahoki, M.A. 2010. Report of national project “Forage quality of range species in Iran”, Organization of Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management of Iran, 230 p. [In Persian]
 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 7th Ed., Animal Feed, chapter 4, p.54: Arlington: AOAC International.
Atrian P. 2009. Sheep Nutrition, First edition, Aeej press, 348p.
Bachlava, E., Cardinal, A. J., 2009 .Correlation between Temperature and Oleic Acid Seed Content in Three Segregating Soybean Populations. Crop Science, 49 (4), 1328-1335.
Baghestani Maybodi, N., Sanadgol, A.A., Zare, M.T., 2007. Effect of plant row spaces and cutting methods on forage quality of Atriplex lentiformis in Yazd province. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 73, 55-64. [In Persian with English Summary]
Bahraini, M.J., Dehghani Ghenateghestani, A., 2004. Summer forage sorghum yield, protein and prussic acid contents as affected by plant density and nitrogen topdressing. Journal of /agricultural science and Technology, 6, 73-83.
Bahraini, B., Allahdadi, M., 2020. Effect of saline irrigated water on forage quality of global artichoke (Cynara cardunculus Var. scolymus L.) Iran agricultural Research, 39, (1), 59-66.
Bellaloui, N., Mengistu. A., Kassem, M.A., 2013. Effect of genetics and environment on fatty acid stability in soybean seed. Food and Nutrition Science, 4, 165-175.
Blaise, D., Singh, J.V., Bonde, A.N., Tekale, K.U., Mayee., C.D., 2005. Effects of farmyard manure and fertilizers on yield, fiber quality and nutrient balance of rainfed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Bioresource Technology, 96 (3), 345–349.
Casler, M.D., 2001. Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value. Advance in Agronomy, 71, 51–107.
Craine, J.M., Elmore, A.J., Olson, K.C. Tolleson, D., 2010. Climate change and cattle nutritional stress. Global Change Biology, 16 (10), 2901-2911.
Coruh, I., Tan, M., 2008. Lucerne persistence, yield and quality as influenced by stand aging. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 51, 39-43.
Davazdahemami, S., Alizadeh, M., Zeinali, H., Jalali, S., 2020. Yield and nutritive value of sainfoin (Onobrychis vicifolia Scop.). Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 9 (1), 1-9.
El Shaer, H.M., 2010. Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants as potential forage for ruminants in the Near East region. Small Ruminant Research, 91, 3–12.
Flowers, T.J., Hajibagheri, M.A., Clipson, N.J.W., 1986. Halophytes. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 313–337.
Flowers, T.J., Colmer, T.D., 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist, 179, 945–963.
Ferreira, G., Alfonso, M., Depino, S., Alessandri, E. 2014. Effect of planting density on nutritional quality of green-chopped corn for silage. Dairy Science, 97, 5918–5921.
Gallego-Giraldo, L., Shadle, G., Shen, H., Barros-Rios, J., Fresquet, S., Wang, H., Dixon, R., 2016. Combining enhanced biomass density with reduced lignin level for improved forage quality. Plant Biotechnology, 14, 895–904.
Gaffarian, M.R., Yadavi, A., Movahhedi Denavi, M., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Salehi, M. 2020. Improvement of physiological indices and biological yield by intercropping of kochia (Kochia scoparia), sesbania (Sesbania aculeate) and guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoliba) under the salinity stress of irrigation water. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 26, 1319-1330.
Han, K., Liu, B., Liu, P., Wang, Z., 2020. The optimal plant density of maize for dairy cow forage production. Agronomy. 112 (3), 1-13.
Hedayati-Firoozabadi, A., Kazemeini, S.A., Pirasteh- Anosheh, H., Ghadiri, H., Pessarakli, M., 2020. Forage yield and quality as affected by salt stress in different ratios of Sorghum bicolor- Bassia indica intercropping. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43 (17), 2579-2589.
Jahanzad, E., Jorat, M., Moghadam, H., Sadeghpour, A., Chaichi, M.R., Dashtaki, M. 2013. Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultral Water Management, 117, 62-69.
Julier, B., Huyghe, C.  Ecalle, C., 2000. Within- and among- cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa forage quality, morphology and yield. Crop Science, 40,365-369.
Kazemi, M., Ghasemi Bezdi, K., 2021. An investigation of the nutritional value of camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) at three growth stage and it’s substitution with part of the forage in Afshari ewes diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 271, 1-11.
Laghari, A.H., Memon, A.A., Memon, S., Nelofar, A., Khan, K.M., Yasmin, A. 2012. Determination of free phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity of methanolic extracts obtained from leaves and flowers of camel thorn (Alhagi maurorum). Natural Products Researches, 26 (2), 173–176.
Lamb, J.F.S., HJ.G. Jung, C.C. Sheaffer, Samac, D.A., 2007. Alfalfa leaf protein and stem carbohydrate and lignin content under hay and biomass management systems. Crop Science, 47, 1407-1415.
Masters, D.G., Benes, S.E., Norman, H.C., 2007. Biosaline agriculture for forage and livestock production. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 119, 234–248.
Masters, D., Tiong, M., Vercoe, P., Norman, H., 2010. The nutritive value of river saltbush (Atriplex amnicola) when grown in different concentrations of sodium chloride irrigation solution. Small Ruminant Research, 91 (1), 56–62.
Mekonen, T., Tolera, A., Nurfeta, A., Bradford, B., Mekasha, A., 2021. Location and plant spacing affected biomass yield and nutritional value of pigeon pea forage. Agronomy, 2021, 1-20.
Monirifar, H., Mirmozaffari Roudsari, A., Ghassemi, S., Tavasolee, A., 2020. Harvest time and cultivar effect on growth, physiological traits, yield and quality of alfalfa in saline condition. International Journal of Plant Production, 13, 453-462.
Moor, K.J., Collins, M., Nelson, C.J., Redfearn, D.D., 2020. Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, Volume 2, 7th (eds). Wiley, Croydon, UK, PP: 608-714.
Muhammad, G., Muhammad, A.H., Farooq, A., Muhammas, A., Anwar-Hassan, G., 2014. Alhagi: A plant genus rich in bioactive for pharmaceoticals, Phytotherapy Research, 29 (1), 1-13.
Munns, R., 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist, 167, 645–663.
Nabati, J., Kafi, M., Nezami, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Masoumi, A., Zare Mehrgerdi. M.2014. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of forage kochia (Kochia scoparia) in different salinity levels and time. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12:613–620.
Naseri, H., Lashkari sanami, N., Sadeghi Sangdehi, S.A., 2019. Forage quality change of camel’s feeding in the Maranjab desert.  Range and Watershed Management, 71 (4), 1099-1109. [In Persian with English Summary]
Negra ˜o, S., Schmo ckel, S., Tester, M., 2017. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Annals of Botany, 119 (1), 1–11.
Neu, A.E., Sheaffer, C.C., Undersander, J., Hall. M.H., Kniffen, D.M., Wells, M.S., Catalano, D.N., Martinson, K.L., 2017. Hay rake-type effect on ash and forage nutritive values of alfalfa hay. Agronomy. 109 (5), 2163-2171.
Panta, S., flowers, T., Lane P., Doyle, R., Haros, G., 2014. Halophyte agriculture: success stories. Environmental and experimental Botany, 107, 71-83.
Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Shiran Tafti, M., Dehghani, F., Ranjbar, G., 2021. Evaluation the ability of camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum Medik.) growth in saline lands. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 28 (3), 507-519.
Piri. A., Palangi, A. and Eivazi, P., 2012. The determination of nutritive value of Alhagi by in situ and gas production techniques, European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2(3), 846–849.
Rao, S.C., Coleman, S.W., Mayeux, H.S., 2002. Forage production and nutritive value of selected pigeonpea ecotypes in the southern Great Plains. Crop Science, 42 (4), 1259-1263.
Rozema, J., Flowers, T., 2008. Crops for a salinized world. Science, 322, 1478–1480.
Saroya, A.S., 2013. Controversial Herbal Drugs of Ayurveda. Scientific Publishers, India, 279 P.
Seiter, S., Altemose, C.E., Davis, H., 2004. Forage soybean yield and quality responses to plant density and row distance.  Agronomy Journal, 96, 966-970.
Song, J., Chen, M., Feng, G., Jia, Y., Wang, B., Zhang, F., 2009. Effect of salinity on growth, ion accumulation and the roles of ions in osmotic adjustment of two populations of Suaeda salsa. Plant Soil, 314, 133–141.
Standing Committee on Agriculture (SCA). 1990. CSIRO. Melbourne, Australia, 266 p.
Tang, G.Q., Novitzky, W.P., Griffin, H.C., Huber, S.C., Dewey, R.E., 2005. Oleate Desaturase Enzymes of Soybean: Evidence of Regulation through Differential Stability and Phosphorylation, Plant Journal, 44 (3), 433-446.
Towhidi, A., Zhandi, M., 2007. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and palatability of nine plant species for dromedary camels in the province of Semnan, Iran., Egyptian Journal of Biology, 9, 47–52.
Ventura, Y., Eshel A., Pasternak, D., Sagi, M., 2015. The development of halophyte-based agriculture: past and present. Annals of Botany, 115 (3), 1-12.
Wang, X., He, H., Kou, S., Zhou, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, Y., Zhou, W., 2019. Effect of different planting densities on biomass yield and quality for various varieties of silage maize. Pratacultural Science, 36 (1), 169–177.
Yadav, S.P., Bharadwaj, R., Nayak, H., Mahto, R., Singh, R.K., Prasad, S.K., 2019. Impact of salt stress on growth, productivity and physicochemical properties of plants: a Review. International Journal of Computing Sociology Computing Sociology, 7,1793–1798.
Yin, L., Xu, H., Dong, S., Chu, J., Dai, X., He, M., 2019. Optimised nitrogen allocation favours improvement in canopy photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency: Evidence from late-sown winter wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 159, 75–86.
Zou, G.A., Mansur, S., Hu, S.C., Aisa, H.A., Shakhidoyatov, K.M., 2012. Pyrrole alkaloids from Alhagi sparsifolia. Chemistery Natural Products, 48(4), 635–637.