Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is ranked fourth among cereals in terms of area under cultivation and grain yield after wheat, barley and rice. Water scarcity or water stress is one of the most limiting factors in crop growth and crop yield, which reduces the average yield by 50% and even higher values. Water stress in corn through adverse effects on inoculation and grain filling, reduced plant photosynthesis, reduced amount of material grown and as a result of grain shrinkage, reduced leaf area and disrupting physiological processes, reduces the number of grains per ear, weight Thousands of seeds, bio-yield and grain yield. Conservation tillage is one of the inevitable methods of conservation agriculture by which the effect of water stress on plant growth and yield can be reduced. In agro-ecosystems, conservation tillage, while preserving and improving water resources and the environment, improves crop production and makes it sustainable. Since Iran is located in the arid and semi-arid region of the world and drought has a negative impact on the yield of its products, the study of water stress and strategies to deal with it is of particular importance; Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the yield response and yield components of maize to tillage systems and irrigation regimes in Karaj.
 Materials and methods
In order to evaluate the effect of different tillage systems and irrigation regimes on corn yield, an experiment was conducted as split-plot in the form of randomized complete blocks with three replications in the research farm of the University of Tehran (longitude 35 degrees East, latitude 35 degrees and 48 Minute North) in 2016. The main factor in this experiment was tillage with two levels (no-tillage and conventional tillage) and the second factor was irrigation with three levels (without water stress, moderate water stress and severe water stress based on 75, 110 and 150 mm evaporation from Evaporation pan surface, respectively). Irrigation was done using plastic tapes (type) and the irrigation volume was controlled by the meter. Irrigation treatments were applied from the 4-leaf stage. The distance between the main, sub-factors and blocks (replicates) was 10, 2 and 10 meters, respectively, and there were six 10-meter planting lines within each experimental plot. Also, the distance between rows of corn in the plots was 75 cm and the distance between plants per row was 15.5 cm (density of 86,000 plants per hectare). To determine the water requirement, the Class A evaporation pan method was used and using daily meteorological data, Equations 1 and 2 were used:
ETC = KC × ET0                       (Eq.  1)
ET0 = K p × E pan                      (Eq. 2)
in them, ETc = Evapotranspiration of the desired crop (mm.day-1), KC= Plant coefficient, ET0= Reference evapotranspiration (mm.day-1), Kp= Plate coefficient (without unit), E pan= Evaporation of the pan (mm.day-1)
Results
The results showed that the effect of tillage and tillage interaction at irrigation levels on any of the traits was not significant, but the effect of irrigation regimes on plant height, number of seeds per ear, 1000-seed weight, ear weight, grain yield, Biological yield, harvest index and water use efficiency were significant. The highest plant height was obtained in conditions without water stress (217 cm). Also, the highest number of seeds per ear was obtained under normal irrigation conditions, so that the application of severe stress reduced the number of seeds per ear by 26%. Severe water stress reduced the weight of 1000 seeds by 12%. Also, the weight of ear decreased by 38% compared to normal irrigation in severe stress and reached 151 g. The highest grain yield in normal irrigation was 12471 kg.ha-1, which severe stress reduced grain yield by almost 40%. A similar trend was observed in biological yield, with severe water stress reducing by 29%. In terms of water use efficiency, severe water stress increased it to 2.21 kg.m-3, which showed a growth of 31% compared to normal irrigation.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that the tillage system had no significant effect on any of the traits, but water stress had a negative effect on all traits except water use efficiency, so that plant height, 1000-seed weight, Number of seeds per ear, ear weight, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index decreased sharply but water use efficiency increased compared to treatment without water stress. Based on the results of this study, corn irrigation based on 75 mm of evaporation from the evaporation pan surface in similar climatic conditions is recommended.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Afshoon, E., Jahansooz, M.R., Moghadam, H., Oveisi, M., 2020. Effect of tillage, nitrogen fertilizer, and water stress on crop growth indices and yield of forage corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Crops Improvement. 23(2), 235-246. [In Persian with English Summary].
Ahmad, Z., Waraich, E.A., Ahmad, T., Ahmad, R., Awan, M.I., 2015. Yield responses of maize as influenced by supplemental foliar applied phosphorus under drought stress. International Journal of Food and Allied Sciences. 1(2), 45-55.
Ahmadi, J., Khanghah, H.Z., Rostami, M., Choukan, R., 2000. Evaluation of drought tolerance in maize hybrids commercially delayed. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 4, 891-906. [In Persian with English Summary].
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
Cakir, R., 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89(1), 1-16.
Anjum, S.A., Wang, L.C., Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Xue, L.L., Zou, C.M., 2011. Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science.197(3), 177-185.
Campos, H., Cooper, M., Edmeades, G.O., Loffler, C., Schussler, J.R., Ibanez, M., 2006. Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of breeding for yield in the US corn belt. Maydica. 51(2), 369.
Chen, J., He, Y., Li, P., 2021. Effects of tillage alteration on soil water content, maize crop water potential and grain yield under subtropical humid climate conditions. International Agrophysics. 35(1), 1-9.
Ciampitti, I.A., Vyn, T.J., 2011. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Research. 121(1), 2-18.
Condon, A.G., Richards, R.A., Rebetzke, G.J., Farquhar, G.D., 2004. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany. 55(407), 2447-2460.
Crasta, O.R., Cox, W.J., 1996. Temperature and soil water effects on maize growth, development yield, and forage quality. Crop Science. 36(2), 341-348.
Di Paolo, E., Rinaldi, M., 2008. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research. 105(3), 202-210.
Djaman, K., Irmak, S., 2012. Soil water extraction patterns and crop, irrigation, and evapotranspiration water use efficiency of maize under full and limited irrigation and rainfed settings. Transactions of the ASABE. 55(4), 1223-1238.
Edmeades, G.O., 1999. Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations grain in biomass, grain yield and harvest index. Crop Science. 39, 1306-1315.
Food and Agriculture Organization., 2014. FAO, http://www.FAO.org/ag/ca/1a.html
Golestani Far, F., Mahmoodi, S., Zamani, G.H.R., Sayyari Zahan, M.H., 2016. Effect of drought stress on water use efficiency and root dry weight of wheat (triticum aesativum L.) and rye (secale cereale L.) in competition conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 15(2), 430-450. [In Persian with English Summary].
Hassan, F.A.S., Ali, E.F., 2014. Impact of different water regimes based on class-A pan on growth, yield and oil content of Coriandrum sativum L. plant. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 13(2), 155-161.
Howell, T.A., Yazar, A., Schneider, A.D., Dusek, D.A., Copeland, K.S., 1995. Yield and water use efficiency of corn in response to LEPA irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE. 38(6), 1737-1747.
Jaafari, P., Imani, M.R., 2004. Study of drought stress and plant density on yield and some agronomical traits of maize KSC 301. Abstracts of the 8th. Iranian Congress of Crop Sciences. College of Agriculture, Universty of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. 235 pp. [In Persian].
Khalili, M., Moghaddam, M., Kazemi Arbat, H., Shakiba, MR., Kanooni, H., Choghan, R., 2009. Effect of drought stress on different maize genotypes. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2(20), 67-84. [In Persian with English Summary].
Kim, K.I., Clay, D.E., Carlson, C.G., Clay, S.A., Trooien, T., 2008. Do synergistic relationships between nitrogen and water influence the ability of corn to use nitrogen derived from fertilizer and soil? Agronomy Journal. 100(3), 551-556.
Li, Y., Tao, H., Zhang, B., Huang, S., Wang, P., 2018. Timing of water deficit limits maize kernel setting in association with changes in the source-flow-sink relationship. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9, 1326.
Masjedi, A., Shokouhfar, A., Alavifazel, M., 2009. A survey of most suitable irrigation scheduling and effect of drought stress on yield for summer corn (SC.704) with class A evaporation pan in Ahvaz. Water and Soil Science. 12(46), 543-550. [In Persian with English summary].
Moser, S.B., Feil, B., Jampatong, S., Stamp, P., 2006. Effects of pre-anthesis drought, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and variety on grain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropical maize. Agricultural Water Management. 81(1-2), 41-58.
Nabizadeh, E., Banifazel, M., Taherifard, E., 2012. The effects of plant growth promoting on some of traits in maize (cv. SC704) under drought stress condition. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2(4), 875-881.
Nilahyane, A., Islam, M., Mesbah, A., Garcia, y., Garcia, A., 2018. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization strategies on silage corn grown in semi-arid conditions. Agronomy, 8(10), 208.
Ntanos, D.A., Koutroubas, S.D., 2002. Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for Indica and Japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research. 74, 93-101.
Pandey, R.K., Maranville, J.W., Admou, A., 2000. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: I. Grain yield and yield components. Agricultural Water Management. 46(1), 1-13.
Parvizi, Y., Nabati, E., 2004. Effect of manure application and irrigation interval on yield indices and water use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 63, 21-29. [In Persian with English summary].
Peng, Z., Wang, L., Xie, J., Li, L., Coulter, J.A., Zhang, R., Choudhary, S., 2019. Conservation tillage increases water use efficiency of spring wheat by optimizing water transfer in a semi-arid environment. Agronomy. 9(10), 583.
Rabbani, J., Emam, Y., 2011. Yield response of maize hybrids to drought stress at different growth stages. Journal of Crop Production and Processing. 1(2), 65-78. [In Persian with English summary].
Sah, R. P., Chakraborty, M., Prasad, K., Pandit, M., Tudu, V.K., Chakravarty, M.K., Moharana, D., 2020. Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Scientific reports. 10(1), 1-15.
Sayed, A., Sarker, A., Kim, J.E., Rahman, M., Mahmud, M.G.A., 2020. Environmental sustainability and water productivity on conservation tillage of irrigated maize in red brown terrace soil of Bangladesh. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 19(4), 276-284.
 Sepasi, S., Klarstaqy, K., Abraham, H., 2012. Effects of different levels drought stress and plant density on yield and yield components of SC 704. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 3, 279-288. [In Persian with English summary].
Setter, T. L., Flannigan, B. A., Melkonian, J., 2001. Loss of kernel set due to water deficit and shade in maize: carbohydrate supplies, abscisic acid, and cytokinins. Crop Science, 41(5), 1530-1540.
 Tolk, J.A., Evett, S.R., Xu, W., Schwartz, R.C., 2016. Constraints on water use efficiency of drought tolerant maize grown in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Research. 186, 66-77.
Vazirimehr, M. R., Ganjali, H. R., Keshtehgar, A., Rigil, K., 2014. Seed priming effect on the number of rows per ear, grain weight and economic yield corn in Sistan region. International Journal of Biosciences. 4(4), 87-91.
 Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Altman, A., 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 218(1), 1-14.
 Wang, Z., Sun, J., Du, Y., Niu, W., 2021. Conservation tillage improves the yield of summer maize by regulating soil water, photosynthesis and inferior kernel grain filling on the semiarid Loess Plateau, China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
 Yoder, A., Beyer, R., Jones, C., 2015. The effects of drought-affected grain and carbohydrase inclusion in starter diets on broiler chick performance. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 24: 177-185.
 Zarabi, M., Alahdadi, I., Abbas Akbari, Gh., Iran Nejad, N., Ali Akbari, Gh., 2010. Reduction of drought stress effects on yield and yield components of grain corn (Zea mays L.) using mixed biofertilizers and phosphorus. Journal of Crops Improvement. 12(2), 37-50. [In Persian with English summary].