Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Former PhD student, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Mazandaran Branch, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Amol, Iran

5 Professor of Plant Biochemistry Department, Heinrich Heine University (HHU), Düsseldorf, Germany

6 Assistant Professor of Plant Biochemistry Department, Heinrich Heine University (HHU), Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

Introduction
Salinity as one of the major abiotic stresses influences plant growth and development. Rice with a salt tolerance threshold of 3 ds/m is regarded as a very sensitive crop, especially at seedling stage. Metabolite profiling is conducted by instruments such as GC-MS (Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) and permits the study of plant responses to environmental stresses at the molecular level. The present study assessed the primary metabolite profiles related to high salinity stress in sensitive (IR28) and tolerant (CSR28) genotypes of rice seedlings in shoots and roots after 6h and 54 h salinity exposure.
Material and methods
The seeds of two rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. Indica) genotypes with different salinity tolerance were obtained from International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Philippines. The plants were grown hydroponically in the greenhouse of Heinrich-Heine-University (HHU), Düsseldorf, Germany. The two-week old seedlings were exposed to 150 mM (15 ds/m) NaCl salinity. The topmost parts of the plants were harvested (in five replications of 10 seedlings each) at 6h and 54h post-treatment. Metabolite extraction was performed by GC-MS method. The experiment was conducted as factorial in a completely randomized design (CRD) and significance level was tested using ANOVA in SAS v9.2 software. R software was used for Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using metabolite z-score data
 
Results and discussion
GC-MS analysis identified 37 primary metabolites including 18 amino acids (AAs), five sugars and sugar alcohols and 14 organic acids (OAs) in roots and shoots of the CSR28 and IR28 genotypes at 6h and 54h post-salt exposure. In response to salinity, amino acids and sugars accumulated and organic acids depleted in both genotypes. Long-term stress revealed pronounced differences between the two genotypes. The major osmolyte proline indicated maximum response to salinity in CSR28 shoots, while the stress marker GABA accumulated more in IR28 shoots. Under high salinity the osmoprotectants raffinose and myo-inositol increased in CSR28 roots. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed amino acid accumulations in the long-term exposure of salt stress in roots are main contributors to differentiate the genotypes for salt tolerance.
Conclusions
Based on GC-MS analysis, 83.3% increase in amino acids and 61.8% decrease in organic acids were observed in response to salinity, indicating an increase in osmotic adjustment mechanisms and a decrease in photosynthetic reactions in the genotypes, respectively. The PCA demonstrated that amino acids play the most important role in separating the samples under salinity stress and control conditions in both organs. Further, the genotypes were differentiated due to metabolic changes in roots in response to salinity particularly in the long-term stress. Proline which is one of the most important osmolytes involved in abiotic stresses was significantly higher in the shoots of CSR28 under the long-term salinity compared to that of IR28. On the other hand, GABA which is a stress marker accumulated more in the shoots of the sensitive genotype. Some metabolites such as aspartate myo-inositol, citrate, glycerate, isocitrate and shikimate were specifically accumulated in roots. Finally, proline, GABA, etc. can be used as biomarkers for selecting salt tolerant lines. The present study highlights the contribution of metabolic adaptation to salinity tolerance.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) for providing the seeds. We also acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (GAU), Gorgan, Iran and Heinrich-Heine-University (HHU), Düsseldorf, Germany.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Acosta-Motos J.R., Ortuño, M.F., Bernal-Vicente, A., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Sanchez-Blanco, M.J., Hernandez, J.A., 2017. Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy. 7, 18.
Agricultural Statistics, 2019. Annual Report. Ministry of Agriculture Press. https:// www.maj.ir/Index.aspx. [In Persian]
Ahmad, P., Prasad, M.N.V., 2011. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. Springer. 473p.
Batista‐Silva, W., Heinemann, B., Rugen, N., Nunes‐Nesi, A., Araújo, W.L., Braun, H.P., Hildebrandt, T.M., 2019. The role of amino acid metabolism during abiotic stress release. Plant, Cell Environment. 42, 1630-1644.
Bouche, N., Fromm, H., 2004. GABA in plants: just a metabolite? Trends in Plant Science. 9, 110-115.
Chaves, M., Flexas, J., Pinheiro C., 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany. 103, 551-560.
El Mahi, H., Pérez-Hormaeche, J., De Luca, A., Villalta, I., Espartero, J., Gámez-Arjona, F., et al., 2019. A critical role of sodium flux via the plasma Membrane Na+/H+ exchanger SOS1 in the salt tolerance of rice. Plant Physiology. 180, 1046-1065.
Fiehn, O., 2002. Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Molecular Biology. 48, 155–171.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy. FAO; 2019. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ en/#data/QC (Accessed 15 May 2021).
Gu, J., Weber, K., Klemp, E., Winters, G., Franssen, S.U., Wienpahl, I., et al., 2012. Identifying core features of adaptive metabolic mechanisms for chronic heat stress attenuation contributing to systems robustness. Integrative Biology. 4, 480-493.
Gupta, P., De, B., 2017. Metabolomics analysis of rice responses to salinity stress revealed elevation of serotonin, and gentisic acid levels in leaves of tolerant varieties. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 12, e1335845.
Hernández, J.A., 2019. Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Trends and Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20, 2408.
Hoang, T.M.L., Tran, T.N., Nguyen, T.K.T., Williams, B., Wurm, P., Bellairs, S., Mundree, S., 2016. Improvement of salinity stress tolerance in rice: challenges and opportunities. Agronomy. 6, 54.
Hu, L., Zhou, K., Li, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B., Li, C., et al., 2018. Exogenous myo-inositol alleviates salinity-induced stress in Malus hupehensis Rehd. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 133, 116-126.
Jarideh, P., Amiri-Fahliani, R., Masoumi-Asl, A., Moradi, A., Hosseini-Chaleshtory, M., 2021. Genetic parameters estimation and factor analysis of morphological and physiological characteristics of F2:4 rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes in germination stage under salinity conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences. 4, 183-194. [In Persian with English Summary]
Jia, Q., Kong, D., Li, Q., Sun, S., Song, J., Zhu, Y., et al., 2019. The function of inositol phosphatases in plant tolerance to abiotic stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20, 3999.
Jones, D.L., 1998. Organic acids in the rhizosphere–a critical review. Plant and Soil. 205, 25-44.
Hunter, M.C., Smith, R.G., Schipanski, M.E., Atwood, L.W., Mortensen, D.A., 2017. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience. 67, 386-391.
Kim, J.K., Bamba, T., Harada, K., Fukusaki, E., Kobayashi, A., 2006. Time-course metabolic profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana cell cultures after salt stress treatment. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58, 415-424.
Kumar, R., Bohra, A., Pandey, A.K., Pandey, M.K., Kumar, A., 2017. Metabolomics for plant improvement: status and prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8, 1302.
Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S., Pons, T.L., 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer. 623p.
Liang, X., Zhang, L., Natarajan, S.K., Becker, DF., 2013. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 19, 998-1011.
Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L., Fernie, A., 2006. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nature Protocols. 1, 387–396.
Lutts, S., Kinet, J., Bouharmont, J., 1995. Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 46, 1843-1852.
Munns, R., Tester, M., 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 59, 651-681.
Nam, M., Bang, E., Kwon, T., Kim, Y., Kim, E., Cho, K., et al., 2015. Metabolite profiling of diverse rice germplasm and identification of conserved metabolic markers of rice roots in response to long-term mild salinity stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 16, 21959-21974.
Nishizawa, A., Yabuta, Y., Shigeoka, S., 2008. Galactinol and raffinose constitute a novel function to protect plants from oxidative damage. Plant Physiology. 147, 1251-1263
Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K., Shinozaki, K., Tran, L.S.P., 2014. Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 5, 86.
Patterson, J.H., Newbigin, E., Tester, M., Bacic, A., Roessner, U., 2009. Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 60, 4089-4103.
Piasecka, A., Kachlicki, P., Stobiecki, M., 2019. Analytical methods for detection of plant metabolomes changes in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20, 379.
Reddy, P.P., 2015. Climate Resilient Agriculture for Ensuring Food Security. Springer. 373p.
Shim, S.H., Lee, S.K., Lee, D.W., Brilhaus, D., Wu, G., Ko, S., et al., 2020. Loss of function of rice plastidic glycolate/glycerate translocator 1 impairs photorespiration and plant growth. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10, 1726.
Szabados, L., Savoure, A., 2010. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science. 15, 89-97.
Wang, W.S., Zhao, X.Q., Li, M., Huang, L.Y., Xu, J.L., Zhang, F., et al., 2016. Complex molecular mechanisms underlying seedling salt tolerance in rice revealed by comparative transcriptome and metabolomic profiling. Journal of Experimental Botany. 67, 405-419.
Yancey, P.H., 2005. Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolic and counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity and other stresses. Journal of Experimental Botany. 208, 2819-2830.
Yoshiba, Y., Kiyosue, T., Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Shinozaki, K., 1997. Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant and Cell Physiology. 38, 1095-1102.
Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.H., 1971. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Los Baños, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
Zhao, X., Wang, W., Zhang, F., Deng, J., Li, Z., Fu, B., 2014. Comparative metabolite profiling of two rice genotypes with contrasting salt stress tolerance at the seedling stage. Plos One. 9, e108020.